Andrea Busnelli

Risks of conservative management in women with ovarian endometriomas undergoing IVF

BACKGROUND Classical surgical management of endometriotic ovarian cysts using the laparoscopic stripping technique has been recently questioned because of the surgical-related injury to the ovarian reserve. Accordingly, available guidelines suggest that endometriomas with a mean diameter below 4 cm should not be systematically removed before IVF procedures. However, conservative management may have some potential drawbacks and risks. The presence of the endometrioma may theoretically interfere with ovarian responsiveness to hyperstimulation and oocyte competence, the retrieval of the oocytes may be more difficult and risky, the disease may progress during the procedure, pregnancy outcome may be affected and there is the risk of missing occult malignancies with cancer development later in life. In the present review, we aimed at assessing whether these risks do exist and, if so, at estimating their clinical relevance. METHODS We searched PubMed for articles published in the English language between January 1990 and August 2014 that reported on endometriomas and assisted reproductive techniques. Special care was given to studies reporting data purporting to distinguish the effects of ovarian endometriomas per sé from those consequent to surgery for endometriosis or from endometriosis in general. RESULTS Based on the evidence reviewed in the present study, it can be concluded that conservative management may actually expose women to four of the following theoretical risks, i.e. infection of the endometriomas, follicular fluid contamination with the endometrioma content, higher risk of pregnancy complications and cancer development later in life. The first three conditions do not justify surgery because these events are uncommon and the number of women needed to be treated would be exceedingly high and would not justify the costs and risks of the intervention. Albeit also very rare, the possibility of developing ovarian cancer later in life is more troublesome because it is a life-threatening condition. However, this alarmism is supported by only one cohort study and this risk can be effectively prevented by postponing surgery until after the IVF programme is concluded or when women have definitely satisfied their reproductive wishes. CONCLUSION The available evidence on the risks of conservative management does not support systematic surgery before IVF in women with small ovarian endometriomas.

Adhesion Prevention in Endometriosis: A Neglected Critical Challenge

Prevention of adhesions, whether de novo or by re-formation, is one of the most important and surprisingly neglected aspect of the treatment of endometriosis. Adhesions may cause infertility, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain but also intestinal obstruction and complications at subsequent surgery. They may play a role in the development of some forms of the disease such as ovarian endometriomas and possibly also deep invasive nodules. Three randomized controlled trials have been published documenting some partial success with Interceed, Oxiplex/AP gel or Adept solution in reducing adhesions extent at second look laparoscopy performed a few weeks after initial surgery. However, data on relevant long-term outcomes such as fertility, pelvic pain or disease recurrences or other adhesions-related complications is lacking. Noteworthy, endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disorder and the insult causing adhesions is expected to persist after surgery. Therefore preventing adhesion formation with exclusively agents at the time of surgery may be insufficient. Future studies should focus on a 2-step strategy that includes measures applied at the time of surgery and subsequent administration of agents able to prevent the development of new adhesions.

Postoperative Medical Therapy After Surgical Treatment of Endometriosis: From Adjuvant Therapy to Tertiary Prevention

The high rate of disease recurrence after surgery is critical and frustrating for women with endometriosis. Adjuvant treatments using a 3- to 6-months course of hormone therapy after surgery have been extensively investigated during the last 2 decades; however, results have been unsatisfactory, primarily because the benefits of hormone therapy rapidly vanish once treatment is discontinued. The protective effect is limited to the period of use. Accordingly, it is recognized that suppressive hormone therapy after surgery markedly prevents recurrent episodes only if given over the long term. The emerging view is that estroprogestins do not ameliorate the effects of surgery but demonstrate tertiary prevention of the disease. They prevent ovulation and reduce retrograde menstrual flow, two crucial events in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. The available literature strongly supports the benefits of prolonged administration of estroprogestins after surgery in preventing recurrence of endometriomas and dysmenorrhea. In contrast, data on dyspareunia and nonmenstrual pelvic pain remain scanty and unconvincing, and there is no information about recurrence of other forms of endometriosis such as peritoneal implants and adhesions. Overall, estroprogestin therapy after surgery to treat endometriosis should be recommended in women who do not seek to become pregnant. Further evidence is warranted to better delineate the beneficial effects of this emerging but convincing strategy.

In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes in Treated Hypothyroidism

BACKGROUND Levothyroxine has been shown to enhance pregnancy outcomes in women with hypothyroidism requiring in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, the precise magnitude of these benefits remains to be determined. In particular, it has yet to be clarified whether levothyroxine may fully overcome the detrimental effects of hypothyroidism or, conversely, whether affected women remain at reduced prognosis for pregnancy outcomes. METHODS Patients who underwent IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) over a 3-year period were reviewed. Cases were deemed eligible if they were diagnosed with clinical or subclinical hypothyroidism and were receiving levothyroxine. Controls were two subsequently age-matched euthyroid women for every case. Both cases and controls were selected only if serum thyrotropin was ≤2.5 mIU/L. RESULTS In total, 137 women with treated hypothyroidism and 274 controls were included. Baseline characteristics of the two study groups were similar with the exception of body mass index, which was slightly higher among the cases (22.9±3.9 vs. 21.9±3.3 kg/m2, p=0.013). Most IVF-ICSI cycle outcome variables were also similar, with the exception of a higher rate of cancellation for poor response (3.6% vs. 0.7%, p=0.04), a longer duration of stimulation (10.9±2.2 vs. 10.1±2.0 days, p=0.001), a higher proportion of women failing to obtain viable embryos (17% vs. 7%, p=0.006), and a lower fertilization rate (75% vs. 86%, p=0.017) among cases. Conversely, the clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle, the implantation rate, and the live birth rate per started cycle did not differ; they were 36% and 34% (p=0.93), 28% and 22% (p=0.11), and 30% and 27% (p=0.50) in cases and controls, respectively. Subgroup analyses comparing women with (n=79) and without (n=58) thyroid autoimmunity and comparing women who were diagnosed with overt hypothyroidism (n=70) or subclinical hypothyroidism (n=67) failed to identify relevant differences. CONCLUSIONS In our population, IVF-ICSI outcome was not significantly hampered in women with adequately treated hypothyroidism. The magnitude of the detected differences in cycle outcome was mild, and we failed to document any differences for the most relevant outcomes, i.e., pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and delivery rate. In conclusion, adequate levothyroxine treatment maintaining thyrotropin serum levels below 2.5 mIU/L may overcome the detrimental effects of hypothyroidism.

Thyroid axis dysregulation during in vitro fertilization in hypothyroid-treated patients

BACKGROUND While there is a large body of evidence showing a significant impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on thyroid function in euthyroid patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), information on the effect of this treatment on thyroid axis equilibrium in hypothyroid-treated patients is insufficient. The goal of this prospective study was to investigate serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) modifications in hypothyroid-treated patients during IVF. METHODS Hypothyroid-treated women selected for IVF between November 2010 and December 2011 were considered for study entry. They were eligible if serum TSH tested the month preceding the IVF cycle was 0.4-2.5 mIU/L. Additional inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a certified diagnosis of clinical or subclinical hypothyroidism; (2) consumption of at least 25 μg of levothyroxine daily; (3) serum free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine tested the month preceding the IVF cycle within the reference range; (4) no previous IVF cycles; (5) regular menstrual cycles; and (6) day 3 serum follicle-stimulating hormone <12 IU/mL and anti-Müllerian hormone >0.5 ng/mL. Serum TSH was tested at three time points: between day 1 and day 8 of the cycle during the month preceding the start of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), at the time of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration and at 16 days after hCG administration. RESULTS Seventy-two women met our selection criteria. The serum levels of TSH at basal assessment, at the time of hCG administration, and at 16 days after hCG administration were 1.7 ± 0.7, 2.9 ± 1.3, and 3.2 ± 1.7 mIU/L, respectively. All pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. Serum TSH exceeded the threshold of 2.5 mIU/L in 46 subjects at the time of hCG administration (64%, [CI: 53-75%]) and in 49 subjects 16 days after hCG administration (68%, [CI: 57-79%]). CONCLUSIONS Serum TSH increased considerably during COH in adequately treated hypothyroid women undergoing IVF. We suggest strictly monitoring these women during IVF cycles and, if necessary, promptly adjusting the levothyroxine dose. This is the most pragmatic approach but, to date, it is not supported by clinical evidence. Further studies aimed at clarifying the most suitable therapeutic strategy are thus warranted.

Incidence of elevation of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rate of euthyroid women encountering an elevation of serum TSH above the threshold of 2.5 mIU/L during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF. STUDY DESIGN Six-month prospective cohort study on 175 consecutive euthyroid women undergoing their first IVF cycle. Serum TSH assessments were performed before COH, at the time of hCG administration and at +16 days after hCG administration. Women were eligible if serum TSH tested the month preceding the IVF cycle was 0.4-2.5 mIU/L. A history of thyroid disorders was an exclusion criterion. RESULTS Serum concentrations of TSH at the three scheduled assessments were 1.5±0.5, 2.2±1.0 and 2.1±1.1 mIU/L, respectively. A statistically significant increase occurred between basal levels and levels at the time of hCG administration (p<0.001). Afterwards, levels remained stable (p=0.49). Serum TSH at the time of hCG administration exceeded the threshold of 2.5 mIU/L in 61 subjects, corresponding to 35% (95% CI: 28-42%). At +16 days after hCG administration, this event was observed in 47 subjects (27%, 95% CI: 21-34%). Baseline characteristics of women who did and did not exceed the threshold were similar apart from basal serum TSH, which was higher in the former group. The OR was 7.6 (95%CI: 2.9-20.2) per mIU/L (p<0.001). Cycle outcome and pregnancy rate were also similar. CONCLUSION Serum TSH exceeds the threshold of 2.5 mIU/L during COH in one out of three women who are euthyroid prior to enter an IVF cycle. Further evidence is warranted to elucidate the clinical relevance of our findings.

Age-related infertility and unexplained infertility: an intricate clinical dilemma

A diagnosis of unexplained infertility is commonly made when clinical investigations fail to identify any obvious barriers to conception. As a consequence, unexplained infertility includes several heterogeneous conditions, one being women with age-related infertility. However, the latter represent a peculiar and different situation. Women with age-related infertility may have a different prognosis and may benefit from different treatments. Unfortunately, since fecundity declines with age, discerning between unexplained infertility and age-related infertility becomes more and more difficult as the womans age increases. In this opinion, with the use of a mathematical model we show that the rate of false positive diagnoses of unexplained infertility increases rapidly after 35 years of age. Using a threshold of 2 years of unfruitful, regular unprotected intercourse, this rate exceeds 50% in women starting pregnancy seeking after 37 years. The scenario is much worse using a threshold of 1 year. From a clinical perspective, extrapolating results obtained in a population of young women with unexplained infertility to those with age-related infertility is not justified. It is noteworthy that, if Assisted Reproductive Technologies are unable to overcome age-related infertility, the older women erroneously labeled with unexplained infertility may receive inappropriate therapies. These may expose women to unjustified risks and waste financial resources. Unfortunately, the available literature about older women is scanty and does not provide valid evidence. Randomized controlled trials aimed at identifying the most suitable clinical management of older women with a normal infertility work-up are pressingly needed.

IVF outcome in poor responders failing to produce viable embryos in the preceding cycle

This study postulated that poor-responder women failing to obtain viable embryos would represent a subgroup of subjects with extremely poor prognosis. To elucidate this aspect, women in this condition over a 4-year period were retrospectively identified and their IVF outcomes in subsequent cycles were evaluated. A total of 108 women satisfied the selection criteria and underwent at least one further IVF cycle. There were 19 women excluded because they opted for a mild approach using clomiphene citrate alone, leaving 89 women for data analyses. Four women had a live birth during this first cycle, corresponding to a delivery rate per started cycle of 4.5% (95% CI 1.5-10.0%). From a public health perspective, the mean cost per delivery was € 124,540. Younger age emerged as the unique predictive factor of success. In conclusion, women with poor ovarian response failing to obtain viable embryos have extremely low chances of success in subsequent cycles. Considering the costs and risks of IVF, the appropriateness of pursuing treatments in these women is questionable. Younger women may represent a possible exception since their chances of delivery are higher.

Management of Endometriosis in the Infertile Patient.

Abstract The management of endometriosis‐related infertility remains debated. However, in recent years, the role of in vitro fertilization (IVF) has progressively grown. Reasons to explain this change include (1) the improvement of the effectiveness and safety of IVF, (2) the raised awareness of the modest effectiveness of surgery, (3) the inherent risks of surgery including in particular the damage to the ovarian reserve when ovarian endometriomas have to be removed, (4) the ineffectiveness of intrauterine insemination and the possible risks of endometriosis progression associated with the use of this technique. However, IVF is not able to overcome all the potential detrimental effects of endometriosis and can actually fail. Future efforts should aim at improving the effectiveness and safety of both surgery and IVF. Fertility preservation techniques may play a role in the future, but data are currently too scanty to support its recommendation.

THE LONG-TERM IMPACT OF CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION ON THYROID FUNCTION

OBJECTIVE Evidence on the long-term impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on thyroid function is scarce. To investigate this, we report on serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) modifications in euthyroid and hypothyroid women during COH and 3 months after the end of the stimulation cycle. METHODS Women who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) and who did not become pregnant were eligible. Cases were women with treated hypothyroidism and basal serum TSH <2.5 mIU/L. Controls were euthyroid women matched to cases by age and basal serum TSH. Women could be included if serum TSH was available at 4 time points: prior to initiating COH (time 1); at the time of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (time 2); 16 days after hCG administration (time 3); and 3 months after the end of the IVF cycle (time 4). RESULTS Thirty-seven case-control pairs were included. Serum TSH at times 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 1.7 ± 0.6, 3.1 ± 1.4, 3.1 ± 1.3, and 2.7 ± 1.7 mIU/L, and 1.7 ± 0.6, 2.9 ± 1.0, 2.7 ± 1.0, and 1.9 ± 0.7 mIU/L among cases and controls, respectively. A statistically significant difference emerged at time 4 (P<.001). In both groups, serum TSH was higher at time 4 compared to time 1. Serum TSH exceeded the recommended threshold of 2.5 mIU/L at time 4 in 51% of cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 35 to 68%) and in 16% of controls (95% CI, 4 to 28%) (P = .003). CONCLUSION COH seems to have a long-term impact on TSH levels. The magnitude of this effect is particularly pronounced in hypothyroid women.