Anders Ullman

Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group

BACKGROUND The role of long-acting, inhaled beta2-agonists in treating asthma is uncertain. In a double-blind study, we evaluated the effects of adding inhaled formoterol to both lower and higher doses of the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide. METHODS After a four-week run-in period of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily), 852 patients being treated with glucocorticoids were randomly assigned to one of four treatments given twice daily by means of a dry-powder inhaler (Turbuhaler): 100 microg of budesonide plus placebo, 100 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol, 400 microg of budesonide plus placebo, or 400 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol. Terbutaline was permitted as needed. Treatment continued for one year; we compared the frequency of exacerbations of asthma, symptoms, and lung function in the four groups. A severe exacerbation was defined by the need for oral glucocorticoids or a decrease in the peak flow to more than 30 percent below the base-line value on two consecutive days. RESULTS The rates of severe and mild exacerbations were reduced by 26 percent and 40 percent, respectively, when formoterol was added to the lower dose of budesonide. The higher dose of budesonide alone reduced the rates of severe and mild exacerbations by 49 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Patients treated with formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide had the greatest reductions -- 63 percent and 62 percent, respectively. Symptoms of asthma and lung function improved with both formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide, but the improvements with formoterol were greater. CONCLUSIONS In patients who have persistent symptoms of asthma despite treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids, the addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy or the use of a higher dose of budesonide may be beneficial. The addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy improves symptoms and lung function without lessening the control of asthma.

Early intervention with budesonide in mild persistent asthma: a randomised, double-blind trial *

BACKGROUND Although inhaled glucocorticosteroids are recommended for persistent asthma, their long-term effect on recent onset, mild, persistent asthma has yet to be established. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind clinical trial in 7241 patients in 32 countries to assess the effects of budesonide in patients who had had mild persistent asthma for less than 2 years and who had not had previous regular treatment with glucocorticosteroids. Patients aged 5-66 years received either budesonide or placebo once daily for 3 years in addition to their usual asthma medications. The daily budesonide dose was 400 microg, or 200 microg for children younger than 11 years. The primary outcome was time to first severe asthma-related event, and analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS 198 of 3568 patients on placebo and 117 of 3597 on budesonide had at least one severe asthma exacerbation; hazard ratio 0.56 (95% CI 0.45-0.71, p<0.0001). Patients on budesonide had fewer courses of systemic corticosteroids and more symptom-free days than did those on placebo. Compared with placebo, budesonide increased postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from baseline by 1.48% (p<0.0001) after 1 year and by 0.88% (p=0.0005) after 3 years (expressed as percent of the predicted value). The corresponding increase in prebronchodilator FEV1 was 2.24% after 1 year and 1.71% after 3 years (p<0.0001 at both timepoints). The effect of treatment on all outcome variables was independent of the baseline lung function (prebronchodilator or postbronchodilator) or baseline medication. In children younger than 11 years, 3-year growth was reduced in the budesonide group by 1.34 cm. The reduction was greatest in the first year of treatment (0.58 cm) than years 2 and 3 (0.43 cm and 0.33 cm, respectively). INTERPRETATION Long-term, once-daily treatment with low-dose budesonide decreases the risk of severe exacerbations and improves asthma control in patients with mild persistent asthma of recent onset.

Asthma quality of life during 1 year of treatment with budesonide with or without formoterol

The Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) study has provided the first opportunity to examine the long-term effects of inhaled steroids and long-acting beta2-agonists on asthma-specific quality of life. The objectives of the present study were to: evaluate the effects of long-term (1 yr) formoterol and increasing doses of budesonide on asthma quality of life; 2) to determine whether initial improvements in quality of life are sustained when improvements in clinical indices persist; and 3) to evaluate the long-term relationship between changes in clinical indices and changes in quality of life. Of the 852 asthmatic adults enrolled, 470 from five countries participated in this quality of life evaluation. After a 4-week run-in on 1,600 microg budesonide, patients were randomized to either 200 microg (Bud200) or 800 microg budesonide (Bud800) in combination with either 24 microg formoterol (F) or placebo daily for 1 yr. The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) was completed and conventional clinical indices measured at enrolment and randomization and on seven occasions during the following 12 months. During the run-in, there was an improvement in AQLQ score (changes (delta) in overall score approximately 0.50; p<0.0001). After randomization, there was a further improvement in the Bud800+F group (delta=0.21; p=0.028). One month post-randomization, improvements in all groups stabilized and were sustained throughout the 12 months in a pattern very similar to that observed for the conventional clinical indices. The correlation of individual patient changes in clinical indices and changes in AQLQ score during the 12-month randomized period were weak to moderate (maximum r=0.51). Improvements in quality of life, which were greatest in the 800 microg budesonide plus 24 microg formoterol group, were sustained throughout the 12 months in a similar manner to the clinical indices. Long-term changes in conventional clinical indices cannot be used to predict the effect of treatment on individual patient experience.

Salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol in the isolated guinea pig trachea: differences in maximum relaxant effect and potency but not in functional antagonism.

BACKGROUND--Formoterol and salmeterol are new long acting beta 2 adrenoceptor agonists. The maximum relaxant effect, potency and functional antagonism against carbachol induced contraction for salmeterol, formoterol and salbutamol have been compared in the guinea pig isolated trachea. In addition, the possibility of inducing a non-beta adrenoceptor mediated relaxation by salmeterol was studied. METHODS--Concentration response experiments were conducted with isolated tracheal preparations (n = 4-6 in all experiments), precontracted by carbachol to cause either 40% (60 nmol/l), 80% (0.3 mumol/l) or 100% (3 mumol/l, supramaximal) of the maximum contraction. Each beta agonist was added cumulatively at each level of precontraction. Additional cumulative concentration response experiments were conducted for salmeterol alone at the highest level of precontraction, with and without beta blockade by sotalol (1 mmol/l). With the drug concentrations which produced the maximum response and the highest level of precontraction, the relaxation of formoterol (10 nmol/l) and salmeterol (1 mumol/l) was also compared non-cumulatively. Finally, with the corresponding drug concentrations and precontraction, the relaxant effect was compared for formoterol (10 nmol/l) in salmeterol relaxed airways with that of salmeterol (1 mumol/l) in formoterol relaxed airways. RESULTS--The increase in carbachol concentration from 60 nmol/l to 3 mumol/l induced a rightward shift in the mean (SE) concentration (log steps) causing 50% maximum relaxation for salmeterol (0.73 (0.17)), formoterol (0.85 (0.18)), and salbutamol (1.13 (0.11)). Significant differences in the maximum relaxant effect were shown at the highest level of precontraction only, with a remaining active tension of percentage precontraction of 27% (4%) for 1 mumol/l salbutamol and 35% (3%) for 10 nmol/l formoterol compared with 50% (2%) for 1 mumol/l salmeterol. The rank order of potency was: formoterol > salbutamol approximately salmeterol at all levels of precontraction (-log EC50: 9.32 (0.05) for formoterol, 7.82 (0.08) for salbutamol, and 7.50 (0.13) for salmeterol at 80% maximum precontraction). Beta blockade by sotalol (1 mmol/l) significantly inhibited the relaxation induced by salmeterol (1 mumol/l) (remaining active tension: 104% (1%) v 71% (11%) of precontraction) but not the relaxation induced by salmeterol (10 mumol/l) (remaining active tension: 75% (5%) v 71% (12%) of precontraction). In the non-cumulative experiments, formoterol displayed more relaxant effect than salmeterol (remaining active tension: 51% (6%) v 65% (6%) of precontraction). Finally, formoterol significantly relaxed salmeterol relaxed airways (relaxant effect: 22% (8%) of precontraction) whereas there was no significant response to salmeterol in formoterol relaxed airways (relaxant effect: 5% (12%) of precontraction). CONCLUSIONS--In the guinea pig isolated trachea, formoterol and salbutamol produce more relaxant effect than salmeterol, suggesting that salmeterol is a partial beta 2 agonist. Very high concentrations of salmeterol may induce non-beta adrenoceptor mediated relaxation. Formoterol is more potent than both salbutamol and salmeterol. There is no pronounced difference in the magnitude of antagonism against carbachol induced contractions between salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol.

Differences in bronchodilating potency of salbutamol in Turbuhaler as compared with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulation in patients with reversible airway obstruction

Two studies are presented, with the aim of establishing the dose potency ratio for salbutamol given via Turbuhaler and via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Both studies were of a double-blind, randomized design. Outpatients with mild-to-moderate chronic reversible airway obstruction were given single doses of salbutamol administered via Turbuhaler and via pMDI. Efficacy and safety variables were measured before and during 6 h after each dose. The first study was a four-way crossover study including 12 patients. The salbutamol doses given were: 50, 100 and 2x100 microg via Turbuhaler and 2x100 microg via pMDI (Ventolin). The study showed that 2x100 microg of salbutamol inhaled via Turbuhaler is more potent than 2x100 microg salbutamol inhaled via a pMDI, and that 100 microg salbutamol via Turbuhaler is at least as potent as 2x100 microg salbutamol inhaled via a pMDI. The second study including 50 patients was a placebo-controlled five-way crossover, study. Two doses of salbutamol via Turbuhaler, 50 and 2x100 microg, and via pMDI, 100 and 2x200 microg, were given. There was a dose-dependent response in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) for both inhalers. Adjusted for differences in baseline FEV1 values, the estimated relative dose potency for Turbuhaler versus pMDI was 1.98:1 (95% confidence interval 12-3.2). These studies showed that the same bronchodilating effect can be achieved when half the dose of salbutamol given via a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler is given via Turbuhaler.

Effectiveness of early budesonide intervention in Caucasian versus Asian patients with asthma: 3-year results of the START study.

Objective and background:  Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid therapy exclusively in Asian patients with asthma. The present analysis compared the efficacy of early intervention with inhaled budesonide in Caucasian and Asian patients over the first 3 years of the inhaled Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy in early asthma study.

Non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic neural activation in guinea-pig bronchi: powerful and frequency-dependent stabilizing effect on tone.

1 We examined non‐adrenergic, non‐cholinergic (NANC) stimulation for its stabilizing effect on bronchial smooth‐muscle tone with respect to its regulatory power and the effect of variations in neural impulse frequency. 2 The guinea‐pig isolated main bronchus (n = 4–12) was pretreated with indomethacin (10 μm) and incubated with atropine (1 μm) and guanethidine (10 μm). Electrical field stimulation (EFS: 1200 mA, 0.5 ms, 240 s) was applied at various levels of tone prior to EFS: first without tone, then at a moderate tone induced by histamine (0.3 μm) and, finally, at a high tone induced by histamine (6 μm). Three different stimulation frequencies (1, 3 or 10 Hz) were used in order to produce moderate to near‐maximum contractile and relaxant NANC neural responses. Both the contractile and the relaxant NANC responses were tetrodotoxin‐sensitive in the guinea‐pig isolated main bronchus (3 Hz). 3 Without tone prior to EFS, NANC activation (1, 3 or 10 Hz) induced a pronounced contractile response. At a moderate level of tone prior to EFS, NANC activation induced a less pronounced contractile response. At the highest level of tone prior to EFS, NANC activation induced a relaxant response. All these NANC responses adjusted the tone towards a similar level and this ‘stabilization level’ was 56(6)% at 1 Hz, 65(3)% at 3 Hz and 56(5)% at 10 Hz, expressed as a percentage of the maximum histamine‐induced (0.1 mm) tone in each airway preparation. 4 There was a difference of approximately 90% of maximum between the highest and the lowest tone level prior to NANC activation. This difference was reduced by the converging contractile and relaxant NANC responses and the magnitude of this ‘convergence effect’ was 40(8)% at 1 Hz, 72(4)% at 3 Hz and 90(2)% at 10 Hz. 5 These findings indicate that NANC neural activation stabilizes bronchial smooth‐muscle tone via a contraction when the tone is low prior to activation and via a relaxation when the tone is high prior to activation. The NANC stabilizing effect on tone appears to be powerful and its magnitude can be controlled by the neural impulse frequency. The level of tone towards which the NANC responses converge does not appear to be markedly altered by variations in the impulse frequency. Our findings are consistent with a regulatory role for NANC responses in the control of bronchial smooth‐muscle tone.