Andrea Penna

Shaking Table Test of a Strengthened Full-Scale Stone Masonry Building with Flexible Diaphragms

An extensive experimental campaign has been conducted at EUCENTRE to understand the dynamic behavior of historic stone masonry structures and evaluate the seismic performance of selected strengthening strategies, aimed at improving wall-to-floor connections and in-plane diaphragm stiffness. Shaking table tests were performed of full-scale two-storey buildings in undressed double-leaf stone masonry with timber floor and roof. A first prototype (Building 1), representing a vulnerable building without antiseismic detailing and devices, was tested showing a response characterized by in-plane distortion of the flexible diaphragms and local out-of-plane failure mechanisms. In Building 2 the wall-to-diaphragm connections were improved, providing only a moderate in-plane stiffening of the wooden diaphragms. When subjected to shake-table testing, the strengthened building showed a global type of structural response without the occurrence of out-of-plane mechanisms. In the present paper the strengthening interventions on Building 2 are described, and the results obtained during the dynamic tests are illustrated, focusing on the response of the structure, the evolution of damage mechanisms during the tests, in comparison to the seismic performance of the first unstrengthened reference prototype response. The improvement of the connections proved to be very effective, increasing significantly the seismic capacity of Building 2 with respect to Building 1.

Seismic Performance of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Masonry: From Experimental Testing of the In-Plane Capacity of Walls to Building Response Simulation

The need to assess the seismic performance of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry arose in different countries in the last years. The use of AAC for load-bearing walls is quite common in low seismicity areas in Central and Northern Europe, where its thermal insulation properties, together with lightness and workability, are particularly appreciated. Increasing attention to energy-efficient buildings is now supporting the adoption of a material with such characteristics also in higher seismicity regions. Hence, in order to correctly study the seismic performance of this constructive system, the in-plane response of unreinforced AAC masonry panels has been assessed through an experimental test campaign aiming at obtaining a reliable description of the lateral cyclic behavior. The experimental results are summarized in the article and the derived essential seismic design parameters are presented. The test results allowed the calibration of a macro-element model representative of the nonlinear response of single piers, simulating their cyclic experimental behavior. Three-dimensional models of unreinforced AAC masonry buildings were then obtained using the TREMURI program. Their seismic performance assessment has been carried out through both a nonlinear static (pushover) procedure and nonlinear dynamic time history analyses. Nevertheless, the obtained results allow for some preliminary considerations on the global response of this type of construction and its potential for application in moderate and high seismicity countries.

Seismic assessment of existing and strengthened stone-masonry buildings: critical issues and possible strategies

The seismic performance of stone masonry buildings is known to be generally poor with respect to other structural typologies. However, significant differences can be observed for different architectural configurations, structural details and masonry mechanical properties. In particular, the seismic vulnerability of existing stone masonry structures is often governed by local failure modes, typically consisting of out-of-plane overturning of structural portions or crumbling of outer wythes in multi-leaf walls. In buildings with an adequate masonry quality, an overall behaviour controlled by the in-plane capacity of walls can develop and govern the global failure mode, provided that proper connections between perpendicular walls and between walls and floors are effective in contrasting the activation of early local failures. In these cases, the in-plane stiffness of diaphragms (typically vaults and timber floors/roofs) can play a significant role in coupling the response of the different walls, hence controlling the global building capacity. Recent experimental testing campaigns carried out in different laboratories have focused on several aspects of the seismic response of stone masonry buildings and on the effect of several strengthening techniques. The availability of such experimental results allowed validation and improvement of analysis tools and procedures for the assessment of the seismic capacity of existing stone masonry structures. In order to make them available to all practitioners, the research achievements need to be incorporated in codes and guidelines for the assessment and strengthening of existing stone masonry buildings. The procedures currently proposed in several codes are already based on a rational approach, which starts from the acquisition of an adequate structural knowledge level and allows for using nonlinear analysis procedures. They could straightforwardly include new research findings and practical developments.

The Effect of Stiffened Floor and Roof Diaphragms on the Experimental Seismic Response of a Full-Scale Unreinforced Stone Masonry Building

An extensive experimental program was carried out at EUCENTRE, within a research project on the evaluation and reduction of the seismic vulnerability of stone masonry structures. The main part of the experimental program has been devoted to the shaking table tests on three full-scale, two-story, single-room prototype buildings made of undressed double-leaf stone masonry. The first building tested was representative of existing unreinforced stone masonry structures with flexible wooden diaphragms, without any specific anti-seismic design nor detailing. In the second and third buildings, strengthening interventions were simulated on structures theoretically identical to the first one, improving wall-to-floor and wall-to-roof connections and increasing diaphragm stiffness. In particular, in the third specimen, steel and r.c. ring beams were used to improve the diaphragm connection to the walls and collaborating r.c. slab and multi-layer plywood panels were used to stiffen floor and roof diaphragms, respectively. This article describes the strengthening interventions applied to the third building prototype and presents the experimental results obtained during the shaking table tests. The results obtained permitted the calibration of a macroelement model representative of the nonlinear behavior of the structure.

Evaluation of Uncertainties in the Seismic Assessment of Existing Masonry Buildings

The assessment of existing masonry buildings is an important issue in earthquake prone countries like Italy. The current Italian building code, which adopts the approach proposed by Eurocode 8, includes an assessment procedure based on the use of confidence factors, whose values depend on the level of knowledge of the structure. These factors are intended to take into account all possible uncertainties related to the incomplete knowledge of the structure. This article investigates the reliability of the code-based procedure for the assessment of existing masonry buildings and pinpoints some problematic aspects. The approach followed is the simulation of the entire code-based assessment procedure, with the flow of decisions that an engineer would face in the assessment of an existing building schematized in the form of a logic tree. The proposed simulated procedure accounts for different sources of epistemic uncertainty like the selection of the level of knowledge, uncertainty in the results and location of in-situ tests, identification of several structural details, etc. A Monte Carlo procedure allows the simulation of a large number of random assessments intended to be performed by different virtual engineers. The results are then compared with those coming from the assessment of the “perfectly known” structure, used as a benchmark, providing an estimate of the validity of the codified assessment methodology.

Mesozonation of the Italian territory for the definition of real spectrum-compatible accelerograms

The Italian building code defines the seismic action in terms of elastic acceleration response spectra derived from the results of a probabilistic seismic hazard study performed for the whole national territory. This representation of the seismic input is insufficient for several situations (e.g. analysis of geotechnical systems or time-history analyses of structures), for which the seismic input needs to be specified in terms of accelerograms. This work illustrates a methodology for the seismic mesozonation of the Italian territory, with the aim of defining suites of 7 real accelerograms recorded at outcropping rock sites with flat topographic conditions and, most importantly, compatible with the elastic acceleration response spectrum defined by the Italian building code at any location in Italy. These accelerograms do not require any correction and can be directly used for nonlinear dynamic analyses of structures and geotechnical systems. The mesozonation is based on identification of groups of spectra with similar characteristics and shape. For each of these groups, a parent spectrum is defined and used for selecting real spectrum-compatible records. Limited linear scaling is then applied to these accelerograms to make them compatible with all the response spectra of the group. The results of this work for the 475-years return period are accessible through the SEISM-HOME Web-GIS (www.eucentre.it/seismhome.html) providing, for any site in Italy, a suite of 7 real accelerograms spectrum-compatible, on average, with the acceleration response spectrum prescribed by the Italian building code. SEISM-HOME is a useful tool for practitioners needing ready-to-use time-histories for seismic analyses.

Identification of Suitable Limit States from Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses of Masonry Structures

Performance-based earthquake engineering, developed over the last decades for the design and assessment of other structures, can also be applied for masonry structures if the particularities of masonry are incorporated into the procedure. According to this methodology, structural performance can be assessed according to damage states which are identified through displacement/damage indicators. While various methods for the identification of limit states from the results of nonlinear static analyses exist, the identification of damage states from the results of nonlinear dynamic analyses is still uncertain. This article investigates a number of criteria allowing to identify the attainment of significant limit states from the results of time history analyses, in terms of appropriately identified response quantities. These criteria are applied to five building prototypes and their results are compared. A comparison with the limit states derived from nonlinear static analyses is also made.

Typological Seismic Risk Maps for Italy

This paper describes the methodology followed to derive typological seismic risk maps for Italy and then presents the results. In its classical definition, seismic risk is obtained from the convolution of hazard, vulnerability and exposure. Due to the absence of reliable data on exposure for the entire Italian territory, this study proposes typological seismic risk maps, obtained by simply convolving hazard and vulnerability for several building typologies characteristic of the Italian building stock. A specific hazard study in terms of PGA has been carried out. The results have then been convolved with empirical typological fragility curves, that were derived from data collected during post-earthquake surveys after the main Italian events of the last 30 years. Useful applications can be found for the typological seismic risk maps, both for risk mitigation strategies and for purely economical evaluations (e.g., insurance and reinsurance studies).

Shaking table test on a full scale URM cavity wall building

A shaking table test on a two-storey full scale unreinforced masonry (URM) building was performed at the EUCENTRE laboratory within a comprehensive research programme on the seismic vulnerability of the existing Dutch URM structures. The building specimen was meant to represent the end-unit of a terraced house, built with cavity walls and without any particular seismic design or detailing. Cavity walls are usually composed of an inner loadbearing leaf and an outer leaf having aesthetic and weather-protection functions. In the tested specimen, the loadbearing masonry was composed of calcium silicate bricks, sustaining two reinforced concrete floors. A pitched timber roof was supported by two gable walls. The veneer was made of clay bricks connected to the inner masonry by means of metallic ties, as seen in common construction practice. An incremental dynamic test was carried out up to the near-collapse limit state of the specimen. The input motions were selected to be consistent with the characteristics of induced seismicity ground motions. The article describes the characteristics of the building and presents the results obtained during the material characterization and the shaking table tests, illustrating the response of the structure, the damage mechanism and its evolution during the experimental phases. All the processed data are freely available upon request (see http://www.eucentre.it/nam-project).

Methods and Approaches for Blind Test Predictions of Out-of-Plane Behavior of Masonry Walls: A Numerical Comparative Study

ABSTRACT Earthquakes cause severe damage to masonry structures due to inertial forces acting in the normal direction to the plane of the walls. The out-of-plane behavior of masonry walls is complex and depends on several parameters, such as material and geometric properties of walls, connections between structural elements, the characteristics of the input motions, among others. Different analytical methods and advanced numerical modeling are usually used for evaluating the out-of-plane behavior of masonry structures. Furthermore, different types of structural analysis can be adopted for this complex behavior, such as limit analysis, pushover, or nonlinear dynamic analysis. Aiming to evaluate the capabilities of different approaches to similar problems, blind predictions were made using different approaches. For this purpose, two idealized structures were tested on a shaking table and several experts on masonry structures were invited to present blind predictions on the response of the structures, aiming at evaluating the available tools for the out-of-plane assessment of masonry structures. This article presents the results of the blind test predictions and the comparison with the experimental results, namely in terms of formed collapsed mechanisms and control outputs (PGA or maximum displacements), taking into account the selected tools to perform the analysis.