Amudha Palanisamy
Wake Forest University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Amudha Palanisamy.
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2012
Sumit Mohan; Amudha Palanisamy; Demetra Tsapepas; Bekir Tanriover; R. John Crew; Geoffrey Dube; Lloyd E. Ratner; David J. Cohen; Jai Radhakrishnan
The effect of low titers of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) detected only by sensitive solid-phase assays (SPAs) on renal transplant outcomes is unclear. We report the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of rejection rates and graft outcomes for renal transplant recipients with such preformed DSAs, defined by positive results on SPA but negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatch results. Our search identified seven retrospective cohort studies comprising a total of 1119 patients, including 145 with isolated DSA-SPA. Together, these studies suggest that the presence of DSA-SPA, despite a negative flow cytometry crossmatch result, nearly doubles the risk for antibody-mediated rejection (relative risk [RR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.89; P<0.001) and increases the risk for graft failure by 76% (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.74; P=0.01). These results suggest that donor selection should consider the presence of antibodies in the recipient, identified by the SPA, even in the presence of a negative flow cytometry crossmatch result.
American Journal of Transplantation | 2015
Barry I. Freedman; Bruce A. Julian; Stephen O. Pastan; Ajay K. Israni; David Schladt; Michael D. Gautreaux; Vera Hauptfeld; Robert A. Bray; Howard M. Gebel; Allan D. Kirk; Robert S. Gaston; Jeffrey Rogers; Alan C. Farney; Giuseppe Orlando; Robert J. Stratta; Sumit Mohan; Lijun Ma; Carl D. Langefeld; Pamela J. Hicks; Nicholette D. Palmer; Patricia L. Adams; Amudha Palanisamy; A. Reeves-Daniel; Jasmin Divers
Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) nephropathy variants in African American deceased kidney donors were associated with shorter renal allograft survival in a prior single‐center report. APOL1 G1 and G2 variants were genotyped in newly accrued DNA samples from African American deceased donors of kidneys recovered and/or transplanted in Alabama and North Carolina. APOL1 genotypes and allograft outcomes in subsequent transplants from 55 U.S. centers were linked, adjusting for age, sex and race/ethnicity of recipients, HLA match, cold ischemia time, panel reactive antibody levels, and donor type. For 221 transplantations from kidneys recovered in Alabama, there was a statistical trend toward shorter allograft survival in recipients of two‐APOL1‐nephropathy‐variant kidneys (hazard ratio [HR] 2.71; p = 0.06). For all 675 kidneys transplanted from donors at both centers, APOL1 genotype (HR 2.26; p = 0.001) and African American recipient race/ethnicity (HR 1.60; p = 0.03) were associated with allograft failure. Kidneys from African American deceased donors with two APOL1 nephropathy variants reproducibly associate with higher risk for allograft failure after transplantation. These findings warrant consideration of rapidly genotyping deceased African American kidney donors for APOL1 risk variants at organ recovery and incorporation of results into allocation and informed‐consent processes.
Transplantation | 2016
Barry I. Freedman; Stephen O. Pastan; Ajay K. Israni; David Schladt; Bruce A. Julian; Gautreaux; Hauptfeld; Robert A. Bray; Howard M. Gebel; Allan D. Kirk; Robert S. Gaston; Jeffrey Rogers; Alan C. Farney; Giuseppe Orlando; Robert J. Stratta; Sumit Mohan; Lijun Ma; Carl D. Langefeld; Bowden Dw; Pamela J. Hicks; Palmer Nd; Amudha Palanisamy; A. Reeves-Daniel; Brown Wm; Jasmin Divers
Background Two apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) renal-risk variants in donors and African American (AA) recipient race are associated with worse allograft survival in deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) from AA donors. To detect other factors impacting allograft survival from deceased AA kidney donors, APOL1 renal-risk variants were genotyped in additional AA kidney donors. Methods The APOL1 genotypes were linked to outcomes in 478 newly analyzed DDKTs in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Multivariate analyses accounting for recipient age, sex, race, panel-reactive antibody level, HLA match, cold ischemia time, donor age, and expanded criteria donation were performed. These 478 transplantations and 675 DDKTs from a prior report were jointly analyzed. Results Fully adjusted analyses limited to the new 478 DDKTs replicated shorter renal allograft survival in recipients of APOL1 2-renal-risk-variant kidneys (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; P = 0.03). Combined analysis of 1153 DDKTs from AA donors revealed donor APOL1 high-risk genotype (HR, 2.05; P = 3 × 10−4), older donor age (HR, 1.18; P = 0.05), and younger recipient age (HR, 0.70; P = 0.001) adversely impacted allograft survival. Although prolonged allograft survival was seen in many recipients of APOL1 2-renal-risk-variant kidneys, follow-up serum creatinine concentrations were higher than that in recipients of 0/1 APOL1 renal-risk-variant kidneys. A competing risk analysis revealed that APOL1 impacted renal allograft survival, but not recipient survival. Interactions between donor age and APOL1 genotype on renal allograft survival were nonsignificant. Conclusions Shorter renal allograft survival is reproducibly observed after DDKT from APOL1 2-renal-risk-variant donors. Younger recipient age and older donor age have independent adverse effects on renal allograft survival.
Clinical Transplantation | 2016
Robert J. Stratta; Alan C. Farney; Giuseppe Orlando; Umar Farooq; Yousef Al-Shraideh; Amudha Palanisamy; A. Reeves-Daniel; William Doares; Scott Kaczmorski; Michael D. Gautreaux; Samy S. Iskandar; Gloria Hairston; Elizabeth Brim; Margaret Mangus; Hany El-Hennawy; Muhammad Arsalan Khan; Jeffrey Rogers
The need to expand the organ donor pool remains a formidable challenge in kidney transplantation (KT). The use of expanded criteria donors (ECDs) represents one approach, but kidney discard rates are high because of concerns regarding overall quality. Dual KT (DKT) may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from marginal donors.
Kidney International | 2015
Jun Ma; Jasmin Divers; Nicholette D. Palmer; Bruce A. Julian; Ajay K. Israni; David Schladt; Stephen O. Pastan; Kryt Chattrabhuti; Michael D. Gautreaux; Vera Hauptfeld; Robert A. Bray; Allan D. Kirk; W. Mark Brown; Robert S. Gaston; Jeffrey Rogers; Alan C. Farney; Giuseppe Orlando; Robert J. Stratta; Meijian Guan; Amudha Palanisamy; A. Reeves-Daniel; Donald W. Bowden; Carl D. Langefeld; Pamela J. Hicks; Lijun Ma; Barry I. Freedman
Variants in donor multidrug resistance protein 1 (ABCB1) and caveolin 1 (CAV1) genes are associated with renal allograft failure after transplantation in Europeans. Here we assessed transplantation outcomes of kidneys from 368 African American (AA) and 314 European American (EA) deceased donors based on 38 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning ABCB1 and 16 SNPs spanning CAV1, including previously associated index and haplotype-tagging SNPs. Tests for association with time to allograft failure were performed for the 1,233 resultant kidney transplantations, adjusting for recipient age, sex, ethnicity, cold ischemia time, PRA, HLA match, expanded-criteria donation, and APOL1- nephropathy variants in AA donors. Interaction analyses between APOL1 with ABCB1 and CAV1 were performed. In a meta-analysis of all transplantations, ABCB1 index SNP rs1045642 was associated with time to allograft failure and other ABCB1 SNPs were nominally associated, but not CAV1 SNPs. ABCB1 SNP rs1045642 showed consistent effects with the 558 transplantations from EA donors, but not with the 675 transplantations from AA donors. ABCB1 SNP rs956825 and CAV1 SNP rs6466583 interacted with APOL1 in transplants from AA donors. Thus, the T allele at ABCB1 rs1045642 is associated with shorter renal allograft survival for kidneys from American donors. Interactions between ABCB1 and CAV1 with APOL1 may influence allograft failure for transplanted kidneys from AA donors.
Clinical Transplantation | 2014
Yousef Al-Shraideh; Umar Farooq; Alan C. Farney; Amudha Palanisamy; Jeffrey Rogers; Giuseppe Orlando; Michael R. Buckley; A. Reeves-Daniel; William Doares; Scott Kaczmorski; Michael D. Gautreaux; Samy S. Iskandar; Gloria Hairston; Elizabeth Brim; Margaret Mangus; Robert J. Stratta
We performed a retrospective single‐center review of 884 deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants (KTs) in patients (pts) aged ≥40 yr.
Pediatric Nephrology | 2014
Amudha Palanisamy; A. Reeves-Daniel; Barry I. Freedman
Dramatic improvements have been seen in short-term kidney allograft survival over recent decades with introduction of more potent immunosuppressant medications and regimens. Unfortunately, improvements in long-term graft survival have lagged behind. The genomics revolution is providing new insights regarding the potential impact of kidney donor genotypes on long-term graft survival. Variation in the donor apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1), caveolin 1 (CAV1), and multi-drug resistance 1 encoding P-glycoprotein genes (ABCB1) are all associated with graft survival after kidney transplantation. Although the precise mechanisms whereby these donor gene variants confer risk for graft loss have yet to be determined, these findings provide novel opportunities for modifying interactive environmental factors and optimizing kidney allocation with the ultimate goal of improving long-term graft survival rates.
World journal of transplantation | 2016
Yousef Al-Shraideh; Umar Farooq; Hany El-Hennawy; Alan C. Farney; Amudha Palanisamy; Jeffrey Rogers; Giuseppe Orlando; Muhammad Saif Ullah Khan; A. Reeves-Daniel; William Doares; Scott Kaczmorski; Michael D. Gautreaux; Samy S. Iskandar; Gloria Hairston; Elizabeth Brim; Margaret Mangus; Robert J. Stratta
AIM To compare outcomes between single and dual en bloc (EB) kidney transplants (KT) from small pediatric donors. METHODS Monocentric nonprospective review of KTs from pediatric donors ≤ 5 years of age. Dual EB KT was defined as keeping both donor kidneys attached to the inferior vena cava and aorta, which were then used as venous and arterial conduits for the subsequent transplant into a single recipient. Donor age was less useful than either donor weight or kidney size in decision-making for kidney utilization as kidneys from donors < 8 kg or kidneys < 6 cm in length were not transplanted. Post-transplant management strategies were standardized in all patients. RESULTS From 2002-2015, 59 KTs were performed including 34 dual EB and 25 single KTs. Mean age of donors (17 mo vs 38 mo, P < 0.001), mean weight (11.0 kg vs 17.4 kg, P = 0.046) and male donors (50% vs 84%, P = 0.01) were lower in the dual EB compared to the single KT group, respectively. Mean cold ischemia time (21 h), kidney donor profile index (KDPI; 73% vs 62%) and levels of serum creatinine (SCr, 0.37 mg/dL vs 0.49 mg/dL, all P = NS) were comparable in the dual EB and single KT groups, respectively. Actuarial graft and patient survival rates at 5-years follow-up were comparable. There was one case of thrombosis resulting in graft loss in each group. Delayed graft function incidence (12% dual EB vs 20% single KT, P = NS) was slightly lower in dual EB KT recipients. Initial duration of hospital stay (mean 5.4 d vs 5.6 d) and the one-year incidences of acute rejection (6% vs 16%), operative complications (3% vs 4%), and major infection were comparable in the dual EB and single KT groups, respectively (all P = NS). Mean 12 mo SCr and abbreviated MDRD levels were 1.17 mg/dL vs 1.35 mg/dL and 72.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) vs 60.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (both P = NS) in the dual EB and single KT groups, respectively. CONCLUSION By transplanting kidneys from young pediatric donors into adult recipients, one can effectively expand the limited donor pool and achieve excellent medium-term outcomes.
Case reports in nephrology | 2015
Amudha Palanisamy; Paul Persad; Patrick P. Koty; Laurie L. Douglas; Robert J. Stratta; Jeffrey Rogers; A. Reeves-Daniel; Giuseppe Orlando; Alan C. Farney; Michael W. Beaty; Mark J. Pettenati; Samy S. Iskandar; David D. Grier; Scott Kaczmorski; William Doares; Michael D. Gautreaux; Barry I. Freedman; Bayard L. Powell
We report the rare occurrence of donor-derived myeloid sarcoma in two kidney transplant patients who received organs from a single deceased donor. There was no evidence of preexisting hematologic malignancy in the donor at the time of organ recovery. Both recipients developed leukemic involvement that appeared to be limited to the transplanted organ. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and molecular genotyping analyses confirmed that the malignant cells were of donor origin in each patient. Allograft nephrectomy and immediate withdrawal of immunosuppression were performed in both cases; systemic chemotherapy was subsequently administered to one patient. Both recipients were in remission at least one year following the diagnosis of donor-derived myeloid sarcoma. These cases suggest that restoration of the immune system after withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy and allograft nephrectomy may be sufficient to control HLA-mismatched donor-derived myeloid sarcoma without systemic involvement.
Journal of gerontology and geriatric research | 2016
Umar Farooq; Yousef Al-Shraideh; Alan C. Farney; Amudha Palanisamy; Jeffrey Rogers; Giuseppe Orlando; A. Reeves-Daniel; William Doares; Scott Kaczmorski; Hany El-Hennawy; Muhammad Saif Ullah Khan; Michael D. Gautreaux; Samy S. Iskandar; Gloria Hairston; Elizabeth Brim; Robert J. Stratta
Background: Deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes in patients who are aged 70 years and older are understudied. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our single center DD KT outcomes in patients aged 70 years and older. All patients received antibody induction with tacrolimus, half-dose mycophenolate, ± steroids. Results: Over 10.75 years, we performed 114 KTs in 112 patients aged 70 and older (mean 73.8, range 70-84 years) including 42 patients who were aged 75 and older. The study group included 60 males/52 females and 79 Caucasians/28 African Americans/5 other with a mean waiting time of 16 months; 75 patients (66%) received kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) and 14 received dual KTs. Delayed graft function occurred in 27% and influenced graft but not patient survival. With a mean follow-up of 68 months, patient survival was 59% and uncensored kidney graft survival was 47%. Three year and death-censored kidney graft survival rates were 76% and 74%, respectively. Outcomes were similar in patients < or ≥ 75 years. Of 60 graft losses, death with a functioning graft (DWFG) accounted for 41 (68%). Of 46 deaths, 72% were due to cardio/cerebrovascular events, infection, or malignancy. At present, 54 of the 66 surviving patients (81.8%) have functioning grafts. The incidences of acute rejection and major infection were 14% and 45%, respectively. Conclusions: Advanced recipient age has a modest effect on medium-term outcomes in appropriately selected elderly patients using predominantly ECD kidneys, which may not be appropriate for younger patients. However, medium-term outcomes are largely influenced by a higher incidence of DWFGs in the elderly, suggesting that matching strategies for kidney and patient longevity are warranted.