Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrea Fernandes is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrea Fernandes.


PLOS ONE | 2011

Life Expectancy at Birth for People with Serious Mental Illness and Other Major Disorders from a Secondary Mental Health Care Case Register in London

Chin-Kuo Chang; Richard D. Hayes; Gayan Perera; Mathew T. M. Broadbent; Andrea Fernandes; William Lee; Matthew Hotopf; Robert Stewart

Objective Despite improving healthcare, the gap in mortality between people with serious mental illness (SMI) and general population persists, especially for younger age groups. The electronic database from a large and comprehensive secondary mental healthcare provider in London was utilized to assess the impact of SMI diagnoses on life expectancy at birth. Method People who were diagnosed with SMI (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder), substance use disorder, and depressive episode/disorder before the end of 2009 and under active review by the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) in southeast London during 2007–09 comprised the sample, retrieved by the SLAM Case Register Interactive Search (CRIS) system. We estimated life expectancy at birth for people with SMI and each diagnosis, from national mortality returns between 2007–09, using a life table method. Results A total of 31,719 eligible people, aged 15 years or older, with SMI were analyzed. Among them, 1,370 died during 2007–09. Compared to national figures, all disorders were associated with substantially lower life expectancy: 8.0 to 14.6 life years lost for men and 9.8 to 17.5 life years lost for women. Highest reductions were found for men with schizophrenia (14.6 years lost) and women with schizoaffective disorders (17.5 years lost). Conclusion The impact of serious mental illness on life expectancy is marked and generally higher than similarly calculated impacts of well-recognised adverse exposures such as smoking, diabetes and obesity. Strategies to identify and prevent causes of premature death are urgently required.


BMC Psychiatry | 2010

All-cause mortality among people with serious mental illness (SMI), substance use disorders, and depressive disorders in southeast London: a cohort study.

Chin-Kuo Chang; Richard D. Hayes; Matthew Broadbent; Andrea Fernandes; William Lee; Matthew Hotopf; Robert Stewart

BackgroundHigher mortality has been found for people with serious mental illness (SMI, including schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders, and bipolar affective disorder) at all age groups. Our aim was to characterize vulnerable groups for excess mortality among people with SMI, substance use disorders, depressive episode, and recurrent depressive disorder.MethodsA case register was developed at the South London and Maudsley National Health Services Foundation Trust (NHS SLAM), accessing full electronic clinical records on over 150,000 mental health service users as a well-defined cohort since 2006. The Case Register Interactive Search (CRIS) system enabled searching and retrieval of anonymised information since 2008. Deaths were identified by regular national tracing returns after 2006. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for the period 2007 to 2009 using SLAM records for this period and the expected number of deaths from age-specific mortality statistics for the England and Wales population in 2008. Data were stratified by gender, ethnicity, and specific mental disorders.ResultsA total of 31,719 cases, aged 15 years old or more, active between 2007-2009 and with mental disorders of interest prior to 2009 were detected in the SLAM case register. SMRs were 2.15 (95% CI: 1.95-2.36) for all SMI with genders combined, 1.89 (1.64-2.17) for women and 2.47 (2.17-2.80) for men. In addition, highest mortality risk was found for substance use disorders (SMR = 4.17; 95% CI: 3.75-4.64). Age- and gender-standardised mortality ratios by ethnic group revealed huge fluctuations, and SMRs for all disorders diminished in strength with age. The main limitation was the setting of secondary mental health care provider in SLAM.ConclusionsSubstantially higher mortality persists in people with serious mental illness, substance use disorders and depressive disorders. Furthermore, mortality risk differs substantially with age, diagnosis, gender and ethnicity. Further research into specific risk groups is required.


BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | 2013

Development and evaluation of a de-identification procedure for a case register sourced from mental health electronic records

Andrea Fernandes; Danielle Cloete; Matthew Broadbent; Richard D. Hayes; Chin-Kuo Chang; Richard Jackson; Angus Roberts; Jason Tsang; Murat Soncul; Jennifer Liebscher; Robert Stewart; Felicity Callard

BackgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) provide enormous potential for health research but also present data governance challenges. Ensuring de-identification is a pre-requisite for use of EHR data without prior consent. The South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM), one of the largest secondary mental healthcare providers in Europe, has developed, from its EHRs, a de-identified psychiatric case register, the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS), for secondary research.MethodsWe describe development, implementation and evaluation of a bespoke de-identification algorithm used to create the register. It is designed to create dictionaries using patient identifiers (PIs) entered into dedicated source fields and then identify, match and mask them (with ZZZZZ) when they appear in medical texts. We deemed this approach would be effective, given high coverage of PI in the dedicated fields and the effectiveness of the masking combined with elements of a security model. We conducted two separate performance tests i) to test performance of the algorithm in masking individual true PIs entered in dedicated fields and then found in text (using 500 patient notes) and ii) to compare the performance of the CRIS pattern matching algorithm with a machine learning algorithm, called the MITRE Identification Scrubber Toolkit – MIST (using 70 patient notes – 50 notes to train, 20 notes to test on). We also report any incidences of potential breaches, defined by occurrences of 3 or more true or apparent PIs in the same patient’s notes (and in an additional set of longitudinal notes for 50 patients); and we consider the possibility of inferring information despite de-identification.ResultsTrue PIs were masked with 98.8% precision and 97.6% recall. As anticipated, potential PIs did appear, owing to misspellings entered within the EHRs. We found one potential breach. In a separate performance test, with a different set of notes, CRIS yielded 100% precision and 88.5% recall, while MIST yielded a 95.1% and 78.1%, respectively. We discuss how we overcome the realistic possibility – albeit of low probability – of potential breaches through implementation of the security model.ConclusionCRIS is a de-identified psychiatric database sourced from EHRs, which protects patient anonymity and maximises data available for research. CRIS demonstrates the advantage of combining an effective de-identification algorithm with a carefully designed security model. The paper advances much needed discussion of EHR de-identification – particularly in relation to criteria to assess de-identification, and considering the contexts of de-identified research databases when assessing the risk of breaches of confidential patient information.


BMJ Open | 2016

Cohort profile of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre (SLaM BRC) Case Register : current status and recent enhancement of an Electronic Mental Health Record-derived data resource.

Gayan Perera; Matthew Broadbent; Felicity Callard; Chin-Kuo Chang; Johnny Downs; Rina Dutta; Andrea Fernandes; Richard D. Hayes; Max Henderson; Richard Jackson; Amelia Jewell; Giouliana Kadra; Ryan Little; Megan Pritchard; Hitesh Shetty; Alexander Tulloch; Robert Stewart

Purpose The South London and Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre (SLaM BRC) Case Register and its Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) application were developed in 2008, generating a research repository of real-time, anonymised, structured and open-text data derived from the electronic health record system used by SLaM, a large mental healthcare provider in southeast London. In this paper, we update this registers descriptive data, and describe the substantial expansion and extension of the data resource since its original development. Participants Descriptive data were generated from the SLaM BRC Case Register on 31 December 2014. Currently, there are over 250 000 patient records accessed through CRIS. Findings to date Since 2008, the most significant developments in the SLaM BRC Case Register have been the introduction of natural language processing to extract structured data from open-text fields, linkages to external sources of data, and the addition of a parallel relational database (Structured Query Language) output. Natural language processing applications to date have brought in new and hitherto inaccessible data on cognitive function, education, social care receipt, smoking, diagnostic statements and pharmacotherapy. In addition, through external data linkages, large volumes of supplementary information have been accessed on mortality, hospital attendances and cancer registrations. Future plans Coupled with robust data security and governance structures, electronic health records provide potentially transformative information on mental disorders and outcomes in routine clinical care. The SLaM BRC Case Register continues to grow as a database, with approximately 20 000 new cases added each year, in addition to extension of follow-up for existing cases. Data linkages and natural language processing present important opportunities to enhance this type of research resource further, achieving both volume and depth of data. However, research projects still need to be carefully tailored, so that they take into account the nature and quality of the source information.


Drug and Alcohol Dependence | 2011

Associations between substance use disorder sub-groups, life expectancy and all-cause mortality in a large British specialist mental healthcare service

Richard D. Hayes; Chin-Kuo Chang; Andrea Fernandes; Matthew Broadbent; William Lee; Matthew Hotopf; Robert Stewart

BACKGROUND People with substance use disorders (SUDs) have increased risk of mortality but risk in sub-groups is poorly understood. METHODS SUD cases, aged 15 years or older, were identified in the South London and Maudsley Case Register which contains over 150,000 specialist mental healthcare and addictions service users linked to regular national mortality tracing. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for the period 2007-2009 were calculated based on expected numbers of deaths for England and Wales in 2008 then stratified by gender, age, ethnicity, and type of substance use disorder. Life expectancies at birth were estimated. RESULTS We detected 10,927 cases with a primary substance use disorder diagnosis prior to 2010, who were active to South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust services between 2007 and 2009. Alcohol and opioid use disorders were the most common disorders (45.4% and 44.2% of the SUD cohort respectively) and were associated with increased mortality (SMRs 4.04 and 4.85 respectively). Subgroups at particularly high risk were women with opioid use disorder (SMR 7.32) and those under the age of 45 years with alcohol use disorder (SMR 9.25). SMRs associated with alcohol and opioid use disorders diminished with age. Life expectancies of individuals with alcohol and opioid use disorders were reduced by 9-17 years compared to national norms. CONCLUSIONS Those under 45 years with alcohol use disorder and women with opioid use disorder are at particularly high risk of mortality. More targeted health care is required to address the specific needs of these vulnerable subgroups.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Functional status and all-cause mortality in serious mental illness.

Richard D. Hayes; Chin-Kuo Chang; Andrea Fernandes; Aysha Begum; David To; Matthew Broadbent; Matthew Hotopf; Robert Stewart

Background Serious mental illness can affect many aspects of an individual’s ability to function in daily life. The aim of this investigation was to determine if the environmental and functional status of people with serious mental illness contribute to the high mortality risk observed in this patient group. Methods We identified cases of schizophrenia, schizoaffective and bipolar disorder aged ≥15 years in a large secondary mental healthcare case register linked to national mortality tracing. We modelled the effect of activities of daily living (ADLs), living conditions, occupational and recreational activities and relationship factors (Health of the Nation Outcome Scale [HoNOS] subscales) on all-cause mortality over a 4-year observation period (2007–10) using Cox regression. Results We identified 6,880 SMI cases (242 deaths) in the observation period. ADL impairment was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3–2.8; p = 0.001, p for trend across ADL categories = 0.001) after controlling for a broad range of covariates (including demographic factors, physical health, mental health symptoms and behaviours, socio-economic status and mental health service contact). No associations were found for the other three exposures. Stratification by age indicated that ADLs were most strongly associated with mortality in the youngest (15 to <35 years) and oldest (≥55 years) groups. Conclusions Functional impairment in people with serious mental illness diagnoses is a marker of increased mortality risk, possibly in younger age groups as a marker of negative symptomatology.


Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 2012

Associations between symptoms and all-cause mortality in individuals with serious mental illness

Richard D. Hayes; Chin-Kuo Chang; Andrea Fernandes; Aysha Begum; David To; Matthew Broadbent; Matthew Hotopf; Robert Stewart

OBJECTIVE To determine if aggression, hallucinations or delusions, and depression contribute to excess mortality risk observed in individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). METHODS We identified SMI cases (schizophrenia, schizoaffective and bipolar disorder) aged≥15years in a large secondary mental healthcare case register linked to national mortality tracing. We modelled the effect of specific symptoms (HoNOS subscales) on all-cause mortality using Cox regression. RESULTS We identified 6880 SMI cases (242 deaths) occurring 2007-2010. Bipolar disorder was associated with reduced mortality risk compared to schizophrenia (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.4-0.96; p=0.028). Mortality was not significantly associated with hallucinations and delusions or overactive-aggressive behaviour, but was associated with physical illness/disability. There was a positive association between mortality and subclinical depression among individuals with schizophrenia (HR 1.5; 1.1-2.2; p=0.019) but a negative association with subclinical and more severe depression among those with schizoaffective disorder (HR 0.1; 0.02-0.4; p=0.001 and 0.3; 0.1-0.8; p=0.021, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The recognised increased risk of mortality in SMI did not appear to be influenced by severity of hallucinations, delusions, or overactive-aggressive behaviour. Physical illness and lifestyle may need to be addressed and the relationship between depression and mortality requires further investigation.


BMC Psychiatry | 2014

Suicide completion in secondary mental healthcare: a comparison study between schizophrenia spectrum disorders and all other diagnoses.

Javier-David Lopez-Morinigo; Andrea Fernandes; Chin-Kuo Chang; Richard D. Hayes; Matthew Broadbent; Robert Stewart; Anthony S. David; Rina Dutta

BackgroundSuicide completion is a tragic outcome in secondary mental healthcare. However, the extent to which demographic and clinical characteristics, suicide method and service use-related factors vary across psychiatric diagnoses remains poorly understood, particularly regarding differences between ‘schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD)’ and ‘all other diagnoses’, which may have implications for suicide prevention in high risk groups.Methods308 patients who died by suicide over 2007–2011 were identified from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre Case Register. Demographic, clinical, services use-related factors, ‘full risk assessment’ ratings and the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HONOS) scores were compared across psychiatric diagnoses. Specifically, differences between patients with and without SSD were investigated.ResultsPatients with SSD ended their lives at a younger age, were more frequently of Black ethnicity and had higher levels of social deprivation than other diagnoses. Also, these patients were more likely to have HONOS and ‘risk assessment’ completed. However, patients who had no SSD scored significantly higher on ‘self-injury’ and ‘depression’ HONOS items and they were more likely to have the following ‘risk assessment’ items: ‘suicidal ideation’, ‘hopelessness’, ‘feeling no control of life’, ‘impulsivity’ and ‘significant loss’. Of note, ‘disengagement’ was more common in patients with SSD, although they had been seen by the staff closer to the time of suicide than in all-other diagnoses. Whilst ‘hanging’ was the most common suicide method amongst patients with non-SSD, most service users with a SSD diagnosis used ‘jumping’ (from heights or in front of a vehicle).ConclusionsSuicide completion characteristics varied between SSD and other diagnoses in patients receiving secondary mental healthcare. In particular, although clinicians tend to more frequently recognize suicide risk as a focus of concern in patients who have SSD, who are therefore more likely to have a detailed risk assessment documented; ‘known’ suicide risk factors appear to be more relevant in patients with non-SSD. Hence, the classic suicide prevention model might be of little use for SSD.


BMJ Open | 2016

Risk assessment and suicide by patients with schizophrenia in secondary mental healthcare: A case–control study

Javier Lopez-Morinigo; Rosa Ayesa-Arriola; Beatriz Torres-Romano; Andrea Fernandes; Hitesh Shetty; Matthew Broadbent; Maria-Encarnacion Dominguez-Ballesteros; Robert Stewart; Anthony S. David; Rina Dutta

Objectives To investigate the role of risk assessment in predicting suicide in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) receiving secondary mental healthcare. We postulated that risk assessment plays a limited role in predicting suicide in these patients. Design Retrospective case–control study. Setting Anonymised electronic mental health record data from the South London and Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust (SLaM) (London, UK) linked with national mortality data. Participants In 242 227 SLaM service users up to 31 December 2013, 635 suicides were identified. 96 (15.1%) had a SSD diagnosis. Those who died before 1 January 2007 (n=25) were removed from the analyses. Thus, 71 participants with SSD who died from suicide over the study period (cases) were compared with 355 controls. Main outcome measure Risk of suicide in relation to risk assessment ratings. Results Cases were younger at first contact with services (mean±SD 34.5±12.6 vs 39.2±15.2) and with a higher preponderance of males (OR=2.07, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.65, p=0.01) than controls. Also, suicide occurred within 10 days after last contact with services in half of cases, with the most common suicide methods being hanging (14) and jumping (13). Cases were more likely to have the following ‘risk assessment’ items previously recorded: suicidal history (OR=4.42, 95% CI 2.01 to 9.65, p<0.001), use of violent method (OR=3.37, 95% CI 1.47 to 7.74, p=0.01), suicidal ideation (OR=3.57, 95% CI 1.40 to 9.07, p=0.01) and recent hospital discharge (OR=2.71, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.28, p=0.04). Multiple regression models predicted only 21.5% of the suicide outcome variance. Conclusions Predicting suicide in schizophrenia is highly challenging due to the high prevalence of risk factors within this diagnostic group irrespective of outcome, including suicide. Nevertheless, older age at first contact with mental health services and lack of suicidal history and suicidal ideation are useful protective markers indicative of those less likely to end their own lives.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2018

Can risk assessment predict suicide in secondary mental healthcare? Findings from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre (SLaM BRC) Case Register

Javier-David Lopez-Morinigo; Andrea Fernandes; Hitesh Shetty; Rosa Ayesa-Arriola; Ashraful Bari; Robert Stewart; Rina Dutta

PurposeThe predictive value of suicide risk assessment in secondary mental healthcare remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which clinical risk assessment ratings can predict suicide among people receiving secondary mental healthcare.MethodsRetrospective inception cohort study (n = 13,758) from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) (London, UK) linked with national mortality data (n = 81 suicides). Cox regression models assessed survival from the last suicide risk assessment and ROC curves evaluated the performance of risk assessment total scores.ResultsHopelessness (RR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.05–4.80, p = 0.037) and having a significant loss (RR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.03–3.55, p = 0.041) were significantly associated with suicide in the multivariable Cox regression models. However, screening statistics for the best cut-off point (4–5) of the risk assessment total score were: sensitivity 0.65 (95% CI 0.54–0.76), specificity 0.62 (95% CI 0.62–0.63), positive predictive value 0.01 (95% CI 0.01–0.01) and negative predictive value 0.99 (95% CI 0.99–1.00).ConclusionsAlthough suicide was linked with hopelessness and having a significant loss, risk assessment performed poorly to predict such an uncommon outcome in a large case register of patients receiving secondary mental healthcare.

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrea Fernandes's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew Broadbent

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hitesh Shetty

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge