Anchalee Avihingsanon

A randomized trial of combination hepatitis B therapy in HIV/HBV coinfected antiretroviral naïve individuals in Thailand

Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is associated with considerable liver disease morbidity and mortality. Emerging HIV epidemics in areas of high HBV endemicity such as Asia are expanding the population with HIV/HBV coinfection. Limited randomized trial data exist to support current guidelines for HBV combination therapy in HIV/HBV coinfection. The objective of this prospective randomized clinical trial was to compare the strategy of HBV monotherapy with lamivudine (LAM) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus HBV combination therapy with LAM/TDF in antiretroviral‐naïve HIV/HBV‐coinfected subjects in Thailand. Thirty‐six HIV/HBV‐coinfected subjects initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were randomized to either LAM (arm 1), TDF (arm 2), or LAM/TDF (arm 3) as HBV‐active drugs within HAART. At week 48, time‐weighted area under the curve analysis revealed that the median HBV DNA reduction from baseline was 4.07 log10 c/mL in arm 1, 4.57 log10 c/mL in arm 2, and 4.73 log10 c/mL in arm 3 (P = 0.70). HBV DNA suppressed to <3 log10 c/mL in 46% in arm 1, 92% in arm 2, and 91% in arm 3 (P = 0.013, intent‐to‐treat analysis). HBV‐resistant changes were detected in two subjects, both in arm 1. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss was observed in 33% of HBeAg‐positive subjects, and 8% experienced hepatitis B surface antigen loss. Hepatic flare was observed in 25% of subjects. Conclusion: LAM monotherapy resulted in a greater proportion of subjects with HBV DNA >3 log10 c/mL at week 48 and in early resistance development. This study confirms current treatment guidelines that recommend a TDF‐based regimen as the treatment of choice for HIV/HBV coinfection, but does not demonstrate any advantage of HBV combination therapy in this short‐term setting. (HEPATOLOGY 2008.)

Gemini: a noninferiority study of saquinavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir as initial HIV-1 therapy in adults.

Introduction:Direct comparison of the efficacy and safety of different agents is needed to guide selection of optimal treatment regimens for therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Methods:Gemini was a 48-week, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults randomized to either saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r) 1000 mg/100 mg twice a day or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 400 mg/100 mg twice a day, each with emtricitabine/tenofovir 200 mg/300 mg every day. Results:A similar proportion of participants in the SQV/r (n = 167) and LPV/r (n = 170) arms had HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies per milliliter at week 48: 64.7% vs 63.5% and estimated difference in proportion for noninferiority: 1.14%, 96% confidence interval: −9.6 to11.9 (P < 0.012), confirming that SQV/r was noninferior to LPV/r treatment. There were no significant differences in week 48 CD4 counts between arms. The rate and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in the median change from baseline between arms in plasma lipids except for triglyceride levels, which were significantly higher in the LPV/r at week 48. Conclusions:In treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients, SQV/r treatment was noninferior in virologic suppression at 48 weeks to LPV/r treatment and offered a better triglyceride profile.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Related Lipoatrophy and Lipohypertrophy Are Associated with Serum Concentrations of Leptin

The relationship between the adipocyte-derived hormone leptin, insulin resistance, and fat redistribution in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has not been established. We classified a cohort of HIV type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients with >or=6 months of antiretroviral exposure as having no lipodystrophy (51 patients [43% of the cohort]), lipoatrophy (23 patients [19% of the cohort]), mixed lipodystrophy (29 patients [24% of the cohort]), or lipohypertrophy (17 patients [14% of the cohort]), on the basis of physical examination, anthropometric measurements, and the findings of dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography. Measurements of insulin resistance were higher for patients with each category of lipodystrophy, compared with those observed for patients with no lipodystrophy (P<.001). Mean leptin levels (+/- standard deviation) were lowest in patients with lipoatrophy (1.76+/-1.20 ng/mL), highest in patients with lipohypertrophy (9.10+/-6.86 ng/mL), and significantly different from those in patients without lipodystrophy (3.14+/-2.30 ng/mL; both P<.01). In this cohort of antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients, a low serum level of leptin was independently associated with insulin resistance in patients with lipoatrophy, after controlling for total and regional body fat.

Immunopathogenesis of hepatic flare in HIV/hepatitis b virus (Hbv)-coinfected individuals after the initiation of Hbv-active antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND The pathogenesis of and risk factors for hepatic flare (HF) after the initiation of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-active antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV/HBV-coinfected individuals is not well understood. METHODS We studied HF in ART-naive HIV/HBV-coinfected individuals in Thailand (n = 36) who were beginning HBV-active ART as part of a prospective clinical trial. HF was defined as an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level>5 times the upper limit of normal or >200 IU/L higher than that at baseline. Immune mediators (interleukin [IL]-18, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, soluble CD26 [sCD26], sCD30, sCD8, CXCL-10, CCL-2, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon [IFN]-gamma, and IFN-alpha) and activated NK cells were quantified. RESULTS HBV DNA and ALT levels at baseline were higher in patients with HF (n=8) than in patients without HF (n=28) (P=.01). After the initiation of ART, CXCL-10 levels remained elevated in patients with HF but decreased in patients without HF (P<.01). sCD30 levels increased and were significantly higher at week 8 in patients with HF (P<.05). There was a positive correlation between levels of ALT and levels of CXCL-10, sCD30, CCL-2, and IL-18 at week 8 (the time of peak ALT level) but not at other time points. CONCLUSION Elevated HBV DNA and ALT levels before the initiation of HBV-active ART are risk factors for HF. The pathogenesis of HF after the initiation of HBV-active ART is probably consistent with immune restoration disease.

Efavirenz versus Boosted Atazanavir or Zidovudine and Abacavir in Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive, HIV-Infected Subjects: Week 48 Data from the Altair Study

BACKGROUND Antiretroviral therapy is complicated by drug interactions and contraindications. Novel regimens are needed. METHODS This open label study randomly assigned treatment-naive, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects to receive tenofovir-emtricitabine with efavirenz (Arm I), with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (Arm II), or with zidovudine/abacavir (Arm III). Pair-wise comparisons of differences in time-weighted mean change from baseline plasma HIV-RNA to week 48 formed the primary analysis. Treatment arms were noninferior if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was <0.5 log(10) copies/mL. Secondary objectives included virologic, immunologic and safety end points. RESULTS The intention-to-treat population comprised 322 patients (Arm I, n = 114; Arm II, n = 105; and Arm III, n = 103). Noninferiority for the primary end point was established. Analysis for superiority showed that Arm III was significantly less potent than Arm I (-0.20 log(10) copies/mL; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.01 log(10) copies/mL; P = .038). The proportions of patients on each of Arm I (95%) and Arm II (96%) with <200 copies/mL were not different (P = .75), but the percentage of patients in Arm III with <200 copies/mL (82%) was significantly lower (P = .005). CD4+ cell counts did not differ. Serious adverse events were more frequent in Arm III (n = 30) than in Arm I or Arm II (n = 15 for each; P = .062). CONCLUSIONS A novel quadruple nucleo(t)side combination demonstrated significantly less suppression of HIV replication, compared with the suppression demonstrated by standard antiretroviral therapy regimens, although it did meet the predetermined formal definition of noninferiority. Secondary analyses indicated statistically inferior virologic and safety performance. Efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir arms were equivalent in viral suppression and safety.

Patterns and Causes of Suboptimal Response to Tenofovir-Based Therapy in Individuals Coinfected With HIV and Hepatitis B Virus

BACKGROUND Tenofovir (TDF) is effective for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection; however, some individuals have ongoing HBV viremia, the reasons for which are unclear. We determined the patterns and factors associated with detectable HBV DNA in HIV-HBV-coinfected subjects on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS One hundred sixty-five HIV-HBV-coinfected individuals from the United States, Australia, and Thailand, the majority of whom were on HAART at study entry, were prospectively followed semiannually for a median of 2.8 years. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with detectable HBV DNA. RESULTS Anti-HBV regimens were TDF/emtricitabine (57%), lamivudine or emtricitabine (19%), or TDF monotherapy (13%). During follow-up, HBV DNA was detected at 21% of study visits and was independently associated with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HAART <2 years, CD4 <200 cells/mm(3), detectable HIV RNA, reporting <95% adherence, and anti-HBV regimen. TDF/emtricitabine was less likely to be associated with detectable HBV than other regimens, including TDF monotherapy (odds ratio, 2.79; P = .02). In subjects on optimal anti-HBV therapy (TDF/emtricitabine) and with undetectable HIV RNA, HBeAg, CD4 <200 mm(3), and reporting <95% adherence remained associated with detectable HBV DNA. Three main patterns of HBV viremia were observed: persistent HBV viremia, viral rebound (>1 log from nadir), and viral blips. No TDF resistance was identified. CONCLUSIONS Tenofovir/emtricitabine was superior to other anti-HBV regimens in long-term HBV suppression. HBV viremia on therapy was identified in 1 of 3 main patterns. Suboptimal adherence was associated with detectable HBV DNA during therapy, even when HIV was undetectable.

Immunologic Markers as Predictors of Tuberculosis-Associated Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in HIV and Tuberculosis Coinfected Persons in Thailand

This study analyzes immunologic markers to predict and diagnose tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) in HIV and TB coinfected adults who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Thailand. T helper 1 cytokines interleukin (IL)-2, IL-12, and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) levels in response to PPD and RD1 antigens were assessed prior to ART, at weeks 6, 12, and 24 of treatment, and at time of TB-IRIS. Of 126 subjects, 22 (17.5%) developed TB-IRIS; 14 (64%) subjects received steroid treatment and 3 (14%) received NSAIDs; none of the subjects died. Median interval between ART initiation and TB-IRIS development was 14 days. IFN-gamma, IL-2, and IL-12 responses did not differ between TB-IRIS and no TB-IRIS subjects (p > 0.05). More research into the immunopathogenesis of TB-IRIS and diagnostic potential of cytokine markers is warranted.

Treatment of HIV infection with once-daily regimens

Introduction: Treatment for HIV infection requires a lifetime antiretroviral therapy. In order to improve adherence, once daily (OD) is thus a preferred regimen. Areas covered: Evidence-based information and most recent guidelines recommendation, both from resource-rich and resource-limited settings, on antiretroviral regimens that can be administered OD will be reviewed. Sources of evidences were from the late clinical development studies (Phase III and II) published in Medline or major international conferences. Expert opinion: Nine OD US FDA-approved regimens and one new integrase inhibitor OD regimen have been shown to be efficient and well tolerated. For the fixed-dose single-tablet regimens (STRs), there are two currently approved regimens: Atripla® and Complera®. Another STR elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir (QUAD, Stribild®) is recently approved by the US FDA (August 20, 2012), whereas two additional SRTs, including abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir and darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/GS-7340 are undergoing Phase III and II trials, respectively. Three OD regimens are currently recommended by the US DHHS guidelines as the preferred regimens for treatment-naïve patients (efavirenz, boosted atazanavir and boosted darunavir). EFV-based regimen is the only OD regimen available for resource-limited countries. Nevertheless, it should be noted that each of these OD regimens has its own advantages and disadvantages and therefore should be selected accordingly.

A low dose of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir provides adequate pharmacokinetic parameters in HIV-1-infected Thai adults.

Several dose‐finding studies of boosted protease inhibitors have demonstrated that doses lower than those recommended in Caucasian populations exhibit in the Thai population similar pharmacokinetic (PK) properties with sustained virological suppression but reduced toxicity. We therefore evaluated the PK profiles of lower than the standard doses of atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) in 22 adult Thai patients with well‐suppressed human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV‐1) infection. The PK parameters of ATV/RTV at a dosage of 200/100 mg once daily, plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, were significantly lower than those associated with a dosage of 300/100 mg once daily in the same patients. In addition, the PK parameters for the lower dosage in these Thai patients were comparable to historical data from Caucasian cohorts who received the standard dose of ATV/RTV (300/100 mg). None of the patients showed subtherapeutic values of <0.15 mg/l at any time point. Bilirubin concentration decreased significantly after dose reduction, and viral load remained at <50 copies/ml in all subjects. Therefore, ATV/RTV at a dose of 200/100 mg once daily (plus appropriate backbone medication) warrants further long‐term efficacy studies, particularly in patients of Thai and other Asian ethnicities.

Clinical case definition and manifestations of paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome.

Background:The International Network for the Study of HIV-associated IRIS (INSHI) recently published criteria for tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) diagnosis. The performance of this definition and clinical manifestations of TB-IRIS were studied. Methods:Antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV/TB Thai patients receiving antituberculous therapy were enrolled during 2006–2007 and prospectively followed through 24 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. Patients were defined as having paradoxical TB-IRIS if they fulfilled the ‘study definition’ by French 2004 and were confirmed by an external reviewer. All were later compared by the classification according to ‘INSHI-2008’. Results:For the 126 patients, median baseline CD4 cell count was 43 cells/μl and HIV-1 RNA was 5.9 log10 Ý copies/ml. Seventy-three (58%) had extrapulmonary/disseminated TB. Twenty-two (18%) and 21 (17%) fulfilled TB-IRIS criteria according to the study definition and INSHI-2008 definition, respectively. Two (2%) were diagnosed by study definition only and one (1%) by INSHI-2008 definition only. Twenty (16%) were concordantly diagnosed by both definitions and 103 (82%) were consistently negative. Eighteen (82%) had worsening of a preexisting site, whereas four (18%) had TB-IRIS in a new location. Lymph node enlargement (73%) and fever (59%) were common in TB-IRIS. Sensitivity and specificity of INSHI-2008 was 91% (95% confidence interval, 72–98%) and 99% (95% confidence interval, 95–99.8%), respectively. Positive predictive value was 95% and negative predictive value was 98%. By multivariate analysis, factors predicting TB-IRIS were extrapulmonary TB (odds ratio, 8.63) and disseminated TB (odds ratio, 4.17). Conclusion:There was high concordance between the INSHI-2008 and French 2004 definition for TB-IRIS diagnosis in HIV/TB patients with relatively high rate of paradoxical TB-IRIS. This suggests that lack of HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell count monitoring does not impede the ability to diagnose TB-IRIS.