Amy G. Mell

A multi-subject evaluation of uncertainty in anatomical landmark location on shoulder kinematic description.

An accurate assessment of shoulder kinematics is useful for understanding healthy normal and pathological mechanics. Small variability in identifying and locating anatomical landmarks (ALs) has potential to affect reported shoulder kinematics. The objectives of this study were to quantify the effect of landmark location variability on scapular and humeral kinematic descriptions for multiple subjects using probabilistic analysis methods, and to evaluate the consistency in results across multiple subjects. Data from 11 healthy subjects performing humeral elevation in the scapular plane were used to calculate Euler angles describing humeral and scapular kinematics. Probabilistic analyses were performed for each subject to simulate uncertainty in the locations of 13 upper-extremity ALs. For standard deviations of 4 mm in landmark location, the analysis predicted Euler angle envelopes between the 1 and 99 percentile bounds of up to 16.6°. While absolute kinematics varied with the subject, the average 1–99% kinematic ranges for the motion were consistent across subjects and sensitivity factors showed no statistically significant differences between subjects. The description of humeral kinematics was most sensitive to the location of landmarks on the thorax, while landmarks on the scapula had the greatest effect on the description of scapular elevation. The findings of this study can provide a better understanding of kinematic variability, which can aid in making accurate clinical diagnoses and refining kinematic measurement techniques.

Impact of pain on shoulder elevation velocity in patients with rotator cuff tears

Pain is routinely implicated as a factor when considering impaired movement in injured populations. Movement velocity is often considered during the rehabilitation process; unfortunately our understanding of pains impact on shoulder movement velocity in rotator cuff tear patients is less understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that there would be an increase in peak and mean shoulder elevation velocities following the decrease of shoulder pain in rotator cuff tear patients, regardless of tear size. Fifteen subjects with full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCT) performed humeral elevation and lowering in three planes before and after receiving a lidocaine injection to relieve pain. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale. Humeral elevation velocity data were collected using an electromagnetic tracking system. A significant reduction in pain (pre-injection 3.53 ± 1.99; post-injection 1.23 ± 1.43) resulted in significant increases in maximum and mean humeral elevation velocities. Mean shoulder elevation and lowering velocities increased 15.10 ± 2.45% while maximum shoulder movement velocities increased 12.77 ± 3.93%. Furthermore, no significant relationships were noted between tear size and movement velocity. These significant increases in movement velocity provide evidence to further support the notion that human motion can be inhibited by injury-associated pain, and that by reducing that pain through clinical interventions, human movement can be impacted in a positive fashion.