Ana Quartilho

Leading causes of certifiable visual loss in England and Wales during the year ending 31 March 2013

PurposeThe last article on causes of sight impairment (SI) in England and Wales was for April 2007–March 2008. This report updates these figures for April 2012–March 2013.MethodsIn England and Wales, registration for SI is initiated by completion of a certificate of vision impairment (CVI). The main cause of visual impairment was ascertained for certificates completed April 2012–March 2013. A proportional comparison against April 2007–March 2008 was made.ResultsWe received 24 009 CVIs of which 10 410 were for severe sight impairment (SSI) and 13 129 were for SI. These numbers were slightly higher than those observed in April 2007–March 2008 (9823 SSI; 12 607 SI). The ratio SI:SSI has remained static with 55% of all certifications being SI. The proportion of certificates without a single main cause has fallen slightly (16.6 to 14%). The proportion of certificates with a main cause of degeneration of the macula and posterior pole (mostly age-related macular degeneration (AMD)) decreased from 58.6 to 50% SSI and from 57.2 to 52.5% SI. Glaucoma remains the second most common cause (11% SSI; 7.6% SI) but hereditary retinal disorders overtook diabetes as third leading cause of SSI.ConclusionAMD is still by far the leading cause of certifications for sight impairment in England and Wales (both SI and SSI). Proportionate changes have been observed since 2008, but it is important to note that a proportionate increase in one condition will impact on others.

Ophthalmic statistics note 7: multiple hypothesis testing—to adjust or not to adjust

Investigating multiple research questions, or hypotheses, within one study is a common scenario in biomedical research with many examples in ophthalmology. As the number of statistical tests increases, the overall chance that we draw an erroneous conclusion in our study gets higher in a predictable manner. Each statistical test conducted at the conventional 5% significance level (α) has a one in 20 chance (or 0.05 probability) of appearing significant simply due to chance (a type I error) and a 1−0.05=0.95 probability of being non-significant. If we test two independent true null hypotheses, the probability that neither test will be significant is 0.95×0.95=0.90. Likewise, if we test 14 independent hypotheses, the probability that none will be significant is 0.9514=0.49, and the probability that at least one will be significant is 1−0.49=0.51, that is, we are more likely than not to find at least one test significant. In other words, if we go on carrying out tests of significance we are very likely to find a spurious significant result. In the field of statistics, this phenomenon is known as the problem of multiple testing or the multiplicity problem .1 Consider the ABC study which compared bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with standard National Health Service (NHS) care.2 This study was conducted on 131 patients and found that 21 (32%) of patients treated with bevacizumab gained ≥15 letters compared with two (3%) of those in the standard care group with an OR of 18.1 (95% CI 3.6 to 91.2; p<0.001). The primary objective of this study was to determine whether bevacizumab was superior to standard NHS care and this single test of significance provided strong evidence. Closer inspection of the study reveals however that a variety of different treatments were used within the NHS standard care arm …

Soft Contact Lenses to Optimize Vision in Adults with Idiopathic Infantile Nystagmus: A Pilot Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Purpose: The optimal management of infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) is still unclear. Contact lenses (CL) may be superior to glasses in improving visual function in INS but it is not known whether their beneficial effects are due to optical correction alone, or to an additional proprioceptive effect, and whether soft CLs would be as effective as rigid CLs. There is little data on feasibility and and the present study aimed to provide this information. Methods: We completed a pilot Randomized Control Trial (RCT) at a single tertiary referral centre in London, UK. We enrolled 38 adults with idiopathic INS and randomised them to either plano CL (with corrective spectacles if required) or to corrective CL. CL wear was required for a minimum of 2 weeks. Primary outcome measures were feasibility and safety of CL wear in INS; secondary outcome measures were visual acuity and nystagmus waveform parameters. Results: 27 completed the study (27/38,71%). 4 partcipants withdrew due to difficulty with CL insertion/removal and 7 were lost to follow up. CL tolerability was high (24/27,89%) - 2 found the CLs irritant, and 1 had an exacerbation of allergic eye disease. At two weeks, mean improvement in binocular visual acuity from baseline with plano CLs was 0.07 logMAR (95% confidence interval (CI: 0.03-0.11) and 0.06 logMAR with fully corrective CLs (95% CI:0.02-0.1). Mean improvement in the eXpanded Nystagmus Acuity Function (NAFX, a nystagmus acuity function based on eye movement recording) with plano CLs was -0.04(95% CI: -0.08-0.005) and -0.05 with fully corrective CLs(95% CI: -0.09–0.003). Conclusions: CLs are well tolerated, with a low risk profile. Whilst our study was not powered to detect significant changes in BCVA and waveform parameters between treatment arms, we observed a trend towards an improvement in visual function at two weeks from baseline with CLs.

Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma Have Relative Sparing of the Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect Compared to Those With Open Angle Glaucoma and Elevated Intraocular Pressure

Purpose We determined whether there is relative sparing of pupil function in glaucoma patients with normal pressures compared to those with high pressures. Methods A cross-sectional study was done of 68 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): 38 had normal IOPs on all-day phasing before treatment (never >21 mm Hg), with confirmed progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (NTG) and 30 had glaucomatous optic neuropathy associated with elevated intraocular pressures (>25 mm Hg; HP-POAG). The relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) was quantified with the RAPDx device, and mean deviation of visual field loss was obtained from reliable Humphrey visual fields. Outcomes measures evaluated were difference in slope between NTG and HP-POAG when plotting: (1) RAPD score against difference in mean deviation (MD) between eyes, and (2) RAPD score against difference in RNFL thickness between eyes. Results The slopes for magnitude of RAPD versus difference in MD were -0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.076, -0.044) for patients with NTG and -0.08 (95% CI, -0.109, -0.067) for those with HP-POAG. Fitting the interaction term showed a statistically significant difference between the slopes (0.023; 95% CI [0.0017, 0.0541]; P value = 0.037; HP-POAG reference group). Thus, for difference in MD, the slope for patients with NTG was flatter than the slope for those with HP-POAG. Conclusions Glaucoma patients with NTG have a lesser RAPD for a given level of intereye difference of HVF MD, compared to patients with high IOPs. This suggests that damage to intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) differs between the normal and high-pressure forms of open-angle glaucoma (OAG), and supports the theory that mitochondrial optic neuropathies may have a role in the group of diagnoses currently termed normal tension glaucoma.

Visual functioning in adults with Idiopathic Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome (IINS)

ABSTRACT Purpose: IINS is associated with mild/moderate visual impairment, strabismus and compensatory head postures (CHP), which can negatively impact quality of life. Standard visual acuity assessments tend to underestimate the effect of IINS on visual functioning. Published evidence on the effect of INS on quality of life is slowly emerging. Our study examines visual functioning of adults with IINS using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionairre-25 (VFQ-25). Methods: 38 participants were recruited to participate in the study. All participants underwent detailed clinical examination, as well as appropriate investigations and were asked to complete the self administered VFQ-25. Results: 35/38 participants completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the population was 35.1 years (range 17-64). Mean overall VFQ-25 score at baseline was 65 (SD 13, range 34-91). Participants specifically demonstrated lowest scores for the impact of IINS on mental health, role limitations and dependency. 26/35 of participants were not driving, either due to sub-normal vision, lack of confidence or difficulties with contrast sensitivity. Conclusions: IINS can have a greater than expected impact on an individual’s quality of life, without necessarily causing markedly reduced visual acuity. Our study showed lowest scores in the domains of mental health and wellbeing. Patients also reported reduced visual functioning in driving, which can impact adversely on employability and independence. Visual functioning questionnaires such as the VFQ-25 may provide more functional information on the impact of nystagmus on an individual’s quality of life than objective measures such as high contrast Snellen and/or LogMAR visual acuity.

Case-control study of risk factors for acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus.

Purpose To determine risk factors for the development of acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus in the UK in a case-controlled study. Methods Between November 2009 and December 2010, we prospectively identified 73 individuals who developed acute corneal hydrops. We then identified 174 controls from nine regions in the UK with keratoconus who had not had hydrops. For cases and controls we recorded demographics and clinical features. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify risk factors. Results Univariate analysis suggested strong associations between the odds of hydrops and each of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (OR 4.08, 95% CI 1.45 to 11.49, p=0.008), asthma (OR 2.70, CI 1.34 to 5.47, p=0.006), atopic dermatitis (OR 3.13, CI 1.50 to 6.56, p=0.002), learning difficulties (OR 7.84, CI 2.86 to 21.46, p<0.001), previous hydrops (OR 40.2; CI 6.2 to ∞, p<0.001), black ethnicity (OR 2.98, CI 0.98 to 8.99; p=0.05), visual acuity in the worse eye (OR 8.76 CI 3.86 to 19.88; p<0.001) and minimum keratometry of ≥48 D prior to the hydrops (OR 4.91, CI 1.07 to 22.6, p=0.041). The use of a contact lens correction was also found to be associated with the odds of hydrops (OR 0.08; CI 0.03 to 0.19, p<0.001). Multiple variable regression indicated that having vernal keratoconjunctivitis (adjusted OR (AOR) 15, 95% CI 1.30 to 173.7; p=0.03), asthma (AOR 4.92, CI 1.22 to 19.78; p=0.025), visual acuity in worse eye (AOR 4.11, CI 1.18 to 14.32; p=0.026) and a high keratometry value (AOR 4.44, CI 0.85 to 23.18; p=0.077) were independently associated with the odds of hydrops in subjects with keratoconus. Conclusion Some individuals with keratoconus are at high risk of developing acute corneal hydrops. These patients could be managed more aggressively to reduce their risk of developing this complication of their disease.

Tablet computers versus optical AIDS to support education and learning in children and young people with low vision: Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial, CREATE (Children Reading with Electronic Assistance to Educate)

Introduction Low vision and blindness adversely affect education and independence of children and young people. New ‘assistive’ technologies such as tablet computers can display text in enlarged font, read text out to the user, allow speech input and conversion into typed text, offer document and spreadsheet processing and give access to wide sources of information such as the internet. Research on these devices in low vision has been limited to case series. Methods and analysis We will carry out a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility of a full RCT of assistive technologies for children/young people with low vision. We will recruit 40 students age 10–18 years in India and the UK, whom we will randomise 1:1 into two parallel groups. The active intervention will be Apple iPads; the control arm will be the local standard low-vision aid care. Primary outcomes will be acceptance/usage, accessibility of the device and trial feasibility measures (time to recruit children, lost to follow-up). Exploratory outcomes will be validated measures of vision-related quality of life for children/young people as well as validated measures of reading and educational outcomes. In addition, we will carry out semistructured interviews with the participants and their teachers. Ethics and dissemination NRES reference 15/NS/0068; dissemination is planned via healthcare and education sector conferences and publications, as well as via patient support organisations. Trial registration number NCT02798848; IRAS ID 179658, UCL reference 15/0570.