Ana Stefancic
Columbia University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ana Stefancic.
The Journal of Primary Prevention | 2007
Ana Stefancic; Sam Tsemberis
Housing First is an effective intervention that ends and prevents homelessness for individuals with severe mental illness and co-occurring addictions. By providing permanent, independent housing without prerequisites for sobriety and treatment, and by offering support services through consumer-driven Assertive Community Treatment teams, Housing First removes some of the major obstacles to obtaining and maintaining housing for consumers who are chronically homeless. In this study, consumers diagnosed with severe mental illness and who had the longest histories of shelter use in a suburban county were randomly assigned to either one of two Housing First programs or to a treatment-as-usual control group. Participants assigned to Housing First were placed in permanent housing at higher rates than the treatment-as-usual group and, over the course of four years, the majority of consumers placed by both Housing First agencies were able to maintain permanent, independent housing. Results also highlight that providers new to Housing First must be aware of ways in which their practices may deviate from the essential features of Housing First, particularly with respect to enrolling eligible consumers on a first-come, first-served basis and separating clinical issues from tenant or housing responsibilities. Finally, other aspects of successfully implementing a Housing First program are discussed.
Community Mental Health Journal | 2011
Deborah K. Padgett; Victoria Stanhope; B.F. Henwood; Ana Stefancic
The Housing First (HF) approach for homeless adults with serious mental illness has gained support as an alternative to the mainstream “Treatment First” (TF) approach. In this study, group differences were assessed using qualitative data from 27 HF and 48 TF clients. Dichotomous variables for substance use and substance abuse treatment utilization were created and examined using bivariate and logistic regression analyses. The HF group had significantly lower rates of substance use and substance abuse treatment utilization; they were also significantly less likely to leave their program. Housing First’s positive impact is contrasted with the difficulties Treatment First programs have in retaining clients and helping them avoid substance use and possible relapse.
Archives of General Psychiatry | 2010
Todd P. Gilmer; Ana Stefancic; Susan L. Ettner; Willard G. Manning; Sam Tsemberis
CONTEXT Chronically homeless adults with severe mental illness are heavy users of costly inpatient and emergency psychiatric services. Full-service partnerships (FSPs) provide housing and engage clients in treatment. OBJECTIVE To examine changes in recovery outcomes, mental health service use and costs, and quality of life associated with participation in FSPs. DESIGN A quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference design with a propensity score-matched control group was used to compare mental health service use and costs of FSP with public mental health services. Recovery outcomes were compared before and after services use, and quality of life was compared cross-sectionally. SETTING San Diego County, California, from October 2005 through June 2008. PARTICIPANTS Two hundred nine FSP clients and 154 clients receiving public mental health services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Recovery outcomes (housing, financial support, and employment), mental health service use (use of outpatient, inpatient, emergency, and justice system services), and mental health services and housing costs from the perspective of the public mental health system. RESULTS Among FSP participants, the mean number of days spent homeless per year declined 129 days from 191 to 62 days; the probability of receiving inpatient, emergency, and justice system services declined by 14, 32, and 17 percentage points, respectively; and outpatient mental health visits increased by 78 visits (P < .001 each). Outpatient costs increased by
Community Mental Health Journal | 2007
Leyla Gülçür; Sam Tsemberis; Ana Stefancic; Ronni Michelle Greenwood
9180; inpatient costs declined by
Evaluation and Program Planning | 2014
Geoffrey Nelson; Ana Stefancic; Jennifer Rae; Greg Townley; Sam Tsemberis; Eric Macnaughton; Tim Aubry; Jino Distasio; Roch Hurtubise; Michelle Patterson; Vicky Stergiopoulos; Myra Piat; Paula Goering
6882; emergency service costs declined by
Psychiatric Services | 2013
Todd P. Gilmer; Ana Stefancic; Marisa Sklar; Sam Tsemberis
1721; jail mental health services costs declined by
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research | 2010
Sarah A. McGraw; Mary Jo Larson; Susan Foster; Marilyn Kresky-Wolff; Elizabeth M. Botelho; Emily A. Elstad; Ana Stefancic; Sam Tsemberis
1641; and housing costs increased by
Psychiatric Services | 2012
Philip T. Yanos; Ana Stefancic; Sam Tsemberis
3180 (P < .003 each). Quality of life was greater among FSP clients than among homeless clients receiving services in outpatient programs. CONCLUSIONS Participation in an FSP was associated with substantial increases in outpatient services and days spent in housing. Reductions in costs of inpatient/emergency and justice system services offset 82% of the cost of the FSP.
American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation | 2013
Ronni Michelle Greenwood; Ana Stefancic; Sam Tsemberis; Volker Busch-Geertsema
This study tests components of Wong and Solomon’s (2002, Mental Health Services Research, 4(2), 13–28) model of community integration, identifying both the dimensions and predictors of integration. It evaluates community integration among adults with psychiatric disabilities assigned randomly to receive either independent scatter-site apartments with the Housing First approach (experimental) or services as usual (control). Factor analysis supported a definition of community integration that includes psychological, physical, and social domains, but also suggested the existence of another factor, independence/self-actualization. Regression analysis suggested that choice and independent scatter-site housing were predictors of psychological and social integration respectively. Psychiatric hospitalization, symptomatology and participation in substance use treatment were also found to influence aspects of integration. We discuss several issues that future studies should explore including the possibility that the same factor can differentially influence discrete aspects of integration, the role of person–environment fit, integration that is not based in the neighborhood, and, finally, conceptions of community integration from the perspective of consumers themselves.
Journal of Addictive Diseases | 2012
Philip W. Appel; Sam Tsemberis; Herman Joseph; Ana Stefancic; Dawn Lambert-Wacey
This research sought to determine whether the implementation of Housing First in a large-scale, multi-site Canadian project for homeless participants with mental illness shows high fidelity to the Pathways Housing First model, and what factors help or hinder implementation. Fidelity ratings for 10 Housing First programs in five cities were made by an external quality assurance team along five key dimensions of Housing First based on 84 key informant interviews, 10 consumer focus groups, and 100 chart reviews. An additional 72 key informant interviews and 35 focus groups yielded qualitative data on factors that helped or hindered implementation. Overall, the findings show a high degree of fidelity to the model with more than 71% of the fidelity items being scored higher than 3 on a 4-point scale. The qualitative research found that both delivery system factors, including community and organizational capacity, and support system factors, training and technical assistance, facilitated implementation. Fidelity challenges include the availability of housing, consumer representation in program operations, and limitations to the array of services offered. Factors that accounted for these challenges include low vacancy rates, challenges of involving recently homeless people in program operations, and a lack of services in some of the communities. The study demonstrates how the combined use of fidelity assessment and qualitative methods can be used in implementation evaluation to develop and improve a program.