Ana Isabel Castillo

The activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors stimulates in situ and in vitro beta-amyloid removal by human macrophages.

The endocannabinoid system is a promising therapeutic target in a wide variety of diseases. However, the non-desirable psychotropic effects of natural and synthetic cannabinoids have largely counteracted their clinical usefulness. These effects are mostly mediated by cannabinoid receptors of the CB(1) type, that exhibit a wide distribution in neuronal elements of the CNS. Thus, the presence of other elements of this system in the CNS, such as CB(2) receptors, may open new possibilities for the development of cannabinoid-based therapies. These receptors are almost absent from the CNS in normal conditions but are up-regulated in glial cells under chronic neuroinflammatory stimuli, as has been described in Alzheimers disease. To understand the functional role of these receptors, we tested their role in the process of beta-amyloid removal, that is currently considered as one of the most promising experimental approaches for the treatment of this disease. Our results show that a CB(2) agonist (JWH-015) is capable of inducing the removal of native beta-amyloid removal from human frozen tissue sections as well as of synthetic pathogenic peptide by a human macrophage cell line (THP-1). Remarkably, this effect was achieved at low doses (maximum effect at 10 nM) and was specific for this type of cells, as U373MG astrocytoma cells did not respond to the treatment. The effect was CB(2)-mediated, at least partially, as the selective CB(2) antagonist SR144528 prevented the JWH-015-induced plaque removal in situ. These data corroborate the possible therapeutic interest of CB(2) cannabinoid specific chemicals in the treatment of Alzheimers disease.

A Permissive Retinoid X Receptor/Thyroid Hormone Receptor Heterodimer Allows Stimulation of Prolactin Gene Transcription by Thyroid Hormone and 9-cis-Retinoic Acid

ABSTRACT Heterodimers of the retinoid X receptor (RXR) with the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) are considered to be nonpermissive. It is believed that within these complexes RXR acts as a “silent partner.” We demonstrate here that a permissive heterodimer mediates stimulation of prolactin expression by the thyroid hormone T3 and by 9-cis retinoic acid (9-cis-RA). A response element located in the prolactin distal enhancer mediates transactivation by both ligands in pituitary cells, and RXR recruits coactivators when bound to this element as a heterodimer with TR. Furthermore, transcription by the RXR agonist can be obtained in CV-1 cells only after overexpression of coactivators, and overexpression of corepressors inhibits the response in pituitary cells. Thus, cell type-specific differences in coregulator recruitment can determine the cellular response to both ligands. Coactivator recruitment by 9-cis-RA requires the ligand-dependent transactivation domains (AF-2) of both heterodimeric partners. Interestingly, the presence of the RXR ligand can overcome the deleterious effect of the AF-2 mutation E401Q on association with coactivators and transactivation. These results demonstrate an unexpected role for RXR in TR signaling and show that in particular cellular environments this receptor can act as a “nonsilent” partner of TR, allowing stimulation by RXR agonists.

Activation of the prolactin gene by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha appears to be DNA binding-independent.

Although the effects of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have been studied primarily in adipocytes and liver, the wide distribution of these receptors suggests that they might also play a role in other cell types. We present evidence that PPAR activators stimulate the expression of the prolactin gene in pituitary GH4C1 cells. Transfection assays in non-pituitary HeLa cells showed that stimulation of the prolactin promoter by PPARα requires the presence of the transcription factor GHF-1 (or Pit-1). Proximal promoter sequences confer responsiveness to PPARα, and activation by this receptor is lost concomitantly with the response to GHF-1. Surprisingly, expression of the retinoid X receptor (RXR) abolishes stimulation by PPARα. Furthermore, the promoter region that confers PPARα responsiveness does not contain a PPAR response element. This suggests that the transcriptional effect of PPARα might be mediated by protein-protein interactions rather than by binding of PPAR/RXR to the promoter. A direct interaction between PPARα and GHF-1 was confirmed by in vitro binding studies. Expression of the coactivators SRC-1 and CREB-binding protein, which bind to PPAR, also enhanced the responsiveness of the prolactin promoter to PPARα. Furthermore, CREB-binding protein also significantly increased activation by GHF-1, and both proteins associated in vitro. Thus, PPARα, a receptor that normally acts as a ligand-dependent transcription factor by binding to specific DNA sequences in one context, can also stimulate the prolactin promoter by association with GHF-1 and coactivator proteins.

Insulin-like growth factor-1 stimulates rat prolactin gene expression by a Ras, ETS and phosphatidylinositol 3- kinase dependent mechanism

We have examined the influence of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1) on prolactin gene expression in rat pituitary GH4C1 cells. Incubation with IGF-1 increases prolactin mRNA levels and activates the prolactin promoter in transient transfection assays. A similar degree of activation is observed with constructs extending to −3000 and −176 base pairs of the prolactin 5′ flanking region, indicating that the IGF-1 response element is located in the proximal promoter sequences. A plasmid containing 101 base pairs shows a partial stimulation by IGF-1, and the response is lost in a deletion to −76 base pairs. The Ras oncoproteins have been implicated as a critical signaling component in mediating the effect of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. Expression of oncogenic RasVal12 mimics the effect of IGF-1 on the prolactin promoter, and a dominant negative Ras, RasAsn17, blocks IGF-1-mediated stimulation. Dominant negative mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) also reduces the activation of the prolactin promoter by IGF-1. Ets transcription factors have been described to lie downstream of Ras and MAPK in the signaling pathway leading to prolactin gene activation. Mutation of two Ets binding sites in the promoter region between −101 and −76 abolishes the response to IGF-1. Furthermore, a dominant negative Ets vector strongly reduces the response of the prolactin promoter to IGF-1 and Ras. The endogenous concentration of Ets-related proteins is not limiting in GH4C1 cells for the IGF-1 effect. However, c-Ets-1 and GHF-1 act synergistically in HeLa cells with the IGF-1 receptor, reconstituting pituitary IGF-1 responsiveness. The response to IGF-1 in GH4C1 cells is still observed after transfection with RasVal12 suggesting that, although Ras is required, IGF-1 could stimulate other pathway/s in addition to Ras. Wortmanin, an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (Pl-3 kinase), also prevents the response of the prolactin promoter to IGF-1. These results show that both the Ras/MAPK/Ets pathway, as well as the activation of Pl-3 kinase are involved in the signaling mechanism leading to prolactin expression by IGF-1 in GH4C1 cells.

Vitamin D-Dependent Recruitment of Corepressors to Vitamin D/Retinoid X Receptor Heterodimers

ABSTRACT Transcriptional regulation by nuclear receptors is mediated by recruitment of coactivators and corepressors. In the classical model, unliganded nonsteroidal receptors bind corepressors, such as the silencing mediator of thyroid and retinoid receptors (SMRT) or nuclear corepressor (NCoR), that are released upon ligand binding. We show here that, unlike other receptors, the heterodimer of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) recruits NCoR and SMRT strictly in a VDR agonist-dependent manner. Binding of an agonist to VDR allows its partner receptor, RXR, to bind the corepressors. The RXR ligand has the opposite effect and induces corepressor release from the heterodimer. 1,25-Dihydroxy-vitamin D3 (VD3) causes recruitment of SMRT and NCoR to a VDR target promoter. Down-regulation of corepressors by means of small interfering RNA enhances transcriptional responses to VD3. These data reveal a new paradigm of SMRT and NCoR binding to nuclear receptors and demonstrate that these corepressors can function as physiological negative regulators of VD3-mediated transcription.

Association with Ets-1 Causes Ligand- and AF2-Independent Activation of Nuclear Receptors

ABSTRACT The vitamin D receptor (VDR) normally functions as a ligand-dependent transcriptional activator. Here we show that, in the presence of Ets-1, VDR stimulates the prolactin promoter in a ligand-independent manner, behaving as a constitutive activator. Mutations in the AF2 domain abolish vitamin D-dependent transactivation but do not affect constitutive activation by Ets-1. Therefore, in contrast with the actions of vitamin D, activation by Ets-1 is independent of the AF2 domain. Ets-1 also conferred a ligand-independent activation to the estrogen receptor and to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α. In addition, Ets-1 cooperated with the unliganded receptors to stimulate the activity of reporter constructs containing consensus response elements fused to the thymidine kinase promoter. There is a direct interaction of the receptors with Ets-1 which requires the DNA binding domains of both proteins. Interaction with Ets-1 induces a conformational change in VDR which can be detected by an increased resistance to proteolytic digestion. Furthermore, a retinoid X receptor-VDR heterodimer in which both receptors lack the core C-terminal AF2 domain can recruit coactivators in the presence, but not in the absence, of Ets-1. This suggests that Ets-1 induces a conformational change in the receptor which creates an active interaction surface with coactivators even in the AF2-defective mutants. These results demonstrate the existence of a novel mechanism, alternative to ligand binding, which can convert an unliganded receptor from an inactive state into a competent transcriptional activator.

β—Amyloid exacerbates inflammation in astrocytes lacking fatty acid amide hydrolase through a mechanism involving PPAR-α, PPAR-γ and TRPV1, but not CB1 or CB2 receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The endocannabinoid system may regulate glial cell functions and their responses to pathological stimuli, specifically, Alzheimers disease. One experimental approach is the enhancement of endocannabinoid tone by blocking the activity of degradative enzymes, such as fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH).

The retinoid X receptor ligand restores defective signalling by the vitamin D receptor

It is assumed that the retinoid X receptor (RXR) acts as a silent partner to the vitamin D receptor (VDR) with its only function to increase affinity of VDR/RXR to its DNA recognition site. In this study, we show that the RXR ligand 9‐cis‐retinoic acid (9‐cis‐RA) induces recruitment of coactivators by the DNA‐bound heterodimer and potentiates vitamin D‐dependent transcriptional responses. The presence of 9‐cis‐RA increases induction of cyp24 transcripts and differentiation of colon cancer cells by vitamin D, confers significant agonistic activity to a VDR ligand with very low agonistic activity and can even restore transcriptional activity of an AF‐2 mutant VDR that causes hereditary rickets. This study shows that, in VDR/RXR heterodimers, allosteric communication triggered by the RXR ligand has a previously unrecognized role in vitamin D signalling, with important physiological and therapeutic implications.

Activation of the human immunodeficiency virus type I long terminal repeat by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3

The genetic predisposition of the host and the virus is the most important determinant for prediction of the course of human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) viral infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) progression. Transcription from the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) is a crucial step for viral replication. Here, we describe a stimulatory role of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) on HIV-1 LTR transactivation. Transient transfections reveal that VDR activates the LTR in HeLa, U937, and Cos-1 cells in a ligand-dependent manner. 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 (vitD3) promotes activation of a minimal LTR construct (from nucleotides -35 to +89), lacking a previously described hormone response element that binds several nuclear receptors. NF-kappaB (nuclear factor-kappa B) and Sp1-binding sites, which are responsible for most basal LTR activity in HeLa cells, are also dispensable for vitD3-dependent HIV-1 transcription. Although the tat response element element is not required for VDR-mediated HIV-1 gene expression, the viral protein Tat acts in a synergistic manner with the receptor to stimulate LTR activity. Furthermore, our data also show cooperation of the receptor with various cellular coactivators for HIV-1 transactivation by vitD3. Paradoxically, mutations in the VDR ligand-dependent transcriptional activation function-2 that abrogate vitD3-dependent stimulation through classical vitamin D response elements, do not reduce vitD3-mediated LTR transactivation. Furthermore, point mutations in the DNA-binding domain that abolish receptor binding to consensus DNA sequences do not affect ligand-dependent HIV-1 stimulation. These results show that VDR activates the HIV-1 LTR through different mechanisms, including non-classical nuclear receptor transcriptional actions that may ensure viral transcription under different physiological scenarios.

Growth factor ligands of tyrosine kinase receptors activate the Rous sarcoma virus promoter by a Ras- and Raf-dependent mechanism

In PC12 cells, NGF and other ligands of tyrosine kinase receptors increased the activity of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promoter. IGF-1 stimulated the RSV promoter in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. This promoter was also activated by oncogenic Ras and Raf in different cell types, and growth factor induction was inhibited by expression of dominant negative forms of ras and raf, showing that its effect is mediated by a Ras- and Raf-dependent mechanism. Therefore, the RSV promoter should not be used in the determination of transfection efficiency in the studies on regulation of gene expression by ligands of tyrosine kinase receptors, ras and raf.