Anand Dayama

Endovascular Repair With Fenestrated-Branched Stent Grafts Improves 30-Day Outcomes for Complex Aortic Aneurysms Compared With Open Repair

BACKGROUND Endovascular repair is associated with better 30-day outcomes than open surgical repair for patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms. In patients with complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs) requiring suprarenal or supravisceral aortic cross-clamping during open repair, few data exist directly comparing the real-world outcomes of open repair versus endovascular repair with fenestrated-branched stent grafts (FEVAR). METHODS Outcomes for patients who underwent elective CAA repair using open repair and FEVAR between 2005 and 2010 were analyzed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. CAA was defined as aneurysm of the aorta involving the visceral and/or renal arteries. RESULTS This study compared 1091 patients who underwent open repair (group A: male, 71.5%; age, 71 ± 9 years) with 264 patients treated with FEVAR (group B: male, 82.2%; age, 74 ± 9 years). The 2 groups did not significantly differ with respect to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (ASA III/IV: A, 93%; B, 95%, P = 0.6), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (A: 21%; B: 22%; P = 0.7), prior cardiac surgery (A: 24%; B: 20%; P = 0.19), or preoperative renal function (glomerular filtration rate: A: 69 ± 2; B: 70 ± 27; P = 0.535). Group A had significantly higher risk of any complication (A: 42%; B: 19%; P < 0.001), nonsurgical complications (A: 30%; B: 8%; P < 0.001), pulmonary complications (A: 21%; B: 2%; P < 0.001), renal complications (A: 10%; B: 1.5%; P = 0.001), and any cardiovascular complication (A: 8%; B: 2%; P < 0.001). The composite end point of surgical site infections/graft failure/bleeding transfusions were also higher in group A (A: 22%; B: 15%; P = 0.014). Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower for FEVAR (A: 5.4%; B: 0.8%; P = 0.001), as was total length of hospital stay (A: 11 ± 10 days; B: 4 ± 5 days; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This nationwide real-world database suggests that in similar patient populations, repair of CAAs with FEVAR is associated with reduced 30-day morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. Although long-term comparative studies are needed, FEVAR may represent a preferred treatment alternative to open repair for patients with CAAs.

Age-Stratified Results from 20,095 Aortoiliac Aneurysm Repairs: Should We Approach Octogenarians and Nonagenarians Differently?

BACKGROUND In the endovascular era, elderly patients are offered repair of their aortoiliac aneurysms (AAA) more frequently than in the past. Our objective is to compare age groups and draw inferences for AAA repair outcomes. STUDY DESIGN We identified 20,095 patients who underwent AAA repair between 2005 and 2010 using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP national database. Preoperative characteristics and outcomes were compared among age groups (group A: 0 to 64 years; B: 65 to 79 years; C: 80 to 89 years; and D: 90 years and older). RESULTS The age distribution of the cohort was A: 17.1%, B: 57.2%, C: 24%, and D: 1.7%. Nonagenarians presented significantly more often as emergencies in comparison with groups A to C (A: 13.8%, B: 10.8%, C: 12.9%, D: 22.1%; p < 0.001). Endovascular aneurysm repair was performed more frequently in older patients (A: 55.2%, B: 63.7%, C: 74.6%, D: 77.9%; p < 0.001). Risk of any complication was significantly different among groups, becoming more prevalent with advanced age (A: 22.8%, B: 23.4%, C: 24.7%, D: 27.8%; p = 0.041). Nonsurgical complications (A: 14.7%, B: 16.4%, C: 18%, D: 19.8%; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular complications (A: 3.9%, B: 4.5%, C: 5.5%, D: 5.2%; p = 0.003) were also higher with advanced age. Overall mortality was 3.1%, 4.9%,7.2%, and 13.2% for groups A to D, respectively (p < 0.001). Mortality after elective AAA repair was significantly higher for open surgery compared with endovascular aneurysm repair in all age groups (open surgery vs endovascular aneurysm repair, A:1.9% vs 0.5%; p = 0.001; B: 3.9% vs 1.2%; p < 0.001; C: 7.4% vs 2%; p < 0.001; D: 18.8% vs 3.8%; p = 0.004). After adjusting for confounders in the entire cohort, advanced age persisted as an independent factor for postoperative mortality with a higher risk of death of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5), 2.7 (95% CI, 1.9-3.8), and 3.3 (95% CI, 1.8-6.1) times for groups B, C, and D, respectively (group A reference). CONCLUSIONS Advanced age is independently associated with higher risk of death after AAA repair and indication for surgery should be adjusted for different age groups accordingly. Endovascular aneurysm repair should be preferred for octogenarians and nonagenarians with indication to undergo repair of their AAA.

Iliac Conduits for Endovascular Repair of Aortic Pathologies

OBJECTIVES Challenging iliac access during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is associated with a higher risk of access site complications such as injury or rupture of the iliac vessels. As a result, the use of iliac conduits is frequently used to facilitate access during TEVAR. This report evaluates the effect of iliac conduits on TEVAR outcomes. METHODS The 2005-2010 American College of Surgeons Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify vascular patients undergoing elective TEVAR. Patients without conduit (Group A) were compared to patients who underwent TEVAR with conduit (Group B). RESULTS We identified 1037 patients (90%) in Group A (69 ± 12.7 years, 42% female) and 117 patients (10%) in Group B (70 ± 12.6 years, 68% female). Women received conduits more often than men (Male:5.8%, Female:15.7%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of non-surgical (A:19%,B:25%,p = 0.121), pulmonary (A:11%,B:16%, p = 0.115), renal (A:3.1%, B:1.7%, p = 0.4) and cardiovascular complications (A:8%, B:12%, p = 0.143) between groups. However, any complication (A:24%, B:33%. p = 0.025), surgical complications (A:10%, B:16%, p = 0.035) and mortality (A:4.5%, B:12%. p = 0.001) were significantly higher in Group B. In multivariate analysis, use of conduit was associated with a 3.8 times higher risk of death compared with no conduit after controlling for confounders. Length of in-hospital stay was similar for both groups (A:6.6 ± 8.8, B:7.6 ± 8 days, p = 0.247). The use of conduits had a declining rate over time from 17.9% in 2006 down to 6.5% in 2010. CONCLUSIONS Female patients more frequently require iliac conduits during TEVAR compared to men. Conduits were associated with a higher rate of surgical complications and mortality. The incidence of conduit use has decreased threefold in the last five years. Safer access for TEVAR by use of a conduit should not be abandoned based on these results, but there should be a heightened awareness for the higher rate of mortality in these patients.

Regarding “Remodeling of aortic aneurysm and aortic neck on follow-up after endovascular repair with suprarenal fixation”

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the remodeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the Zenith (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) device. METHODS This was a retrospective study of anatomic data related to characteristics of the aortic neck diameter, iliac artery diameter, and aneurysm sac diameter collected during a clinical study of the Zenith device. RESULTS In this study, 739 patients were observed for 2 years and 158 of them were observed for 5 years. The monthly rate of change for the neck diameter was more rapid in the early postoperative period (postoperative-30 days), with an expansion of 0.7 ± 0.09 mm/month, and during the third year of follow-up (24-36 months), with a monthly expansion rate of 0.10 ± 0.24 mm. The iliac arteries were also more prone to expansion during the first postoperative month (right iliac, 0.95 ± 0.08 mm/month; left iliac, 0.91 ± 0.08 mm/month) and in the next 6 months with a monthly expansion rate of 0.18 ± 0.02 mm and 0.21 ± 0.02 mm for the right and left iliac arteries, respectively. Remodeling of the aneurysm sac occurred mainly in the first postoperative year with a regression rate of 0.89 ± 0.05 mm/month between 1 and 6 months and 0.44 ± 0.04 mm/month for the second half of the year. The aneurysm sac regression rate dropped to 0.2 mm/month in the second postoperative year. Changes in the aortic neck diameter were statistically significant (P < .001) only at the 24- to 36-month postoperative interval. Changes in the aortic sac diameter were statistically significant (P < .001) at the 30-day to 6-month, 6- to 12-month, and 12- to 24-month intervals. Among patients who underwent reintervention, aortic sac expansion occurred primarily in the 24- to 36-month interval. CONCLUSIONS Expansion of the aortic neck after EVAR for the Zenith endograft occurs mainly between 24 and 36 months; aortic aneurysm sac regression occurs more obviously at 1 to 12 months. Iliac arteries at the landing zone expand more rapidly in the first postoperative year. Late surveillance of EVAR patients is essential to avoid late complications after aortic remodeling.

Late Gore Excluder endoprosthesis fabric tear leading to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture 5 years after initial implant

Endoprosthesis fabric tear leading to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture is a rare event. In this report, we describe a patient who presented with an abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture after a tear in the fabric of the Gore Excluder endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore and Associationes, Flagstaff, Ariz) 5 years after implantation. The reason for the fabric tear was unknown. The complication was successfully treated by relining the endograft with an aortic cuff and two iliac limbs. The patient experienced an uneventful recovery after the intervention.

Incidental Findings in Patients Evaluated for Thoracic Aortic Pathology Using Computed Tomography Angiography

BACKGROUND Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is routinely used to diagnose thoracic aortic pathology and for surveillance after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The purpose of our study was to assess the prevalence of unsuspected disease identified on CTA examination for thoracic aortic pathology and to determine potential clinical significance of these findings. METHODS A retrospective review of 242 patients (136 men and 106 women; mean age, 65.7 ± 13.9 years) referred for clinical evaluation of thoracic aortic pathology during a 12-year period was performed. CTA was acquired after obtaining full written informed consent and injecting nonionic contrast Omnipaque 350 intravenously. Subsequently, axial images were obtained from the thoracic inlet through the pubic symphysis. The prevalence of incidental findings was recorded. A finding was judged potentially significant if a therapeutic intervention or radiologic follow-up was deemed advisable on the basis of the CTA findings. RESULTS Prevalence of incidental findings were noncalcified pulmonary lesions (subcentimeter nodule [28, 11.57%], nodule >1 cm [16, 6.61%], and pulmonary mass >3 cm [4, 1.65%]), calcified pulmonary nodules (35, 14.46%), simple liver cysts (32, 13.22%), contrast-enhancing liver lesion (7, 2.89%), renal mass (7, 2.89%), and pancreatic mass (5, 2.06%). Subsequent diagnostic tests were recommended for 63 findings in 55 (22.72%) patients, which revealed 11 (4.5%) patients had metastatic disease-six primary lung cancer, one metastatic lesion (mets) to the lung, one renal cell carcinoma with mets in the lung, one primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mets in the liver, one unknown primary with mets in the liver, and one other poorly differential metastatic carcinoma with lesions in the pancreas, adrenal glands, kidneys, and small bowel with unknown primary. CONCLUSION CTA evaluation in patient with aortic pathology may reveal a high rate of malignant lesions. Attention to the incidental finding of suspicious lesion on computed tomographic scans in the chest and abdomen and appropriate follow-up by the requesting surgeon is important in patients undergoing surveillance for aortic pathologies.

Risk factors associated with bladder and urethral injuries in female children with pelvic fractures: An analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND Bladder and/or urethral injuries (BUIs) secondary to pelvic fractures are rare in children and are associated with a high morbidity. These injuries are much less likely to occur in females and are often missed in the emergency department. To help clinicians detect these injuries in female children, larger studies are needed to identify risk factors specific to this patient population. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with BUI in female children with a pelvic fracture. METHODS We reviewed the National Trauma Data Bank for females younger than 16 years who sustained a pelvic fracture from 2010 to 2012. Patients with penetrating injuries were excluded. Variables including patient characteristics, mechanism of injury, and type of pelvic fracture were selected for bivariate analysis. Variables with an association of p < 0.05 were then tested using binary logistic regression. RESULTS Of the 149,091 females younger than 16 years in the National Trauma Data Bank, 2,639 patients (2%) with pelvic fractures were identified. The median patient age was 12 years (interquartile range [IQR], 7–14 years). BUI was identified in 81 patients (3%). Patients with BUI had a significantly higher median Injury Severity Score (ISS) (25 [IQR, 17–34] vs. 13 [IQR, 6–22], p < 0.001). Four variables were found to be independently associated with BUI in the logistic regression model: vaginal laceration (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 9.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4–18.7), disruption of the pelvic circle (adjusted OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6–5.6), multiple pelvic fractures (adjusted OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3–3.9), and sacral spine injury (adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0–2.6). In total, 62 patients (77%; 95% CI, 67–86%) with BUI had at least one of these findings. CONCLUSION Female children who sustained a pelvic fracture and have a vaginal laceration, disruption of the pelvic circle, multiple pelvic fractures, or a sacral spine injury seem to be at highest risk for BUI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

Endovascular management of aortic arch vessel occlusion: successful revascularization of innominate and left subclavian arteries.

A 56-year-old female presented with pain in her bilateral upper extremities. Angiogram demonstrated occlusion of her left subclavian and innominate arteries (IAs). The patient’s left subclavian occlusion was successfully treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stenting. One month later, endovascular revascularization of the IA was performed. Initially the lesion could not be directly transversed from neither an antegrade nor a retrograde approach. Wires were passed from the brachial and femoral arteries into the right common carotid artery where the femoral wire was snared and brought out through the right brachial access. Over this through-and-through wire access, angioplasty and stenting of the IA was performed with an excellent angiographic result. In follow-up, the patient remained free of upper extremity symptoms. Occlusive lesions of the aortic arch vessels can be successfully managed with antegrade and retrograde endovascular techniques.

The effect of recent chemotherapy in aorto-iliac aneurysm repair.

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of recent chemotherapy (Chx) on outcome of aorto-iliac aneurysm (AAA) repair. The 2005–2010 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried to identify vascular patients undergoing AAA repair within 30 days after Chx. Seventy-one patients underwent AAA repair within 30 days of receiving Chx, group A (71 ± 8.4 years, 77.5% males) and 20,024 patients underwent AAA repair without prior Chx, group B (73 ± 9 years, 79.2% males). The two groups did not significantly differ with respect to open or endovascular repair (open repair A: 32%, B: 35%, P = 0.66). However, patients in group A presented more often as emergent cases (A: 27%, B: 12%, P = 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis for emergent cases after adjustment for relevant confounders also demonstrated that patients with recent Chx present more often as emergency (P = 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 2.4). Thirty-day non-surgical complications were more common in group A (A: 25%, B: 16.5%, P = 0.046) while surgical complications were equivalent (A: 15.5%, B: 12.3%, P = 0.414). Risk of death was significantly higher in group A in univariate analysis (A: 13%, B: 5%, P = 0.005, OR: 2.6). Patients who receive Chx within 30 days prior to AAA repair present more frequently as emergencies leading to higher mortality. The reason for this cannot be sufficiently explained by the current database but patient selection for elective repair or the effect of Chx on the natural course of AAA may play a role.

WOUNDED BUT NOT BROKEN: OUTCOMES OF CARDIAC CONTUSION IN PATIENTS WITH A PRE-EXISTING HEART FAILURE

Heart failure is known to be a common co-morbidity that worsens mortality outcomes in both medical and non-medical admissions. We sought to describe the effects of a direct impact to the heart - such as a cardiac contusion injury on the failing heart. We identified all patients with the ICD-9 codes