Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Anastassis Perrakis is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Anastassis Perrakis.


Nature Structural & Molecular Biology | 1999

Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement.

Anastassis Perrakis; Richard J. Morris; Victor S. Lamzin

In protein crystallography, much time and effort are often required to trace an initial model from an interpretable electron density map and to refine it until it best agrees with the crystallographic data. Here, we present a method to build and refine a protein model automatically and without user intervention, starting from diffraction data extending to resolution higher than 2.3 Å and reasonable estimates of crystallographic phases. The method is based on an iterative procedure that describes the electron density map as a set of unconnected atoms and then searches for protein-like patterns. Automatic pattern recognition (model building) combined with refinement, allows a structural model to be obtained reliably within a few CPU hours. We demonstrate the power of the method with examples of a few recently solved structures.


Nature | 2000

The Crystal Structure of DNA Mismatch Repair Protein Muts Binding to a G X T Mismatch

Meindert H. Lamers; Anastassis Perrakis; Jacqueline H. Enzlin; Herrie H. K. Winterwerp; Niels de Wind; Titia K. Sixma

DNA mismatch repair ensures genomic integrity on DNA replication. Recognition of a DNA mismatch by a dimeric MutS protein initiates a cascade of reactions and results in repair of the newly synthesized strand; however, details of the molecular mechanism remain controversial. Here we present the crystal structure at 2.2 Å of MutS from Escherichia coli bound to a G·T mismatch. The two MutS monomers have different conformations and form a heterodimer at the structural level. Only one monomer recognizes the mismatch specifically and has ADP bound. Mismatch recognition occurs by extensive minor groove interactions causing unusual base pairing and kinking of the DNA. Nonspecific major groove DNA-binding domains from both monomers embrace the DNA in a clamp-like structure. The interleaved nucleotide-binding sites are located far from the DNA. Mutations in human MutSα (MSH2/MSH6) that lead to hereditary predisposition for cancer, such as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, can be mapped to this crystal structure.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2004

Developments in the CCP4 molecular-graphics project

Liz Potterton; Stuart McNicholas; Eugene Krissinel; Jan Gruber; Kevin Cowtan; Paul Emsley; Garib N. Murshudov; Serge X. Cohen; Anastassis Perrakis; Martin Noble

Progress towards structure determination that is both high-throughput and high-value is dependent on the development of integrated and automatic tools for electron-density map interpretation and for the analysis of the resulting atomic models. Advances in map-interpretation algorithms are extending the resolution regime in which fully automatic tools can work reliably, but at present human intervention is required to interpret poor regions of macromolecular electron density, particularly where crystallographic data is only available to modest resolution [for example, I/sigma(I) < 2.0 for minimum resolution 2.5 A]. In such cases, a set of manual and semi-manual model-building molecular-graphics tools is needed. At the same time, converting the knowledge encapsulated in a molecular structure into understanding is dependent upon visualization tools, which must be able to communicate that understanding to others by means of both static and dynamic representations. CCP4 mg is a program designed to meet these needs in a way that is closely integrated with the ongoing development of CCP4 as a program suite suitable for both low- and high-intervention computational structural biology. As well as providing a carefully designed user interface to advanced algorithms of model building and analysis, CCP4 mg is intended to present a graphical toolkit to developers of novel algorithms in these fields.


Methods in Enzymology | 2003

ARP⧸wARP and Automatic Interpretation of Protein Electron Density Maps

Richard J. Morris; Anastassis Perrakis; Victor S. Lamzin

Publisher Summary This chapter presents phase improvement, coupled with automated map interpretation and model building, as one unified process within the framework of the automated refinement procedure (ARP/wARP) software suite. ARP/wARP is an experimental hypothesis-generating and testing procedure for placing atoms in the most likely places (according to density) and using graph-searching combined with geometric comparisons against expected stereochemical parameters to determine the most likely mainchain fragments. ARP/wARP is a software suite (copyrighted by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory) based on the paradigm of viewing model building and refinement as one unified procedure for optimizing phase estimates. The current version ARP/wARP 6.0, released in July 2002, works with density recognition-driven procedures for placing and removing atoms and therefore is limited to diffraction data extending to about 2.5 A. The iterative cycles of density modeling by the placement of atoms, unrestrained refinement of their parameters, automated model building, and restrained refinement of the hybrid model provide a powerful means of phase refinement.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2001

ARP/wARP and molecular replacement

Anastassis Perrakis; Maria Harkiolaki; Keith S. Wilson; Victor S. Lamzin

The aim of ARP/wARP is improved automation of model building and refinement in macromolecular crystallography. Once a molecular-replacement solution has been obtained, it is often tedious to refine and rebuild the initial (search) model. ARP/wARP offers three options to automate that task to varying extents: (i) autobuilding of a completely new model based on phases calculated from the molecular-replacement solution, (ii) updating of the initial model by atom addition and deletion to obtain an improved map and (iii) docking of a structure onto a new (or mutated) sequence, followed by rebuilding and refining the side chains in real space. A few examples are presented where ARP/wARP made a considerable difference in the speed of structure solution and/or made possible refinement of otherwise difficult or uninterpretable maps. The resolution range allowing complete autobuilding of protein structures is currently 2.0 A, but for map improvement considerable advances over more conventional refinement techniques are evident even at 3.2 A spacing.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 1997

wARP: Improvement and Extension of Crystallographic Phases by Weighted Averaging of Multiple-Refined Dummy Atomic Models

Anastassis Perrakis; Titia K. Sixma; Keith S. Wilson; Victor S. Lamzin

wARP is a procedure that substantially improves crystallographic phases (and subsequently electron-density maps) as an additional step after density-modification methods such as solvent flattening and averaging. The initial phase set is used to create a number of dummy atom models which are subjected to least-squares or maximum-likelihood refinement and iterative model updating in an automated refinement procedure (ARP). Averaging of the phase sets calculated from the refined output models and weighting of structure factors by their similarity to an average vector results in a phase set that improves and extends the initial phases substantially. An important requirement is that the native data have a maximum resolution beyond approximately 2.4 A. The wARP procedure shortens the time-consuming step of model building in crystallographic structure determination and helps to prevent the introduction of errors.


The EMBO Journal | 2006

Structure and E3‐ligase activity of the Ring–Ring complex of Polycomb proteins Bmi1 and Ring1b

Gretel Buchwald; Petra van der Stoop; Oliver Weichenrieder; Anastassis Perrakis; Maarten van Lohuizen; Titia K. Sixma

Polycomb group proteins Ring1b and Bmi1 (B‐cell‐specific Moloney murine leukaemia virus integration site 1) are critical components of the chromatin modulating PRC1 complex. Histone H2A ubiquitination by the PRC1 complex strongly depends on the Ring1b protein. Here we show that the E3‐ligase activity of Ring1b on histone H2A is enhanced by Bmi1 in vitro. The N‐terminal Ring‐domains are sufficient for this activity and Ring1a can replace Ring1b. E2 enzymes UbcH5a, b, c or UbcH6 support this activity with varying processivity and selectivity. All four E2s promote autoubiquitination of Ring1b without affecting E3‐ligase activity. We solved the crystal structure of the Ring–Ring heterodimeric complex of Ring1b and Bmi1. In the structure the arrangement of the Ring‐domains is similar to another H2A E3 ligase, the BRCA1/BARD1 complex, but complex formation depends on an N‐terminal arm of Ring1b that embraces the Bmi1 Ring‐domain. Mutation of a critical residue in the E2/E3 interface shows that catalytic activity resides in Ring1b and not in Bmi1. These data provide a foundation for understanding the critical enzymatic activity at the core of the PRC1 polycomb complex, which is implicated in stem cell maintenance and cancer.


Nature Structural & Molecular Biology | 1996

Bacterial chitobiase structure provides insight into catalytic mechanism and the basis of Tay-Sachs disease

Ivo Tews; Anastassis Perrakis; Amos B. Oppenheim; Zbigniew Dauter; Keith S. Wilson; Constantin E. Vorgias

Chitin, the second most abundant polysaccharide on earth, is degraded by chitinases and chitobiases. The structure of Serratia marcescens chitobiase has been refined at 1.9 Å resolution. The mature protein is folded into four domains and its active site is situated at the C-terminal end of the central (βα)8-barrel. Based on the structure of the complex with the substrate disaccharide chitobiose, we propose an acid-base reaction mechanism, in which only one protein carboxylate acts as catalytic acid, while the nucleophile is the polar acetamido group of the sugar in a substrate-assisted reaction. The structural data lead to the hypothesis that the reaction proceeds with retention of anomeric configuration. The structure allows us to model the catalytic domain of the homologous hexosaminidases to give a structural rationale to pathogenic mutations that underlie Tay–Sachs and Sandhoff disease.


Nature | 1998

Structure of a cephalosporin synthase

Karin Valegård; Anke C. Terwisscha van Scheltinga; Matthew D. Lloyd; Takane Hara; S. Ramaswamy; Anastassis Perrakis; A. Thompson; Hwei-Jen Lee; Jack E. Baldwin; Christopher J. Schofield; Janos Hajdu; Inger Andersson

Penicillins and cephalosporins are among the most widely used therapeutic agents. These antibiotics are produced from fermentation-derived materials as their chemical synthesis is not commercially viable. Unconventional steps in their biosynthesis are catalysed by Fe(II)-dependent oxidases/oxygenases; isopenicillin N synthase (IPNS), creates in one step the bicyclic nucleus of penicillins, and deacetoxycephalosporin C synthase (DAOCS) catalyses the expansion of the penicillin nucleus into the nucleus of cephalosporins. Both enzymes use dioxygen-derived ferryl intermediates in catalysis but, in contrast to IPNS, the ferryl form of DAOCS is produced by the oxidative splitting of a co-substrate, 2-oxoglutarate (α-ketoglutarate). This route of controlled ferryl formation and reaction is common to many mononuclear ferrous enzymes, which participate in a broader range of reactions than their well-characterized counterparts, the haem enzymes. Here we report the first crystal structure of a 2-oxoacid-dependent oxygenase. High-resolution structures for apo-DAOCS, the enzyme complexed with Fe(II), and with Fe(II) and 2-oxoglutarate, were obtained from merohedrally twinned crystals. Using a model based on these structures, we propose a mechanism for ferryl formation.


Structure | 2011

A New Generation of Crystallographic Validation Tools for the Protein Data Bank

Randy J. Read; Paul D. Adams; W. Bryan Arendall; Axel T. Brunger; Paul Emsley; Robbie P. Joosten; Gerard J. Kleywegt; Eugene Krissinel; Thomas Lütteke; Zbyszek Otwinowski; Anastassis Perrakis; Jane S. Richardson; William Sheffler; Janet L. Smith; Ian J. Tickle; Gert Vriend; Peter H. Zwart

Summary This report presents the conclusions of the X-ray Validation Task Force of the worldwide Protein Data Bank (PDB). The PDB has expanded massively since current criteria for validation of deposited structures were adopted, allowing a much more sophisticated understanding of all the components of macromolecular crystals. The size of the PDB creates new opportunities to validate structures by comparison with the existing database, and the now-mandatory deposition of structure factors creates new opportunities to validate the underlying diffraction data. These developments highlighted the need for a new assessment of validation criteria. The Task Force recommends that a small set of validation data be presented in an easily understood format, relative to both the full PDB and the applicable resolution class, with greater detail available to interested users. Most importantly, we recommend that referees and editors judging the quality of structural experiments have access to a concise summary of well-established quality indicators.

Collaboration


Dive into the Anastassis Perrakis's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Victor S. Lamzin

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Titia K. Sixma

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robbie P. Joosten

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wouter H. Moolenaar

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Serge X. Cohen

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander Fish

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tatjana Heidebrecht

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jens Hausmann

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge