Ana Elizabeth Figueiredo

PERITONEAL DIALYSIS-RELATED INFECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: 2010 UPDATE

Department of Medicine and Therapeutics,1 Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,2 Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Faculdade de Enfermagem, Nutrição e Fisioterapia,3 Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences,4 Lucknow, India; Department of Nephrology,5 Princess Alexandra Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Medical Microbiology,6 Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Centre for Kidney Diseases,7 Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore; Section of Infectious Disease,8 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA; Pediatric Nephrology Division,9 University Children’s Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Dianet Dialysis Centers,10 Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

ISPD Position Statement on Reducing the Risks of Peritoneal Dialysis–Related Infections

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,1 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust,2 London, UK; Faculdade de Enfermagem,3 Nutriccao e Fisioterapia, Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Princess Alexandra Hospital and School of Medicine,4 University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre,5 Singapore; Saint John Regional Hospital,6 Horizon Health Network, St. John, New Brunswick, Canada; Sri Ramachandra University No 1,7 Ramachandra Nagar, Porur, Chennai, India; and Department of Medicine and Therapeutics,8 Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China SPECIAL ARTICLE

Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access.

Faculdade de Enfermagem, Nutricao e Fisioterapia,1 Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Department of Nephrology,2 Serdang Hospital, Jalan Puchong, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia; Sheffield Kidney Institute,3 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Nephrology,4 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Renal Services,5 Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; Nephrology,6 Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India; Dialysis Unit,7 Dianet Dialysis Centers and Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

ISPD PERITONITIS RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 UPDATE ON PREVENTION AND TREATMENT

Abstract Peritonitis is a common and serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although less than 5% of peritonitis episodes result in death, peritonitis is the direct or major contributing cause of death in around 16% of PD patients (1-6). In addition, severe or prolonged peritonitis leads to structural and functional alterations of the peritoneal membrane, eventually leading to membrane failure. Peritonitis is a major cause of PD technique failure and conversion to long-term hemodialysis (1,5,7,8). Recommendations under the auspices of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) were first published in 1983 and revised in 1993, 1996, 2000, 2005, and 2010 (9-14). The present recommendations are organized into 5 sections: 1. Peritonitis rate 2. Prevention of peritonitis 3. Initial presentation and management of peritonitis 4. Subsequent management of peritonitis 5.

RESEARCH INTO PAIN PERCEPTION WITH ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA (AVF) CANNULATION

Patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) undergoing haemodialysis (HD) are repeatedly exposed to stress and pain from approximately 300 punctures per year to their arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Repeated AVF punctures lead to a considerable degree of pain, due to the calibre and length of the bevel of fistula needles. Pain is a sensitive, emotional and subjective experience. The objective of this study was to measure pain associated with AVF needling. The analogue visual scale (AVS) divided into 10 equal parts (0 indicating lack of pain, and 10 unbearable pain) was used. Patients(7) perceptions were measured in three different HD sessions. Pain was considered mild during AVF needling. The buttonhole technique caused a mean degree of pain of 2.4 (+/-1.7), compared to 3.1 (+/-2.3) using the conventional ropeladder technique. Although without reaching a statistically significant difference, diminished pain was associated with the buttonhole technique.

ISPD Catheter-Related Infection Recommendations: 2017 Update

Department of Medicine and Therapeutics,1 Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Nephrology,2 University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Renal Electrolyte Division,3 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Renal Division,4 Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul,5 FAENFI, Porto Alegre, Brazil; Division of Nephrology,6 Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan; Division of Nephrology,7 Bezmialem Vakif University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná,8 Curitiba, Brazil; Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital,9 Nephrology Department and Internal Medicine, Tilburg, Netherlands; and Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre,10 Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK ISPD GUIDELINES/RECOMMENDATIONS

Adesão ao tratamento farmacológico de pacientes em hemodiálise

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to treatment in patients on hemodialysis is not a simple process. Strategies to promote adherence will meet the need for improvements in the process of orientation concerning the disease and its pharmacological treatment. OBJECTIVES: To identify compliance with pharmacological treatment of patients on hemodialysis and the main factors related to it we used the Adherence Scale. METHODS: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study. Interviews were conducted to collect socioeconomic, pharmacological data, as well as those regarding self-reported adherence to drug. RESULTS: Out of the 65 participants, 55.4% showed non-compliance. The mean number of drugs used was 4.1 ± 2.5 (self-report) and 6.2 ± 3.0 (prescription). Statistical analysis showed significant differences concerning compliance at different ages (> 60 years are more adherent). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients have difficulty to comply with treatment and the main factor was forgetfulness. Regarding age, elderly patients are more adherent to treatment. The low level of knowledge about the used drugs may be one of the reasons for the lack of adherence, and the patients orientation process by a team of multiprofessionals involved in assisting is a strategy to promote adherence.

Low Serum Potassium Levels Increase the Infectious-Caused Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Propensity-Matched Score Study

Background and Objectives Hypokalemia has been consistently associated with high mortality rate in peritoneal dialysis. However, studies investigating if hypokalemia is acting as a surrogate marker of comorbidities or has a direct effect in the risk for mortality have not been studied. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the effect of hypokalemia on overall and cause-specific mortality. Design, Setting, Participants and Measurements This is an analysis of BRAZPD II, a nationwide prospective cohort study. All patients on PD for longer than 90 days with measured serum potassium levels were used to verify the association of hypokalemia with overall and cause-specific mortality using a propensity match score to reduce selection bias. In addition, competing risks were also taken into account for the analysis of cause-specific mortality. Results There was a U-shaped relationship between time-averaged serum potassium and all-cause mortality of PD patients. Cardiovascular disease was the main cause of death in the normokalemic group with 133 events (41.8%) followed by PD-non related infections, n=105 (33.0%). Hypokalemia was associated with a 49% increased risk for CV mortality after adjustments for covariates and the presence of competing risks (SHR 1.49; CI95% 1.01-2.21). In contrast, in the group of patients with K <3.5mEq/L, PD-non related infections were the main cause of death with 43 events (44.3%) followed by cardiovascular disease (n=36; 37.1%). For PD-non related infections the SHR was 2.19 (CI95% 1.52-3.14) while for peritonitis was SHR 1.09 (CI95% 0.47-2.49). Conclusions Hypokalemia had a significant impact on overall, cardiovascular and infectious mortality even after adjustments for competing risks. The causative nature of this association suggested by our study raises the need for intervention studies looking at the effect of potassium supplementation on clinical outcomes of PD patients.

Impact of patient training patterns on peritonitis rates in a large national cohort study

BACKGROUND Ideal training methods that could ensure best peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcome have not been defined in previous reports. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of training characteristics on peritonitis rates in a large Brazilian cohort. METHODS Incident patients with valid data on training recruited in the Brazilian Peritoneal Dialysis Multicenter Study (BRAZPD II) from January 2008 to January 2011 were included. Peritonitis was diagnosed according to International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines; incidence rate of peritonitis (episodes/patient-months) and time to the first peritonitis were used as end points. RESULTS Two thousand two hundred and forty-three adult patients were included in the analysis: 59 ± 16 years old, 51.8% female, 64.7% with ≤4 years of education. The median training time was 15 h (IQI 10-20 h). Patients were followed for a median of 11.2 months (range 3-36.5). The overall peritonitis rate was 0.29 per year at risk (1 episode/41 patient-months). The mean number of hours of training per day was 1.8 ± 2.4. Less than 1 h of training/day was associated with higher incidence rate when compared with the intervals of 1-2 h/day (P = 0.03) and >2 h/day (P = 0.02). Patients who received a cumulative training of >15 h had significantly lower incidence of peritonitis compared with <15 h (0.26 per year at risk versus 0.32 per year at risk, P = 0.01). The presence of a caregiver and the number of people trained were not significantly associated with peritonitis incidence rate. Training in the immediate 10 days after implantation of the catheter was associated with the highest peritonitis rate (0.32 per year), compared with training prior to catheter implantation (0.28 per year) or >10 days after implantation (0.23 per year). More experienced centers had a lower risk for the first peritonitis (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to analyze the association between training characteristics and outcomes in a large cohort of PD patients. Low training time (particularly <15 h), smaller center size and the timing of training in relation to catheter implantation were associated with a higher incidence of peritonitis. These results support the recommendation of a minimum amount of training hours to reduce peritonitis incidence regardless of the number of hours trained per day.

Influence of sodium profile in preventing complications during hemodialysis

Although a safe procedure, hemodialysis (HD) can cause numerous complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of complications during dialysis, interdialytic weight gain, and the predialysis and postdialysis blood pressure in HD patients with and without variable sodium. Patients were observed during 12 HD sessions and those presenting with recurrent hypotension were selected for a step‐wise model of variable sodium profiling. A total of 53 patients were evaluated; the mean‐SD age was 53.7±16.3 years and 22 (41.5%) were male. Of these, 18 (34.0%) were selected to receive variable sodium profiling: the mean (SD) age was 59.9±12.6 years, and 10 (55.6%) were female. A significant decline in the occurrence of cramps (p<0.027), in the mean interdialytic weight gain (p<0.009), and a tendency to reduce the number of hypotensive episodes were detected in patients using variable sodium profiling. On the other hand, predialysis systolic blood pressure presented a significant increase (p<0.048). Using variable sodium, there was a statistically significant reduction in cramps and in the mean interdialytic weight gain. There was a significant increase in predialysis systolic pressure. Regarding hypotension episodes, only a tendency toward a reduction in the frequency of hypotension episodes could be detected.