Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrea Lipparini is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrea Lipparini.


Strategic Management Journal | 1999

The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study

Gianni Lorenzoni; Andrea Lipparini

In this paper we present a study of the structure of three lead firm‐network relationships at two points in time. Using data on companies in the packaging machine industry, we study the process of vertical disintegration and focus on the ability to coordinate competencies and combine knowledge across corporate boundaries. We argue that the capability to interact with other companies—which we call relational capability—accelerates the lead firm’s knowledge access and transfer with relevant effects on company growth and innovativeness. This study provides evidence that interfirm networks can be shaped and deliberately designed: over time managers develop a specialized supplier network and build a narrower and more competitive set of core competencies. The ability to integrate knowledge residing both inside and outside the firm’s boundaries emerges as a distinctive organizational capability. Our main goal is to contribute to the current discussion of cooperative ties and dynamic aspects of interfirm networks, adding new dimensions to resource‐based and knowledge‐based interpretations of company performance. Copyright


Journal of Business Venturing | 1994

The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks

Andrea Lipparini; Maurizio Sobrero

Abstract The entrepreneurial view of the firm stresses the need for a more insightful understanding of business leaders within sets of SMEs. Here, competitiveness emerges as a network-embedded capability and the coordination among firms, maximizing firm-specific competencies, represents a strategic leverage in accomplishing and maintaining a sustainable competitive advantage. When the goal is not only greater efficiency in terms of the lowest cost but innovation in terms of how to improve productive performance by changing the way in which it is undertaken, a critical issue becomes the entrepreneurs ability to create, manage, and recombine the set of relationships with external suppliers. The ability to glue external expertise and capabilities in an original and unique way is considered the key factor in pursuing innovative performance. As orchestrators of inter-firm linkages, entrepreneurs relying on personal networks and prior relationships are able to identify possible sources of knowledge. As coordinators of such innovative ties, they combine a wide set of diverse competencies not only to overcome size constraints through development cost reduction, but also to recoup ideas and creativity for the realization of more complex typologies of innovation. These elements reduce the level of uncertainty, while enhancing early cooperation between firms. Because the entrepreneur is supposed to be able to manage a higher number of “innovative poles”, which can be better managed thanks to trust and reputation developed in prior relationships, the different management topology could be associated with a different level of supplier contribution to the development of new products. This paper provides insights into the role of suppliers in the new product development process, and explores the role of the entrepreneur in promoting and managing a wide set of external, innovative ties. Attention is focused on 103 small- and medium- sized firms located within two Italian industrial networks where interdependencies are unusually large and complex. With respect to the first aim, the empirical analysis confirmed SMEs structural recourse to suppliers. More important, the contribution of such resources is not necessarily limited to cost reductions and marginal improvements. Although incremental contributions certainly exist and are relevant, more complex relationships largely focused on joint design and development emerge as important patterns in buyer—supplier interaction. With respect to the second aim, an entrepreneurial explanation of SMEs innovative performance is advanced. In a competitive environment where the actors are not atomistic, but exist within systems of actors, the relational capability could represent for entrepreneurial firms the way to gain a sustainable competitive advantage. We found entrepreneurs who, exploiting basic experiences, seek new combinations among the various inter-firm ties, relying upon such linkages as a vehicle for transferring and combining their organizationally embedded learning capability. Our findings showed that (1) when the entrepreneur is leading and managing the business, more suppliers are involved in the development of new products, and (2) the type of contribution given by suppliers differs by management typology. More precisely, the incremental type of contribution is dominant whenever professional management is present, while the relevance of architectural and radical topologies increase when the entrepreneur is present. On a broader level, the findings suggest further studies to address the question of how internally determined, rather than spontaneous, is the evolution toward a network structure in sets of SMEs similar to those studied. We showed that the number and the quality of inter-firm relationships cannot be explained merely by environment-specific factors.


Archive | 2018

The Role of Networks for Innovation in Temporary and Project-Based Organizations

Federica Brunetta; Paolo Boccardelli; Andrea Lipparini

This theoretical contribution discusses the role of networks for innovation in project-based organizations. Network serve as loci for innovation in providing timely access to knowledge and resources that are otherwise unavailable and stimulating internal expertise and learning capabilities‚ especially in industries in which complex knowledge bases expand rapidly. Moreover, networks may serve as the alternative access to resources that are not readily available through market exchanges. The aim of this contribution is to address some of the critical issues related to a better understanding of how diverse network structures impact on innovation. The authors build upon social network arguments, drawing on the idea that “optimal” network structure should be understood according to the context in which the network is embedded, the nature of the actors and the content of the relationships.


Strategic Management Journal | 2014

From core to periphery and back: A study on the deliberate shaping of knowledge flows in interfirm dyads and networks

Andrea Lipparini; Gianni Lorenzoni; Simone Ferriani


Journal of Business Research | 2015

Central positions and performance in the scientific community. Evidences from clinical research projects

Federica Brunetta; Paolo Boccardelli; Andrea Lipparini


Finanza, Marketing e Produzione | 2012

Centralità e Performance Scientifica: Alcune Evidenze dai Network di Ricerca Clinica

Federica Brunetta; Paolo Boccardelli; Andrea Lipparini


Archive | 2012

To Bridge or not to Bridge: A Study of the Impact of Structural Holes on Performance in Temporary Organizations

Paolo Boccardelli; Andrea Lipparini


Archive | 2015

Le strategie di collaborazione

Paolo Boccardelli; Isabella Leone; Andrea Lipparini


Strategic Managemen Society: Strategies in a World of Networks | 2014

An Analysis of Network Structure in highly-regulated settings: Evidences from Clinical Research

Federica Brunetta; Paolo Boccardelli; Andrea Lipparini


EGOS conference: Reimagining, Rethinking, Reshaping: Organizational Scholarship in Unsettled Times | 2014

Does the Interplay of network structure and institutions affect scientific productivity? Evidences from the Pharmaceutical R&D

Federica Brunetta; Paolo Boccardelli; Andrea Lipparini

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrea Lipparini's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paolo Boccardelli

Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Federica Brunetta

Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge