An-Sofie Smetcoren
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by An-Sofie Smetcoren.
Research on Aging | 2016
Sarah Dury; Liesbeth De Donder; Nico De Witte; Dorien Brosens; An-Sofie Smetcoren; Sofie Van Regenmortel; Dominique Verté
Purpose: Volunteering among older adults has received increasing attention from researchers, policy makers, and associations. However, there remains a lack of knowledge in how volunteering is impacted by other activities in the lives of older adults. In order to understand activity engagement in later life, insights into the extent to which activities compete with or complement each other are necessary. Methods: Data for the present research were derived from the Belgian Aging Studies (N = 23,768). The main objective is to uncover the activities that impede or stimulate actual volunteering and/or the likeliness to volunteer at an older age. Results: Structural equation models indicate a strong positive correlation between altruistic types of activities and actual volunteering. Furthermore, older adults active in personal leisure activities are more drawn to be potential volunteers. Implications: The article demonstrates that the activity level of older people is not sufficient to understand volunteering, that is, a distinction between the types of activities is essential.
Aging & Mental Health | 2017
Sarah Dury; Ellen Elisa De Roeck; Daan Duppen; Bram Fret; Lieve Hoeyberghs; Deborah Lambotte; Michaël Van der Elst; Anne van der Vorst; J.M.G.A. Schols; Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen; G. A. Rixt Zijlstra; Jan De Lepeleire; Birgitte Schoenmakers; Tinie Kardol; Nico De Witte; Dominique Verté; Liesbeth De Donder; Peter Paul De Deyn; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; An-Sofie Smetcoren; Eva Dierckx
Abstract Objectives: This paper investigates risk profiles of frailty among older people, as these are essential for detecting those individuals at risk for adverse outcomes and to undertake specific preventive actions. Frailty is not only a physical problem, but also refers to emotional, social, and environmental hazards. Methods: Using data generated from the Belgian Ageing Studies, a cross-sectional study (n = 28,049), we tested a multivariate regression model that included sociodemographic and socioeconomic indicators as well as four dimensions of frailty, for men and women separately. Results: The findings indicated that for both men and women, increased age, having no partner, having moved house in the previous 10 years, having a lower educational level and having a lower household income are risk characteristics for frailty. Moreover, when looking at the different frailty domains, different risk profiles arose, and gender-specific risk characteristics were detected. Discussion: This paper elaborates on practical implications, and formulates a number of future research recommendations to tackle frailty in an aging society. The conclusion demonstrates the necessity for a thorough knowledge of risk profiles of frailty, as this will save both time and money and permit preventive actions to be more individually tailored.
Ageing & Society | 2017
An-Sofie Smetcoren; Liesbeth De Donder; Sarah Dury; Nico De Witte; Tinie Kardol; Dominique Verté
ABSTRACT Older people consider moving home when there is a discrepancy between actual and desired living conditions. This study builds on the classic push and pull framework described in the early work of Lee and Wiseman by identifying whether or not individual differences among older people can be predictive for certain push and pull reasons (such as housing, health, neighbourhood and social contact). On the basis of data from the Belgian Ageing Studies (N = 35,402), it was found that 13.9 per cent of older respondents had moved in the last ten years (N = 4,823). An analysis of the movers revealed inequalities in the reasons for moving in later life and raises the question of whether a relocation is voluntary (being able to move) or involuntary (being forced to move). Respondents with lower household incomes and poor mental health were significantly more likely to have moved because of stressors pushing them out of their previous dwelling, whereas older people with higher household incomes or home-owners were mainly pulled towards a more attractive environment.
BMC Public Health | 2018
Sarah Dury; Eva Dierckx; Anne van der Vorst; Michaël Van der Elst; Bram Fret; Daan Duppen; Lieve Hoeyberghs; Ellen Elisa De Roeck; Deborah Lambotte; An-Sofie Smetcoren; J.M.G.A. Schols; Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen; G. A. Rixt Zijlstra; Jan De Lepeleire; Birgitte Schoenmakers; Dominique Verté; Nico De Witte; Tinie Kardol; Peter Paul De Deyn; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Liesbeth De Donder
BackgroundThe debate on frailty in later life focuses primarily on deficits and their associations with adverse (health) outcomes. In addition to deficits, it may also be important to consider the abilities and resources of older adults. This study was designed to gain insights into the lived experiences of frailty among older adults to determine which strengths can balance the deficits that affect frailty.MethodsData from 121 potentially frail community-dwelling older adults in Flemish-speaking Region of Belgium and Brussels were collected using a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected using the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and numeric rating scales (NRS) for quality of life (QoL), care and support, meaning in life, and mastery. Bivariate analyses, paired samples t-tests and means were performed. Qualitative data on experiences of frailty, frailty balance, QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery were collected using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were subjected to thematic content analysis.ResultsThe “no to mild frailty” group had higher QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery scores than the “severe frailty” group. Nevertheless, qualitative results indicate that, despite being classified as frail, many older adults experienced high levels of QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery. Respondents mentioned multiple balancing factors for frailty, comprising individual-level circumstances (e.g., personality traits, coping strategies, resilience), environmental influences (e.g., caregivers, neighborhood, social participation), and macro-level features (e.g., health literacy, adequate financial compensation). Respondents also highlighted that life changes affected their frailty balance, including changes in health, finances, personal relationships, and living situation.ConclusionThe findings indicate that frailty among older individuals can be considered as a dynamic state and, regardless of frailty, balancing factors are important in maintaining a good QoL. The study investigated not only the deficits, but also the abilities, and resources of frail, older adults. Public policymakers and healthcare organizations are encouraged to include these abilities, supplementary or even complementary to the usual focus on deficits.
Geron | 2017
An-Sofie Smetcoren; Sarah Dury; Liebeth den Donder; Eva Dierckx
SamenvattingDit artikel focust op kwetsbaarheid bij thuiswonende ouderen. Onderzoek binnen de gerontologie heeft aangetoond dat vele ouderen de wens uitdrukken om oud te worden in de vertrouwde leefsituatie, internationaal omschreven met de term ‘ageing in place’. Willen we ‘ageing in place’ op een kwaliteitsvolle manier mogelijk maken, dan is een vroegtijdige detectie van zorgbehoeften en zorgtekorten bij ouderen in kwetsbare situaties noodzakelijk. Om hieraan tegemoet te komen, werden in het kader van het D-SCOPE project 121 ouderen bevraagd naar hun ervaring van kwetsbaarheid.
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics | 2018
Deborah Lambotte; Liesbeth De Donder; Sofie Van Regenmortel; Bram Fret; Sarah Dury; An-Sofie Smetcoren; Eva Dierckx; Nico De Witte; Dominique Verté; Martinus J.M. Kardol
OBJECTIVES This study examines different combinations of informal and formal care use of older adults and investigates whether these combinations differ in terms of need for care (physical and psychological frailty) and enabling factors for informal and formal care use (social and environmental frailty). METHODS Using cross-sectional data from the Belgian Ageing Studies (survey, N = 38,066 community-dwelling older adults), Latent Class Analysis (LCA) is used to identify combinations of informal and formal care use. Bivariate analyses are used to explore the relationship between the different combinations of care use and frailty. RESULTS Latent Class Analysis (LCA) identified 8 different types of care use, which vary in combinations of informal and formal caregivers. Older adults who are more likely to combine care from family and care from all types of formal caregivers are more physically, psychologically and environmentally frail than expected. Older adults who are more likely to receive care only from nuclear family, or only from formal caregivers are more socially frail than expected. CONCLUSIONS Older adults with a higher need for care are more likely to receive care from different types of informal and formal caregivers. High environmental frailty and low social frailty are related with the use of care from different types of informal and formal caregivers. This study confirms that informal care can act as substitute for formal care. However, this substitute relationship becomes a complementary relationship in frail older adults. Policymakers should take into account that frailty in older adults affects the use of informal and formal care.
Journal of Population Ageing | 2016
Sofie Van Regenmortel; Liesbeth De Donder; Sarah Dury; An-Sofie Smetcoren; Nico De Witte; Dominique Verté
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences | 2014
Liesbeth De Donder; Dorien Brosens; Nico De Witte; Tine Buffel; Sarah Dury; An-Sofie Smetcoren; Dominique Verté
Tijdschrift Voor Gerontologie En Geriatrie | 2018
An-Sofie Smetcoren; Sarah Dury; L. De Donder; Eva Dierckx; N. De Witte; S. Engelborghs; P.P. De Deyn; A. van der Vorst; M. Van der Elst; Deborah Lambotte; Lieve Hoeyberghs; Bram Fret; Daan Duppen; E. De Roeck; Martinus J.M. Kardol; Birgitte Schoenmakers; J. De Lepeleire; Gertrude A. Rixt Zijlstra; G.I.J.M. (Ruud) Kempen; J.M.G.A. Schols; D. Verté
Social Indicators Research | 2017
Sofie Van Regenmortel; Liesbeth De Donder; An-Sofie Smetcoren; Deborah Lambotte; Nico De Witte; Dominique Verté