Andrea Icks

High prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in Southern Germany: Target populations for efficient screening. The KORA survey 2000

Aims/hypothesisTo estimate the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and their relations with cardiovascular risk factors in the general population aged 55 to 74 years in Southern Germany.MethodsOral glucose tolerance tests were carried out in a random sample of 1353 subjects aged 55 to 74 years participating in the KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) Survey 2000. Prevalences of glucose tolerance categories (1999 WHO criteria) were adjusted for sample probabilities. The numbers needed to screen (NNTS) to identify one person with undiagnosed diabetes were estimated from age-adjusted logistic regression models.ResultsSample design-based prevalences of known and unknown diabetes, IGT, and IFG were 9.0%, 9.7%, 16.8%, 9.8% in men, and 7.9%, 6.9%, 16.0%, 4.5% in women, respectively. In both sexes, participants with undiagnosed diabetes had higher BMI, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, uric acid, and lower HDL-cholesterol than normoglycaemic subjects. A combination of abdominal adiposity, hypertension, and parental diabetes in men resulted in a NNTS of 2.9 (95%CI: 2.0–4.6). In women, the combination of increased triglycerides, hypertension and parental diabetes history yielded a NNTS of 3.2 (95%CI: 2.2–5.1).Conclusion/interpretationAbout 40% of the population aged 55 to 74 years in the Augsburg region have disturbed glucose tolerance or diabetes. Half of the total cases with diabetes are undiagnosed. Cardiovascular risk factors worsen among glucose tolerance categories, indicating the need for screening and prevention. Screening for undiagnosed diabetes could be most efficient in individuals with abdominal adiposity (men), hypertriglyceridaemia (women), hypertension, and parental diabetes history.

Long-Term Prognosis of Diabetic Foot Patients and Their Limbs Amputation and death over the course of a decade

OBJECTIVE There is a dearth of long-term data regarding patient and limb survival in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The purpose of our study was therefore to prospectively investigate the limb and person survival of DFU patients during a follow-up period of more than 10 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Two hundred forty-seven patients with DFUs and without previous major amputation consecutively presenting to a single diabetes center between June 1998 and December 1999 were included in this study and followed up until May 2011. Mean patient age was 68.8 ± 10.9 years, 58.7% were male, and 55.5% had peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Times to first major amputation and to death were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox multiple regression. RESULTS A first major amputation occurred in 38 patients (15.4%) during follow-up. All but one of these patients had evidence of PAD at inclusion in the study, and 51.4% had severe PAD [ankle-brachial pressure index ≤0.4]). Age (hazard ratio [HR] per year, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01–1.10]), being on dialysis (3.51 [1.02–12.07]), and PAD (35.34 [4.81–259.79]) were significant predictors for first major amputation. Cumulative mortalities at years 1, 3, 5, and 10 were 15.4, 33.1, 45.8, and 70.4%, respectively. Significant predictors for death were age (HR per year, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.06–1.10]), male sex ([1.18–2.32]), chronic renal insufficiency (1.83 [1.25–2.66]), dialysis (6.43 [3.14–13.16]), and PAD (1.44 [1.05–1.98]). CONCLUSIONS Although long-term limb salvage in this modern series of diabetic foot patients is favorable, long-term survival remains poor, especially among patients with PAD or renal insufficiency.

Regional differences in the prevalence of known Type 2 diabetes mellitus in 45–74 years old individuals: Results from six population‐based studies in Germany (DIAB‐CORE Consortium)

Diabet. Med. 29, e88–e95 (2012)

Incidence of lower-limb amputations in the diabetic compared to the non-diabetic population. Findings from nationwide insurance data, Germany, 2005-2007.

INTRODUCTION One major objective is to reduce the risk of lower limb amputation in diabetes mellitus. Nationwide data to incidences of amputations in the diabetic and non-diabetic populations in Germany as well as relative and attributable risks due to diabetes are lacking so far. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using data of a nationwide statutory health insurance (1.6 million members), we assessed all first non-traumatic lower-limb amputations between 2005 and 2007. We estimated sex-age-specific and standardized incidences of amputations in the diabetic and non-diabetic populations, and relative and attributable risks due to diabetes. RESULTS Of all subjects with a first amputation in the study period 2005-2007 (n=994), 66% had diabetes, 76% were male, mean age (SD) was 67 (13) years. Incidences per 100 000 person years (standardized to the 2004 German population) in the diabetic and the non-diabetic populations: 176.5 (95% confidence interval 156.0-196.9) and 20.0 (17.0-23.1) in men, and 76.9 (61.9-91.8) and 13.4 (10.7-16.2) in women. Standardized relative risks: 8.8 (7.3-10.7) in men and 5.7 (4.3-7.6) in women. Attributable risks among exposed: 0.89 and 0.83 and population attributable risks 0.59 and 0.40, each in men and women, respectively. DISCUSSION In our first German nationwide study, we found the relative risk of lower limb amputation in the diabetic compared to the non-diabetic to be lower than in earlier regional studies in Germany, supporting results of regional reductions of the excess amputation risk due to diabetes. A repetition of the study is warranted to further evaluate trends according to the St. Vincent goals.

Incidence of Blindness in Relation to Diabetes: A population-based study

OBJECTIVE A reduction of diabetes-related blindness was declared a primary objective for Europe (St. Vincent Declaration). We collected data about incidence rates of blindness in the diabetic population compared with the nondiabetic population. Up to now, such data are scarce—even worldwide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A complete list of newly registered blindness allowance recipients was drawn up in the district of Württemberg-Hohenzollern, Germany, between 1990 and 1993. From these data, we estimated age-specific and standardized incidence rates of blindness in the entire, the diabetic, and the nondiabetic population, as well as relative and attributable risks due to diabetes. RESULTS There were 2,714 people meeting the inclusion criteria; 1,823 (67.2%) were female and 781 (28.8%) had diabetes. In 318 subjects, diabetes was likely to be the only cause of blindness; in 192 subjects, it was one of several contributory causes. Age of women was 73.9 ± 19.4 years (mean ± SD) and of men 63.3 ± 25.5 years. Results standardized to the (West) German population are as follows: incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years): total population: 13.5; diabetic population: 60.6; nondiabetic population: 11.6; relative risk: 5.2; attributable risk among exposed: 0.81; and population attributable risk: 0.14. The relative risks decreased considerably with increasing age. When the study is repeated to monitor the St. Vincent targets, a reduction in the incidence rate of blindness in the diabetic population by 17% will be detected with 95% power. CONCLUSIONS Great relative and attributable risks, especially in younger age-groups, indicate the need for increased attention to preventive measures for microvascular complications.

Blindness Due to Diabetes: Population-based Age- and Sex-specific Incidence Rates

Reducing the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and blindness was declared one of the main objectives in St Vincent. To date, hardly any valid data are available on the age‐ and sex‐specific incidence of diabetes‐related blindness. They are necessary, however, to evaluate intervention activities. Therefore, we used a population‐based registry of blindness to calculate incidence of blindness due to diabetes. In one German district (Rhineland) we obtained complete lists of cases of blindness newly registered in 1990 and 1991 and coded as blind due to diabetes (n = 589). We estimated age‐specific incidence rates in the entire as well as in the diabetic population. Incidence rates of blindness due to diabetes (100000−1 * year−1), standardized to the West‐German population, were 3.2 (CI 95 %: 2.9;3.4) in the entire population and 60.5 (CI 95 %: 45.7;75.4) in the diabetic population. Incidence rates in the diabetic population showed a peak between 20 and 40 years of age, probably due to complications of Type 1 diabetes. Incidence was higher in diabetic women than in diabetic men (p <0.05 at ages ≥40 years). Repeating the study will detect a decrease in the incidence of blindness due to diabetes by one‐third with over 99 % power. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Costs of dialysis—a regional population-based analysis

BACKGROUND Population-based estimates of costs of renal replacement therapy are scarce in the literature. The aim of our study was to calculate the costs of long-term dialysis in 2006 on the basis of patient-specific data from a well-defined population in a region in western Germany (n = 310,757). METHODS Cost estimation was performed from the perspective of the statutory health insurance. All dialysis patients from the study region (n = 344, 54% male, mean age (+/-SD) 69 +/- 13 years, 42% diabetic) were assessed for the costs of the dialysis procedures, dialysis-related hospital admissions, outpatient contacts outside of our dialysis center, dialysis-related medication, patient transportation and related costs (e.g. reimbursement fees on the basis of the German diagnosis-related group system, price scales). We estimated the cumulative cost per patient year in 2006 (in Euros), along with the 10th and 90th percentiles and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) by using bootstrapping procedures. RESULTS The mean total dialysis-related cost in 2006 was 54,777 Euros (95% CI, 51,445-65,705) per patient year. The largest part of the costs (55%) was caused by the dialysis procedures, followed by the costs of medication (22%), hospitalization (14%) and transportation (8%). The total cost increased significantly with increasing age. No significant association was found between total cost and sex, dialysis strategy, end-stage renal disease duration and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS We present for the first time a cost estimation of dialysis in Germany on the basis of patient-level data in a population-based sample. Except age, patient characteristics were not significantly associated with costs. The largest part of the costs was caused by the dialysis procedures themselves; however, other dialysis-specific health care utilization also strongly contributed to the total cost.

Diabetes prevalence based on health insurance claims: large differences between companies

Diabet. Med. 28, 919–923 (2011)

Time-dependent impact of diabetes on mortality in patients after major lower extremity amputation: survival in a population-based 5-year cohort in Germany.

OBJECTIVE To estimate the impact of diabetes on mortality in patients after first major lower extremity amputation (LEA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using claims data of a nationwide statutory health insurance, we assessed all deaths in a cohort of all 444 patients with a first major LEA since 2005 (71.8% male; mean age 69.1 years; 58.3% diabetic; 43% with amputation above the knee) up to 2009. Using Cox regression, we estimated the time-dependent hazard ratios to compare patients with and without diabetes. RESULTS The cumulative 5-year mortality was 68% in diabetic and 59% in nondiabetic individuals. In the first course, mortality was lower in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients. Later, the diabetes risk increased yielding crossed survival curves after 2 to 3 years (time dependency of diabetes; P = 0.003). Age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for diabetes were as follows: 0–30 days: 0.50 [95% CI 0.31–0.84]; 31–60 days: 0.60 [0.25–1.41]; 61 days to 6 months: 0.75 [0.38–1.48]; >6–12 months: 1.27 [0.63–2.53]; >12–24 months: 1.65 [0.88–3.08]; >24–36 months: 2.02 [0.80–5.09]; and >36–60 months: 1.91 [0.70–5.21]. The pattern was similar in both sexes. In the full model, significant risk factors for mortality were age (1.05; 1.03–1.06), amputation above the knee (1.50; 1.16–1.94), and quartile category 3 or 4 of the number of prescribed medications (1.64; 1.12–2.40 and 1.76; 1.20–2.59). Further adjustment for comorbidity did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS In this population-based study, we found a time-dependent mortality risk of diabetes following first major LEA, which may be in part a result of a healthier lifestyle in diabetic patients or the access to specific treatment structures in diabetic individuals.

Prevalence of known diabetes in German adults aged 25-69 years: results from national health surveys over 15 years.

Aims  The few studies examining the secular trend in diabetes prevalence in Germany have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, using nationally representative samples of adults, we investigated whether the prevalence of known diabetes has changed over 15 years.