Andrea Maresca

Plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Hypertension is a major cause of cardiovascular remodeling. In the cardiovascular system, the remodeling of the extracellular matrix is controlled by the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and the tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs). The aim of this meta-analysis is to elucidate the behavior of plasma MMP and TIMP levels in hypertension and their relationship to cardiovascular remodeling. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched up to July 2011. Studies were considered eligible if they provided values of plasma MMPs and TIMPs in hypertensive patients. Given the high variability of the plasma biomarker values among studies, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated. Results Ten studies provided plasma MMP-9; the SMD between 778 hypertensive patients and 669 controls was 1.95 units (P < 0.05). Thirteen studies provided plasma TIMP-1; the SMD between 851 hypertensive patients and 646 normotensive individuals was 1.92 units (P < 0.01). Three studies investigated whether plasma TIMP-1 predicted left ventricular (LV) remodeling; the SMD between 92 hypertensive patients with and 88 hypertensive patients without LV hypertrophy was 5.81 units (P < 0.05). As for diastolic heart failure (HF), five studies provided data for plasma MMP-2; the SMD between 321 hypertensive patients with and 334 hypertensive patients without HF was 2.36 units (P < 0.01). The heterogeneity among studies was high. Conclusions These results suggest that MMP-2, MMP-9 and TIMP-1 may have a role as biomarkers of cardiovascular remodeling in hypertension. If these results are confirmed in prospective clinical studies, they could provide new tools to stratify cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.

Endothelin receptor blockade lowers plasma aldosterone levels via different mechanisms in primary aldosteronism and high-to-normal renin hypertension

BACKGROUND Endothelin (ET)-1 contributes to raising blood pressure (BP) and inducing cardiovascular disease by vasoconstriction and potent stimulation of aldosterone secretion. In the rat this latter effect occurs via ET(B) receptors; in humans in vitro studies implicated both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, but there is no conclusive evidence in vivo. METHODS We recruited 13 consenting hypertensive patients: six with primary aldosteronism (PA) and seven with high-to-normal renin hypertension (HNRH). They were infused with a low dose (200 nmol/min for 5 min followed by 100 nmol/min for 10 min) of the ET(A)-selective antagonist BQ-123 either alone or, on a different day, together with an identical dose of the ET(B)-selective antagonist BQ-788. Plasma aldosterone, cortisol and ACTH concentration and plasma renin activity (PRA) were measured with radioimmunoassay at -15, 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360 min, while BP was recorded non-invasively. RESULTS BQ-123 alone and combined with BQ-788 significantly lowered mean BP in both PA and HNRH patients (by 6-10 mmHg at nadir; P<0.01). In PA patients, a short-lived decrease of aldosterone was elicited by combined BQ-123 and BQ-788 (-14%; P<0.05), but not by BQ-123 alone; cortisol, ACTH, and PRA were unaffected by either treatment. In HNRH patients, BQ-123 both alone and combined with BQ-788 lowered aldosterone (-39 and -28%, respectively) and PRA (-43 and -16%, respectively), while cortisol and ACTH were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS Endogenous ET-1 contributes to maintaining the high BP values and the aldosterone secretion in both PA and HNRH patients. In the former patients, the aldosterone secretagogue effect of ET-1 is mediated via ET(B) receptors, while in the latter it occurs mainly via ET(A)-mediated stimulation of renin production.

Effects of dual blockade of Renin-Angiotensin system on concentric left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension: a randomized, controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a major role in promoting left ventricular (LV) remodeling in essential hypertension. We designed a controlled, randomized pilot study aimed to test the hypothesis that the dual RAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEi) + angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) can be more effective in decreasing LV hypertrophy and improving diastolic function than a largely employed association such as ACEi + calcium-antagonist (Ca-A). METHODS Twenty-four never-treated hypertensive patients with LV concentric hypertrophy were randomized to ramipril + candesartan or ramipril + lercanidipine. Before and after the 6-month treatment they underwent a 24-h blood pressure (BP) monitoring and echocardiographic examination. RESULTS At baseline, age, body mass index (BMI), 24-h BP, and LV morpho-functional parameters were similar between the two groups. The 6-month treatment induced in both groups a significant decrease of 24-h BP, septal and posterior wall thickness, and LV mass index (LVMi) (ACEi + ARB 155 +/- 19 to 122 +/- 17 g/m(2), P < 0.0001; ACEi + Ca-A 146 +/- 18 to 127 +/- 20 g/m(2), P < 0.0001). Systolic function remained unchanged; LV diastolic parameters increased significantly in both groups. The extent of 24-h BP decrease was similar between the two groups (-13.3/16.3% vs. -12.3/15.8%, P = 0.63/P = 0.71), whereas the decrease of LV mass (-22% vs. -12.8%, P < 0.005) and the improvement of diastolic function were greater in ACEi + ARB group. CONCLUSIONS In comparison with ACEi + Ca-A, ACEi + ARB treatment showed a greater antiremodeling effect, that can be reasonably ascribed to a BP-independent effect of the dual RAS blockade.

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: effects on hypertensive target organ damage

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a relevant role not only in the pathophysiology of essential hypertension, but also in the development of hypertensive target organ damage. Different drugs acting on RAAS components are now available: angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II AT1 receptors blockers (ARBs), non-selective and selective aldosterone antagonists. The review will focus on their effects on hypertensive organ damage. In fact, apart from the well known efficacy in reducing blood pressure, all these drugs have been demonstrated to protect against target organ damage, reversing or preventing its development. The main issues addressed will be: effects of the RAAS blockade on heart and kidney disease, protective action against arterial wall damage, with a focus on the endothelial protection. The comparison among ACE inhibitors, ARBs and aldosterone antagonists will be discussed, with specific reference to different class and/or drug effects and to the results of few studies evaluating the effects of combination therapy with different drugs blocking the RAAS.

Hypertension and cerebrovascular diseases: a specific role of vascular protection for the prevention of dementia.

Summary: Despite the use of antihypertensive drugs, mortality (but not morbidity) from cerebrovascular diseases has been reduced significantly. As a consequence, an increasing number of patients suffer from recurring strokes and from the debilitating consequences of cerebrovascular diseases and develop progressive cognitive impairment. Its pathological substrates are regional alteration of cerebral perfusion, lacunae, white matter lesions, progressive cortical atrophy, even in the asymptomatic patient and in the absence of extracranial carotid artery stenosis. Lacunar infarction and white matter lesions are particularly frequent in the hypertensive diabetic patient. Lacunae and white matter lesions sometimes coexist and may favour the development of dementia in the hypertensive patient, through focal ischaemia, perivascular oedema, disruption of the blood‐brain barrier, cerebral diaschisis and cortical deafferentation. Treatment with calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics smooth the patchy hypoperfusion despite the fall in pressure. However, the time course and the extent of this effect vary according to the drug administered. In particular, only a calcium channel blocker increased perfusion of both cortical and subcortical areas, while diuretic treatment increased perfusion only after prolonged treatment, and this effect was limited to the cortical areas. Such differences may explain the discrepant results on risk reduction for dementia observed in large intervention trials.

Cerebral Perfusion in Hypertensives with Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Comparative Study of Lacidipine and Hydrochlorothiazide

Focal cerebral hypoperfusion is a common finding in uncomplicated hypertensives even in the absence of large vessel atherosclerosis, and neuropsychological deficits correlate with cerebral hypoperfusion in hypertensive patients with cerebral microangiopathy. We investigated the effects on cerebral perfusion of the dihydropiridine calcium antagonist lacidipine and of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in asymptomatic hypertensive patients with concomitant atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries. Fifteen essential hypertensives (including 13 males, aged 55–75 years) with at least one 30–60% stenosis of the internal carotid artery at echo-colorDoppler examination were treated in a double-blind, randomized, parallel study with lacidipine (4–6 mg od) or HCTZ (25–50 mg od) for 3 months after a 4-week single-blind placebo period. Regional cerebral perfusion was assessed at baseline and at the end of the treatment period with HMPAO-SPECT. Relative perfusion of cortical and subcortical areas was calculated as the ratio between their tracer activity and that of the cerebellum. At baseline, mean relative perfusion (MRP) of the cortical and subcortical areas was similar in the stenotic and the contralateral side. Despite the fall in pressure, lacidipine increased MRP both in the cortical and in the subcortical areas, whereas HCTZ increased MRP only in the cortical areas. The mean change in local vascular resistance, adjusted for initial perfusion value, wasÿ20 A.U.(arbitrary unit) with lacidipine andÿ12 A.U with HCTZ (p< 0.001). These differential effects of antihypertensive drugs on subcortical perfusion may be of benefit in the long-term prevention of vascular dementia in hypertensive patients.Focal cerebral hypoperfusion is a common finding in uncomplicated hypertensives even in the absence of large vessel atherosclerosis, and neuropsychological deficits correlate with cerebral hypoperfusion in hypertensive patients with cerebral microangiopathy. We investigated the effects on cerebral perfusion of the dihydropiridine calcium antagonist lacidipine and of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in asymptomatic hypertensive patients with concomitant atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries. Fifteen essential hypertensives (including 13 males, aged 55-75 years) with at least one 30-60% stenosis of the internal carotid artery at echo-color Doppler examination were treated in a double-blind, randomized, parallel study with lacidipine (4-6 mg od) or HCTZ (25-50 mg od) for 3 months after a 4-week single-blind placebo period. Regional cerebral perfusion was assessed at baseline and at the end of the treatment period with HMPAO-SPECT. Relative perfusion of cortical and subcortical areas was calculated as the ratio between their tracer activity and that of the cerebellum. At baseline, mean relative perfusion (MRP) of the cortical and subcortical areas was similar in the stenotic and the contralateral side. Despite the fall in pressure, lacidipine increased MRP both in the cortical and in the subcortical areas, whereas HCTZ increased MRP only in the cortical areas. The mean change in local vascular resistance, adjusted for initial perfusion value, was -20 A.U. (arbitrary unit) with lacidipine and -12 A.U. with HCTZ (p < 0.001). These differential effects of antihypertensive drugs on subcortical perfusion may be of benefit in the long-term prevention of vascular dementia in hypertensive patients.

Left ventricular remodeling in patients with metabolic syndrome: Influence of gender

AIM The study was aimed to evaluate the influence of gender on left ventricular (LV) remodeling in metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS AND RESULTS We enrolled 200 subjects without diabetes or overt cardiovascular diseases, never treated with anti-hypertensive drugs or statins: 60 men and 40 women with MetS matched by age, gender and 24 h systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) with 60 men and 40 women without MetS. The patients underwent blood tests, 24 h our BP monitoring, LV echocardiographic examination. LV mass indexed by eight(2.7) was significantly greater in men and women with MetS than without MetS. Compared with women without MetS, women with MetS had significantly higher posterior wall thickness and relative wall thickness, greater prevalence of LV concentric remodeling/hypertrophy and lower indices of LV diastolic function, whereas all these parameters were not significantly different between men with and without MetS. MetS was an independent predictor of relative wall thickness and LV mass index in women, but not in men. CONCLUSION The impact of MetS on LV remodeling is significantly influenced by gender: the effects of MetS are more pronounced in women, with development of LV concentric hypertrophy/remodeling and preclinical diastolic dysfunction.

OSA, metabolic syndrome and CPAP: Effect on cardiac remodeling in subjects with abdominal obesity

BACKGROUND We evaluated whether obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment influence left ventricular (LV) remodelling independently of abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS Cardiorespiratory examination, 24-h BP monitoring and echocardiogram were performed in overweight/obese patients with increased abdominal adiposity and symptoms suggesting OSA : OSA/MetS (n.50), OSA/noMetS (n.22), noOSA/MetS (n.29), noOSA/noMets (n.16). The evaluation was repeated in 41 patients after ≥18 months of CPAP. RESULTS Despite similar age, gender, BMI and 24-h BP, the 2 groups with MetS had greater LV remodelling (LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction) than the 2 groups without MetS. From multiple regression analysis independent determinants for LV mass were MetS, 24-h systolic BP and age, for LV diastolic function were LV mass index, MetS and age. After CPAP, the 20 patients with decreased body weight showed diastolic BP decrease, LV hypertrophy regression and diastolic function improvement, whereas, despite similar respiratory improvement, BP and LV parameters were unchanged in the 21 patients with body weight unchanged/increased. CONCLUSION In patients with increased abdominal adiposity, LV remodelling is not associated to OSA per se; chronic CPAP treatment does not influence LV remodelling whose regression is mainly linked to body weight decrease.

Angiotensin II type 1 and type 2 receptor expression in circulating monocytes of diabetic and hypercholesterolemic patients over 3-month rosuvastatin treatment

BackgroundIn diabetes, a variety of pro-inflammatory cellular changes has been found in various cell types, including monocytes which are known to be involved in all the phases of atherogenesis. Angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor (AT1R) mediates the pro-atherogenic effects of Ang II whereas the type 2 receptor (AT2R) seems associated with atheroprotection. We sought to investigate the potential changes of AT1R-AT2R expression in human monocytes of type 2 diabetic- hypercholesterolemic patients and in hypercholesterolemic subjects, upon clinical treatment with rosuvastatin.MethodsThe AT1R membrane protein and mRNA AT1R and AT2R expression in monocytes were investigated in 10 type 2 diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients and in 10 hypercholesterolemic subjects, before and after 3-month rosuvastatin treatment. Moreover, the serum cytokine levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) were detected.ResultsAs expected, rosuvastatin was associated with a change in the lipid profile in the two groups. Both the membrane protein (P = 0.008) and the AT1R mRNA expression (P = 0.038) were significantly reduced during treatment in the absence of AT2R expression change in diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients whereas no significant difference was observed in hypercholesterolemic subjects. The serum IL-4 levels were increased during treatment whereas no change was observed in IFN-γ in diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients. No cytokine change was observed in hypercholesterolemic subjects.ConclusionsOur study on monocytes of diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients, showing a reduced AT1R but not AT2R expression during rosuvastatin treatment, suggests that statin therapy may modulate favorably the AT1-AT2 receptor balance in subjects with coexistent type 2 diabetes.

Effectiveness of barnidipine 10 or 20 mg plus losartan 50-mg combination versus losartan 100-mg monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension not controlled by losartan 50-mg monotherapy: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study

BACKGROUND Increasing the dose or adding a second antihypertensive agent are 2 possible therapeutic choices when blood pressure (BP) is poorly controlled with monotherapy. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of barnidipine 10 or 20 mg added to losartan 50 mg versus losartan 100 mg alone in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension whose BP was uncontrolled by losartan 50-mg monotherapy. METHODS This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. Eligible patients (aged 30-74 years) had uncontrolled hypertension, defined as office sitting diastolic BP (DBP) > or =90 mm Hg and/or systolic BP (SBP) > or =140 mm Hg, and mean daytime DBP > or =85 mm Hg and/or SBP > or =135 mm Hg. All were being treated with losartan 50 mg at enrollment. After a 1-week run-in period while taking losartan 50 mg, patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with open-label barnidipine 10 mg plus losartan 50 mg or losartan 100-mg monotherapy. At the end of this period, patients with uncontrolled BP had barnidipine doubled to 20 mg and continued for an additional 6 weeks, whereas patients not achieving control on treatment with losartan 100 mg were discontinued. Office BP was measured at each visit, whereas 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed at randomization and at the final visit (ie, after 12 weeks of treatment, or at 6 weeks for patients not controlled on losartan 100 mg). The intent-to-treat population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had valid ABPM recordings at baseline and the final visit. The primary end point was the change in daytime DBP between baseline and 12 weeks of treatment, compared between the combination treatment and monotherapy. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated during each study visit. RESULTS A total of 93 patients were enrolled (age range, 30-75 years; 60% [56/93] men). After the 1-week run-in period, 68 patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with open-label barnidipine 10 mg plus losartan 50 mg (n = 34) or losartan 100-mg monotherapy (n = 34). A total of 53 patients were evaluable (barnidipine plus losartan, n = 28; losartan, n = 25). After 6 weeks of treatment, 18 patients in the combination treatment group (64.3%) had their dose of barnidipine doubled from 10 to 20 mg because BP was not normalized by treatment, whereas 8 patients in the losartan group (32.0%) were discontinued for the same reason. The between-treatment difference (losartan alone - combination treatment) for changes from baseline in daytime DBP was -1.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -5.8 to 2.4 mm Hg; P = NS). A similar result was observed for daytime SBP (-3.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -8.1 to 1.7 mm Hg; P = NS). Likewise, no significant differences were found for nighttime values (mean [95% CI] DBP, 0.5 mm Hg [-3.7 to 4.7 mm Hg]; SBP, 1.5 mm Hg [-4.1 to 7.1 mm Hg]) or 24-hour values (DBP, -0.9 mm Hg [-4.8 to 2.9 mm Hg]; SBP, -1.6 mm Hg [-5.9 to 2.7 mm Hg]). Combination treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of SBP responder patients (ie, <140 mm Hg or a reduction of > or =20 mm Hg) compared with monotherapy (82.1% [23/28] vs 56.0% [14/25]; P = 0.044). Drug-related AEs were reported in 4 patients taking combination treatment (total of 7 AEs, including 2 cases of peripheral edema and 1 each of tachycardia, atrial flutter, tinnitus, confusion, and polyuria) and in 2 patients taking losartan alone (total of 2 AEs, both tachycardia). CONCLUSIONS This open-label, parallel-group study found that there was no significant difference in the BP-lowering effect of barnidipine 10 or 20 mg in combination with losartan 50 mg compared with losartan 100-mg monotherapy in these patients with essential hypertension previously uncontrolled by losartan 50-mg monotherapy. However, the percentage of responders for SBP was significantly higher with the combination. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT) no. 2006-001469-41.