Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrea M. Abbott is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrea M. Abbott.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010

Are Mastectomy Rates Really Increasing in the United States

Elizabeth B. Habermann; Andrea M. Abbott; Helen M. Parsons; Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle

PURPOSE After the National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement in 1990, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) became more common while mastectomy rates decreased. However, several recently published single-institution studies have reported an increase in mastectomy rates in the past decade. We conducted a population-based study to evaluate national trends in the surgical treatment of breast cancer from 2000 through 2006. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of women undergoing surgical treatment for breast cancer. We evaluated variation in mastectomy rates by demographic and tumor factors and calculated differences in mastectomy rates across time. We utilized logistic regression to identify time trends and patient and tumor factors associated with mastectomy, testing for significance using two-sided methods. RESULTS We identified 233,754 patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ or stage I to III unilateral breast cancer from 2000 to 2006. The proportion of women treated with mastectomy decreased from 40.8% in 2000 to 37.0% in 2006 (P < .001). These patterns were maintained across patient and tumor factors. Although the unilateral mastectomy rate decreased during the study period, the contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate increased. Women were less likely to receive mastectomy over time (odds ratio, 1.18 for 2000 v 2006; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.23; P < .0001), after adjusting for patient and tumor factors. CONCLUSION In contrast to single-institution studies, our population-based analysis found a decrease in unilateral mastectomy rates from 2000 to 2006 in the United States. Variations in referral patterns and patient selection are potential explanations for these differences between single institutions and national trends.


Current Oncology Reports | 2010

The Increasing Use of Prophylactic Mastectomy in the Prevention of Breast Cancer

Todd M Tuttle; Andrea M. Abbott; Amanda K. Arrington; Natasha M. Rueth

Selected high-risk women without breast cancer choose to undergo bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) to reduce their risk of developing the disease. Several studies have reported that BPM significantly reduces, but does not eliminate, breast cancer risk. Few studies have reported rates or trends of BPM use. Patients with unilateral breast cancer are at increased risk for developing cancer in the normal contralateral breast. Some breast cancer patients choose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) to prevent cancer in the contralateral breast. The risk of contralateral breast cancer is significantly reduced after CPM. Recent studies reported that CPM rates have markedly increased in recent years in the United States. Alternatives to CPM include surveillance with clinical breast examination, mammography, and, potentially, breast MRI. Endocrine therapy with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors significantly reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer and may be more acceptable than CPM for some patients.


Cancer | 2011

Trends in the use of implantable accelerated partial breast irradiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United States

Andrea M. Abbott; Elizabeth B. Habermann; Todd M Tuttle

In 2002, the US Food and Drug Administration approved an implantable balloon catheter that delivers accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after breast‐conserving surgery (BCS). The objective of the current study was to determine the use of implantable APBI (IAPBI) in the United States and factors associated with IAPBI use.


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine | 2016

90Y Radioembolization of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Using Glass Microspheres: Safety and Survival Outcomes from a 531-Patient Multicenter Study

Ryan Hickey; Robert J. Lewandowski; Totianna Prudhomme; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Brian Baigorri; J.J. Critchfield; Joseph Ralph Kallini; Ahmed Gabr; Boris Gorodetski; Jean Francois H Geschwind; Andrea M. Abbott; Ravi Shridhar; Sarah B. White; William S. Rilling; Brendan Boyer; Shannon Kauffman; Sharon W. Kwan; Siddarth Padia; Vanessa L. Gates; Mary F. Mulcahy; Sheetal Mehta Kircher; Halla Sayed Nimeiri; Al B. Benson; Riad Salem

Hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma are a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Most colorectal liver metastases become refractory to chemotherapy and biologic agents, at which point the median overall survival declines to 4–5 mo. Radioembolization with 90Y has been used in the salvage setting with favorable outcomes. This study reports the survival and safety outcomes of 531 patients treated with glass-based 90Y microspheres at 8 institutions, making it the largest 90Y study for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Methods: Data were retrospectively compiled from 8 institutions for all 90Y glass microsphere treatments for colorectal liver metastases. Exposure to chemotherapeutic or biologic agents, prior liver therapies, biochemical parameters before and after treatment, radiation dosimetry, and complications were recorded. Uni- and multivariate analyses for predictors of survival were performed. Survival outcomes and clinical or biochemical adverse events were recorded. Results: In total, 531 patients received 90Y radioembolization for colorectal liver metastases. The most common clinical adverse events were fatigue (55%), abdominal pain (34%), and nausea (19%). Grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 13% of patients at any time. The median overall survival from the first 90Y treatment was 10.6 mo (95% confidence interval, 8.8–12.4). Performance status, no more than 25% tumor burden, no extrahepatic metastases, albumin greater than 3 g/dL, and receipt of no more than 2 chemotherapeutic agents independently predicted better survival outcomes. Conclusion: This multiinstitutional review of a large cohort of patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with 90Y radioembolization using glass microspheres has demonstrated promising survival outcomes with low toxicity and low side effects. The outcomes were reproducible and consistent with prior reports of radioembolization.


Cancer | 2012

Prognosis for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma survivors: A conditional survival analysis

Andrea M. Abbott; Elizabeth B. Habermann; Helen M. Parsons; Todd M Tuttle

The AJCC staging system and post‐operative nomograms use patient and tumor characteristics to provide prognostic estimates after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). While these variables help to predict survival at the time of diagnosis and resection, the applicability of these prognostic factors to survivors of RPS remains unknown. We hypothesized that the variables evaluated in the current staging system and post‐operative nomograms would have limited ability to predict conditional survival in patients surgically treated for RPS.


Surgical Clinics of North America | 2014

Locoregional Therapies in Melanoma

Andrea M. Abbott; Jonathan S. Zager

In-transit disease is defined as any dermal or subcutaneous metastases that arise between the primary melanoma but not beyond the draining regional nodal basin. Patients who develop in-transit disease are at further risk to develop additional locoregional and distant disease. Treatment must be individualized and take into consideration the extent of disease, tumor characteristics, and patient characteristics including age, comorbidities, previous therapies, and site of recurrence. Surgery, regional perfusions and intralesional injections all play a role in management options. These patients should be discussed and managed by a multidisciplinary team whenever possible.


Clinical Colorectal Cancer | 2015

Outcomes of Therasphere Radioembolization for Colorectal Metastases

Andrea M. Abbott; Richard D. Kim; Sarah E. Hoffe; Bulent Arslan; Ben Biebel; Junsung Choi; Ghassan El-Haddad; Bela Kis; Jennifer Sweeney; Kenneth L. Meredith; Khaldoun Almhanna; Jonathan R. Strosberg; David Shibata; William J. Fulp; Ravi Shridhar

INTRODUCTION The liver is the most common site for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 (Y90) represents an alternative approach in the management of unresectable hepatic colorectal metastases. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes after treatment with Y90. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of patients undergoing Y90 glass microsphere treatment for metastatic CRC from 2009 to 2013 was conducted. Multivariable analysis (MVA) of factors related to overall survival (OS) was performed using the Cox proportional hazard and OS estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS We identified 68 patients. Median and 2-year OS were 11.6 months and 34%. For patients with ≤ 25% hepatic burden of disease (HBD) and 1 chemotherapy regimen, 2-year OS was 63%. Median and 2-year OS for patients with ≤ 25% versus > 25% HBD were 19.6 months and 42% versus 3.4 months and 0% (P < .0001). Univariate analysis revealed that higher HBD, ≥ 3 lines of chemotherapy received, and higher carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were found to be significant predictors of worse OS. MVA revealed age, > 25% HBD, ≥ 3 lines of chemotherapy, and higher CEA were independently prognostic for increased mortality, and resected status of the primary tumor was associated with decreased mortality. The presence of extrahepatic metastases was not prognostic. Toxicities were mild and only 5 patients experienced Grade 3/4 biochemical toxicity. CONCLUSION Yttrium-90 was associated with acceptable OS with minimal morbidity in this series. Minimal exposure to chemotherapy and low HBD were found to be associated with better OS, however, even patients with chemotherapy-refractory disease received a benefit from treatment.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013

Prospective multicenter trial evaluating balloon-catheter partial-breast irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Andrea M. Abbott; Pamela R. Portschy; Chung K. Lee; Chap T. Le; Linda K. Han; Tara Washington; Michael Kinney; Margit Bretzke; Todd M Tuttle

PURPOSE To determine outcomes of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) with MammoSite in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a prospective, multicenter trial between 2003 and 2009. Inclusion criteria included age >18 years, core needle biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, and no prior breast cancer history. Patients underwent breast-conserving surgery plus MammoSite placement. Radiation was given twice daily for 5 days for a total of 34 Gy. Patients were evaluated for development of toxicities, cosmetic outcome, and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). RESULTS A total of 41 patients (42 breasts) completed treatment in the study, with a median follow up of 5.3 years. Overall, 28 patients (68.3%) experienced an adverse event. Skin changes and pain were the most common adverse events. Cosmetic outcome at 6 months was judged excellent/good by 100% of physicians and by 96.8% of patients. At 12 months, 86.7% of physicians and 92.3% of patients rated the cosmetic outcome as excellent/good. Overall, 4 patients (9.8%) developed an IBTR (all DCIS), with a 5-year actuarial rate of 11.3%. All IBTRs were outside the treatment field. Among patients with IBTRs, the mean time to recurrence was 3.2 years. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated partial-breast irradiation using MammoSite seems to provide a safe and cosmetically acceptable outcome; however, the 9.8% IBTR rate with median follow-up of 5.3 years is concerning. Prospective randomized trials are necessary before routine use of APBI for DCIS can be recommended.


World Journal of Surgery | 2012

United States trends in the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer.

Todd M Tuttle; Natasha M. Rueth; Andrea M. Abbott; Beth A Virnig

Before the publication of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project Trial (NSABP) B-06, most breast cancer patients in the United States were treated with mastectomy [1, 2]. After the publication of NSABP-B06 in 1985, the rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) increased, but only slightly. After the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement concluded that BCS plus radiation therapy (RT) was ‘‘preferred’’ for early-stage breast cancer, BCS rates markedly increased throughout the 1990s and early 2000s [2, 3]. However, during the past decade, several trends in the local treatment of breast cancer have been observed that are counter-intuitive to the findings from prospective randomized trials. The objective of this review is to evaluate recent patterns in the local treatment of breast cancer in the United States. This review will concentrate on three specific trends: (1) mastectomy/BCS rates; (2) contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates; and (3) use of RT after BCS. We will also discuss potential consequences of these trends and strategies to ensure appropriate local treatment for most breast cancer patients. Mastectomy/BCS rates


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

Hepatic Progression-free and Overall Survival After Regional Therapy to the Liver for Metastatic Melanoma

Andrea M. Abbott; Matthew Doepker; Young Chul Kim; Matthew C. Perez; Cassandra Gandle; Kerry Thomas; Junsung Choi; Ravi Shridhar; Jonathan S. Zager

Objectives: Regional therapy for metastatic melanoma to the liver represents an alternative to systemic therapy. Hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with liver metastases from cutaneous or uveal melanoma treated with yttrium-90 (Y90), chemoembolization (CE), or percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) was conducted. Results: Thirty patients (6 Y90, 10 PHP, 12 CE, 1 PHP then Y90, 1 CE then PHP) were included. Multivariate analysis showed improved HPFS for PHP versus Y90 (P=0.004), PHP versus CE (P=0.02) but not for CE versus Y90. PFS was also significantly different: Y90 (54 d), CE (52 d), PHP (245 d), P=0.03. PHP treatment and lower tumor burden were significant predictors of prolonged PFS on multivariate analysis. Median OS from time of treatment was longest, but not significant, for PHP at 608 days versus Y90 (295 d) and CE (265 d), P=0.24. Only PHP treatment versus Y90 and lower tumor burden had improved OS on multivariate analysis (P=0.03, 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: HPFS and PFS were significantly prolonged in patients treated with PHP versus CE or Y90. Median OS in PHP patients was over double that seen in Y90 or CE patients but was significant only between PHP and Y90.

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrea M. Abbott's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ravi Shridhar

Florida Hospital Orlando

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth L. Meredith

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah E. Hoffe

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christine Laronga

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Loretta Loftus

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge