Amos Mapleston
James Cook University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Amos Mapleston.
Marine and Freshwater Research | 2011
Alastair V. Harry; Andrew J. Tobin; Colin A. Simpfendorfer; David J. Welch; Amos Mapleston; Jimmy White; Ashley J. Williams; Jason Stapley
Small-scale and artisanal fisheries for sharks exist in most inshore, tropical regions of the world. Although often important in terms of food security, their low value and inherent complexity provides an imposing hurdle to sustainable management. An observer survey of a small-scale commercial gill-net fishery operating within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage area revealed at least 38 species of elasmobranch were present in the catch. Of the total elasmobranch catch, 95% was 25 species of Carcharhiniformes from the families Carcharhinidae, Hemigaleidae and Sphyrnidae. Individual species were captured in a variety of ways by the fishery, often with strongly biased sex ratios and in a variety of life stages (e.g. neonates, juveniles, adult). Despite this, the main carcharhiniform taxa captured could be qualitatively categorised into four groups based on similar catch characteristics, body size and similarities in life history: small coastal ( 2000 mm); and hammerheads. Such groupings can potentially be useful for simplifying management of complex multispecies fisheries. The idiosyncrasies of elasmobranch populations and how fisheries interact with them provide a challenge for management but, if properly understood, potentially offer underutilised options for designing management strategies.
Environmental Biology of Fishes | 2002
Robert R. Simpson; Amos Mapleston
The decline of the endangered Mary River cod, Maccullochella peelii mariensis, of Queensland, Australia, has been attributed to anthropomorphic habitat alterations, however, the relationships between this subspecies and its physical environment are poorly understood. We used radiotelemetry to investigate the movements and use of habitats by nine Mary River cod (total length 420–760 mm; weight 1.3–5.5 kg) in the Mary River system over a 20 month period. The mean distance moved each month was positively correlated with monthly stream discharge, but the direction of movements was unpredictable. Patterns of movement varied considerably among individuals and appeared to be unrelated to size. Cod established home ranges of between 70 and 820 m in length. Five of the tagged cod returned to a previous home range after moving more than 10 km, whereas three did not move more than 2 km from their capture location for the duration of the study. Cod used large woody debris complexes more than any other type of habitat, and rarely used areas of open water. Managers should give high priority to maintenance of fish passage and protection/rehabilitation of large woody debris habitats if cod populations are to recover.
Journal of Fish Biology | 2013
Leanne M. Currey; Ashley J. Williams; Bruce D. Mapstone; Campbell R. Davies; G. Carlos; David J. Welch; Colin A. Simpfendorfer; Aaron C. Ballagh; Ann Penny; Edwin Mark Grandcourt; Amos Mapleston; A. S. Wiebkin; K. Bean
Life-history characteristics of six tropical Lethrinus species sampled from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area were compared. Two species groups were identified based on fork length (LF ): large species with maximum LF > 640 mm (longface emperor Lethrinus olivaceus, yellowlip emperor Lethrinus xanthochilus and spangled emperor Lethrinus nebulosus) and small species with maximum LF < 480 mm (Pacific yellowtail emperor Lethrinus atkinsoni, pink ear emperor Lethrinus lentjan and ornate emperor Lethrinus ornatus). Lifespan was not correlated with LF . Early growth for all species was rapid and similar during the first few years of life, but coefficients of the von Bertalanffy growth function varied considerably among species. Growth also differed between sexes for L. atkinsoni. Reproductive characteristics varied among species, with peak periods of spawning occurring in November to December for L. atkinsoni, July to August for L. nebulous, September to October for L. olivaceus and a protracted season for L. lentjan, although fewer samples were available for the last two species. Sex-specific LF and age distributions and gonad histology of L. lentjan were suggestive of a functional protogynous reproductive pattern, as observed in other lethrinids. Gonad histology indicated non-functional protogynous hermaphroditism for L. atkinsoni and L. nebulosus. The diversity of life histories among these closely related species emphasizes the difficulty in devising single management strategies appropriate for multi-species fisheries and illustrates the importance of understanding species-specific life histories to infer responses to exploitation.
Marine and Freshwater Research | 2006
Aaron C. Ballagh; Gavin A. Begg; Amos Mapleston; Andrew J. Tobin
The growth of narrow-barred Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson) was examined over a broad spatial scale encompassing the east coast of Queensland, Australia. Our aim was to use back-calculation to identify potential biases in growth estimation, and to provide a more recent estimate of growth for Spanish mackerel on the east coast of Queensland. Growth trends were determined using the body proportional hypothesis (BPH) back-calculation model and compared between back-calculated and observed length-at-age data. The back-calculated von Bertalanffy growth function parameters estimated for males and females, respectively, were L∞ = 1047 mm, K = 0.75, t0 = –0.18 and L∞ = 1248 mm, K = 0.51 and t0 = –0.39. Significant differences in growth of Spanish mackerel sampled among different regions along the east coast were observed. A comparison of back-calculated and observed length-at-age data revealed significant biases in the observed length-at-age data for younger aged fish. Our findings contrast with previous estimates of growth for Spanish mackerel from the east coast of Queensland and highlight the use of back-calculation for the first few annuli as a means of avoiding biases in growth estimation arising from gear selectivity associated with fishery-dependent samples of fast-growing fish.
Marine and Freshwater Research | 2010
Ross J. Marriott; Bruce D. Mapstone; Aaron C. Ballagh; Leanne M. Currey; Ann Penny; Ashley J. Williams; Gary Jackson; Dongchun Lou; Amos Mapleston; Nicholas D. C. Jarvis; I. Keay; Stephen J. Newman
Multiple readings of otoliths are often carried out to assess the repeatability and reliability of increment counts for estimating fish age. Various criteria have been used to assign or discard age estimates from repeated counts when discrepancies occur although the reasons for doing so are usually not stated or justified. Trends in relative frequencies (percentage disagreement, PD) and magnitudes (inter-read discrepancy, IRD) of otolith-count discrepancies were explored for 15 species of fish collected from a range of locations around Australia to explore generality in the best explanatory model(s) for otolith-count discrepancies and, hence, the most appropriate criterion for accepting or rejecting age estimates from multiple-count data. Increasing discrepancies with increasing age, according to a constant per-increment probability of error, was the best-approximating model for 9 of the 15 species for PD data but for only two species for IRD data. Our results indicated disproportionately higher rates of rejection of estimates from older age groups if exact agreement between repeated counts was required for age acceptance. Results varied with the reader, region and the method of otolith reading, indicating that multiple criteria for accepting or rejecting counts from multiple readings may be required among or even within species.
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology | 2010
Ian Brown; Wayne Sumpton; Mark McLennan; D. G. Mayer; Matthew J. Campbell; John Kirkwood; Adam Butcher; Ian A. Halliday; Amos Mapleston; David J. Welch; Gavin A. Begg; B. Sawynok
Fisheries Management and Ecology | 2010
Wayne Sumpton; Ian Brown; D. G. Mayer; Mark McLennan; Amos Mapleston; Adam Butcher; David J. Welch; John Kirkwood; B. Sawynok; Gavin A. Begg
Fisheries Research | 2008
Amos Mapleston; David J. Welch; Gavin A. Begg; Mark McLennan; D. G. Mayer; Ian Brown
Environmental Biology of Fishes | 2014
Andrew J. Tobin; Amos Mapleston; Alastair V. Harry; Mario Espinoza
Fisheries Research | 2009
Vivian M. Nguyen; Marie-Ange Gravel; Amos Mapleston; Kyle C. Hanson; Steven J. Cooke