Amsal Tarekegne
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Amsal Tarekegne.
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics | 2012
Vanessa S. Windhausen; Gary N. Atlin; John Hickey; José Crossa; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E. Sorrells; Babu Raman; Jill E. Cairns; Amsal Tarekegne; Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Pichet Grudloyma; Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E. Melchinger
Genomic prediction is expected to considerably increase genetic gains by increasing selection intensity and accelerating the breeding cycle. In this study, marker effects estimated in 255 diverse maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids were used to predict grain yield, anthesis date, and anthesis-silking interval within the diversity panel and testcross progenies of 30 F2-derived lines from each of five populations. Although up to 25% of the genetic variance could be explained by cross validation within the diversity panel, the prediction of testcross performance of F2-derived lines using marker effects estimated in the diversity panel was on average zero. Hybrids in the diversity panel could be grouped into eight breeding populations differing in mean performance. When performance was predicted separately for each breeding population on the basis of marker effects estimated in the other populations, predictive ability was low (i.e., 0.12 for grain yield). These results suggest that prediction resulted mostly from differences in mean performance of the breeding populations and less from the relationship between the training and validation sets or linkage disequilibrium with causal variants underlying the predicted traits. Potential uses for genomic prediction in maize hybrid breeding are discussed emphasizing the need of (1) a clear definition of the breeding scenario in which genomic prediction should be applied (i.e., prediction among or within populations), (2) a detailed analysis of the population structure before performing cross validation, and (3) larger training sets with strong genetic relationship to the validation set.
BMC Genomics | 2013
Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Marilyn L. Warburton; Amsal Tarekegne; Stephen Mugo; Barbara Meisel; Pierre Sehabiague; Boddupalli M. Prasanna
BackgroundIdentification of QTL with large phenotypic effects conserved across genetic backgrounds and environments is one of the prerequisites for crop improvement using marker assisted selection (MAS). The objectives of this study were to identify meta-QTL (mQTL) for grain yield (GY) and anthesis silking interval (ASI) across 18 bi-parental maize populations evaluated in the same conditions across 2-4 managed water stressed and 3-4 well watered environments.ResultsThe meta-analyses identified 68 mQTL (9 QTL specific to ASI, 15 specific to GY, and 44 for both GY and ASI). Mean phenotypic variance explained by each mQTL varied from 1.2 to 13.1% and the overall average was 6.5%. Few QTL were detected under both environmental treatments and/or multiple (>4 populations) genetic backgrounds. The number and 95% genetic and physical confidence intervals of the mQTL were highly reduced compared to the QTL identified in the original studies. Each physical interval of the mQTL consisted of 5 to 926 candidate genes.ConclusionsMeta-analyses reduced the number of QTL by 68% and narrowed the confidence intervals up to 12-fold. At least the 4 mQTL (mQTL2.2, mQTL6.1, mQTL7.5 and mQTL9.2) associated with GY under both water-stressed and well-watered environments and detected up to 6 populations may be considered for fine mapping and validation to confirm effects in different genetic backgrounds and pyramid them into new drought resistant breeding lines. This is the first extensive report on meta-analysis of data from over 3100 individuals genotyped using the same SNP platform and evaluated in the same conditions across a wide range of managed water-stressed and well-watered environments.
World Development | 2017
Girma T. Kassie; Awudu Abdulai; William H. Greene; Bekele Shiferaw; Tsedeke Abate; Amsal Tarekegne; Chloe Sutcliffe
Highlights • Farmers’ willingness to pay for traits determines adoption of improved varieties.• Maize breeding efforts need to consider trait preferences of farmers.• Farmers are willing to pay more for drought tolerance than any other maize trait.• Trait-based promotion and marketing of improved maize varieties is recommended.
Remote Sensing | 2018
Richard Makanza; Mainassara Zaman-Allah; Jill E. Cairns; Cosmos Magorokosho; Amsal Tarekegne; Mike Olsen; Boddupalli M. Prasanna
In the crop breeding process, the use of data collection methods that allow reliable assessment of crop adaptation traits, faster and cheaper than those currently in use, can significantly improve resource use efficiency by reducing selection cost and can contribute to increased genetic gain through improved selection efficiency. Current methods to estimate crop growth (ground canopy cover) and leaf senescence are essentially manual and/or by visual scoring, and are therefore often subjective, time consuming, and expensive. Aerial sensing technologies offer radically new perspectives for assessing these traits at low cost, faster, and in a more objective manner. We report the use of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with an RGB camera for crop cover and canopy senescence assessment in maize field trials. Aerial-imaging-derived data showed a moderately high heritability for both traits with a significant genetic correlation with grain yield. In addition, in some cases, the correlation between the visual assessment (prone to subjectivity) of crop senescence and the senescence index, calculated from aerial imaging data, was significant. We concluded that the UAV-based aerial sensing platforms have great potential for monitoring the dynamics of crop canopy characteristics like crop vigor through ground canopy cover and canopy senescence in breeding trial plots. This is anticipated to assist in improving selection efficiency through higher accuracy and precision, as well as reduced time and cost of data collection.
Crop Science | 2015
Yoseph Beyene; Kassa Semagn; Stephen Mugo; Amsal Tarekegne; Raman Babu; Barbara Meisel; Pierre Sehabiague; Dan Makumbi; Cosmos Magorokosho; Sylvester O. Oikeh; John Gakunga; Mateo Vargas; Michael Olsen; Boddupalli M. Prasanna; Marianne Bänziger; José Crossa
Crop Science | 2017
Benhilda Masuka; Gary N. Atlin; Mike Olsen; Cosmos Magorokosho; M. T. Labuschagne; José Crossa; Marianne Bänziger; Kevin V. Pixley; Bindiganavile S. Vivek; Angela von Biljon; John MacRobert; Gregorio Alvarado; Boddupalli M. Prasanna; Dan Makumbi; Amsal Tarekegne; Bish Das; Mainassara Zaman-Allah; Jill E. Cairns
Crop Science | 2015
Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Raman Babu; Sudha Nair; Manje Gowda; Biswanath Das; Amsal Tarekegne; Stephen Mugo; George Mahuku; Mosisa Worku; Marilyn L. Warburton; Mike Olsen; Boddupalli M. Prasanna
Crop Science | 2016
Yoseph Beyene; Kassa Semagn; José Crossa; Stephen Mugo; Gary N. Atlin; Amsal Tarekegne; Barbara Meisel; Pierre Sehabiague; Bindiganavile S. Vivek; Sylvester O. Oikeh; Gregorio Alvarado; Lewis Machida; Michael Olsen; Boddupalli M. Prasanna; Marianne Bänziger
Crop Science | 2013
Edmore Gasura; Peter Setimela; Richard Edema; P. T. Gibson; Patrick Okori; Amsal Tarekegne
Crop Science | 2017
Benhilda Masuka; Cosmos Magorokosho; Mike Olsen; Gary N. Atlin; Marianne Bänziger; Kevin V. Pixley; Bindiganavile S. Vivek; M. T. Labuschagne; Rumbidzai Matemba-Mutasa; Juan Burgueño; John MacRobert; Boddupalli M. Prasanna; Bish Das; Dan Makumbi; Amsal Tarekegne; José Crossa; Mainassara Zaman-Allah; Angeline van Biljon; Jill E. Cairns