André M. Murad

Randomized Phase III Trial of Single-Agent Pemetrexed Versus Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 2

PURPOSE To compare single-agent pemetrexed (P) versus the combination of carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multicenter phase III randomized trial, patients with advanced NSCLC, ECOG PS of 2, any histology at first and later amended to nonsquamous only, no prior chemotherapy, and adequate organ function were randomly assigned to P alone (500 mg/m(2)) or CP (area under the curve of 5 and 500 mg/m(2), respectively) administered every 3 weeks for a total of four cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 205 eligible patients were enrolled from eight centers in Brazil and one in the United States from April 2008 to July 2011. The response rates were 10.3% for P and 23.8% for CP (P = .032). In the intent-to-treat population, the median PFS was 2.8 months for P and 5.8 months for CP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.63; P < .001), and the median OS was 5.3 months for P and 9.3 months for CP (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.83; P = .001). One-year survival rates were 21.9% and 40.1%, respectively. Similar results were seen when patients with squamous disease were excluded from the analysis. Anemia (grade 3, 3.9%; grade 4, 11.7%) and neutropenia (grade 3, 1%; grade 4, 6.8%) were more frequent with CP. There were four treatment-related deaths in the CP arm. CONCLUSION Combination chemotherapy with CP significantly improves survival in patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2.

Rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy in advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (RILOMET-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Rilotumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the ligand of the MET receptor, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of rilotumumab combined with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine, and to assess potential biomarkers, in patients with advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was done at 152 centres in 27 countries. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, MET-positive tumours (≥25% of tumour cells with membrane staining of ≥1+ staining intensity), and evaluable disease, who had not received previous systemic therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computerised voice response system to receive rilotumumab 15 mg/kg intravenously or placebo in combination with open-label chemotherapy (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously; cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenously; capecitabine 625 mg/m2 orally twice daily) in 21-day cycles for up to ten cycles. After completion of chemotherapy, patients continued to receive rilotumumab or placebo monotherapy until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or study termination. Randomisation was stratified by disease extent and ECOG performance status. Both patients and physicians were masked to study treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. We report the final analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01697072. FINDINGS Between Nov 7, 2012, and Nov 21, 2014, 609 patients were randomly assigned to rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (rilotumumab group; n=304) or placebo plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (placebo group; n=305). Study treatment was stopped early after an independent data monitoring committee found a higher number of deaths in the rilotumumab group than in the placebo group; all patients in the rilotumumab group subsequently discontinued all study treatment. Median follow-up was 7·7 months (IQR 3·6-12·0) for patients in the rilotumumab group and 9·4 months (5·3-13·1) for patients in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 7·7-10·2) in the rilotumumab group compared with 10·7 months (9·6-12·4) in the placebo group (stratified hazard ratio 1·34, 95% CI 1·10-1·63; p=0·003). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the rilotumumab and placebo groups were neutropenia (86 [29%] of 298 patients vs 97 [32%] of 299 patients), anaemia (37 [12%] vs 43 [14%]), and fatigue (30 [10%] vs 35 [12%]). The frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the rilotumumab and placebo groups (142 [48%] vs 149 [50%]). More deaths due to adverse events occurred in the rilotumumab group than the placebo group (42 [14%] vs 31 [10%]). In the rilotumumab group, 33 (11%) of 298 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and nine (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression. In the placebo group, 23 (8%) of 299 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and eight (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression. INTERPRETATION Ligand-blocking inhibition of the MET pathway with rilotumumab is not effective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. FUNDING Amgen.

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Tegafur-Uracil (UFT) vs Fluorouracil for the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Brazil and Argentina

SummaryThe treatment of colorectal cancer continues to pose major challenges for oncologists throughout the world. Uracil and tegafur (UFT), as an oral agent, represents a new patient-focused approach to managing a malignancy with few treatment alternatives other than an intravenous fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimen. The ability of UFT to achieve equivalent clinical outcomes compared with continuous 5-FU infusion, along with its oral formulation and mild toxicity profile, provide a compelling backdrop for fiscal analysis. An economic assessment of therapy attributes and effects would, therefore, be prudent and necessary when deliberating the adoption of this chemotherapy regimen.We developed a pharmacoeconomic model in Brazil and Argentina identifying clinical practices associated with chemotherapy administration and adverse event management practices from a panel of physicians assembled in each country. Practice patterns and clinical events were then evaluated for resource utilisation trends. The perspective of this pharmacoeconomic analysis was that of the healthcare payor. Country-specific charge data were applied to the identified resources to arrive at an average cost per patient receiving a 6-cycle course of 5-FU with either levamisole and/or leucovorin as a modulator vs a modelled oral UFT/leucovorin regimen. As a comparator, the oral UFT/leucovorin regimen was modelled based on the expert panel’s input. Adverse events and incidence data were derived from clinical trial data for both agents. Both agents were analysed in the treatment of metastatic disease and as adjuvant therapy. The principal findings of a cost-minimisation analysis in Brazil revealed approximately equivalent treatment costs for both regimens in the adjuvant setting. When analysing the metastatic treatment arm, costs diverged by

Gefitinib and celecoxib in advanced metastatic gastrointestinal tumors: a pilot feasibility study

R335/per patient (

Phase II multicenter trial of docetaxel, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (DEF) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a novel, safe, and active regimen

R = Reals - the currency of Brazil) in favour of a UFT regimen. The profile in Argentina yielded more dramatic differences, with a UFT regimen costing

BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS FOR MULTIMODAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES. MODULE 3: CONTROVERSIES AND UNRESECTABLE METASTASES

P782/per patient (

GUIDELINE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF BILE DUCT CANCERS BY THE BRAZILIAN GASTROINTESTINAL TUMOR GROUP

P = Pesos — the currency of Argentina) less than a 5-FU regimen in the adjuvant setting. In the treatment of metastatic disease, a UFT regimen provided

741TiPRILOMET-1: AN INTERNATIONAL PHASE 3 MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF RILOTUMUMAB PLUS EPIRUBICIN, CISPLATIN AND CAPECITABINE (ECX) AS FIRST LINE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED MET-POSITIVE GASTRIC OR GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION (G/GEJ) ADENOCARCINOMA

P1188/per patient in savings over a 5-FU regimen. These differences are predominantly driven by the mild toxicity profile of UFT and its corresponding less severe adverse event management practice patterns. In addition, the oral formulation of UFT versus intravenous 5-FU provides for ease of administration, lowering the total cost of care as well as likely impacting on the patient’s quality of life.The pharmacoeconomic results suggest that a UFT regimen is a useful and economical alternative to the standard 5-FU regimen in the treatment of colorectal cancer in Brazil and Argentina.

Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo (P)-controlled trial of rilotumumab (R) plus epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced MET-positive (pos) gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer: RILOMET-1 study.

BACKGROUND This pilot, open-label study examined the safety and tolerability (primary objective) and efficacy (secondary objective) of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, in patients with advanced or refractory gastrointestinal (GI) tumors of epithelial origin. METHODS Patients were administered gefitinib (250 mg/day) plus celecoxib (400 mg twice daily). In the event of toxicity, dose interruptions were permitted and a single celecoxib dose reduction was allowed. RESULTS Thirty patients (median age 60 years) with primary colorectal (25 patients), pancreatic (3 patients), esophageal (1 patient), or gall bladder (1 patient) tumors were recruited, 29 of whom had received prior chemotherapy. Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild and consisted mainly of acne, diarrhea, and nausea. Few severe AEs were noted. There were no withdrawals or deaths due to AEs. Dose reductions for celecoxib were reported for five patients, in three cases due to toxicity. Stable disease was confirmed in 12 patients (40%), with progressive disease in 18 patients (60%). CONCLUSIONS After study completion, safety issues relating to the long-term use of COX-2 inhibitors have been raised. However, in this pilot study, the combination of gefitinib and celecoxib was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced GI cancer.

A randomized phase III trial of single-agent pemetrexed (P) versus carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and performance status (PS) of 2.

BackgroundThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [DEF] as treatment for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer.MethodsThirty-seven patients participated in the study (median age, 56 years; range, 22–73 years); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [PS], 0–2). Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV (day 1), 5-FU 500 mg/m2 IV (days 1–3), and epirubicin 50 mg/m2 IV (day 1) were administered every 3 weeks for six cycles.ResultsIn total, 20/37 patients (54%) completed six treatment cycles. Thirteen patients (35%; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 20% to 51%) had an objective response; 1 patient (3%) achieved a complete response and 12 patients (32%) achieved partial responses. Stable disease was observed in 7 patients (19%) and progressive disease in 5 patients (14%). Twelve patients (32%) were unevaluable. Clinical benefit (based on PS, weight gain, and analgesic consumption) was observed in 11 patients (30%). Median follow-up was 41 months (range, 26–53 months), median time to progression was 6.6 months (range, 0.5–29.2 months), median overall survival was 10.7 months (range, 7.0–14.6 months), and 1-year survival was 40%. The regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3–4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 8 patients (22%; 6% of cycles) and grade 3–4 neutropenia in 1 patient (1% of cycles). The most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities were alopecia (11% of cycles), diarrhea (4% of cycles) and vomiting (2% of cycles); grade 1–2 asthenia and fatigue occurred in 43% of cycles.ConclusionDEF is effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, and has a good safety profile.