Ammie K. Kalan
Max Planck Society
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ammie K. Kalan.
Scientific Reports | 2016
Hjalmar S. Kühl; Ammie K. Kalan; Mimi Arandjelovic; Floris Aubert; Lucy D’Auvergne; Annemarie Goedmakers; Sorrel Jones; Laura Kehoe; Sebastien Regnaut; Alexander Tickle; Els Ton; Joost van Schijndel; Ekwoge E. Abwe; Samuel Angedakin; Anthony Agbor; Emmanuel Ayuk Ayimisin; Emma Bailey; Mattia Bessone; Matthieu Bonnet; Gregory Brazolla; Valentine Ebua Buh; Rebecca L. Chancellor; Chloe Cipoletta; Heather Cohen; Katherine Corogenes; Charlotte Coupland; Bryan K. Curran; Tobias Deschner; Karsten Dierks; Paula Dieguez
The study of the archaeological remains of fossil hominins must rely on reconstructions to elucidate the behaviour that may have resulted in particular stone tools and their accumulation. Comparatively, stone tool use among living primates has illuminated behaviours that are also amenable to archaeological examination, permitting direct observations of the behaviour leading to artefacts and their assemblages to be incorporated. Here, we describe newly discovered stone tool-use behaviour and stone accumulation sites in wild chimpanzees reminiscent of human cairns. In addition to data from 17 mid- to long-term chimpanzee research sites, we sampled a further 34 Pan troglodytes communities. We found four populations in West Africa where chimpanzees habitually bang and throw rocks against trees, or toss them into tree cavities, resulting in conspicuous stone accumulations at these sites. This represents the first record of repeated observations of individual chimpanzees exhibiting stone tool use for a purpose other than extractive foraging at what appear to be targeted trees. The ritualized behavioural display and collection of artefacts at particular locations observed in chimpanzee accumulative stone throwing may have implications for the inferences that can be drawn from archaeological stone assemblages and the origins of ritual sites.
American Journal of Primatology | 2017
Christophe Boesch; Ammie K. Kalan; Anthony Agbor; Mimi Arandjelovic; Paula Dieguez; Vincent Lapeyre; Hjalmar S. Kühl
Wild chimpanzees regularly use tools, made from sticks, leaves, or stone, to find flexible solutions to the ecological challenges of their environment. Nevertheless, some studies suggest strong limitations in the tool‐using capabilities of chimpanzees. In this context, we present the discovery of a newly observed tool‐use behavior in a population of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) living in the Bakoun Classified Forest, Guinea, where a temporary research site was established for 15 months. Bakoun chimpanzees of every age‐sex class were observed to fish for freshwater green algae, Spirogrya sp., from rivers, streams, and ponds using long sticks and twigs, ranging from 9 cm up to 4.31 m in length. Using remote camera trap footage from 11 different algae fishing sites within an 85‐km2 study area, we found that algae fishing occurred frequently during the dry season and was non‐existent during the rainy season. Chimpanzees were observed algae fishing for as little as 1 min to just over an hour, with an average duration of 9.09 min. We estimate that 364 g of Spirogyra algae could be retrieved in this time, based on human trials in the field. Only one other chimpanzee population living in Bossou, Guinea, has been described to customarily scoop algae from the surface of the water using primarily herbaceous tools. Here, we describe the new behavior found at Bakoun and compare it to the algae scooping observed in Bossou chimpanzees and the occasional variant reported in Odzala, Republic of the Congo. As these algae are reported to be high in protein, carbohydrates, and minerals, we hypothesize that chimpanzees are obtaining a nutritional benefit from this seasonally available resource.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology | 2015
Ammie K. Kalan; Christophe Boesch
One proposed benefit for the seemingly costly behaviour of food calling is the recruitment of social allies and mates by the signaller. In chimpanzees, food calls are only produced for approximately half of all feeding events. Therefore, we investigated the influence of social and ecological context on the probability of making a food call upon arriving to a food patch in a group of wild chimpanzees. First, we tested whether feeding events where food calls had been uttered did in fact attract more individuals to join the caller. Secondly, we examined the influence of two sources of audience effects: those who were physically present with the caller and those who were presumed nearby but out of sight, and thirdly the effect of various ecological factors. We found that when feeding on fruit species, events where food calls had been produced had a higher probability of group mates arriving, even whilst controlling for the effect of pant hoots. Furthermore, the probability of uttering a food call was motivated by social more than ecological context. Specifically, high-ranking males were more likely to make food calls when estrous females were nearby, while low-ranking males and females generally called more when more females were nearby, irrespective of their reproductive state. These effects were independent of the increase in food call probability when male callers were accompanied by more males. Our findings support the recruitment function of food calls and suggest that high-ranking males call to attract estrous females to food patches to obtain mating opportunities.
Nature Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Michael Haslam; R. Adriana Hernandez-Aguilar; Tomos Proffitt; Adrián Arroyo; Tiago Falótico; Dorothy M. Fragaszy; Michael D. Gumert; John W. K. Harris; Michael A. Huffman; Ammie K. Kalan; Suchinda Malaivijitnond; Tetsuro Matsuzawa; William C. McGrew; Eduardo B. Ottoni; Alejandra Pascual-Garrido; Alex K. Piel; Jill D. Pruetz; Caroline Schuppli; Fiona A. Stewart; Amanda Tan; Elisabetta Visalberghi; Lydia V. Luncz
Since its inception, archaeology has traditionally focused exclusively on humans and our direct ancestors. However, recent years have seen archaeological techniques applied to material evidence left behind by non-human animals. Here, we review advances made by the most prominent field investigating past non-human tool use: primate archaeology. This field combines survey of wild primate activity areas with ethological observations, excavations and analyses that allow the reconstruction of past primate behaviour. Because the order Primates includes humans, new insights into the behavioural evolution of apes and monkeys also can be used to better interrogate the record of early tool use in our own, hominin, lineage. This work has recently doubled the set of primate lineages with an excavated archaeological record, adding Old World macaques and New World capuchin monkeys to chimpanzees and humans, and it has shown that tool selection and transport, and discrete site formation, are universal among wild stone-tool-using primates. It has also revealed that wild capuchins regularly break stone tools in a way that can make them difficult to distinguish from simple early hominin tools. Ultimately, this research opens up opportunities for the development of a broader animal archaeology, marking the end of archaeology’s anthropocentric era.Nearly ten years after the field of primate archaeology was first proposed, the status of the field is reported on, including recent discoveries as well as future directions and challenges, marking the end of archaeology’s ‘anthropocentric era’.
Mammalia | 2010
Ammie K. Kalan; Bola Madzoké; Hugo J. Rainey
No abstract available
PeerJ | 2018
Ammie K. Kalan; Christophe Boesch
Loud calls are used by many species as long-distance signals for group defense, mate attraction, and inter- and intragroup spacing. Chimpanzee loud calls, or pant hoots, are used in a variety of contexts including group coordination and during male contests. Here, we observed an alpha male takeover in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) during which the leaf clipping gesture re-emerged after disappearing for almost two years in this community. Leaf clipping only occurred in males and was observed almost exclusively prior to pant hoot vocalizations, as has been observed in other chimpanzee communities of the Taï forest in Côte d’Ivoire. Consequently, we hypothesized that leaf clipping may be important for male-male competition by affecting variation in the acoustic properties of male chimpanzee loud calls. We therefore investigated whether pant hoots preceded by leaf clipping differed acoustically from those without, while also testing the influence of social context on pant hoot variation, namely male dominance rank and hierarchy instability, i.e., before, during and after the alpha takeover. We found that pant hoots preceded by leaf clipping were longer, contained more call elements and drum beats, and lower fundamental and peak frequencies. Moreover, during the alpha takeover pant hoots were shorter, contained fewer drum beats and higher fundamental frequencies. Additionally, pant hoot and aggression rates were also highest during the alpha takeover with leaf clipping more likely to occur on days when pant hooting rates were high. Overall social rank had limited effects on pant hoot variation. We suggest that elevated arousal and aggression during the alpha takeover triggered the re-emergence of leaf clipping and the associated acoustic changes in pant hoots. Further research should focus on the potential mechanisms by which leaf clipping is connected to variation in pant hoots and cross-population comparisons of the behaviour.
Current Biology | 2018
Sven Grawunder; Catherine Crockford; Zanna Clay; Ammie K. Kalan; Jeroen Stevens; Alexander Stoessel; Gottfried Hohmann
Acoustic signals, shaped by natural and sexual selection, reveal ecological and social selection pressures [1]. Examining acoustic signals together with morphology can be particularly revealing. But this approach has rarely been applied to primates, where clues to the evolutionary trajectory of human communication may be found. Across vertebrate species, there is a close relationship between body size and acoustic parameters, such as formant dispersion and fundamental frequency (f0). Deviations from this acoustic allometry usually produce calls with a lower f0 than expected for a given body size, often due to morphological adaptations in the larynx or vocal tract [2]. An unusual example of an obvious mismatch between fundamental frequency and body size is found in the two closest living relatives of humans, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Although these two ape species overlap in body size [3], bonobo calls have a strikingly higher f0 than corresponding calls from chimpanzees [4]. Here, we compare acoustic structures of calls from bonobos and chimpanzees in relation to their larynx morphology. We found that shorter vocal fold length in bonobos compared to chimpanzees accounted for species differences in f0, showing a rare case of positive selection for signal diminution in both bonobo sexes.
Archive | 2013
Ammie K. Kalan; Christophe Boesch
DOI: 10.1159/000354129 298 5th Congress of the European Federation for Primatology researchers usually argue that one of the distinguishing features of non-human primates’ gestures is their high degree of flexibility, which can be considered in different ways: (1) ‘means-end dissociation’, which refers to the use of a particular gesture in different functional contexts and/or several gestures for one specific context, and (2) gesture sequences which consist of combinations of two or more gestural signals. Both strategies enable non-human primates to adjust their gesture use to their partner’s behaviour and to increase the range of potential meanings that can be conveyed by combining the components of a more or less limited gestural repertoire. Because of their flexible use, however, very few gestures have a specific meaning, but their meaning is defined by the context in which they occur. Thus, in contrast to many vocalizations of non-human primates, their gestures are (1) less context-specific and do not represent functionally referential signals and, related to this, (2) gesture sequences do not represent meaningful combinations used for other functions than their single components. Therefore, I will first provide an overview of recent research on the flexible use of gestures in great apes to demonstrate how they create meaning in their interactions with others. I will then discuss how these findings relate to evidence from vocal studies with the aim to identify ‘blind spots’ and biases that currently constrain a fruitful debate about the origins of human language.Comparative studies of primate grasping and manipulative behaviours in captivity are numerous but there has been little research on hand use in the wild. Hand use during wild non-locomotor behaviours may reveal increased ranges of joint mobility or manipulative behaviours that have been previously ignored or underestimated. Manipulative behaviours in apes can strongly correlate with different habitats at the species and population level. Chimpanzees more often use tools in the wild and thus are thought to be more manipulative than gorillas. However, captive studies have demonstrated high dexterity in both taxa. We investigate hand use during manipulation (e.g. food processing, tool-use) in wild mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei, Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda) and wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus, Tai National Park, Cote d’Ivoire). We used video data collected in the wild that included 32 gorilla (n=9 individuals) and 53 chimpanzee (n=11 individuals) instances of manipulative tasks. Digital images were extracted and analysed frame by frame. Preliminary results show that hand grips are similar between gorillas and chimpanzees during the manipulation of common food objects, such as long plant stems or branches. During the manipulation of species-specific food objects, gorillas use variable thumb-index grips during the manipulation of thistles and small plant stems, while chimpanzees use similar grips during nut-cracking. These preliminary results suggest that Bwindi mountain gorillas have similarly high dexterity as that of Tai chimpanzees despite not being tool-users. Gorillas frequently use precision grasping more to obtain small rather than large food items, which is similar to chimpanzees and other non-human primates.Previous studies have shown a positive relationship between proximity to humans or habitat fragmentation and parasitic levels in non-human primates (NHPs). However, to date few have explicitly explored links between parasite load and stress conditions. To better understand the links between parasite prevalence and NHP immune system efficiency and stress levels, faecal samples of Alouatta palliata and the critically endangered Ateles geoffroyi geoffroyi were non-invasively collected in northern Costa Rica. We investigated whether the presence of gastrointestinal parasites was related to the abundance of hormones (cortisol and testosterone). Samples were gathered across three areas differing in the frequency and diversity of human presence, i.e. around the Cano Palma Biological Station, near villages and at ecotourism sites. Two grams of each faecal sample were stored in a sugar saturated solution with 10% formalin to conserve the parasites; the remaining matter was dried to preserve DNA and steroid hormones. The samples enabled the quantification of parasites as well as testosterone and cortisol levels using ELISA as proxies of general health status and stress levels. Data on parasite abundance and hormone levels were contrasted across the two species and the three different sampling areas. Furthermore, we assessed the genetic exchange among the different groups of primates sampled. We genetically analysed the samples using 12 microsatellites previously validated by the University of Costa Rica. We verified whether transmission of parasites among the groups could be possible concomitant to the genetic exchange. This study aimed to better understand and assess the impact of human factors on NHP health and across NHPs with different socio-ecological characteristics.DOI: 10.1159/000354129 290 5th Congress of the European Federation for Primatology considerably between species for any given body size. Numerous hypotheses have been put forward to explain this variation. In recent years, we have tested predictions that flow from a framework focusing on the energetic aspects of having a large amount of the metabolically expensive brain tissue. In this talk, I will give an overview of our findings from broad comparative phylogenetic studies in mammals, and their implications for our understanding of non-human and human primate evolution. In sum, we found evidence for two pathways to increase relative brain size compared to the ancestral state. First, a species may change its lifestyle to allow for a stable increase in its total energy budget, e.g. by changing its diet. Alternatively, or in combination with the first pathway, a species may allocate more energy to the brain and less to other expensive functions such as offspring production. Ultimately, this option results in very low population growth rates even in good conditions, as found in great apes. A further increase in brain size would not be compatible with demographically viable populations in these large-brained primates. However, using comparative evidence from mammals, we demonstrate that help from non-mothers can alleviate this trade-off between reproductive effort and brain size. Nevertheless, the energetic constraints on brain size evolution will only be overcome in species that can actually benefit from enhanced cognitive abilities. While such benefits are potentially ubiquitous, we would expect them to be undermined by unavoidable mortality in some socioecological conditions, and by the difficulty of transferring knowledge across generations in some social systems. A combined test of all these considerations remains a challenge, largely due to the shortcomings of the distinct datasets, but I will present the newest data and results from our current projects.Throughout their range across Africa, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) are threatened with extinction due to habitat destruction, disease and unsustainable levels of hunting and capture, in spite of being protected by national and international laws. In recent years, the bush meat and the pet trade have resulted in a significant increase in the number confiscated orphan chimpanzees. The Chimpanzee Conservation Centre (CCC), located in the High Niger National Park (HNNP), is the only Pan African Sanctuary Alliance (PASA)-accredited sanctuary caring for chimpanzee orphans in Guinea, West Africa. This sanctuary has been rehabilitating confiscated chimpanzees since 1997. With the aim of reinforcing the wild chimpanzee population of the HNNP and to enhance park protection, the CCC, in 2008, released a first group of 12 chimpanzees into the Mafou core area of the park. Five of those individuals have since settled at the release site and continue to be monitored. In August 2011, the CCC was able to re-enforce this resident group with the successful addition of 2 adult females. Post-release monitoring of these individuals involved distance monitoring using simple VHF and/or ARGOS and GPS store-on-board radio collars. Here, we present data downloaded in 2011–2012 from the GPS store-on-board collars of 2 adult males and these 2 additional adult females. These data allowed us to analyse their social dynamics, party composition, habitat preferences, day range and home range use. Our results indicate that these females integrated successfully into the resident group and that the behaviour of these wild-born released orphan chimpanzees mirrors that of wild counterparts inhabiting similar savannah dominated landscapes, suggesting that they have adapted appropriately to their release conditions.
Ecological Indicators | 2015
Ammie K. Kalan; Roger Mundry; Oliver J.J. Wagner; Stefanie Heinicke; Christophe Boesch; Hjalmar S. Kühl
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 2015
Stefanie Heinicke; Ammie K. Kalan; Oliver J.J. Wagner; Roger Mundry; Hanna M. Lukashevich; Hjalmar S. Kühl