Andre da Luz Moreira

CT Enterography for Crohn’s Disease: Accurate Preoperative Diagnostic Imaging

PurposeCT enterography (CTE) is a technique that provides detailed images of the small bowel by using a low Hounsfield unit oral contrast media. This study was designed to correlate CTE findings with operative findings in patients with Crohn’s disease.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of all patients with Crohn’s disease of the small bowel or colon, who had CTE and subsequent small bowel or colon surgery within three months after the CT examination. CTE findings of stricture, fistula, inflammatory mass, abscess, and combinations of these abnormalities were compared with operative findings. Specialist radiologists and fellowship-trained colorectal surgeons participated in the study. The Fisher’s exact test or chi-squared tests were used with respect to categorical data, and the Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test was used for quantitative data.ResultsIn 36 patients, the presence or absence of stricture, fistula, abscess, or inflammatory mass was correctly determined by CTE in 100, 94, 100, and 97 percent, respectively. The accuracy for stricture or fistula number was 83 and 86 percent, respectively. There were nine patients with multiple disease phenotypes identified on CTE of which eight were confirmed at surgery. CTE overestimated or underestimated the extent of disease in 11 patients (31 percent).ConclusionsCTE is an accurate preoperative diagnostic imaging study for small-bowel Crohn’s disease. The ability of this imaging study to detect both luminal and extraluminal pathology is a distinct advantage of CTE compared with small-bowel contrast studies.

Factors Associated With Septic Complications After Restorative Proctocolectomy

Objective:Few studies have evaluated factors that may be associated with the development of septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate preoperative and operative factors that might be associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy. Methods:Patients developing abdominal and pelvic septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy were identified from a prospective database. Patients with subclinical leaks and ileostomy closure leak were not included in the septic complication group. A multivariable logistic regression model for sepsis was constructed using a forward stepwise selection with entry criterion of P < 0.05. Results:From 1983 to 2007, 3233 patients (56% male) were included in the database. Eight-four percent (2597) of patients underwent proximal diversion. Two hundred patients (6.2%) developed septic complications within 3 months of restorative proctocolectomy or within 3 months of ileostomy closure. On multivariate analysis, body mass index > 30 (P = 0.02, OR = 1.77), final pathologic diagnosis of ulcerative/indeterminate colitis (P = 0.02, OR = 2) or Crohns disease (P = 0.02, OR = 3.6), intraoperative (P = 0.02, OR = 1.6), and postoperative transfusions (P = 0.01, OR = 1.9) were all independently associated with septic complications. We also demonstrated an independent association among individual surgeons (P = 0.04) with decreased septic complications. Conclusions:Body mass index greater than 30, final pathologic diagnosis of ulcerative/indeterminate colitis or Crohns disease, intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, and surgeon were all independent factors associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

Outcomes of Crohn's disease presenting with abdominopelvic abscess.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes, quality-adjusted life-years, and the cost-effectiveness gained from percutaneous drainage followed by elective surgery vs. initial surgery for abdominopelvic abscesses related to Crohns disease. METHODS: All consecutive patients with spontaneous Crohns disease-related abdominopelvic abscess from 1997 to 2007 were reviewed. The authors excluded postoperative and perirectal abscesses. Decision analysis during one year of patient life was used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years and the cost-effectiveness of each strategy. RESULTS: Of 94 patients, 48 (51 percent) were initially approached with percutaneous drainage. Thirty-one (65 percent) had successful percutaneous drainage and delayed elective surgery. The factors significantly associated with percutaneous drainage failure were steroid use, colonic phenotype, and multiple or multilocular abscesses. The initial treatment was surgery in the remaining 46 (49 percent) patients. The initial approach with percutaneous drainage gave higher quality-adjusted life-years and was more cost-effective than initial surgery. Percutaneous drainage was the optimal strategy in spite of the risk of failure and septic complications within the plausible range. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage failure is associated with steroid use, colonic phenotype, and multiple or multilocular abscesses. When feasible, percutaneous drainage is the most effective strategy from the perspective of patients and third-party payers.

The evolution of prophylactic colorectal surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past 50 years, prophylactic colorectal surgery for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis has evolved as new technologies and ideas have emerged. The aim of this study was to review all the index surgeries for familial adenomatous polyposis performed at our institution to assess the changes in surgical techniques. METHODS: All index abdominal surgeries for polyposis from 1950 to 2007 were identified through the Polyposis Registry Database. We assigned the patients to prepouch (before 1983), pouch (after 1983), and laparoscopic (after 1991) eras, and analyzed the changes in prophylactic surgery. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-four patients were included; 51% were male. Median age at surgery was 26 (range, 9–66) years. In the prepouch era, 97% (66 of 68) of all surgeries and 100% of restorative surgeries were ileorectal anastomosis. After 1983, 70% (54 of 77) of patients with a severe phenotype had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. After 1991, 110 operations (43%) were laparoscopic (88 ileorectal and 22 ileal pouch-anal anastomosis). CONCLUSION: Colon surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis has evolved as advances in surgical technique have created more options to reduce the risk of cancer. Current strategy uses polyposis severity and distribution to decide on the surgical option, and laparoscopy to minimize morbidity.

Ileorectal anastomosis and proctocolectomy with end ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.

Until the development of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in the early 1980s, proctocolectomy with end ileostomy was the only definitive surgery for ulcerative colitis and colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis was the procedure of choice for affected patients who were reluctant to have a permanent ileostomy. Currently, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the most common procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis requiring surgical treatment. However, there is still a role for ileorectal anastomosis and proctocolectomy with end ileostomy for a selected group of patients. In this review, the authors summarize the current indications for ileorectal anastomosis and proctocolectomy with end ileostomy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Response to Letter to the Editor: Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: The Impact of Longer Interval Between Chemoradiation and Surgery

To the Editors: We thank Dr. Huerta for his kind words and thoughtful comments on our recent article. He brings forth several key issues that remain among the top challenges in treating rectal cancer. We agree that it would obviously be paramount to identify which patients would achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR), but unfortunately this is not currently possible. Indeed, our group and others are currently investigating possible genetic markers to potentially identify which patients are most likely to achieve pCR, but only the future will tell. As Dr. Huerta states, the interval of 8 weeks for analysis in this study was chosen from our previous work which identified that waiting at least 8 weeks was independently associated with a higher percentage of patients achieving pCR. This was a nonrandomized, retrospective study and the exact interval that would be most effective remains undefined. A welldesigned trial is necessary to accurately address this matter and an ongoing NIH-sponsored multicenter prospective trial is enrolling approximately 250 rectal cancer patients into one of five different treatment groups based on an increasing interval between completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. The intervals being examined are 6, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks and the study is expected to complete enrollment within this year. Patients in the longer interval treatment arms will receive chemotherapy during the waiting period. Results of this trial will answer some of the critical issues regarding intervals between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery.