Andrea J. Rapkin

Progesterone metabolite allopregnanolone in women with premenstrual syndrome

Objective To evaluate the anxiolytic 3α-5α-reduced progesterone metabolite allopregnanolone in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and controls. Methods Thirty-five women with prospectively documented PMS and 36 controls were evaluated. Serum progesterone and allopregnanolone levels were measured on days 19 and 26 of the cycle as determined by urinary LH detection kits. Analysis of variance and Student t tests were used to analyze the data. Results Allopregnanolone levels were significantly lower on day 26 in the PMS group than in controls (3.6 ± 0.8 versus 7.5 ± 1.3 ng/mL; P <.04). Significant differences in the ratio of the metabolite to progesterone also were noted, with a smaller ratio in the PMS subjects (0.9 ± 0.3 versus 3.2 ± 1.3 ng/mL; P <.05). There were no significant differences between the PMS and control groups with respect to serum progesterone levels. Conclusion Subjects with PMS manifested lower levels of the anxiolytic metabolite allopregnanolone in the luteal phase when compared with controls. Diminished concentrations of allopregnanolone in women with PMS may lead to an inability to enhance gamma aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibition during states of altered central nervous system excitability, such as ovulation or physiologic or psychological stress. The lowered metabolite levels could contribute to the genesis of various mood symptoms of the disorder, such as anxiety, tension, and depression.

Efficacy of a new low-dose oral contraceptive with drospirenone in premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Objective: To compare the efficacy of a new low-dose oral contraceptive pill (OCP) formulation with placebo in reducing symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Methods: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial consisted of 2 run-in and 3 treatment cycles with daily symptom charting; 450 women with symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder were randomized to either placebo or an OCP formulation containing drospirenone 3 mg and ethinyl estradiol 20 &mgr;g. Hormones were administered for 24 days, followed by 4 days of inactive pills (24/4). Results: Scores on the total Daily Record of Severity of Problems decreased by –37.49 in the drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol group and by –29.99 in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference –7.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] –11.2 to –3.8; P < .001 by rank analysis of covariance). Mood symptom scores were reduced by –19.2 and –15.3 in active-treatment and placebo groups, respectively (adjusted mean difference –3.9, 95% CI –5.84 to –2.01; P = .003); physical symptom scores were reduced by –10.7 and –8.6 in active-treatment and placebo groups, respectively (adjusted mean difference –2.1, 95% CI –3.3 to –0.95; P < .001); and behavioral symptom scores were reduced by –7.7 and –6.2 in active-treatment and placebo groups, respectively (adjusted mean difference –1.5, 95% CI –2.251 to –0.727; P < .001). Response, defined as a 50% decrease in daily symptom scores, occurred in 48% of the active-treatment group and 36% of the placebo group (relative risk 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.6; P = .015) and corresponds to a number-needed-to-treat of 8 patients. Conclusion: A 24/4 regimen of drospirenone 3 mg and ethinyl estradiol 20 &mgr;g improves symptoms associated with premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Level of Evidence: I

A review of treatment of premenstrual syndrome & premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Severe premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and, more recently, premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) have been studied extensively over the last 20 years. The defining criteria for diagnosis of the disorders according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) include at least one moderate to severe mood symptom and one physical symptom for the diagnosis of PMS and by DSM IV criteria a total of 5 symptoms with 1 severe mood symptom for the diagnosis of PMDD. There must be functional impairment attributed to the symptoms. The symptoms must be present for one to two weeks premenstrually with relief by day 4 of menses and should be documented prospectively for at least two cycles using a daily rating form. Nonpharmacologic management with some evidence for efficacy include cognitive behavioral relaxation therapy, aerobic exercise, as well as calcium, magnesium, vitamin B(6) L-tryptophan supplementation or a complex carbohydrate drink. Pharmacologic management with at least ten randomized controlled trials to support efficacy include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors administered daily or premenstrually and serotonergic tricyclic antidepressants. Anxiolytics and potassium sparing diuretics have demonstrated mixed results in the literature. Hormonal therapy is geared towards producing anovulation. There is good clinical evidence for GnRH analogs with addback hormonal therapy, danocrine, and estradiol implants or patches with progestin to protect the endometrium. Oral contraceptive pills prevent ovulation and should be effective for the treatment of PMS/PMDD. However, limited evidence does not support efficacy for oral contraceptive agents containing progestins derived from 19-nortestosterone. The combination of the estrogen and progestin may produce symptoms similar to PMS, such as water retention and irritability. There is preliminary evidence that a new oral contraceptive pill containing low-dose estrogen and the progestin drospirenone, a spironolactone analog, instead of a 19-nortestosterone derivative can reduce symptoms of water retention and other side effects related to estrogen excess. The studies are in progress, however, preliminary evidence suggests that the drospirenone-containing pill called Yasmin may be effective the treatment of PMDD.

Evaluation of a unique oral contraceptive in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). This is the first trial of a unique oral contraceptive containing a combination of drospirenone (DRSP, 3 mg) and ethinyl estradiol (EE, 30 microg) for the treatment of PMDD. DRSP is a spironolactone-like progestin with antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid activity. Spironolactone has been shown to be beneficial in PMS, whereas oral contraceptives have shown conflicting results. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 82 women with PMDD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. [DSM IV]) were randomized to receive DRSP/EE or placebo for three treatment cycles. The primary end point was change from baseline in luteal phase symptom scores as assessed on the Calendar of Premenstrual Experiences (COPE) scale. Patients treated with DRSP/EE showed a numerically greater change from baseline compared with those treated with placebo on each of the 22 COPE items and each of the 4 symptom factors. Between-group differences in symptom improvement reached statistical significance in factor 3 only (appetite, acne, and food cravings, p = 0.027). The secondary end points, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Profile of Mood States (PMS), were consistent with the primary end point in that patients treated with the oral contraceptive showed a numerically greater improvement from baseline compared with those treated with placebo. The results of this study show a consistent trend in the reduction of symptoms that suggested a beneficial effect of DRSP/EE for the treatment of PMDD, despite limitations of the study design.

Towards a consensus on diagnostic criteria, measurement and trial design of the premenstrual disorders : the ISPMD Montreal consensus

Premenstrual disorders (PMD) are characterised by a cluster of somatic and psychological symptoms of varying severity that occur during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and resolve during menses (Freeman and Sondheimer, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 5:30–39, 2003; Halbreich, Gynecol Endocrinol 19:320–334, 2004). Although PMD have been widely recognised for many decades, their precise cause is still unknown and there are no definitive, universally accepted diagnostic criteria. To consider this issue, an international multidisciplinary group of experts met at a face-to-face consensus meeting to review current definitions and diagnostic criteria for PMD. This was followed by extensive correspondence. The consensus group formally became established as the International Society for Premenstrual Disorders (ISPMD). The inaugural meeting of the ISPMD was held in Montreal in September 2008. The primary aim was to provide a unified approach for the diagnostic criteria of PMD, their quantification and guidelines on clinical trial design. This report summarises their recommendations. It is hoped that the criteria proposed here will inform discussions of the next edition of the World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), and the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-V) criteria that are currently under consideration. It is also hoped that the proposed definitions and guidelines could be used by all clinicians and investigators to provide a consistent approach to the diagnosis and treatment of PMD and to aid scientific and clinical research in this field.

Clinical diagnostic criteria for premenstrual syndrome and guidelines for their quantification for research studies

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) encompasses a variety of symptoms appearing during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Although PMS is widely recognized, the etiology remains unclear and it lacks definitive, universally accepted diagnostic criteria. To address these issues an international multidisciplinary group of experts evaluated the current definitions and diagnostic criteria of PMS and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Following extensive correspondence, a consensus meeting was held with the aim of producing updated diagnostic criteria for PMS and guidelines for clinical and research applications. This report presents the conclusions and recommendations of the group. It is hoped that the criteria proposed by the group will become widely accepted and eventually be incorporated into the next edition of the World Health Organizations International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). It is also hoped that the proposed guidelines for quantification of criteria will be used by clinicians and investigators to facilitate diagnostic uniformity in the field as well as adequate treatment modalities when warranted.

Effectiveness of an interdisciplinary pain management program for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain.

&NA; Chronic pelvic pain has rarely been discussed in the pain management literature, although it is extremely common in general gynecological practice and often refractory to traditional medical and surgical therapy. A chronic pelvic pain program was developed to offer an alternative treatment approach for women for whom standard gynecological procedures were inappropriate or unsuccessful. Sixteen subjects completed the full 6–8 week interdisciplinary program, which included both somatic and behavioral therapies. Compared to a waiting list control the results showed a dramatic decrease in reported levels of pain following treatment. Anxiety and depression also decreased and psychosocial functioning improved, including return to work, increased social activities and improved sexual activity. The outcome suggests that the interdisciplinary pain management approach is effective for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain.

Premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder: quality of life and burden of illness.

Premenstrual symptoms are distressing for up to 20% of reproductive-aged women and are associated with impairment in interpersonal or workplace functioning for at least 3–8%. Typical symptoms of premenstrual syndrome and the severe form, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, include irritability, anger, mood swings, depression, tension/anxiety, abdominal bloating, breast pain and fatigue. The symptoms recur monthly and last for an average of 6 days per month for the majority of the reproductive years. For women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder, the symptoms can be as disabling as major depressive disorder. It has been estimated that affected women experience almost 3000 days of severe symptoms during the reproductive years. Until two decades ago, there were no effective treatments for severe premenstrual syndrome. Even in 2000, almost three-quarters of women in the USA with premenstrual disorders either did not seek help or sought treatment unsuccessfully from at least three clinicians for over 5 years. This review will focus on the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment outcomes, quality of life and burden of illness for premenstrual disorders.

ISPMD consensus on the management of premenstrual disorders

The second consensus meeting of the International Society for Premenstrual Disorders (ISPMD) took place in London during March 2011. The primary goal was to evaluate the published evidence and consider the expert opinions of the ISPMD members to reach a consensus on advice for the management of premenstrual disorders. Gynaecologists, psychiatrists, psychologists and pharmacologists each formally presented the evidence within their area of expertise; this was followed by an in-depth discussion leading to consensus recommendations. This article provides a comprehensive review of the outcomes from the meeting. The group discussed and agreed that careful diagnosis based on the recommendations and classification derived from the first ISPMD consensus conference is essential and should underlie the appropriate management strategy. Options for the management of premenstrual disorders fall under two broad categories, (a) those influencing central nervous activity, particularly the modulation of the neurotransmitter serotonin and (b) those that suppress ovulation. Psychotropic medication, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, probably acts by dampening the influence of sex steroids on the brain. Oral contraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, danazol and estradiol all most likely function by ovulation suppression. The role of oophorectomy was also considered in this respect. Alternative therapies are also addressed, with, e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy, calcium supplements and Vitex agnus castus warranting further exploration.

Pathophysiology of premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder are triggered by hormonal events ensuing after ovulation. The symptoms can begin in the early, mid or late luteal phase and are not associated with defined concentrations of any specific gonadal or non-gonadal hormone. Although evidence for a hormonal abnormality has not been established, the symptoms of the premenstrual disorders are related to the production of progesterone by the ovary. The two best-studied and relevant neurotransmitter systems implicated in the genesis of the symptoms are the GABArgic and the serotonergic systems. Metabolites of progesterone formed by the corpus luteum of the ovary and in the brain bind to a neurosteroid-binding site on the membrane of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor, changing its configuration, rendering it resistant to further activation and finally decreasing central GABA-mediated inhibition. By a similar mechanism, the progestogens in some hormonal contraceptives are also thought to adversely affect the GABAergic system. The lowering of serotonin can give rise to PMS-like symptoms and serotonergic functioning seems to be deficient by some methods of estimating serotonergic activity in the brain; agents that augment serotonin are efficacious and are as effective even if administered only in the luteal phase. However, similar to the affective disorders, PMS is ultimately not likely to be related to the dysregulation of individual neurotransmitters. Brain imaging studies have begun to shed light on the complex brain circuitry underlying affect and behaviour and may help to explicate the intricate neurophysiological foundation of the syndrome.