André Archambault

Quality of life: A valid and reliable measure of therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS Quality of life (QOL), a subjective index of health perception and function, embraces physical, social, and emotional performance but has not had a prominent role in clinical trials of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To test the robustness of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), a disease-specific QOL index, this study assessed its validity, reliability, and responsiveness during a multicenter trial. METHODS Three hundred five patients with stable Crohns disease received cyclosporin or placebo for 18 months. IBDQ and dimensional scores (bowel, social, systemic, and emotional) were correlated with disease activity (Crohns disease activity index [CDAI] and Harvey-Bradshaw index). Concordance of IBDQ scores was tested in 280 stable subjects. Linear regression evaluated change in IBDQ scores over time. RESULTS IBDQ scores correlated highly with CDAI (r = -0.67; P < 0.0001). The reliability coefficient for IBDQ score was 0.70 vs. 0.66 for CDAI and 0.55 for Harvey-Bradshaw index. Regression line slopes of IBDQ scores were significantly different in patients who deteriorated from those who remained stable ([b] < 0.15; P < 0.0001). QOL scores were lower in patients who required surgery. CONCLUSIONS The IBDQ is a valid reliable assessment tool that reflects important changes in the health status of patients with IBD. The IBDQ is a robust measure of therapeutic efficacy and should be used in future clinical trials in IBD.

Low-Dose Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND Long-term corticosteroid therapy for Crohns disease is associated with important types of morbidity, such as osteoporosis. Safe and effective alternative treatments are required. Although a short-term benefit of cyclosporine in active Crohns disease has been suggested, the long-term safety and efficacy of this treatment have not been established. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the effect of 18 months of low-dose cyclosporine treatment on the course of Crohns disease. Adult patients whose disease had been active within the previous two years were randomly assigned to receive cyclosporine (151 patients) or placebo (154 patients) in addition to their usual therapy. Randomization was stratified according to center and score on the Crohns Disease Activity Index (193 patients had scores of 150 or less, and 112 had scores greater than 150). The primary outcome measure was clinically important worsening of Crohns disease, defined as a 100-point increase in the Crohns Disease Activity Index from the patients base-line value. Secondary outcomes were the use of prednisone and 5-amino-salicylates, mean score on the Crohns Disease Activity Index and mean quality-of-life score, and the need for surgery. RESULTS The condition of more patients worsened with cyclosporine than with placebo (91 of 151, or 60.3 percent, vs. 80 of 154, or 51.9 percent; P = 0.10). The median time to worsening of disease in patients receiving cyclosporine was 338 days, as compared with 492 days in patients receiving placebo (P = 0.25; relative risk, 1.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.72). Analyses of the mean Crohns Disease Activity Index and quality-of-life scores and of the use of prednisone and 5-aminosalicylates also failed to demonstrate benefit. CONCLUSIONS In our patient population, the addition of low-dose cyclosporine to conventional treatment for Crohns disease did not improve symptoms or reduce requirements for other forms of therapy.

Cimetidine, cigarette smoking, and recurrence of duodenal ulcer.

Three hundred seventy patients with recently healed duodenal ulcer entered into a one-year, double-blind, randomized multicenter trial comparing placebo with three different dose schedules of cimetidine (200 mg twice a day, 300 mg twice a day, and 400 mg at bedtime) for the prevention of recurrent duodenal ulcer. By the end of one year, the cumulative symptomatic recurrence rate as demonstrated by endoscopy was similar for the patients receiving the three dosages of cimetidine (19 per cent, 15 per cent, and 13 per cent, respectively; not significant), whereas the placebo-treated group had a 34.7 per cent symptomatic recurrence rate (P less than 0.01 as compared with each cimetidine group). Cigarette smoking was found to be an important variable; among the placebo recipients ulcer recurrence was significantly more likely in smokers (72 per cent) than in nonsmokers (21 per cent, P less than 0.001). The frequency of ulcer recurrence in smokers was significantly reduced by treatment with cimetidine (from 72 per cent to 34 per cent, P less than 0.). Smokers who received cimetidine were at least as likely to have a recurrence as were nonsmokers who received placebo (34 per cent vs. 21 per cent, not significant). Thus, smoking appears to be a major factor in recurrence of duodenal ulcer, and in smokers, giving up smoking may be more important in the prevention of ulcer recurrences than administration of cimetidine.

Delayed-Release Oral Mesalamine 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablets) Compared with 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablets) for the Treatment of Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis: The ASCEND I Trial

BACKGROUND Delayed-release oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day to 4.8 g/day has been shown to be effective in treating mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC), but it is unknown whether an initial dose of 4.8 g/day is more effective than 2.4 g/day in patients with mildly to moderately active UC and in the subgroup with moderate disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS A six-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial assessing the safety and clinical efficacy of a new dose (ASCEND I) of medication randomly assigned 301 adults with mildly to moderately active UC to delayed-release oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet [n=154]) or 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet [n=147]). The primary efficacy end point was overall improvement (ie, treatment success), defined as complete remission or response to therapy from baseline to week 6. Primary safety end points were adverse events and laboratory evaluations. Data were also analyzed separately for the prespecified subgroup of patients with moderate UC at baseline. RESULTS Treatment success was not statistically different between the treatment groups at week 6; 51% of the group (77 of 150) who received delayed-release oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day and 56% of the group (76 of 136) who received 4.8 g/day reached the efficacy end point (P=0.441). Among the moderate disease subgroup, however, the higher initial dose was more effective; 57% of patients (53 of 93) given delayed-release oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day and 72% of patients (55 of 76) given 4.8 g/day achieved treatment success (P=0.0384). Both regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Delayed-release oral mesalamine is an effective and well-tolerated initial therapy in patients with mildly to moderately active UC, and a 4.8 g/day dose may enhance treatment success rates in patients with moderate disease compared with mesalamine 2.4 g/day.

Omeprazole (20 mg daily) versus cimetidine (1200 mg daily) in duodenal ulcer healing and pain relief

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study in 169 patients with acute duodenal ulcers to compare omeprazole, 20 mg daily, with cimetidine, 600 mg twice daily. After 2 wk, 58% of the omeprazole-treated patients and 46% of the cimetidine-treated patients were completely healed (p = 0.056). After 4 and 6 wk 84% and 88% healed with omeprazole, and 80% and 89% healed with cimetidine (p = NS). After 2 wk, pain was completely gone in 62% of the omeprazole-treated patients versus 46% of the cimetidine-treated patients (p = 0.04). Clinical or laboratory adverse events were reported in 6 (7%) of the omeprazole-treated patients and 11 (13%) of the cimetidine-treated patients (p = NS). An adverse event caused withdrawal of 1 patient on omeprazole (anxiety and depression) and 2 patients on cimetidine (diarrhea and fall in hemoglobin). We conclude that omeprazole (20 mg daily) resulted in a trend toward more rapid ulcer healing compared with a relatively high dose of cimetidine (600 mg b.i.d.), and was preferred by patients for relief of ulcer pain.

A Double-Blind Randomized Study of Cisapride in the Treatment of Nonulcer Dyspepsia

Cisapride is a substituted benzamide with gastrointestinal prokinetic effects presumed to be due to the enhancement of the physiological release of acetylcholine at the myenteric plexus. In a multicentre study, 189 patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) received single-blind placebo treatment for two weeks. A total of 123 patients with no or minimal response to placebo and epigastric pain of at least moderate severity and frequency were randomly assigned to one of the three parallel double-blind treatments for six weeks: cisapride 10 mg tid, cisapride 20 mg tid or placebo. The severity and frequency of individual symptoms (epigastric pain, heartburn, nausea, vomiting anorexia, postprandial discomfort, regurgitation, lower abdominal pain, bloating and constipation) were assessed on a four- and five-point categorical scale, respectively, by the investigator at three on treatment visits and by patients in a daily diary. Analysis of investigator and patient assessments for differences in symptom severity x frequency composite scores among the three treatment groups showed no statistically significant differences for individual symptoms or symptom clusters. As assessed by the investigator, and compared with baseline, cisapride 20 mg tid significantly (P < 0.05) improved epigastric pain, bloating and early satiety as well as improved the total symptom cluster. Investigator evaluation of the five most severe and frequent symptoms for each patient showed statistically significant improvement in each treatment group. For patient diary assessments, statistically significant within-treatment improvement of the total symptom cluster, the five most severe symptoms cluster, bloating and early satiety was observed for both cisapride 20 mg and placebo, whereas epigastric pain significantly (P < 0.05) improved in all three treatment groups. Investigator evaluation of global response (good+excellent) rate at the end of the six week treatment period was 38% for cisapride 20 mg, 47% for cisapride 10 mg and 33% for placebo. No statistically significant difference in this parameter among treatments was noted. Cisapride was well tolerated at both doses with a side effect profile comparable with that of placebo. It is concluded that in this double-blind multicentre study with a single-blind two-week placebo run in phase, cisapride 10 mg tid and 20 mg tid were not effective compared with placebo in improving symptoms in NUD patients. This study re-emphasizes the good prognosis of patients with NUD, with 14% of patients improving in the two-week placebo run-in phase and a further 33% improving in the next six weeks while on placebo. Within-treatment analysis of investigator assessments showed improvement for cisapride 20 mg tid suggesting a trend of efficacy at this dose.

IN SITU pH OF DUODENAL BULB CONTENTS IN NORMAL AND DUODENAL ULCER SUBJECTS

Summary The p H of duodenal bulb contents has been recorded with a guarded, in situ, glass electrode in 75 subjects, 16 with duodenal ulcer. The antrocutaneous and duodenocutaneous potential differences (PD) were simultaneously recorded from flowing KCl bridges attached to the glass electrode lead (these bridges were found to be superior to KCl-agar bridges for this purpose), PD patterns were used to position the glass electrode and monitor its location. That a PD between duodenum and gastric antrum of greater than 15 mv (duodenum more positive) was a reliable sign that the glass electrode was in the duodenal bulb was confirmed by simultaneous cinefluorography. Mean duodenal bulb p H was significantly higher than antral p H in both normal and ulcer subjects. In ulcer subjects, mean duodenal bulb p H (2.9) was significantly lower than normal (4.5). Normal and ulcer antral pH values were similar (1.7). There was no significant difference between ulcer and control groups with respect to the p H of antral or postbulbar duodenal contents. Antral p H was much more stable than duodenal bulbar p H. Postbulbar duodenal p H was higher and more stable than the p H of the duodenal bulb.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of CDP571, a humanized monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor-α, in patients with corticosteroid-dependent Crohn's disease

Aim : To evaluate CDP571, a humanized monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor‐α, for the treatment of corticosteroid‐dependent Crohns disease.

Pancreatic trauma: A new diagnostic approach

The difficulties encountered in the diagnosis of solitary pancreatic injury when there is no other indication for surgical exploration of the abdomen are discussed. We suggest that endoscopic transduodenal pancreatography is a reliable diagnostic tool of great help in evaluating such injuries with little morbidity.

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, tetracycline and omeprazole in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND A previous study showed that 14 days of qid bismuth-based triple therapy with tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 250 mg and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg resulted in excellent Helicobacter pylori eradication rates (89.5%). The present study looked at a shorter treatment period by adding omeprazole and by reducing the dose of tetracycline. METHODS One hundred sixty-one patients with H pylori confirmed by histology and (13)carbon urea breath test were included in the study. They were treated for seven days with bismuth subcitrate 120 mg plus metronidazole 250 mg plus tetracycline 250 mg qid plus omeprazole 20 mg bid (OBMT). Patients were 18 to 75 years of age and had dyspepsia with or without a history of peptic ulcer. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome, active ulcer or previous attempt at eradication, or those who had used antibiotics or antiulcer drugs in the previous 30 days were excluded. Eradication was determined by two (13)carbon urea breath tests done one and three months, respectively, after treatment. Strains with minimal inhibitory concentrations of 8 microg/mL or higher were considered to be resistant to metronidazole. RESULTS The overall per protocol eradication rate was 84%-89.5% in metronidazole-sensitive and 70.8% in metronidazole-resistant strains. Modified intent-to-treat analysis resulted in a 80% eradication rate--82.5% in metronidazole-sensitive and 66.7% in metronidazole-resistant strains. Only one patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The OBMT regimen used in this study is safe and effective against metronidazole-sensitive H pylori strains.