Andrea Milani

Treatment options in recurrent ovarian cancer: latest evidence and clinical potential

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women. Although significant progress has been made in the treatment of OC, the majority of patients experience disease recurrence and receive second-line and sometimes several lines of treatment. Here we review the options available for the treatment of recurrent disease and discuss how different agents are selected, combined and offered in a rationale sequence in the context of multidisciplinary care. We reviewed published work between 1990 and 2013 and meeting abstracts related to the use of chemotherapy and surgery in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. We discuss treatment regimens, efficacy endpoints and safety profiles of the different therapies. Platinum-based drugs are the most active agents and are selected on the basis of a probability of response to retreatment. Nonplatinum-based chemotherapy regimens are usually given in the ‘platinum-resistant’ setting and have a modest effect on outcome. Molecular targeted therapy of ovarian cancer given alone or integrated with chemotherapy is showing promising results. Many patients are now receiving more than one line of therapy for recurrent disease, usually platinum based until platinum resistance emerges. The sequential use of chemotherapy regimens and the incorporation of molecularly targeted treatments, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have over the last decade significantly extended the median survival of patients with ovarian cancer.

Active immunotherapy in HER2 overexpressing breast cancer: current status and future perspectives

BACKGROUND The use of anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has improved the clinical outcome of HER2-overexpressing breast cancers (BCs). Unfortunately, often these tumors tend to relapse and, when metastatic, the duration of clinical benefit is limited over time and almost invariably followed by tumor progression. Alternative approaches to this essentially passive immunotherapy are therefore needed in HER2-overexpressing BC patients. As HER2 is one of the most suitable targets for active immunotherapy in BC, manipulating the immune system is a highly attractive approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed (keywords: breast neoplasm, HER2 vaccine, immunology); data reported at international meetings were included. RESULTS This review provides a focus on the following active vaccinal approaches under clinical investigation against HER2-overexpressing BC: (i) peptide and protein based; (ii) DNA based; (iii) whole tumor cell based; (iv) dendritic cell based. Moreover, the review discuss future challenges in the field, trying to define the best setting for the development of this innovative strategy, considering both immunological and clinical aspects of HER2 targeting. CONCLUSIONS Development of effective vaccines for BC remains a distinct challenge but is likely to become a substantial advance for patients with HER2-overexpressing BCs.BACKGROUND The use of anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has improved the clinical outcome of HER2-overexpressing breast cancers (BCs). Unfortunately, often these tumors tend to relapse and, when metastatic, the duration of clinical benefit is limited over time and almost invariably followed by tumor progression. Alternative approaches to this essentially passive immunotherapy are therefore needed in HER2-overexpressing BC patients. As HER2 is one of the most suitable targets for active immunotherapy in BC, manipulating the immune system is a highly attractive approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed (keywords: breast neoplasm, HER2 vaccine, immunology); data reported at international meetings were included. RESULTS This review provides a focus on the following active vaccinal approaches under clinical investigation against HER2-overexpressing BC: (i) peptide and protein based; (ii) DNA based; (iii) whole tumor cell based; (iv) dendritic cell based. Moreover, the review discuss future challenges in the field, trying to define the best setting for the development of this innovative strategy, considering both immunological and clinical aspects of HER2 targeting. CONCLUSIONS Development of effective vaccines for BC remains a distinct challenge but is likely to become a substantial advance for patients with HER2-overexpressing BCs.

Overcoming endocrine resistance in metastatic breast cancer: Current evidence and future directions

About 75% of all breast cancers are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive. They generally have a more favorable clinical behavior, prognosis, and pattern of recurrence, and endocrine therapy forms the backbone of treatment. Anti-estrogens (such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant) and aromatase inhibitors (such as anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) can effectively control the disease and induce tumor responses in a large proportion of patients. However, the majority of patients progress during endocrine therapy (acquired resistance) and a proportion of patients may fail to respond to initial therapy (de novo resistance). Endocrine resistance is therefore of clinical concern and there is great interest in strategies that delay or circumvent it. A deeper knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that drive endocrine resistance has recently led to development of new strategies that have the promise to effectively overcome it. Many resistance mechanisms have been described, and the crosstalk between ER and growth factor receptor signaling pathways seems to represent one of the most relevant. Compounds that are able to inhibit key elements of these pathways and restore endocrine sensitivity have been studied and more are currently under development. The aim of this review is to summarize the molecular pathophysiology of endocrine resistance in breast cancer and its impact on current clinical management.

Metastatic breast cancer subtypes and central nervous system metastases

BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) subtypes have different survival and response to therapy. We studied predictors of central nervous system metastases (CNS-M) and outcome after CNS-M diagnosis according to tumor subtype. PATIENTS AND METHODS 488 patients with diagnosis of metastatic BC were retrospectively evaluated. According to the combination of hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 status, tumors were grouped in: Luminal (Lum), Luminal/HER2+, pure HER2-positive (pHER2+) and triple negative (TN). Time to CNS progression, CNS-M free interval and Overall Survival (OS) after CNS-M occurrence were compared by the log-rank test. Cox-proportional hazard models were used to study predictor factors associated with CNS progression, including tumor subtype and all potentially clinical relevant variables. RESULTS 115 patients (pts) developed CNS-M with a median time to CNS progression of 31 months. The rate of CNS-M by subtype was: Lum 14%, Lum/HER2+ 35%, pHER2+ 49%, TN 22% (p < 0.001). Compared with Lum tumors, Lum/HER2+ (HR 2.514, p < 0.001), pHER2+ (HR 6.799, p < 0.0001) and TN (HR = 3.179, p < 0.001) subtypes were at higher risk of CNS-M. Median OS in months after CNS-M was: Lum 7.4, Lum/HER2+ 19.2, pHER2+ 7, TN 4.9 (p < 0.002). Belonging to the Lum/HER2+ subtype (HR 0.48, p < 0.037) and having isolated CNS (HR 0.37, p < 0.004) predicted significantly reduced risk of death. CONCLUSIONS After CNS-M, the Lum/HER2+ subtype appears associated with the longest OS. Prospective clinical trials would be required for evaluating the potential role of screening for asymptomatic CNS lesions and of more aggressive CNS-M treatment in Lum/HER2+ subtype.

HER2-positive breast cancer cells resistant to trastuzumab and lapatinib lose reliance upon HER2 and are sensitive to the multitargeted kinase inhibitor sorafenib

Trastuzumab has changed the prognosis of HER2 positive breast cancers. Despite this progress, resistance to trastuzumab occurs in most patients. Newer anti-HER2 therapies, like the dual tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) lapatinib, show significant antitumor activity, indicating that HER2 can be still exploited as a target after trastuzumab failure. However, since a high proportion of patients fail to respond to these alternative strategies, it is possible that cell escape from HER2 targeting may rely on HER2 independent pathways. The knowledge of these pathways deserve to be exploited to develop new therapies. We characterized two human HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cell lines resistant to trastuzumab and lapatinib (T100 and JIMT-1) from a molecular and biological point of view. Indeed, we assessed both in vitro and in vivo the activity of the multitarget inhibitor sorafenib. In both cell lines, the previously proposed mechanisms did not explain resistance to HER2 inhibitors. Notably, silencing HER2 by shRNA did not affect the growth of our cells, suggesting loss of reliance upon HER2. Moreover, we identified alterations in two antiapoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and Survivin which are known to be targets of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. Moreover, sorafenib, strongly inhibited the in vitro growth of T100 and JIMT-1 cells, through the downregulation of both Mcl-1 and Survivin. Similar results were obtained in JIMT-1 xenografts subcutaneously injected in NOD SCID mice. We provide preclinical evidence that tumor cells resistant to trastuzumab and lapatinib may rely on HER2 independent pathways that can be efficiently inhibited by sorafenib.

Buparlisib , an oral pan-PI3K inhibitor for the treatment of breast cancer

Introduction: Deregulation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) intracellular signaling pathway is common in breast cancer (BC) and has been found to be potentially implicated in resistance to endocrine and anti-HER2 therapies. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway may remove this inhibition and restore sensitivity to these compounds. Buparlisib (BKM120) is a potent oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor that is being extensively evaluated in multiple tumor types. Areas covered: This review briefly summarizes the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of buparlisib, focusing on preclinical and clinical data in BC and on ongoing randomized trials. Expert opinion: Overall, buparlisib is a safe and tolerable drug and, despite its peculiar toxicity profile, it is suitable for studies in combination with other anticancer agents in BC. Early-phase clinical trials in BC have provided evidence of antitumor activity. Several trials are being conducted in all the biological subsets of BC, including combinations with endocrine therapy, anti-HER2 agents, PARP-inhibitors and chemotherapy. While clinical results are eagerly awaited, biological material suitable for both genomic and non-genomic analyses is being collected. The authors expect an intense investigation of the potential biomarkers that explain response or resistance to buparlisib and inspire strategies to rationally explore the therapeutic potential of this drug.

Recent advances in the development of breast cancer vaccines

The manipulation of the immune system through the administration of a vaccine to direct an effective and long-lasting immune response against breast cancer (BC) cells is an attractive strategy. Vaccines would have several theoretical advantages over standard therapies, including low toxicities, high specificity, and long-lasting efficacy due to the establishment of immunological memory. However, BC vaccines have failed to demonstrate meaningful results in clinical trials so far. This reflects the intrinsic difficulty in breaking the complex immune-escaping mechanisms developed by cancer cells. New vaccines should be able to elicit complex immunologic response involving multiple immune effectors such as cytotoxic and antibody-secreting B cells, innate immunity effectors, and memory cells. Moreover, especially in patients with large tumor burdens and metastatic disease, combining vaccines with other strategies, such as systemic BC therapies, passive immunotherapy, or immunomodulatory agents, could increase the effectiveness of each approach. Here, we review recent advances in BC vaccines, focusing on suitable targets and innovative strategies. We report results of most recent trials investigating active immunotherapy in BC and provide possible future perspectives in this field of research.

Clinical utility of exemestane in the treatment of breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women, causing a significant mortality worldwide. Different endocrine strategies are available for the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer, including antiestrogen tamoxifen and fulvestrant, as well as third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane. In this review, we will focus on exemestane, its clinical use, and its side effects. Exemestane is a steroidal third-generation AI now used in all treatment settings for breast cancer. In the metastatic disease, it has been extensively investigated as the first-, second-, and further-line treatment and it is now registered for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer whose disease has progressed following antiestrogen therapy. A potential lack of cross-resistance with nonsteroidal AIs has been described, giving additional therapeutic opportunities in sequences of endocrine agents. Exemestane is also approved for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal early breast cancer, either as upfront monotherapy for 5 years, as a switch following 2–3 years of tamoxifen, or as extended therapy beyond 5 years of adjuvant treatment. New promising data also showed a beneficial effect in young premenopausal early breast cancer patients, when administered together with ovarian suppression. Interesting results have also emerged when exemestane has been investigated as neodjuvant treatment as well as preventive agent in healthy women at high risk for breast cancer. Exemestane is generally well tolerated, with a side effect profile similar to that of other AIs, including menopausal symptoms, arthralgia, and bone loss. In conclusion, exemestane can be considered an effective and well-tolerated endocrine treatment option for all stages of breast cancer.

Current status and future perspectives in the endocrine treatment of postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Introduction: Endocrine therapy is a fundamental component of the therapeutic repertoire for treatment of metastatic, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Inevitably, however, tumors develop resistance to these compounds, and overcoming this phenomenon is a key motivator of research in this field. Areas covered: This review summarizes the current status of endocrine therapy for the treatment of metastatic disease, with a main focus on postmenopausal patients. Furthermore, strategies that could potentially sustain endocrine resistance and future perspectives in this direction are also to be described. Relevant references were identified by PubMed searches and from the abstract books of the annual meetings of The European Society of Clinical Oncology (ESMO), The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and from the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposia. Expert opinion: Combinations of endocrine therapy with HER2 targeting agents, as well as with compounds that can interfere with PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling, are two promising strategies for delaying or overcoming endocrine resistance, mediated by these relevant biological pathways. Due to increased costs and the burden of toxicity associated with these combination therapies, compared to endocrine therapy alone, it is imperative to concentrate efforts on establishing biomarkers that can predict efficacy.

Hitting multiple targets in HER2-positive breast cancer: proof of principle or therapeutic opportunity?

Introduction: Pharmacological targeting of the tyrosine kinase receptor HER2 with the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has dramatically changed the outlook of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. However, HER2 is part of a more complex biological network that, when deregulated, plays a central role in sustaining the cancer phenotype. These interactions account for primary or acquired resistance to drugs that hit a single biological target, like trastuzumab. Several preclinical models suggest that simultaneous targeting of crucial metabolic pathways has the potential to circumvent or delay the onset of resistance phenomena in HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Areas covered: This review describes the rationale and results of clinical trials using biologically targeted agents in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Single drugs that hit multiple targets and cocktails of biologically targeted agents are considered, whereas combinations with chemotherapy are not addressed. Expert opinion: Most of the studies using biological agents to hit multiple targets in HER2-positive breast cancer patients confirm that resistance to single-agent HER2-targeting can be overcome. Further developments will include combination of multi-targeting strategies with chemotherapy in patients with earlier-stage disease. In addition, it is possible that newer molecular predictive factors may allow a more rationale choice of the most appropriate targeting for each individual patient.