Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Anders Gülfe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Anders Gülfe.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2005

Tumour necrosis factor blockers do not increase overall tumour risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but may be associated with an increased risk of lymphomas

Pierre Geborek; Carl Turesson; Anders Gülfe; Ingemar F. Petersson; Tore Saxne; Håkan Olsson; Lennart Jacobsson

Objective: To determine whether TNF blockers increase tumour risk in patients with RA. Material and methods: The South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group register (SSATG) comprises over 90% of anti-TNF treated patients with RA in the area. 757 patients treated with etanercept or infliximab included between 1 February 1999 and 31 December 2002 were identified. 800 patients with conventional antirheumatic treatment in a community based cohort served as a comparison cohort. Tumours and deaths were identified in the cancer registry and population census registers. Patients were followed up from initiation of anti-TNF treatment or 1 July 1997 for the comparison group, until death or 31 December 2002. Results: In the anti-TNF group, 16 tumours (5 lymphomas) were identified in 1603 person-years at risk, and in the comparison group 69 tumours (2 lymphomas) in 3948 person-years. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) for total tumour relative risk for the anti-TNF group and the comparison group were 1.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6 to 1.8) and 1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8), respectively. The lymphoma relative risk (RR) was 11.5 (95% CI 3.7 to 26.9) and 1.3 (95% CI 0.2 to 4.5), respectively The total tumour RR excluding lymphoma was 0.79 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.42) and 1.39 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.76), respectively. Proportional hazard analysis for lymphomas yielded RR 4.9 (95% CI 0.9 to 26.2) in anti-TNF treated versus untreated patients. Conclusion: Community based patients with RA treated conventionally had an increased overall tumour risk compared with the background population. A possible additional increased risk for lymphoma associated with TNF blockers was based on few cases and needs confirmation.


Rheumatology | 2007

Treatment response to a second or third TNF-inhibitor in RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register

Johan A Karlsson; Lars Erik Kristensen; Meliha C Kapetanovic; Anders Gülfe; Tore Saxne; Pierre Geborek

OBJECTIVES To study treatment response rates of RA patients undergoing second- and third-line anti-TNF therapy and to identify baseline predictors of response to second-line treatment. METHODS RA patients monitored in a prospective, observational study, having switched anti-TNF therapy once (first-time switchers, n = 337) or twice (second-time switchers, n = 36)--i.e. following failures with one antibody- and one receptor-type agent--between March 1999 and December 2006, were studied. Treatment responses at 3 months were assessed by the ACR and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Predictive potentials for response to second-line treatment of demographics, baseline disease activity measures, disease and treatment characteristics were analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS ACR20 response was met by 51% of first-time and 35% of second-time switchers. Corresponding ACR50 rates were 27 and 18%; EULAR overall rates (EULAR good or moderate response) 71 and 58%; EULAR good rates 25 and 9% and 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) remission rates 16 and 6%. Identified baseline predictors of response to second-line treatment were lower age and HAQ scores, elevated DAS28 values and having ceased the former anti-TNF treatment due to adverse events rather than inefficacy. No variable was predictive for all examined response criteria. CONCLUSIONS Response rates of first-time anti-TNF switchers are somewhat below those of anti-TNF naïve RA patients, while the markedly inferior response rates of second-time switchers suggest other therapeutic options to be considered in this situation. Identified baseline predictors of response may be useful indicators to second-line anti-TNF therapy, but vary depending on the response criteria set studied.


Rheumatology | 2007

Predictors of response to anti-TNF therapy according to ACR and EULAR criteria in patients with established RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register

Lars Erik Kristensen; Meliha C Kapetanovic; Anders Gülfe; Maria K. Söderlin; Tore Saxne; Pierre Geborek

OBJECTIVE To identify factors predicting response to first TNF blocking treatment course in patients with established RA with a special focus on gender differences. METHODS Patients with active RA initiating their first treatment course of TNF-blocking therapy were enrolled. The study period was March 1999 through September 2006. The prospective protocol included information on demographics, clinical characteristics of patients and response measures. Fulfilment of ACR 50-70% improvement and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response or remission [28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) <2.6] at 3 months were chosen as primary outcome measures. Potential predictors of responses were identified using multivariate binary logistic regression models. RESULTS In total, 1565 patients were included in the study. Gender did not influence treatment response. Consistently, concomitant methotrexate (MTX) was significantly associated with EULAR remission, EULAR good response, ACR50 response and ACR70 response with odds ratios (ORs) 1.97, 2.13, 2.10 and 1.75, respectively. Concurrent treatment with other DMARDs was also significantly associated with EULAR remission, EULAR good response and ACR50 response (OR: 1.96, 2.24 and 1.94, respectively). Likewise, low HAQ at baseline consistently predicted good clinical outcome. Disease activity at baseline was directly associated with favourable response when measured by ACR50 and ACR70 (OR: 1.59 and 1.60, respectively), whereas DAS28 score at baseline was inversely associated with EULAR remission (OR: 0.78). CONCLUSIONS In this observational study of patients with established RA, gender did not predict response to anti-TNF therapy, whereas treatment with concomitant DMARDs, especially MTX and low disability were associated with good response. Choice of outcome measures may influence the predictive value of baseline features.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2007

Efficacy and tolerability of anti-TNF therapy in psoriatic arthritis patients: Results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register

Lars Erik Kristensen; Anders Gülfe; Tore Saxne; Pierre Geborek

Background: The use of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agents in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is increasing, and the SSATG register has followed patients with PsA for more than 5 years. The aim of the present work therefore was to present efficacy and tolerability data of TNF-blocking agents on PsA in clinical practice, and to study potential predictors for drug survival (the length of time a patient continues to take a particular drug). Materials and methods: Patients (n = 261) with active PsA, starting anti-TNF therapy for the first time in southern Sweden, were included. Basal characteristics, disease activity measures, and termination reason for blockers were prospectively collected during the period April 1999 to September 2006. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate predictors for treatment termination. Results: Overall, response rates at 3–12 months for global visual analogue scale (VASglobal50) and pain VAS (VASpain50) were about 50%, whereas response rates for European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) scoring “overall” and EULAR “good” were around 75% and 55%, respectively. Concomitant methotrexate (MTX) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% CI 0.39–0.95, p = 0.03), etanercept (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28–0.86, p = 0.01), and high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61–0.97, p = 0.03) at treatment initiation were associated with better overall drug survival. The improved drug survival of concomitant MTX appeared to be related to significantly fewer dropouts because of adverse events (HR =  0.24 (0.11–0.52), p<0.01). The blockers were well tolerated with a rate of serious adverse events of 5–6% per year. No unexpected serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Concomitant MTX and high CRP levels are associated with treatment continuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with PsA regardless of joint distribution. The positive effect of MTX was primarily linked to fewer dropouts because of adverse events.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2010

Rapid and sustained health utility gain in anti-TNF treated inflammatory arthritis. Observational data during seven years in southern Sweden.

Anders Gülfe; Lars Erik Kristensen; Tore Saxne; Lennart Jacobsson; Ingemar F. Petersson; Pierre Geborek

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and other spondylarthritides impose a great impact on the individual in addition to the costs on society, which may be reduced by effective pharmacological treatment. Industry-independent health economic studies should complement studies sponsored by industry. Objective: To study secular trends in baseline health utilities in patients commencing tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockade for arthritis in clinical practice over 7 years; to address utility changes during treatment; to investigate the influence of previous treatment courses; to study the feasibility of health utility measures and to compare them across diagnostic entities. Methods: EuroQoL 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) utility data were collected from a structured clinical follow-up programme of anti-TNF-treated patients with RA (N  =  2554), PsA (N  =  574) or spondylarthritides (N  =  586). Time trends were calculated. Completer analysis was used. Results: There were weak or non-significant secular trends for increasing baseline utilities over time for RA, PsA and spondylarthritides. The maximum gain in utilities had already occurred after 2 weeks for all diagnoses and remained stable for patients remaining on therapy. The first and second anti-TNF courses performed similarly. Conclusions: Utilities at inclusion remained largely unchanged for RA, PsA and spondylarthritides over 7 years. Improvement occurred early during treatment and not beyond 6 weeks at the group level. Improvement during the first course was not consistently greater than the second. There were no major differences between RA, PsA and spondylarthritides. EQ-5D proved feasible and applicable across these diagnoses. These “real world” data may be useful for health economic modelling.


BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | 2009

Disease activity level, remission and response in established rheumatoid arthritis: Performance of various criteria sets in an observational cohort, treated with anti-TNF agents

Anders Gülfe; Daniel Aletaha; Tore Saxne; Pierre Geborek

BackgroundMost composite indices of disease activity and response criteria in RA have been validated and compared in clinical trials rather than routine care. We therefore wanted to compare the performance of the DAS28, SDAI and CDAI activity indices, their activity states, their response criteria, and also compare with the ACR response criteria in an observational clinical setting.MethodsAgreement between the criteria sets was investigated using κ statistics in a non-randomized cohort of 1789 RA patients from southern Sweden, starting their first course of anti-TNF-treatment. Mean disease duration was 12 years. Completer analysis was used.ResultsAgreement between high, moderate and low activity states was moderate or substantial, with κ = 0.5 or better for all criteria. Agreement between SDAI and CDAI disease states was > 90% in these categories with κ > 0.8. DAS28 original and modified cut point remission had good agreement (κ = 0.91). Agreement between responses was substantial at the overall/ACR20 level (about 95%, κ = 0.7 or better) for all criteria. By contrast, agreement was poor between moderate and high level responses.ConclusionDisease activity states according to the various indices perform similarly and show substantial agreement at all levels except remission. Agreement between SDAI and CDAI states is excellent. Response criteria, applied at the individual patient level, are hard to interpret and show poor agreement, except at the lowest level of response. Thus, they should not be applied uncritically in clinical practice.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2011

National EQ-5D tariffs and quality-adjusted life-year estimation: comparison of UK, US and Danish utilities in south Swedish rheumatoid arthritis patients

Johan A Karlsson; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Martin Neovius; L.E. Kristensen; Anders Gülfe; Tore Saxne; Pierre Geborek

Objective To study how the choice of national EQ-5D tariff may affect utility and incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimates. Methods South Swedish rheumatoid arthritis patients in an observational study, starting and continuing anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) monotherapy (n=54) or anti-TNF plus methotrexate (n=215) for 1 year during May 2002 to April 2009, were included. EQ-5D questionnaires were completed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Utilities and accumulated QALY were compared using the UK, US and Danish EQ-5D tariffs. Utilities for all 243 possible EQ-5D health states were also compared. Results US utilities were generally higher than UK, with Danish falling in between. A substantial 1-year mean utility improvement was seen in both study groups using all tariffs (UK 0.28 vs 0.29; US 0.18 vs 0.19; Danish 0.20 vs 0.22). Adjusting for baseline differences between groups, the incremental QALY gain of combined treatment was 0.09 using the UK tariff, while 0.06 according to both US and Danish tariffs. Inter-tariff disagreement in utility and accumulated QALY varied irregularly across the range of utilities. Conclusions Applying different national EQ-5D tariffs to the same data may result in substantially different incremental QALY estimates, crucial knowledge when interpreting cost-utility analyses. Studies using different tariffs cannot be directly compared.


Acta Orthopaedica | 2013

Continuation of TNF blockade in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease. An observational study on surgical site infections in 1,596 elective orthopedic and hand surgery procedures

Elisabet Berthold; Pierre Geborek; Anders Gülfe

Background Increased infection risk in inflammatory rheumatic diseases may be due to inflammation or immunosuppressive treatment. The influence of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors on the risk of developing surgical site infections (SSIs) is not fully known. We compared the incidence of SSI after elective orthopedic surgery or hand surgery in patients with a rheumatic disease when TNF inhibitors were continued or discontinued perioperatively. Patients and methods We included 1,551 patients admitted for elective orthopedic surgery or hand surgery between January 1, 2003 and September 30, 2009. Patient demographic data, previous and current treatment, and factors related to disease severity were collected. Surgical procedures were grouped as hand surgery, foot surgery, implant-related surgery, and other surgery. Infections were recorded and defined according to the 1992 Centers for Disease Control definitions for SSI. In 2003–2005, TNF inhibitors were discontinued perioperatively (group A) but not during 2006–2009 (group B). Results In group A, there were 28 cases of infection in 870 procedures (3.2%) and in group B, there were 35 infections in 681 procedures (5.1%) (p = < 0.05). Only foot surgery had significantly more SSIs in group B, with very low rates in group A. In multivariable analysis with groups A and B merged, only age was predictive of SSI in a statistically significant manner. Interpretation Overall, the SSI rates were higher after abolishing the discontinuation of anti-TNF perioperatively, possibly due to unusually low rates in the comparator group. None of the medical treatments analyzed, e.g. methotrexate or TNF inhibitors, were significant risk factors for SSI. Continuation of TNF blockade perioperatively remains a routine at our center.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2009

Rapid and sustained health utility gain in anti-TNF treated inflammatory arthritis. Observational data during five years in southern Sweden.

Anders Gülfe; Lars Erik Kristensen; Tore Saxne; Lennart Jacobsson; Ingemar F. Petersson; Pierre Geborek

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and other spondylarthritides impose a great impact on the individual in addition to the costs on society, which may be reduced by effective pharmacological treatment. Industry-independent health economic studies should complement studies sponsored by industry. Objective: To study secular trends in baseline health utilities in patients commencing tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockade for arthritis in clinical practice over 7 years; to address utility changes during treatment; to investigate the influence of previous treatment courses; to study the feasibility of health utility measures and to compare them across diagnostic entities. Methods: EuroQoL 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) utility data were collected from a structured clinical follow-up programme of anti-TNF-treated patients with RA (N  =  2554), PsA (N  =  574) or spondylarthritides (N  =  586). Time trends were calculated. Completer analysis was used. Results: There were weak or non-significant secular trends for increasing baseline utilities over time for RA, PsA and spondylarthritides. The maximum gain in utilities had already occurred after 2 weeks for all diagnoses and remained stable for patients remaining on therapy. The first and second anti-TNF courses performed similarly. Conclusions: Utilities at inclusion remained largely unchanged for RA, PsA and spondylarthritides over 7 years. Improvement occurred early during treatment and not beyond 6 weeks at the group level. Improvement during the first course was not consistently greater than the second. There were no major differences between RA, PsA and spondylarthritides. EQ-5D proved feasible and applicable across these diagnoses. These “real world” data may be useful for health economic modelling.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2001

Release of cartilage and bone macromolecules into synovial fluid: differences between psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Bengt Månsson; Anders Gülfe; Pierre Geborek; Dick Heinegård; Tore Saxne

OBJECTIVE To elucidate whether differences in the destructive tissue process in cartilage and bone in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be recognised by different release patterns of molecular fragments derived from joint tissue. METHODS Aggrecan, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), and bone sialoprotein (BSP) were quantified by immunoassays in knee joint synovial fluid samples. These were obtained early in the disease course of patients with PsA and RA. At the time of arthrocentesis radiographs of their knee and hip joints were normal. RESULTS At follow up no destruction had developed in the knees and hips of most patients with PsA (n=18), whereas the patients with RA could be separated into one “destructive” group (n=18) and one “non-destructive” group (n=25). Patients with PsA had low synovial fluid aggrecan concentrations (p<0.001 v the RA destructive group) but high COMP concentrations (p<0.01 and p<0.05v destructive and non-destructive RA groups, respectively). Consequently, the aggrecan/COMP ratio was lowest in the PsA group (p<0.001 and p<0.01 v the destructive and non-destructive RA group, respectively). The synovial fluid concentrations of BSP did not differ between the three patient groups. CONCLUSIONS The release pattern of aggrecan and COMP, reflecting cartilage turnover, differed between the PsA group and, particularly, the destructive RA group. This suggests that different pathophysiological mechanisms for cartilage involvement operate in these conditions, with different destructive potential. The BSP concentrations did not differ between the patients groups, which indicates similar levels of bone involvement.

Collaboration


Dive into the Anders Gülfe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lars Erik Kristensen

Copenhagen University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge