Amy Epps Martin

Performance-Graded Binder Specification for Surface Treatments

Surface treatments have been used by many government agencies as part of their maintenance and rehabilitation programs to improve surface quality and extend the service life of pavements. Traditional specifications for surface treatment binders have failed to characterize materials across the entire spectrum of temperatures experienced during production and construction and in-service and required properties that were not directly related to performance. The Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements (Superpave®) or performance-graded (PG) asphalt binder specification was developed in the 1990s to measure binder properties directly related to hot-mix asphalt concrete (HMAC) performance. This specification included material characterization at low, intermediate, and high temperatures. Direct application of the PG binder specification to binders used in surface treatments is not appropriate because of differences between surface treatments and HMAC with regard to distress types, construction methods, and exposure to environmental conditions. A performance-based specification system for surface treatment binders was developed that maximizes the use of existing equipment required in the PG system for HMAC binders. This new surface performance grading (SPG) specification assumes appropriate design and construction practices and considers only binder properties after construction. The SPG was developed based on the identification of common distresses and the analysis of physical properties at multiple temperatures of surface treatment binders that correlate to these distresses. The final SPG includes limiting values for high-and low-surface pavement design temperatures. Implementation of the SPG specification is recommended after a field validation experiment.

Determination of Volumetric Properties for Permeable Friction Course Mixtures

Current hot mix asphalt (HMA) mix design procedures used to determine the optimum asphalt content (OAC) for permeable or porous friction course (PFC) mixtures are based on volumetric properties, primarily total air void (AV) content. This calculated volumetric parameter depends on the bulk specific gravity (Gmb) and the theoretical maximum specific gravity (Gmm) of the mixture, which are generally difficult to measure in a laboratory due to the high asphalt contents, high total AV contents, and the use of modified asphalts for PFC mixtures. This study evaluated two methodologies for determining Gmb (vacuum and dimensional analysis) and two methodologies for determining Gmm (measured and calculated) for use in calculations of total AV content. For the mixtures assessed in this study, originally designed with a total AV content of 20 %, the alternative methodologies studied led to total AV content values outside the design range (18 to 22 %), which implies the necessity of gradation modifications or changes in the fiber content to meet AV requirements and define an OAC. Dimensional analysis and a calculation procedure, based on values of Gmm measured in the laboratory at low asphalt contents, are recommended for determining Gmb and Gmm values, respectively. In addition, dimensional analysis is preliminarily recommended to compute the water-accessible AV content of PFC mixtures based on the assessment of two methods (vacuum and a methodology proposed for dimensional analysis) to compute this parameter. Water-accessible AV content is considered as an alternative parameter for mix design and evaluation.

Drainability of Permeable Friction Course Mixtures

Drainability is one of the main characteristics of permeable friction course (PFC) mixtures and is the primary reason for using these mixtures as the surface course in asphalt pavements in the United States. Current approaches suggested for PFC mix design to evaluate drainability (using gyratory-compacted specimens) include: (1) achieving a target total air void (AV) content as an indirect indication of permeability and (2) direct measurement of permeability in the laboratory. The assessment conducted in this study suggested that these approaches are not effective in ensuring adequate drainability in field-compacted mixtures. Thus, different alternatives were evaluated to improve this assessment. Corresponding analysis suggested that: (1) the water-accessible AV content can be used as a surrogate of the total AV content to indirectly assess permeability and (2) the water flow value (outflow time) can be applied to evaluate the field drainability of PFC mixtures. The expected value of permeability, determined using a modified version of the Kozeny-Carman equation, was recommended to analytically predict permeability for mix design and evaluation purposes.

Stone-on-Stone Contact of Permeable Friction Course Mixtures

Stone-on-stone contact of the coarse-aggregate fraction is one of the main characteristics of permeable friction course (PFC) asphalt mixtures that is required to provide adequate resistance to both raveling and permanent deformation. Currently, stone-on-stone contact is determined by comparing the air voids content in the coarse aggregate (VCA), assessed in both the dry-rodded condition (VCA DRC ) and the compacted PFC mixture (VCA mix ). The underlying assumption is that the coarse aggregate of a compacted PFC mixture with VCA mix equal to VCA DRC would develop a stone-on-stone contact condition equivalent to that existing in the dry-rodded aggregate. This study focused on proposing enhancements for the quantitative determination of stone-on-stone contact of PFC mixtures. The assessment supported on both laboratory testing and application of the discrete element method and image analysis techniques, led to recommendation of a criterion to determine the breaking-sieve size. In addition, verification of stone-on-stone contact using a maximum VCA ratio of 0.9 was recommended to ensure the design and construction of PFC mixtures with fully developed stone-on-stone contact.

Connected Air Voids Content in Permeable Friction Course Mixtures

Current hot mix asphalt (HMA) mix design procedures used to determine the optimum asphalt content for permeable or porous friction course (PFC) mixtures are based primarily on total air void (AV) content. Durability and functionality of PFC mixtures are also related to the total AV content. However, the connected AV content (defined as the proportion of AV that form connected pathways for air and water transport through PFC mixtures) may provide more insight into the mixture structure in terms of the AV content directly associated with functionality and durability properties and constitute an alternative parameter to conduct PFC mix design and evaluation. This study evaluated two laboratory methodologies (vacuum and dimensional analysis) for determining water-accessible AV content and two types of analysis to compute interconnected AV content based on X-ray Computed Tomography (X-ray CT) and image analysis techniques. Although both the interconnected AV content and water-accessible AV content constitute determinations of connected AV content, different nomenclature was used to differentiate the origin of the calculation. Dimensional analysis with application of vacuum and X-ray CT and image analysis with inclusion of surface AV are recommended for determining water-accessible AV content and interconnected AV content, respectively. Future work should focus on investigating the use of connected AV content as an alternative parameter to integrate in mix design and laboratory and computational evaluation of PFC mixtures.

Evaluation of the Moisture Susceptibility of WMA Technologies

Over the past decade, the use of warm mix asphalt (WMA) for asphalt pavement construction has increased in the United States. However, questions remain about the long-term performance and durability of WMA pavements. One key issue is the moisture susceptibility of WMA pavements. Concerns about WMA moisture susceptibility include the possibility that aggregates will be inadequately dried at lower production temperatures and the fact that several WMA technologies introduce additional moisture in the production process. The objectives of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 9-49 were to (1) assess whether WMA technologies adversely affect the moisture susceptibility of asphalt pavements and (2) develop guidelines for identifying and limiting moisture susceptibility in WMA pavements. The research was conducted through coordinated laboratory and field experiments that investigated the potential for moisture susceptibility in WMA compared to hot mix asphalt (HMA). Design of the experiments was guided by a survey of the state departments of transportation and industry on WMA pavement construction and performance. The survey identified no instances of moisture damage to WMA pavements in service through 2010. This negative finding is supported by the results of recently completed NCHRP Project 9-47A, which conducted intensive evaluations of WMA pavements constructed across the United States between 2006 and 2011. Project 9-49 then focused on development of guidelines for WMA mix design and quality control to identify and minimize any possibility of moisture susceptibility. The laboratory experiments evaluated (1) laboratory-conditioning protocols for WMA before moisture susceptibility testing, (2) the ability of standard test methods to detect moisture susceptibility of WMA, and (3) potential differences in WMA moisture susceptibility measured on laboratory-mixed and -compacted specimens; plant-mixed, laboratory-compacted specimens; and plant-mixed, field-compacted cores. The guidelines are presented in the form of a workflow of conditioning protocols and standard test methods that first assess the potential moisture susceptibility of a WMA mix design or field mixture and then recommend remedies to minimize such susceptibility. Specific test thresholds in the guidelines are based on the results of testing of WMA from field projects in Iowa, Montana, New Mexico, and Texas. This report fully documents the research and includes the following Appendixes: Appendix A, Laboratory Conditioning Experiment; Appendix B, Moisture Conditioning Experiment; Appendix C, Performance Evolution Experiment; Appendix D, Construction Reports and Performance of Field Projects; Appendix E, Mixture Volumetrics; Appendix F, Proposed Draft Revisions to the Appendix to AASHTO R 35; Appendix G, Future Work Plan to Evaluate Moisture Susceptibility of HMA and WMA; and Appendix H, Statistical Results. Appendix F is included herein. Appendixes A—E, G, and H are available on the TRB website.

Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures with Known Field Performance: Evaluated with Dynamic Analysis and Crack Growth Model

Moisture damage in asphalt mixtures refers to loss in strength and durability due to the presence of water. The level and the extent of moisture damage, also called moisture susceptibility, depend on environmental, construction, and pavement design factors; internal structure distribution; and the quality and type of materials used in the asphalt mixture. This study evaluates the moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures with known field performance using dynamic analysis and a crack growth model to characterize the asphalt mixtures and corresponding asphalt mastics. The model parameters were obtained from surface energy measurements, uniaxial dynamic testing for the asphalt mixtures, and dynamic shear testing for the asphalt mastics. Results showed good differentiation between the moisture-conditioned (wet) and unconditioned (dry) specimen behavior and provided a good correlation with the reported field performance of the asphalt mixtures.

Novel Method for Moisture Susceptibility and Rutting Evaluation Using Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test

The Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT) has been widely used as a standard laboratory test to evaluate the moisture susceptibility and rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures. The stripping infection point and the rut depth at a certain number of load cycles are two common parameters obtained from the test. Although these parameters have been widely adopted by several transportation agencies, the accuracy and variability in characterizing mixture properties of these parameters have been questioned. In this study, a novel method to analyze the HWTT results is introduced and three new parameters are proposed to measure the moisture susceptibility and rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures. The new parameters are compared against the current ones to assess their capability to discriminate between three types of asphalt mixtures with different performance results in the HWTT. Significant advantages in characterizing mixture resistance to stripping and rutting are demonstrated by the new parameters. In addition, the effect of antistripping additives and recycled materials on mixture performance in the HWTT is evaluated with mixtures from a field project in Texas. Test results for the new parameters show that the addition of antistripping additives improves the susceptibility of asphalt mixtures to moisture. Specifically, the use of lime is more beneficial for improving mixture performance than a liquid antistripping agent. Conversely, the addition of recycled materials provides mixtures with increased moisture susceptibility but improved rutting resistance.

Effects of Densification on Permeable Friction Course Mixtures

Compaction of permeable or porous friction course (PFC) mixtures is generally considered a process without major issues, and field density requirements (or corresponding total air voids [AV] content) are not currently specified for this type of hot mix asphalt. However, proper densification is one of the most important aspects to control during construction to prevent raveling, the distress most frequently reported as the cause of failure in these mixtures. This paper presents an evaluation of the effect of densification on PFC mixtures. This evaluation included both the study of the internal structure of compacted mixtures and a comparison of performance based on macroscopic response. Results from this study showed that differences encountered in the internal structure of road cores and specimens compacted using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor limit the use of these laboratory compacted specimens in durability and functionality evaluations of PFC mixtures. In addition, changes in densification, after reaching stone-on-stone contact, modified the mixture properties and performance. The magnitude of these modifications provided evidence of the ease of verifying not only stone-on-stone contact during mix design, but also of the importance of controlling the density during construction to ensure an equilibrium density that guarantees the balance between mixture durability and mixture functionality.

Comparative Study on Recovered Binder Properties Using Three Asphalt Emulsion Recovery Methods

Determining the properties of residual binders is important to the effective use of asphalt emulsion chip seals. Yet, the effect of laboratory methods on recovered binder properties used to simulate residual binders in the field is not well understood. In this research, the residues of five asphalt emulsions were compared after recovery by three methods, a Hot Oven procedure (similar to ASTM D244-04), a Stirred-Can procedure (as reported in TXDOT 0-1710), and a Warm Oven method (ASTM D7497-09). The recovered binders were tested with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to assess the presence of residual moisture. Properties of the original base binders and the corresponding recovered binders were compared using dynamic shear rheometry and Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. The SEC results showed no residual water in any of the recovered samples, except the samples from Warm Oven recovery, which showed a small detectable amount of residual moisture. The results from statistical analysis of binder properties using ANOVA plus Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test suggest that recovered binders from the Warm Oven method are statistically different from their base binders. Nevertheless, considering each of the residues recovered from the three methods in paired comparisons with the other residues, none is statistically different from the others.