Anders Nissen Bonde

Net clinical benefit of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: a nationwide observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND The balance between stroke reduction and increased bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is controversial. OBJECTIVES This study assessed the risk associated with CKD in individual CHA₂DS₂-VASc (Congestive heart failure; Hypertension; Age ≥75 years; Diabetes mellitus; previous Stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism; Vascular disease; Age 65 to 74 years; Sex category) strata and the net clinical benefit of warfarin in patients with AF and CKD in a nationwide cohort. METHODS By individual-level linkage of nationwide Danish registries, we identified all patients discharged with nonvalvular AF from 1997 to 2011. The stroke risk associated with non-end-stage CKD and end-stage CKD (e.g., patients on renal replacement therapy [RRT]) was estimated using Cox regression analyses. The net clinical benefit of warfarin was assessed using 4 endpoints: a composite endpoint of death/hospitalization from stroke/bleeding; a composite endpoint of fatal stroke/fatal bleeding; cardiovascular death; and all-cause death. RESULTS From nonvalvular AF patients (n = 154,259), we identified 11,128 patients (7.2%) with non-end-stage CKD and 1,728 (1.1%) receiving RRT. In all CHA₂DS₂-VASc risk groups, RRT was independently associated with a higher risk of stroke/thromboembolism, from a 5.5-fold higher risk in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score = 0 to a 1.6-fold higher risk in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2. In patients receiving RRT with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2, warfarin was associated with lower risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.99). In non-end-stage CKD patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2, warfarin was associated with a lower risk of a composite outcome of fatal stroke/fatal bleeding (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.88), a lower risk of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.88), and a lower risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.69). CONCLUSIONS CKD is associated with a higher risk of stroke/thromboembolism across stroke risk strata in AF patients. High-risk CKD patients (CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2) with AF benefit from warfarin treatment for stroke prevention.

Original InvestigationNet Clinical Benefit of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Nationwide Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND The balance between stroke reduction and increased bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is controversial. OBJECTIVES This study assessed the risk associated with CKD in individual CHA₂DS₂-VASc (Congestive heart failure; Hypertension; Age ≥75 years; Diabetes mellitus; previous Stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism; Vascular disease; Age 65 to 74 years; Sex category) strata and the net clinical benefit of warfarin in patients with AF and CKD in a nationwide cohort. METHODS By individual-level linkage of nationwide Danish registries, we identified all patients discharged with nonvalvular AF from 1997 to 2011. The stroke risk associated with non-end-stage CKD and end-stage CKD (e.g., patients on renal replacement therapy [RRT]) was estimated using Cox regression analyses. The net clinical benefit of warfarin was assessed using 4 endpoints: a composite endpoint of death/hospitalization from stroke/bleeding; a composite endpoint of fatal stroke/fatal bleeding; cardiovascular death; and all-cause death. RESULTS From nonvalvular AF patients (n = 154,259), we identified 11,128 patients (7.2%) with non-end-stage CKD and 1,728 (1.1%) receiving RRT. In all CHA₂DS₂-VASc risk groups, RRT was independently associated with a higher risk of stroke/thromboembolism, from a 5.5-fold higher risk in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score = 0 to a 1.6-fold higher risk in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2. In patients receiving RRT with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2, warfarin was associated with lower risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.99). In non-end-stage CKD patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2, warfarin was associated with a lower risk of a composite outcome of fatal stroke/fatal bleeding (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.88), a lower risk of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.88), and a lower risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.69). CONCLUSIONS CKD is associated with a higher risk of stroke/thromboembolism across stroke risk strata in AF patients. High-risk CKD patients (CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2) with AF benefit from warfarin treatment for stroke prevention.

Stroke and recurrent haemorrhage associated with antithrombotic treatment after gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study.

Study question What are the risks of all cause mortality, thromboembolism, major bleeding, and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding associated with restarting antithrombotic treatment after gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation? Methods This Danish cohort study (1996-2012) included all patients with atrial fibrillation discharged from hospital after gastrointestinal bleeding while receiving antithrombotic treatment. Restarted treatment regimens were single or combined antithrombotic drugs with oral anticoagulation and antiplatelets. Follow-up started 90 days after discharge to avoid confounding from use of previously prescribed drugs on discharge. Risks of all cause mortality, thromboembolism, major bleeding, and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding were estimated with competing risks models and time dependent multiple Cox regression models. Study answer and limitations 4602 patients (mean age 78 years) were included. Within two years, 39.9% (95% confidence interval 38.4% to 41.3%, n=1745) of the patients had died, 12.0% (11.0% to 13.0%, n=526) had experienced thromboembolism, 17.7% (16.5% to 18.8%, n=788) major bleeding, and 12.1% (11.1% to 13.1%, n=546) recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. 27.1% (n=924) of patients did not resume antithrombotic treatment. Compared with non-resumption of treatment, a reduced risk of all cause mortality was found in association with restart of oral anticoagulation (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.46), an antiplatelet agent (0.76, 0.68 to 0.86), and oral anticoagulation plus an antiplatelet agent (0.41, 0.32 to 0.52), and a reduced risk of thromboembolism was found in association with restart of oral anticoagulation (0.41, 0.31 to 0.54), an antiplatelet agent (0.76, 0.61 to 0.95), and oral anticoagulation plus an antiplatelet agent (0.54, 0.36 to 0.82). Restarting oral anticoagulation alone was the only regimen with an increased risk of major bleeding (1.37, 1.06 to 1.77) compared with non-resumption of treatment; however, the difference in risk of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding was not significant between patients who restarted an antithrombotic treatment regimen and those who did not resume treatment. What this study adds Among patients with atrial fibrillation who experience gastrointestinal bleeding while receiving antithrombotic treatment; subsequent restart of oral anticoagulation alone was associated with better outcomes for all cause mortality and thromboembolism compared with patients who did not resume treatment. This was despite an increased longitudinal associated risk of bleeding. Funding, competing interests, data sharing This study was supported by a grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim. Competing interests are available in the full paper on bmj.com. The authors have no additional data to share.

Ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke associated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin use in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

Background Non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are widely used as stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), but comparative data are sparse. Purpose To compare dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban vs. VKA and the risk of stroke/thromboembolism (TE) and intracranial bleeding in AF. Methods Using Danish nationwide registries (2011-15), anticoagulant-naïve AF patients were identified when initiating VKA or an NOAC. Outcomes were stroke/TE and intracranial bleeding. Multiple outcome-specific Cox regression was performed to calculate average treatment effects as standardized differences in 1-year absolute risks. Results Overall, 43 299 AF patients initiated VKA (42%), dabigatran (29%), rivaroxaban (13%), and apixaban (16%). Mean CHA2DS2-VASc (SD) score was: VKA 2.9 (1.6), dabigatran 2.7 (1.6), rivaroxaban 3.0 (1.6), and apixaban 3.1 (1.6). Within patient-specific follow-up limited to the first 2 years, 1054 stroke/TE occurred and 261 intracranial bleedings. Standardized absolute risk (95% CI) of stroke/TE at 1 year after initiation of VKA was 2.01% (1.80% to 2.21%). In relation to VKA, the absolute risk differences were for dabigatran 0.11% (-0.16% to 0.42%), rivaroxaban 0.05% (-0.33% to 0.48%), and apixaban 0.45% (-0.001% to 0.93%). For the intracranial bleeding outcome, the standardized absolute risk at 1 year was for VKA 0.60% (0.49% to 0.72%); the corresponding absolute risk differences were for dabigatran -0.34% (-0.47% to - 0.21%), rivaroxaban -0.13% (-0.33% to 0.08%), and apixaban -0.20% (-0.38% to - 0.01%). Conclusions Among anticoagulant-naïve AF patients, treatment with NOACs was not associated with significantly lower risk of stroke/TE compared with VKA, but intracranial bleeding risk was significantly lower with dabigatran and apixaban.

Risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects of dabigatran compared with warfarin among patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.

AIMS To examine the risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with dabigatran use compared with warfarin among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with AF and no history of gastrointestinal diseases initiating dabigatran or warfarin were identified from Danish nationwide registries from 22 August 2011 until 31 December 2012. Patients were classified as naive or experienced users, according to prior use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. The risk of subsequent proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, upper dyspepsia-like diagnoses (gastroesophageal reflux, gastritis, gastric, and duodenal ulcer) and gastrointestinal bleeding requiring hospitalization, gastroscopy, and discontinuation of dabigatran and warfarin was examined by cumulative incidence rates and multivariable adjusted Cox regression models. We identified five groups: OAC-naive warfarin (n = 4534); OAC-naive dabigatran 110 mg b.i.d. (dabigatran 110) (n = 1168); OAC-naive dabigatran 150 mg b.i.d. (dabigatran 150) (n = 1844); OAC-experienced dabigatran 110 (n = 1143); and OAC-experienced dabigatran 150 (n = 1748). Compared with OAC-naive warfarin, the rate of initiating PPIs was significantly increased for OAC-naive dabigatran 110 [hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.50]. Other dabigatran regimes were not associated with a higher risk of initiating PPIs, upper dyspepsia-like diagnoses, gastrointestinal bleeding, or gastroscopy. The risk of discontinuation was increased for OAC-experienced dabigatran 150 (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25), but not for the other dabigatran-treated groups, relative to OAC-naive warfarin. CONCLUSION Dabigatran was not associated with upper dyspepsia-like diagnoses or gastrointestinal bleeding requiring hospitalization, and gastroscopy. The risk of subsequent PPI use was increased for OAC-naive dabigatran 110 mg users, and the risk of discontinuation was increased for OAC-experienced dabigatran 150 mg users.

Initiation of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: which factors are associated with choice of anticoagulant?

The use of non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing rapidly. We compared characteristics of AF patients initiated on NOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

Renal Function and the Risk of Stroke and Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Observational Cohort Study

Background and Purpose— We sought to determine the risk of stroke/thromboembolism and bleeding associated with reduced renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke and bleeding associated with warfarin treatment in specific estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) groups. Methods— We conducted a register-based cohort study and included patients discharged with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from 1997 to 2011 with available eGFR. Results— A total of 17 349 patients were identified with eGFR available at baseline. All levels of lower eGFR were associated with higher risk of stroke/thromboembolism and bleeding. Use of warfarin was associated with higher bleeding risk in all eGFR groups; hazard ratios 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–1.56), 1.26 (95% CI, 1.14–1.40), 1.18 (95% CI, 1.07–1.31), 1.11 (95% CI, 0.87–1.42), 2.01 (95% CI, 1.14–3.54) in patients with eGFR ≥90, 60 to 89, 30 to 59, 15 to 29, and <15 mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Use of warfarin was associated with lower risk of stroke/thromboembolism in patients with eGFR ≥15 mL/min per 1.73 m2; hazard ratios 0.57 (95% CI, 0.43–0.76), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.51–0.64), 0.48 (95% CI, 0.44–0.54), 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45–0.80) in patients with eGFR ≥90, 60 to 89, 30 to 59, and 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Use of warfarin was not associated with lower risk of stroke/thromboembolism in patients with eGFR<15 mL/min per 1.73 m2; hazard ratio 1.18 (95% CI, 0.58–2.40). Conclusions— In patients with atrial fibrillation, the risk of stroke and bleeding was associated with levels of renal function. Warfarin treatment was associated with higher risk of bleeding in all eGFR groups and lower risk of stroke in patients with eGFR≥15 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Standard and reduced doses of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

Comparative data of non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are lacking in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Use of oral anticoagulants in combination with antiplatelet(s) in atrial fibrillation

Objectives To investigate temporal trends in the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in combination with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Using Danish nationwide registries, all patients with AF who survived 30 days after discharge from MI and/or PCI between 22 August 2011 and 30 September 2016 were identified. Results A total of 2946 patients were included in the study population, of whom 1967 (66.8%) patients were treated with VKA in combination with antiplatelet(s) (VKA+aspirin n=477, VKA+clopidogrel n=439, VKA+aspirin+clopidogrel n=1051) and 979 (33.2%) patients were treated with NOAC in combination with antiplatelet(s) (NOAC+aspirin n=252, NOAC+clopidogrel n=218, NOAC+aspirin+clopidogrel n=509). The overall study population had a median age of 76 years [IQR: 69–82] and consisted of 1995 (67.7%) men. Patients with MI as inclusion event accounted for 1613 patients (54.8%). Patients with high CHA2DS2-VASc score(congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years (2 points), diabetes mellitus, history of stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic thromboembolism (2 points), vascular disease, age 65-75 years, and female sex) accounted for 132 2814 (95.5%) of patients, and patients with high HAS-BLED score (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, history of stroke, history of bleeding, age >65 years, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug usages, or alcohol abuse, leaving out labile international normalized ratio (not available), and use of antiplatelets (exposure variable)) accounted for 934 (31.7%) of patients. There was an increase from 10% in 2011 to 52% in 2016 in the use of NOACs in combination with antiplatelet(s). Conclusion From 2011 to 2016, the use of NOAC in combination with antiplatelet(s) increased in patients with AF following MI/PCI and exceeded the use of VKA in combination with antiplatelet(s) by 2016.

Renal Function, Time in Therapeutic Range and Outcomes in Warfarin-Treated Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Nationwide Registries

Patients with severely reduced renal function have been excluded from randomized controlled trials of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation (AF). Warfarin treatment in this population is controversial and data on anticoagulation control and the impact on adverse outcomes are needed. By individual-level linkage of nationwide registries, we identified all patients discharged from hospitals with AF in Denmark between 1997 and 2011. Patients with available serum creatinine tests were categorized according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was calculated using the Rosendaal method. The risk of stroke and bleeding was estimated using multivariable Cox regression analyses with eGFR and TTR estimated time dependently throughout follow-up. We identified 10,423 warfarin-treated AF patients with available international normalized ratio and creatinine tests; 5,527 with eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 4,524 with eGFR 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 372 with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Median TTR was 66.7, 61.2 and 49.7% in patients with eGFR > 60, 30–59 and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. A TTR < 70% was associated with a higher risk of stroke/thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20–1.60) and bleeding (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.05–1.42) among patients with eGFR of 30 to 59 and a trend towards higher risk of stroke/thromboembolism (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.86–1.80) and bleeding (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.83–1.65) among patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. In conclusion, warfarin-treated AF patients with reduced renal function have suboptimal anticoagulation control which was related to the risk of adverse outcomes.