Andrea Cassells

Telephone Care Management To Improve Cancer Screening among Low-Income Women: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Context Minority and low-income women have low screening rates for cancer. Contribution In this trial from 11 community and migrant health centers in New York City, 1413 women overdue for cancer screening were randomly assigned to receive a telephone-based intervention (delivered by 8 prevention care managers) or usual care. The intervention included information about breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer and motivational and logistical support for obtaining screening. Within 18 months, the screening rates for all 3 forms of cancer increased more with telephone support than through usual care. Implications Telephone support delivered by trained personnel can improve cancer screening rates among some minority, low-income women. The Editors Higher screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer could reduce cancer mortality rates substantially (1-4). Current cancer screening rates are particularly disappointing among ethnic minorities and individuals with low socioeconomic status (5, 6) who often present with late-stage diagnoses (7) and have high mortality rates (8, 9). Interventions to increase cancer screening have shown limited sustainability and effect on health care disparities. A previous study showed that an office systems approach, which used a medical record flowsheet and practice teamwork, increased screening rates by 20% to 33% in small rural community practices (10); however, a similar intervention was less effective in larger urban practices (11). An office intervention in low-income settings in Florida increased mammography use and home fecal occult blood testing at 12 months (12), but rates decreased substantially after research support ended (13). Use of the telephone to support cancer screening is well documented (14-18), but interventions have typically addressed a single form of cancer screening. In some settings, telephone infrastructures to support childhood immunization (19) and patients with chronic illnesses (20-23) already exist. These infrastructures could add screening support for patients who are already enrolled, or they could expand services to others while making minimal additional demands on primary care practices (24). This paper reports the results of a randomized, controlled trial that tested the effect of centralized telephone care management on cancer screening rates among women 50 to 69 years of age who obtained care at community and migrant health centers in New York City. Methods Settings Federally qualified community and migrant health centers provide comprehensive community-oriented primary care to over 12 million patients nationally (25) and are uniquely positioned to deliver cancer screenings to underserved and minority populations. We sought participation from 15 of the 21 community and migrant health centers in New York City because of their anticipated ability to provide sufficient patients for the study and their affiliations with tertiary care facilities that conduct mammography and colorectal screening and provide follow-up services for abnormal test results. Of these 15 sites, 2 were involved in competing research projects, 2 had few patients who were likely to be eligible and therefore served as pilot sites, and the remaining 11 participated. Clinical Directors Network, a practice-based research network in New York City, was responsible for recruiting clinicians, practices, and women and for implementing the intervention and evaluation. The project was approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at Dartmouth College, by the institutional review board at Clinical Directors Network, and by all relevant bodies responsible for reviewing research at participating community and migrant health centers. Patients Recruitment Women were approached by research assistants during routine visits to the centers or were referred by a clinician. Research assistants explained the study and obtained written informed consent from women who agreed to participate. Women were compensated

Racism and ambulatory blood pressure in a community sample.

15 for participating in an interview whether or not they met eligibility criteria. Eligibility Eligible women were 50 to 69 years of age, were overdue for at least 1 cancer screening according to their medical records, were patients of the center for at least 6 months, and had no plans to move or change health centers within 15 months. We excluded women whose primary language was not English, Spanish, or Haitian Creole and those who were acutely ill or currently receiving cancer treatment. After we obtained consent, a research assistant reviewed patient medical records to confirm eligibility. Mammography and Papanicolaou tests that were performed within the past year were seen as evidence of breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively, whereas reports of home fecal occult blood testing within the past year, sigmoidoscopy within the past 5 years, or colonoscopy within the past 10 years were seen as evidence of colorectal cancer screening. Women whose charts indicated that they were up to date on all 3 cancer screenings were excluded. We also excluded women with unresolved abnormal screening results (for example, positive results on home fecal occult blood testing; mammography results that were categorized as American College of Radiology level 0, 4, or 5; and certain Papanicolaou test results) and notified their physicians of these findings. Design Eligible, consenting women were grouped by center, duration of enrollment at their center (12 months or >12 months), and the number of cancer screenings that they had received at recommended intervals (0 or 1 screening or 2 screenings). The New Yorkbased research assistant assigned women in each group to receive the intervention or usual care by using sealed randomization forms that were produced by Dartmouth College staff with a computer-based random-number generator. Patients were informed of their group assignment individually by telephone. At time of consent, all women received the publication titled Put Prevention into Practice Personal Health Guide (26), which contained information regarding recommended preventive services. Women who were assigned to the usual care group received a single telephone call during which trial staff answered questions about preventive care, informed women of their usual care status, advised them to obtain needed preventive care from their primary care clinician, and thanked them for their participation. Women who were assigned to the intervention group received a series of telephone support calls from a trained prevention care manager who was monitored to ensure quality and consistency. In much the same way that patient navigators guide women through the health care system during cancer treatment (27), prevention care managers facilitated the screening process for each woman by addressing barriers that prevent or delay receipt of cancer screenings. Prevention care managers received 7 hours of training, including an overview of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines (28-30); a review of barriers to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings; and detailed explanations of the targeted screenings. Additional training included role-playing telephone calls during which the managers used the intervention scripts. Thereafter, logs were reviewed in monthly meetings to ensure fidelity to the intervention. The 8 prevention care managers were women, and most were college graduates. Their assignments were determined by patient language needs. Each care manager focused most of her work on patients from 1 or 2 sites while supporting smaller numbers of patients from other sites; contact with clinicians was limited. During the first call with a patient in the intervention group, the prevention care manager answered questions about the health guide and confirmed or updated screening dates found in the womans medical record. She next determined how ready the woman was to act on each screening (31) and worked with the woman to prioritize overdue screenings. The prevention care manager then provided motivational support, responding to each participants specific barriers to screening by using a structured script that was developed through an earlier series of interviews with women (32). Some participants had been advised during office visits with their clinicians to undergo screening; those who had not received such recommendations were sent a written recommendation from their clinician. Women who reported that they had difficulty communicating with their physician were sent brightly colored patient activation cards that listed overdue screenings, which they could share with their clinician at their next appointment. Care managers also scheduled appointments, provided accurate information about screenings over the telephone and by mail, prompted women with appointment reminder calls and letters, provided directions to screening facilities, and helped women to find a means of transportation to appointments. During subsequent calls, which continued for 18 months or until the patient was up to date for all screenings, the prevention care manager asked about future appointments and screenings the patient had received since the last call. The manager then responded to new and ongoing barriers for remaining overdue screenings. Only clinicians, not care managers, were responsible for ordering screenings at all but 2 centers, which permitted care managers to mail home fecal occult blood test kits directly to women who were willing to perform this test. Evaluation Descriptive data on the centers were gathered from surveys that were completed by clinicians and clinical directors. Outcome data were based on reviews of patient medical records, which were conducted at least 3 months after the intervention period to allow for the time lag between receipt of a service and the availability of documentation. Data included patient demographic characteristics, screening dates and results, chronic il

Influencing medication adherence among women with AIDS

Objective: Racism has been identified as a psychosocial stressor that may contribute to disparities in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease. The goal of the present article was to investigate the relationship of perceived racism to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in a sample of American-born Blacks and Latinos. Methods: Participants included English-speaking Black or Latino(a) adults between the ages of 24 and 65. They completed daily mood diaries and measures of perceived racism, socioeconomic status, and hostility. Participants were outfitted with ABP monitors; 357 provided data on waking hours only, and 245 provided data on both waking and nocturnal ABP. Results: Perceived racism was positively associated with nocturnal ABP even when controlling for personality factors and socioeconomic status. Conclusions: The results suggest that racism may influence cardiovascular disease risk through its effects on nocturnal BP recovery. ABP = ambulatory blood pressure; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; CVD = cardiovascular disease; SES = socioeconomic status; HTN = hypertension; AHA = American Heart Association; GHI = gross household income; BMI = body mass index; PEDQ-CV = Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version.

Translation of an Efficacious Cancer-Screening Intervention to Women Enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care Organization

This study examined the effects of a ten-session cognitive-behavioural stress management/expressive supportive therapy (CBSM+) intervention on adherence to antiretroviral medication. Although the intervention was not designed to influence adherence, it was theorized that improved coping and social support could enhance adherence. Women with AIDS (N=174) in Miami, New York and New Jersey, USA, were randomized to a group CBSM+ intervention or individual control condition. Participants were African American (55%), Latina (18%) and Caribbean (18%) with drug (55%) and/or alcohol (32%) histories. Participants were assessed on self-reported medication adherence over seven days, HIV-related coping strategies and beliefs regarding HIV medication. Baseline overall self-reported adherence rates were moderate and related to coping strategies and HIV medication beliefs. Low adherent (80%) participants in the intervention condition increased their mean self-reported medication adherence (30.4% increase, t44=3.1, p<0.01), whereas low adherent women in the control condition showed a non-significant trend (19.6% increase, t44=2.0, p>0.05). The intervention did not improve adherence in this population; conditions did not differ significantly on self-reported adherence. Low adhering intervention participants significantly decreased levels of denial-based coping (F1,88=5.97, p<0.05). Results suggest that future interventions should utilize group formats and address adherence using coping and medication-knowledge focused strategies.

Decreased Depression Up to One Year Following CBSM+ Intervention in Depressed Women with AIDS: The Smart/EST Women’s Project

PURPOSE An earlier randomized controlled trial of prevention care management (PCM) found significant improvement in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-screening rates among women attending Community Health Centers but required substantial research support. This study evaluated the impact of a streamlined PCM delivered through a Medicaid managed care organization (MMCO), an infrastructure with the potential to sustain this program for the long term. METHODS This randomized trial was conducted within an MMCO serving New York City between May 2005 and December 2005. A total of 1,316 women aged 40 to 69 years and not up to date for at least 1 targeted cancer-screening test were randomized to either PCM or a comparison group. Women in the PCM group received up to 3 scripted telephone calls to identify barriers and provide support to obtain any needed breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-screening tests. Women in the comparison group received a modified version of the MMCO’s established mammography telephone outreach program, also in up to 3 calls. Women in both groups received a financial incentive on confirmation that they had received a mammogram. Screening status was assessed through MMCO administrative data. Groups were compared using odds ratios. RESULTS In an intent-to-treat comparison adjusted for baseline screening status, PCM women were 1.69 times more likely to be up-to-date for colorectal cancer-screening tests at follow-up than women in the comparison group (95% confidence interval, 1.03–2.77). Follow-up screening rates for cervical and breast cancer did not differ significantly between study groups on an intent-to-treat basis. CONCLUSIONS The abbreviated PCM telephone intervention was feasible to deliver through an MMCO and improved screening for 1 cancer. This approach has the potential to improve cancer-screening rates significantly in settings that can provide telephone support to women known to be overdue.

Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Prenatal Care: Perinatal Outcomes Among Adolescents in New York City Health Centers

This prospective multisite Phase III clinical trial (Miami, New York, New Jersey) investigated the long-term (one year) effects of a 10-week group cognitive-behavioral stress management/expressive supportive therapy (CBSM+) intervention on disadvantaged minority women living with AIDS. The CBSM+ intervention consisted of 10-weekly group session of stress management, cognitive-behavioral skill training, relaxation techniques and expressive-supportive therapeutic strategies. The primary study outcome was self-reported depression scores as measured by the BDI. The CBSM+ Group intervention significantly decreased depression scores on the BDI for women following the intervention and maintained the decreased level at one-year follow-up.

Counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension: cluster-randomized clinical trial main effects.

OBJECTIVES We compared an evidence-based model of group prenatal care to traditional individual prenatal care on birth, neonatal, and reproductive health outcomes. METHODS We performed a multisite cluster randomized controlled trial in 14 health centers in New York City (2008-2012). We analyzed 1148 pregnant women aged 14 to 21 years, at less than 24 weeks of gestation, and not at high obstetrical risk. We assessed outcomes via medical records and surveys. RESULTS In intention-to-treat analyses, women at intervention sites were significantly less likely to have infants small for gestational age (< 10th percentile; 11.0% vs 15.8%; odds ratio = 0.66; 95% confidence interval = 0.44, 0.99). In as-treated analyses, women with more group visits had better outcomes, including small for gestational age, gestational age, birth weight, days in neonatal intensive care unit, rapid repeat pregnancy, condom use, and unprotected sex (P = .030 to < .001). There were no associated risks. CONCLUSIONS CenteringPregnancy Plus group prenatal care resulted in more favorable birth, neonatal, and reproductive outcomes. Successful translation of clinical innovations to enhance care, improve outcomes, and reduce cost requires strategies that facilitate patient adherence and support organizational change.

A brief sexual barrier intervention for women living with AIDS: Acceptability, use, and ethnicity

Background— Data are limited on the implementation of evidence-based multilevel interventions targeted at blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive blacks who receive care in low-resource primary care practices. Methods and Results— Counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension is a cluster-randomized clinical trial in which 30 community health centers were randomly assigned to the intervention condition (IC) or usual care (UC). Patients at the IC sites received patient education, home BP monitoring, and monthly lifestyle counseling, whereas physicians attended monthly hypertension case rounds and received feedback on their patients’ home BP readings and chart audits. Patients and physicians at the UC sites received printed patient education material and hypertension treatment guidelines, respectively. The primary outcome was BP control, and secondary outcomes were mean changes in systolic and diastolic BPs at 12 months, assessed with an automated BP device. A total of 1059 patients (mean age, 56 years; 28% men, 59% obese, and 36% with diabetes mellitus) were enrolled. The BP control rate was similar in both groups (IC=49.3% versus UC=44.5%; odds ratio, 1.21 [95% confidence interval, 0.90–1.63]; P=0.21). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the intervention was associated with greater BP control in patients without diabetes mellitus (IC=54.0% versus UC=44.7%; odds ratio, 1.45 [confidence interval, 1.02–2.06]); and small-sized community health centers (IC=51.1% versus UC=39.6%; odds ratio, 1.45 [confidence interval, 1.04–2.45]). Conclusions— A practice-based, multicomponent intervention was no better than UC in improving BP control among hypertensive blacks. Future research on the implementation of behavioral modification strategies for hypertension control in low-resource settings should focus on the development of more efficient and tailored interventions in this high-risk population. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00233220.Background— Data are limited on the implementation of evidence-based multilevel interventions targeted at blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive blacks who receive care in low-resource primary care practices. Methods and Results— Counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension is a cluster-randomized clinical trial in which 30 community health centers were randomly assigned to the intervention condition (IC) or usual care (UC). Patients at the IC sites received patient education, home BP monitoring, and monthly lifestyle counseling, whereas physicians attended monthly hypertension case rounds and received feedback on their patients’ home BP readings and chart audits. Patients and physicians at the UC sites received printed patient education material and hypertension treatment guidelines, respectively. The primary outcome was BP control, and secondary outcomes were mean changes in systolic and diastolic BPs at 12 months, assessed with an automated BP device. A total of 1059 patients (mean age, 56 years; 28% men, 59% obese, and 36% with diabetes mellitus) were enrolled. The BP control rate was similar in both groups (IC=49.3% versus UC=44.5%; odds ratio, 1.21 [95% confidence interval, 0.90–1.63]; P =0.21). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the intervention was associated with greater BP control in patients without diabetes mellitus (IC=54.0% versus UC=44.7%; odds ratio, 1.45 [confidence interval, 1.02–2.06]); and small-sized community health centers (IC=51.1% versus UC=39.6%; odds ratio, 1.45 [confidence interval, 1.04–2.45]). Conclusions— A practice-based, multicomponent intervention was no better than UC in improving BP control among hypertensive blacks. Future research on the implementation of behavioral modification strategies for hypertension control in low-resource settings should focus on the development of more efficient and tailored interventions in this high-risk population. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00233220][1]. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-26} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00233220&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2F129%2F20%2F2044.atom

Enhancing the health of women living with HIV: the SMART/EST Women’s Project

Interventions aimed at reducing sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted diseases (HIV/STDs) have focused primarily on male condom use among seronegative men and women. However, female-controlled sexual barriers (female condoms and vaginal microbicides) offer women living with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) alternative methods to protect themselves and others from disease transmission. A pilot behavioral intervention was conducted to increase sexual barrier use and enhance and assess factors related to acceptability. Participants (N=178) were drawn from the Stress Management and Relaxation Training with Expressive Supportive Therapy (SMART/EST) Womens Project, a multisite phase III clinical trial for women living with AIDS (Miami, FL; New York City, NY; Newark, NJ). Intervention participants (n=89) were matched for age and ethnicity with control condition participants (n=89). Women were African American (52%), Haitian (15%), Hispanic (19%), Caucasian (10%), and other ethnicities (4%). The intervention condition received barrier products (male and female condoms and spermicides based on nonoxynol-9 in the form of vaginal gel, film, and suppositories) during three sessions held over 3 months. Data on barrier use and acceptability were analyzed at baseline and 3 and 9 months postintervention. Use of N-9 spermicides on a trial basis increased significantly by 3 months in the intervention conditions (22%–51%, P<.05). Cultural differences in acceptability were greatest between Haitian women and women in other ethnic groups. Exposure to this pilot behavioral intervention was associated with increased acceptability and use of chemical barriers without decreased use of male condoms.

Can Language-Concordant Prevention Care Managers Improve Cancer Screening Rates?

The principal objective of these multisite studies (Florida, New York, New Jersey: epicenters for human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] among women) was to develop and implement effective combinations of behavioral interventions to optimize the health status of the most neglected and understudied population affected by the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic in the United States: poor women of color living with HIV. The two studies enrolled nearly 900 women randomly assigned to “high intensity” (cognitive–behavioral stress management training combined with expressive–supportive therapy [CBSM]+ group) or “low intensity” (individual psychoeducational program) treatment conditions over a period of 9 years. The initial study of the stress management and relaxation training/expressive–supportive therapy (SMART/EST) Women’s Project (SWP I) focused on reducing depression and anxiety, as well as improving self-efficacy and overall quality of life for women with case-defined AIDS. Findings from this study demonstrated the utility of CBSM+ in reducing distress (depression, anxiety) and denial, while improving social support, self-efficacy, coping skills, and quality of life. The second study (SWP II), which included all women living with HIV, extended these findings by demonstrating that exposure to CBSM+ significantly improved the ability of the participants to take advantage of a health behavior change program encouraging the adoption and maintenance of healthier lifestyle behaviors (high levels of medication adherence, appropriate nutritional intake and physical activity, safer sexual practices, and reduced alcohol use/abuse) essential for optimal health in the context of living with HIV. SWP II also determined that the intervention program was equally beneficial to less-acculturated segments of the affected population (ie, non-English speaking HIV+ women) through the creation of culturally and linguistically sensitive Spanish and Creole versions of the program. A third study (SWP III) is currently underway to “translate” this evidence-based treatment program into Community Health Centers in Miami, New York City, and metropolitan New Jersey.