Andrea Ferrara

Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma : a three-year experience

Laparoscopic resection for carcinoma of the colon and rectum is currently under intense scrutiny. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review our three-year experience of laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal carcinoma. METHODS: From October 1991 to September 1994, 76 laparoscopic procedures were performed for colorectal neoplasia (32 males and 44 females; mean age, 69 years). Fifty-five procedures were done for carcinoma, 16 for large polyps, and five for diversion in patients with unresectable cancer. For resectable tumors, the average size was 4 cm; staging was as follows: Dukes A, 10 patients; Dukes B1, 11; Dukes B2, 18; Dukes C1, 1; Dukes C2, 9; and Dukes D, 8. Fourteen cases (25 percent) that were converted to open procedures were compared with the 41 cases that were completed laparoscopically for differences in tumor size, surgical margins, number of lymph nodes harvested, length of hospital stay, and evidence of recurrence. Procedures completed laparoscopically were then compared with a group of open controls completed during the same time period. RESULTS: During the first six months, the conversion rate was 32 percent but dropped to 8 percent in the last six months. There were a total of 19 complications (25 percent), of which 8 (14 percent) were directly related to the laparoscopic technique. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested in laparoscopic resection for carcinoma was 8.5, and the average closest tumor margin was 4.5 cm. When laparoscopic resections were compared with converted and standard open colectomies, there was no significant difference in tumor margins or numbers of nodes resected. Length of stay was significantly shorter for anterior resections completed laparoscopically than for converted or conventional colectomies. Although this was also the trend for right hemicolectomies, it did not reach statistical significance. Mean follow-up of the group completed laparoscopically was 16.7 months, during which there was one recurrence. There were no trocar site recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: This early experience seems to indicate that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma does not per se compromise surgical oncologic principles and encourages us to continue our critical appraisal of this technique.

Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period

AbstractPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We analyzed our experience via a prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal cohort study. The period of study extended from April 1991 to May 2001. Laparoscopic resection was offered selectively in the absence of a large mass, invasion into abdominal wall or adjacent organs, and multiple prior abdominal operations. Every laparoscopic resection performed with curative intent for adenocarcinoma was included. Twenty percent of patients whose procedures were converted to open resection were included in the laparoscopic-resection group because of intention to treat. Oncologic outcome measures of this group were compared with a computerized, case-matched, open-resection group, the case-matching variables being age, gender, site of primary tumor (colon vs. rectum), and TNM stage. The laparoscopic-resection group was followed up prospectively, and data were updated regularly. The follow-up techniques consisted of a combination of office visits, telephone calls, and the United States Social Security Death Index database. RESULTS: The laparoscopic-resection group consisted of 172 patients with a mean age of 67 (range, 27–85) years. The open-resection group consisted of 172 patients with a mean age of 69 (range, 30–90) years. Mean follow-up was 52 (range, 3–128) months. Complete (100 percent) follow-up data were available. The TNM stage distribution was 63 Stage I (37 percent), 51 Stage II (30 percent), 47 Stage III (27 percent), and 11 Stage IV (6 percent) tumors for the laparoscopic-resection group and 65 Stage I (38 percent), 48 Stage II (28 percent), 51 Stage III (29 percent), and 8 Stage IV (5 percent) tumors for patients in the open-resection group (P = 0.75, not significant). Thirty-day mortality was 1.2 percent (2 deaths) in the laparoscopic-resection group and 2.4 percent (4 deaths) in the open-resection group (P > 0.05, not significant). Early and late complication incidences were comparable. Local recurrence was observed in three patients (1.7 percent) in the laparoscopic resection group with the primary tumor in the colon and in three patients (1.7 percent) with the primary tumor in the rectum, for a total incidence of local recurrence in the laparoscopy group of 3.5 percent (6 patients). In the open-resection group, local recurrence was observed in two patients (1.2 percent) among those with primary tumor site in the colon and in three patients (1.7 percent) in the group with primary tumor in the rectum, for a total incidence of local recurrence in the open-resection group of 2.9 percent (5 patients). One of the local recurrences in the laparoscopy group occurred in the port/extraction site, for an incidence of 0.6 percent. Metastasis occurred in 18 patients (10.5 percent) in the open group and in 21 (12.2 percent) in the laparoscopy group. Stage-for-stage overall five-year survival rates were similar in the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis performed for colonic vs. rectal primary adenocarcinoma confirmed that TNM stage for stage-overall survival was similar in the laparoscopic and open-resection groups (log-rank P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the drawbacks of a nonrandomized study, no adverse long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer were observed in a single center’s experience during a ten-year period.

Biofeedback in colorectal practice: A multicenter, statewide, three-year experience

PURPOSE: Biofeedback treatment is often offered to patients in colorectal centers; however, standards of treatment are still lacking. A dedicated team approach is desirable but difficult to coordinate. We present our three-year experience of electromyographic-based biofeedback treatment offered within a multicenter, statewide organization. METHODS: Between October 1992 and October 1995, 188 patients completed a biofeedback treatment program in one of five coordinated centers within a 200-mile radius. A unified common database was established and continuously updated. A colorectal surgeon served as statewide director, and dedicated teams were established at each location. Each local team included the medical director and a certified biofeedback therapist and had access to a dietitian and a nurse data coordinator. Electromyographic-based biofeedback sessions were given weekly, and a home trainer program was established. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients with chronic constipation had a mean of eight (range, 2–14) weekly sessions. A total of 72 patients with fecal incontinence had a mean of seven (range, 2–11) weekly sessions. A total of 84 percent of the constipated and 85 percent of the incontinent patients had significant improvement with biofeedback treatment. Patient compliance and satisfaction were high. Constipated patients increased the mean number of weekly unassisted bowel movements from 0.8 to 6.5. Incontinent patients decreased the mean number of weekly gross incontinence episodes from 11.8 to 2. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback treatment can be extremely successful in both incontinent and constipated patients. A large geographic area can be covered with coordinated centers in which each dedicated team uses a unified treatment protocol, and a common database is established.

Intraoperative use of toradol® facilitates outpatient hemorrhoidectomy

Pain after hemorrhoidectomy is widely feared by many patients who are mostly still treated with oral/intramuscular narcotics to control their pain postoperatively. PURPOSE: In an effort to decrease posthemorrhoidectomy pain by applying newer methods of analgesia, a prospective trial was conducted to investigate the postoperative analgesic effect of Toradol® (ketorolac tromethamine; Syntex Labs, Palo Alto, CA) injected into the sphincter muscle at the time of hemorrhoidectomy and taken orally during a five-day postoperative period in a group of 24 patients (Toradol® group). Results were compared with two other groups of matching patients: one group (narcotics, n=18) treated with standard postoperative narcotic intramuscular/oral analgesics after overnight hospital stay, and a group (SQMP, n=21) previously treated by one of us with outpatient, subcutaneous infusion of morphine sulfate (Roxane Laboratories, Columbus, OH) via a home infusion pump. METHOD: The length of hospitalization, severity of postoperative pain and complications, costs, and side effects were analyzed by patient questionnaire at the time of the first postoperative visit and hospital and clinic records were reviewed. Differences between groups were analyzed using Students t-test withP<0.05 being significant. RESULTS: Subjective pain response and hospitalization cost were significantly less in the SQMP group; however, this was at the expense of increased postoperative complications (urinary retention) and side effects (day until first bowel movement, nausea) although without a decrease in satisfaction rating. The Toradol® group had pain control equivalent to that of the narcotics group, a higher satisfaction rating, and suffered no increase in complications relative to either group. Significantly, there was no urinary retention in the Toradol® group. CONCLUSION: Postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy can be safely controlled as an outpatient using newer methods of pain control. These include both constant-infusion pain pump or supplemental use of the nonsteroidal analgesic ketorolac, both of which allow early release of the patient the day of surgery by diminishing postoperative pain. An important advantage of local injection of ketorolac is the elimination of urinary retention in our study group, probably by blunting the pain reflex response facilitated by prostaglandins, thus allowing safe same-day discharge.

Electromyographic assessment of biofeedback training for fecal incontinence and chronic constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Biofeedback training is an effective modality for the treatment of chronic constipation and fecal incontinence. In general, patients express satisfaction and perceive functional improvement following biofeedback therapy; however, quantifying these observations has been difficult. AIM: This study was undertaken to evaluate the physiologic benefits of biofeedback therapy as reflected by noninvasive electromyography parameters. METHODS: Fifty-five patients who underwent computerized electromyography-based biofeedback treatment at our institution between July 1993 and July 1995 were identified. Noninvasive electromyographic testing was performed before, during (weekly), and at completion of training. Mean number of weekly sessions was seven (range, 5–11). Short-term and ten-second contractions (amplitude/μV), sustained contractions (endurance, in seconds), and net strength (μV) of the external anal sphincter before and after biofeedback were compared for differences. RESULTS: There were 30 patients with chronic constipation, mean age, 65.3 (range, 33–86) years, composed of 24 women, and 25 patients with fecal incontinence, mean age 66 (range, 34–85) years, composed of 12 males. Statistically significant improvement in endurance and net strength following biofeedback training was noted in both the constipated and the fecal incontinence groups. Fifty-three of 55 (96.4 percent) patients expressed 50 to 100 percent subjective satisfaction after biofeedback therapy. Forty-six of 55 (83.6 percent) patients demonstrated individually improved endurance. CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter endurance and net strength, as measured by noninvasive electromyography, significantly improve following biofeedback therapy in both constipated and fecal incontinence patients. These data suggest that endurance and net strength may be useful tools in assessing a benefit from biofeedback training in these patients.

Stapled transanal rectal resection vs. transvaginal rectocele repair for treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome.

PURPOSE: Stapled transanal rectal resection has been introduced as a new technology for the management of obstructive defecation syndrome. In this study we observed the clinical outcomes for stapled transanal rectal resection as compared with transvaginal rectocele repair for obstructive defecation syndrome. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of patients who received transvaginal rectocele repair for obstructive defecation syndrome from June 1997 to February 2002 as compared with patients who received stapled transanal rectal resection from June 2005 to August 2007. The clinical outcomes observed were operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, complication rate, procedure failure rate, recurrence rate, time to recurrence, and dyspareunia rate. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had transvaginal rectocele repair for management of obstructive defecation syndrome, and 36 patients had stapled transanal rectal resection. There was no difference in the age of patients receiving either procedure (transvaginal rectocele repair, 57.92 years old; stapled transanal rectal resection, 53.19 years old; P = 0.1096). Evaluation of the clinical outcomes showed that transvaginal rectocele repair had a longer operative time (transvaginal rectocele repair, 85 minutes; stapled transanal rectal resection, 52 minutes; P = <0.0001), greater estimated blood loss (transvaginal rectocele repair, 108 ml; stapled transanal rectal resection, 43 ml; P = 0.0015), and a lower complication rate (transvaginal rectocele repair, 18.9 percent; stapled transanal rectal resection, 61.1 percent; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The stapled transanal rectal resection procedure can be done with shorter operative times and less blood loss than transvaginal rectocele repair, however, it has a higher complication rate.

Small-cell carcinoma of the rectum

Small-cell carcinoma of the rectum is an infrequent pathologic finding, and its precise incidence is unknown. Its incidence is less than 0.2 percent among all colorectal cancers. This tumor manifests highly aggressive behavior. The treatment of choice is combination chemotherapy similar to that used for small-cell carcinoma of the lung, but in small localized tumors surgery plus chemotherapy is an alternative. We present two cases of small-cell carcinoma of the lower rectum and a review of the literature.

Clinical, manometric, and EMG characteristics of patients with fecal incontinence

Abstract Fecal incontinence occurs frequently in both men and women. Yet, few studies on fecal incontinence have separated the evaluation and interpretation of data by gender. This study was designed to identify differences in the clinical, anorectal manometry, and electromyography (EMG) characteristics between male and female patients with fecal incontinence. We compared 53 incontinent males (mean age, 64 years) with 72 incontinent females (mean age, 61 years). Each patient underwent computerized anorectal manometry, and invasive (pudendal nerve conduction studies and concentric needle EMG) and noninvasive EMG (anal sensor surface electrode). An anal incontinence score (AIS) ranging from 0 to 6 was used to categorize patients. Male patients had higher incontinence scores at presentation (AIS greater than 4, 70% vs. 54%). Female patiens had significantly lower resting pressure (40 vs. 53 mmHg, p < 0.05) and more women had sphincter asymmetry (36% vs. 25%, p < 0.05). Both groups had similar PNTMLs (2.41 vs. 2.47 ms). Difference was seen in the net strength of the sphincter (women 4.0 μV vs. men 8.0 μV, p < 0.05), as measured by noninvasive EMG. In conclusion, it is well known that there are differences in anorectal physiologic function between male and female patients with normal continence. Comparing male and female patients with fecal incontinence suggests that female patients tend to have worse sphincter function that men. Both groups had similar EMG alterations, suggesting a common neurogenic injury as etiology. Future studies are needed to address the sexes separately.

Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy in a colorectal surgical unit

Abstract: The number of patients who undergo ambulatory surgery for haemorrhoids has been increasing over the past few years. The aim of present study was to evaluate our experience with ambulatory treatment of haemorrhoids in a dedicated colorectal surgical unit from January 1995 to April 1997. We performed 225 ambulatory haemorrhoidectomies in this period. Mean age of the patients was 49.5 years, 52% of the patients were male, and 48% female. Thirty-two percent of our patients were classified as ASA level II or III. The most frequent procedure was the threequadrant haemorrhoidectomy (87% of patients). Only 20 patients (8.9%) presented with postoperative complications, of these, only five (2.2%) were considered major and required hospital admission. The mean time until the first postoperative visit was 8.2 days, and to the final visit 37.2 days. The mean number of postoperative visits was 2. Patients with complications had a longer postoperative follow-up. Patient satisfaction was high. We thus conclude that outpatient haemorrhoidectomy is safe and cost effective.

Laparoscopic Colorectal Training Gap in Colorectal and Surgical Residents.

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an established safe procedure with demonstrated benefits. Proficiency in this specialty correlates with the volume of cases. We examined training in this surgical field for both general surgery and colon and rectal surgery residents to determine whether the number of cases needed for proficiency is being realized. Methods: We examined the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and American Board of Colorectal Surgeons (ABCRS) operative statistics for graduating general surgery and colon and rectal surgery residents. Results: Although the number of advanced laparoscopy cases had increased for general surgery residents, there was still a significant gap in case volume between the average number of laparoscopic colorectal operations performed by graduating general surgery residents (21.6) and those performed by graduating colon and rectal surgery residents (81.9) in 2014. Conclusion: There is a gap between general surgery and colon and rectal surgery residency training for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. General surgery residents are not meeting the volume of cases necessary for proficiency in colorectal surgery. This deficit represents a structural difference in training.