Ana Carbonell-Baeza
University of Cádiz
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ana Carbonell-Baeza.
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism | 2015
Víctor Segura-Jiménez; Inmaculada C. Álvarez-Gallardo; Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Virginia A. Aparicio; Francisco B. Ortega; Antonio J. Casimiro; Manuel Delgado-Fernández
OBJECTIVES To characterize a representative sample of fibromyalgia women based on a set of relevant factors known to be related to this disease. To distinguish specific factors of the disease from other symptoms that might also exist in non-fibromyalgia women. To test whether fibromyalgia affects more severely physical or psychological outcomes. METHODS A total of 459 fibromyalgia women vs. 214 non-fibromyalgia (control) women from Southern Spain (Andalusia) took part in this cross-sectional study. Several instruments were used to assess tenderness, impact of fibromyalgia, fatigue, health-related quality of life, mental health, and cognitive performance. RESULTS Overall, fibromyalgia women showed a worse status in pain, fatigue, health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety than controls (P < 0.01). In general, the observed associations presented very large effect sizes (Cohen׳s d from ~1 to ~5.5). No differences between fibromyalgia and controls were observed in cognitive and memory performance, except for delayed recall, but the observed effect size was low (~0.25). The effect size observed for the global physical component (~3.3) was larger than that for the global psychological component (~1.3), all P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS Our results reinforce the understanding of fibromyalgia as a polysymptomatic distress condition with pain as its main symptom. Our findings support that fibromyalgia seems to have a greater impact on physical than on psychological outcomes, though both are largely affected.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2011
Virginia A. Aparicio; Francisco B. Ortega; José M. Heredia; Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Michael Sjöström; Manuel Delgado-Fernández
OBJECTIVES To determine the ability of handgrip strength test to discriminate between presence and absence of fibromyalgia (FM) and FM severity in women. DESIGN A case-control study. SETTING Granada, south Spain. PARTICIPANTS Women with FM (mean age ± SD, n=81; 50.0±7y) and healthy women (mean age ± SD, n=44; 47.7±6y). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Handgrip strength was measured in both hands (average score was used in the analyses) by a maximal isometric test using a hand dynamometer. Patients were classed as having moderate FM if the score in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) was less than 70 and as having severe FM if the FIQ was 70 or greater. RESULTS Handgrip strength levels were lower in patients with FM than healthy women (19.3 vs 27.9kg; P<.001) and in women with severe FM (FIQ≥70) compared with those with moderate FM (FIQ<70) (16.9 vs 20.2kg; P=.02). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that the handgrip strength threshold that best discriminated between the presence and absence of FM was 23.1kg (area under the curve [AUC]=.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.94; P<.001), whereas the handgrip strength threshold that best discriminate between severe and moderate FM was 16.9kg (AUC=.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80; P<.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that handgrip strength 23.1kg or less was associated with 33.8 times higher odds (95% CI, 9.4-121.5) for having FM after adjustment for age. In the FM group, handgrip strength 16.9kg or less was associated with 5.3 times higher odds (95% CI, 1.9-14.5) for having severe FM. CONCLUSIONS Handgrip strength is reduced in women with FM as well as those with severe FM from their peers with moderate FM. Identification of women who fail to meet the suggested standards can be a helpful and informative tool for clinician.
British Journal of Sports Medicine | 2011
Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Virginia A. Aparicio; Francisco B. Ortega; Ana María Cuevas; Inmaculada C Alvarez; Jonatan R. Ruiz; Manuel Delgado-Fernández
Objective To determine the effects of a 3-month multidisciplinary intervention on pain (primary outcome), body composition and physical fitness (secondary outcomes) in women with fibromyalgia (FM). Methods 75 women with FM were allocated to a low-moderate intensity 3-month (three times/week) multidisciplinary (pool, land-based and psychological sessions) programme (n=33) or to a usual care group (n=32). The outcome variables were pain threshold, body composition (body mass index and estimated body fat percentage) and physical fitness (30 s chair stand, handgrip strength, chair sit and reach, back scratch, blind flamingo, 8 feet up and go and 6 min walk test). Results The authors observed a significant interaction effect (group*time) for the left (L) and right (R) side of the anterior cervical (p<0.001) and the lateral epicondyle R (p=0.001) tender point. Post hoc analysis revealed that pain threshold increased in the intervention group (positive) in the anterior cervical R (p<0.001) and L (p=0.012), and in the lateral epicondyle R (p=0.010), whereas it decreased (negative) in the anterior cervical R (p<0.001) and L (p=0.002) in the usual care group. There was also a significant interaction effect for chair sit and reach. Post hoc analysis revealed improvement in the intervention group (p=0.002). No significant improvement attributed to the training was observed in the rest of physical fitness or body composition variables. Conclusions A 3-month multidisciplinary intervention three times/week had a positive effect on pain threshold in several tender points in women with FM. Though no overall improvements were observed in physical fitness or body composition, the intervention had positive effects on lower-body flexibility.
Rheumatology | 2014
Víctor Segura-Jiménez; Virginia A. Aparicio; Inmaculada C. Álvarez-Gallardo; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado; Fernando Estévez-López; Manuel Delgado-Fernández; Ana Carbonell-Baeza
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to validate the modified 2010 ACR preliminary criteria for FM in a Spanish population. METHODS Five hundred and seventy-nine (550 women) FM and 294 (240 women) control participants were enrolled in the study. FM patients were previously diagnosed by a rheumatologist. All participants underwent both the 1990 ACR criteria (1990c) and the modified 2010 ACR criteria (m-2010c). RESULTS The tender points count showed correlations of 0.69, 0.65 and 0.71 with the widespread pain index (WPI), symptoms severity (SS) and polysymptomatic distress (PSD) scales, respectively (all P < 0.001). The WPI, SS and PSD showed greater correlations with impact of FM health-related quality of life, general fatigue and depression than the tender points count. The 1990c showed sensitivity and specificity values of 84.1 and 97.6, respectively, whereas the m-2010c showed values of 88.3 and 91.8, respectively. Both criteria showed the same overall accuracy, with a value of 0.89. When the 1990c and m-2010c were combined and patients had to satisfy one of two criteria to be diagnosed with FM, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of questionnaires were 96.7, 89.8 and 0.94, respectively. The original cut-off points (WPI ≥ 7, SS ≥ 5 and PSD ≥ 12) showed the best test characteristics in the present study. CONCLUSION The m-2010c, with the same cut-off points as the original version, are a valid tool for the diagnosis of FM in our population. Whenever possible, the combination of the 1990c and m-2010c is recommended (patients have to meet one of the two criteria to be diagnosed), since this approach showed the best diagnostic characteristics.
Journal of Sports Sciences | 2010
Palma Chillón; José Castro-Piñero; Jonatan R. Ruiz; Víctor M. Soto; Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Javier Dafos; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez; Manuel J. Castillo; Francisco B. Ortega
Abstract Although flexibility field tests are commonly used in research, sport, and school settings, there is no conclusive evidence about what they actually assess. The first aim of this study was to assess the contributions of the main joints involved in the back-saver sit-and-reach test using angular kinematic analysis. The second aim was to measure the inter-method agreement between the back-saver sit-and-reach test and the sit-and-reach test. A total of 138 adolescents (57 females, 81 males) aged 14.5 ± 1.7 years performed the back-saver sit-and-reach test and the sit-and-reach test. Hip, lumbar, and thoracic angles were assessed by angular kinematic analysis while the participants were performing the back-saver sit-and-reach test. Stepwise linear regression models and the Bland-Altman method were used. The hip angle independently explained 42% (P < 0.001) of the variance in the back-saver sit-and-reach test, the lumbar angle explained an additional 30% (P < 0.001) of the variance, and the thoracic angle an additional 4% (P < 0.001). The inter-method mean difference between back-saver sit-and-reach (BSSR) and sit-and-reach (SR) measures (BSSR – SR) was 0.41 cm (P = 0.21). The results suggest that hip flexibility is the main determinant of the back-saver sit-and-reach test score in adolescents, followed by lumbar flexibility. The back-saver sit-and-reach test can therefore be considered an appropriate and valid test for assessing hip and low-back flexibility in this age group. The back-saver sit-and-reach and sit-and-reach tests provide comparable values.
BMC Public Health | 2014
José Castro-Piñero; Ana Carbonell-Baeza; David Martínez-Gómez; Sonia Gómez-Martínez; Verónica Cabanas-Sánchez; Catalina Santiago; Ana M. Veses; Fernando Bandrés; Ana González-Galo; Félix Gómez-Gallego; Oscar L. Veiga; Jonatan R. Ruiz; Ascensión Marcos
BackgroundAn objective diagnosis of sedentary behaviour as well as of the physical activity and fitness levels in youth and to better understand how lifestyle is associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors and other phenotypes is of clinical and public health interest, and might be informative for developing intervention studies focused on the promotion of physical activity in these population. The aim of this methodological paper is to describe the design and assessment in the UP&DOWN study.Methods/DesignThe UP&DOWN study is a multi-center follow-up design where 2225 Spanish primary and secondary schoolchildren from Cadiz and Madrid, respectively, as well as 110 Spanish adolescents with Down syndrome from Madrid and Toledo were recruited to be assessed. Nine main measurement categories are assessed: i) socio-demographic and early determinants; ii) environmental determinants; iii) physical activity and sedentary behaviour; iv) health-related fitness; v) blood pressure and resting heart rate; vi) mental health; vii) dietary patterns; viii) blood samples; and ix) genetic analysis. During the 3-yr follow-up study, socio-demographic and early determinants, and genetic analysis are only assessed in the first year. Blood sampling is assessed in the first year and the third year (2nd follow-up), and all the other measurements are assessed every year.DiscussionThe findings of the UP&DOWN study may help the Health Information Systems and policy makers to identify the target population for primary prevention and health promotion policies, and to develop and test preventive strategies. Moreover, these data will allow following the trends at population level, as well as to modify/adapt/create new evidence-based physical activity guidelines at national level. The findings will also serve as a scientific platform for interventional studies.
Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine | 2012
Alejandro Romero-Zurita; Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Virginia A. Aparicio; Jonatan R. Ruiz; Pablo Tercedor; Manuel Delgado-Fernández
Background. The purpose was to analyze the effects of Tai-Chi training in women with fibromyalgia (FM). Methods. Thirty-two women with FM (mean age, 51.4 ± 6.8 years) attended to Tai-Chi intervention 3 sessions weekly for 28 weeks. The outcome measures were: tenderness, body composition, functional capacity and psychological outcomes (Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36)). Results. Patients showed improvements on pain threshold, total number of tender points and algometer score (all P < 0.001). The intervention was effective on 6-min walk (P = 0.006), back scratch (P = 0.002), handgrip strength (P = 0.006), chair stand, chair sit & reach, 8 feet up & go and blind flamingo tests (all P < 0.001). Tai-Chi group improved the FIQ total score (P < 0.001) and six subscales: stiffness (P = 0.005), pain, fatigue, morning tiredness, anxiety, and depression (all P < 0.001). The intervention was also effective in six SF-36 subscales: bodily pain (P = 0.003), vitality (P = 0.018), physical functioning, physical role, general health, and mental health (all P < 0.001). Conclusions. A 28-week Tai-Chi intervention showed improvements on pain, functional capacity, symptomatology and psychological outcomes in female FM patients.
International Journal of Sports Medicine | 2014
Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Inmaculada C. Álvarez-Gallardo; Víctor Segura-Jiménez; José Castro-Piñero; Jonatan R. Ruiz; Manuel Delgado-Fernández; Virginia A. Aparicio
The aim of the present study was to determine the reliability and feasibility of physical fitness tests in female fibromyalgia patients. 100 female fibromyalgia patients (aged 50.6±8.6 years) performed the following tests twice (7 days interval test-retest): chair sit and reach, back scratch, handgrip strength, arm curl, chair stand, 8 feet up and go, and 6-min walk. Significant differences between test and retest were found in the arm curl (mean difference: 1.25±2.16 repetitions, Cohen d=0.251), chair stand (0.99±1.7 repetitions, Cohen d=0.254) and 8 feet up and go (-0.38±1.09 s, Cohen d=0.111) tests. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) range from 0.92 in the arm curl test to 0.96 in the back scratch test. The feasibility of the tests (patients able to complete the test) ranged from 89% in the arm curl test to 100% in the handgrip strength test. Therefore, the reliability and feasibility of the physical fitness tests examined is acceptable for female fibromyalgia patients.
BMJ Open | 2013
Jonatan R. Ruiz; Víctor Segura-Jiménez; Francisco B. Ortega; Inmaculada C. Álvarez-Gallardo; Daniel Camiletti-Moirón; Virginia A. Aparicio; Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Pedro Femia; Diego Munguía-Izquierdo; Manuel Delgado-Fernández
Objectives To characterise levels of objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity in women with fibromyalgia. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Local Association of Fibromyalgia (Granada, Spain). Participants The study comprised 94 women with diagnosed fibromyalgia who did not have other severe somatic or psychiatric disorders, or other diseases that prevent physical loading, able to ambulate and to communicate and capable and willing to provide informed consent. Primary outcome measures Sedentary time and physical activity were measured by accelerometry and expressed as time spent in sedentary behaviours, average physical activity intensity (counts/minute) and amount of time (minutes/day) spent in moderate intensity and in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA). Results The proportion of women meeting the physical activity recommendations of 30 min/day of MVPA on 5 or more days a week was 60.6%. Women spent, on average, 71% of their waking time (approximately 10 h/day) in sedentary behaviours. Both sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels were similar across age groups, waist circumference and percentage body fat categories, years since clinical diagnosis, marital status, educational level and occupational status, regardless of the severity of the disease (all p>0.1). Time spent on moderate-intensity physical activity and MVPA was, however, lower in those with greater body mass index (BMI) (−6.6 min and −7 min, respectively, per BMI category increase, <25, 25–30, >30 kg/m2; p values for trend were 0.056 and 0.051, respectively). Women spent, on average, 10 min less on MVPA (p<0.001) and 22 min less on sedentary behaviours during weekends compared with weekdays (p=0.051). Conclusions These data provide an objective measure of the amount of time spent on sedentary activities and on physical activity in women with fibromyalgia.
Arthritis Care and Research | 2015
Alberto Soriano-Maldonado; Jonatan R. Ruiz; Virginia A. Aparicio; Fernando Estévez-López; Víctor Segura-Jiménez; Inmaculada C. Álvarez-Gallardo; Ana Carbonell-Baeza; Manuel Delgado-Fernández; Francisco B. Ortega
This population‐based cross‐sectional study aimed to characterize the association of different components of physical fitness with pain levels, pain‐related catastrophizing, and chronic pain self‐efficacy in women with fibromyalgia (FM).