Andrea R Deussen
University of Adelaide
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrea R Deussen.
BMJ | 2014
Jodie M Dodd; Deborah Turnbull; Andrew J. McPhee; Andrea R Deussen; Rosalie M Grivell; Lisa N. Yelland; Caroline A Crowther; Gary A. Wittert; Julie A. Owens; Jeffrey S. Robinson
Objective To determine the effect of antenatal dietary and lifestyle interventions on health outcomes in overweight and obese pregnant women. Design Multicentre randomised trial. We utilised a central telephone randomisation server, with computer generated schedule, balanced variable blocks, and stratification for parity, body mass index (BMI) category, and hospital. Setting Three public maternity hospitals across South Australia. Participants 2212 women with a singleton pregnancy, between 10+0 and 20+0 weeks’ gestation, and BMI ≥25. Interventions 1108 women were randomised to a comprehensive dietary and lifestyle intervention delivered by research staff; 1104 were randomised to standard care and received pregnancy care according to local guidelines, which did not include such information. Main outcome measures Incidence of infants born large for gestational age (birth weight ≥90th centile for gestation and sex). Prespecified secondary outcomes included birth weight >4000 g, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes. Analyses used intention to treat principles. Results 2152 women and 2142 liveborn infants were included in the analyses. The risk of the infant being large for gestational age was not significantly different in the two groups (lifestyle advice 203/1075 (19%) v standard care 224/1067 (21%); adjusted relative risk 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.07; P=0.24). Infants born to women after lifestyle advice were significantly less likely to have birth weight above 4000 g (lifestyle advice 164/1075 (15%) v standard care 201/1067 (19%); 0.82, 0.68 to 0.99; number needed to treat (NNT) 28, 15 to 263; P=0.04). There were no differences in maternal pregnancy and birth outcomes between the two treatment groups. Conclusions For women who were overweight or obese, the antenatal lifestyle advice used in this study did not reduce the risk delivering a baby weighing above the 90th centile for gestational age and sex or improve maternal pregnancy and birth outcomes. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12607000161426).
BMC Medicine | 2014
Jodie M Dodd; Courtney Cramp; Zhixian Sui; Lisa N. Yelland; Andrea R Deussen; Rosalie M Grivell; Lisa J. Moran; Caroline A Crowther; Deborah Turnbull; Andrew J. McPhee; Gary A. Wittert; Julie A. Owens; Jeffrey S. Robinson
BackgroundOverweight and obesity is a significant health concern during pregnancy. Our aim was to investigate the effect of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice to women who are overweight or obese on components of maternal diet and physical activity.MethodsWe conducted a randomised controlled trial, in which pregnant women with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, and singleton gestation between 10+0 to 20+0 weeks were recruited and randomised to Lifestyle Advice (involving a comprehensive dietary and lifestyle intervention over their pregnancy) or Standard Care. Within the intervention group, we conducted a nested randomised trial in which a subgroup of women were further randomised to receive access to supervised group walking sessions in addition to the standard information presented during the intervention contacts (the Walking group) or standard information only.The outcome measures were maternal dietary intake, (including food groups, macronutrient and micronutrient intake, diet quality (using the Healthy Eating Index; HEI), dietary glycaemic load, and glycaemic index) and maternal physical activity. Women completed the Harvard Semi-Structured Food Frequency Questionnaire, and the Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing Physical Activity (SQUASH), at trial entry, 28 and 36 weeks’ gestational age, and 4 months postpartum.Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, using linear mixed effects models with adjustment for the stratification variables.ResultsWomen randomised to Lifestyle Advice demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the number of servings of fruit and vegetables consumed per day, as well as increased consumption of fibre, and reduced percentage energy intake from saturated fats (P < 0.05 for all). Maternal HEI was significantly improved at both 28 (73.35 ± 6.62 versus 71.86 ± 7.01; adjusted difference in means 1.58; 95% CI 0.89 to 2.27; P < 0.0001) and 36 (72.95 ± 6.82 versus 71.17 ± 7.69; adjusted difference in means 1.77; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.53; P < 0.0001) weeks. There were no differences in dietary glycaemic index or glycaemic load. Women randomised to Lifestyle Advice also demonstrated greater total physical activity (adjusted difference in means 359.76 metabolic equivalent task units (MET) minutes/week; 95% CI 74.87 to 644.65; P = 0.01) compared with women receiving Standard Care. The supervised walking group was poorly utilised.ConclusionsFor women who are overweight or obese, antenatal lifestyle advice improves maternal diet and physical activity during pregnancy.Please see related articles: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/163 and http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/201.Trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (http://ACTRN12607000161426)
BMC Medicine | 2014
Jodie M Dodd; Andrew J. McPhee; Deborah Turnbull; Lisa N. Yelland; Andrea R Deussen; Rosalie M Grivell; Caroline A Crowther; Gary A. Wittert; Julie A. Owens; Jeffrey S. Robinson
BackgroundOverweight and obesity during pregnancy represents a considerable health burden. While research has focused on interventions to limit gestational weight gain, there is little information describing their impact on neonatal health. Our aim was to investigate the effect on a range of pre-specified secondary neonatal outcomes of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice to women who are overweight or obese.MethodsWe report a range of pre-specified secondary neonatal outcomes from a large randomised trial in which antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice was provided to women who were overweight or obese. Pregnant women were eligible for participation with a body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or over, and singleton gestation between 10+0 and 20+0 weeks. Outcome measures included gestational age at birth; Apgar score below 7 at 5 minutes of age; need for resuscitation at birth; birth weight above 4.5 kg or below 2.5 kg; birth weight, length and head circumference (and Z-scores); admission to the nursery; respiratory distress syndrome; and postnatal length of stay. Data relating to the primary outcome (large for gestational age infants defined as birth weight above the 90th centile) and birth weight above 4 kg have been reported previously. Analyses used intention-to-treat principles.ResultsIn total, 2,142 infants were included in the analyses. Infants born to women following lifestyle advice were significantly less likely to have birth weight above 4.5 kg (2.15% versus 3.69%; adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 0.98; P = 0.04), or respiratory distress syndrome (1.22% versus 2.57%; aRR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.90; P = 0.02), particularly moderate or severe disease, and had a shorter length of postnatal hospital stay (3.94 ± 7.26 days versus 4.41 ± 9.87 days; adjusted ratio of means 0.89; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97; P = 0.006) compared with infants born to women who received Standard Care.ConclusionsFor women who are overweight or obese, antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice has health benefits for infants, without an increase in the risk of harm. Continued follow-up into childhood will be important to assess the longer-term effects of a reduction in high infant birth weight on risk of child obesity.Please see related articles: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/161 and http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/201.Clinical trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (http://ACTRN12607000161426)
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2016
Rosalie M Grivell; Lisa N. Yelland; Andrea R Deussen; Caroline A Crowther; Jodie M Dodd
To report the influence of maternal overweight and obesity on fetal growth and adiposity and effects of an antenatal dietary and lifestyle intervention among these women on measures of fetal growth and adiposity as secondary outcomes of the LIMIT Trial.
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica | 2016
Jodie M Dodd; Angela Newman; Lisa J. Moran; Andrea R Deussen; Rosalie M Grivell; Lisa N. Yelland; Caroline A. Crowther; Andrew J. McPhee; Gary A. Wittert; Julie A. Owens; Deborah Turnbull; Jeffrey S. Robinson
Our aim was to evaluate the effect of dietary and lifestyle advice given to women who were overweight or obese during pregnancy on maternal quality of life, anxiety and risk of depression, and satisfaction with care.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2016
Jodie M Dodd; Andrea R Deussen; I Mohamad; Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman; Lisa N. Yelland; Jennie Louise; A.J. McPhee; Rosalie M Grivell; Julie A. Owens; Matthew W. Gillman; Jeffrey S. Robinson
To evaluate the effect of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice on neonatal anthropometry, and to determine the inter‐observer variability in obtaining anthropometric measurements.
Obesity | 2015
Jodie M Dodd; Lavern M. Kannieappan; Rosalie M Grivell; Andrea R Deussen; Lisa J. Moran; Lisa N. Yelland; Julie A. Owens
The effect of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice on secondary measures of maternal anthropometry was evaluated and their correlation with both gestational weight gain and infant birth weight was assessed.
Obesity | 2017
Lisa J. Moran; Angela C. Flynn; Jennie Louise; Andrea R Deussen; Jodie M Dodd
Optimizing maternal diet during pregnancy improves maternal and infant health. This study assessed the effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention for women with overweight or obesity on dietary patterns during pregnancy and post partum.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2018
Jodie M Dodd; Chad Andersen; Jan E. Dickinson; Jennie Louise; Andrea R Deussen; Rosalie M Grivell; L. Voto; Mark D. Kilby; Rory Windrim; Greg Ryan
To evaluate whether Doppler measurement of middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA‐PSV) for timing subsequent intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) in fetuses that had undergone one IUT for anemia secondary to red‐cell alloimmunization is non‐inferior to timing based on expected decrease in fetal hematocrit (Hct) or fetal hemoglobin level, without compromising infant hemoglobin at birth.
Nutrition Reviews | 2018
Jodie M Dodd; Andrea R Deussen; Cecelia O’Brien; Danielle A J M Schoenaker; Amanda Poprzeczny; Adrienne Gordon; Suzanne Phelan
Context Many international clinical guidelines recommend that overweight and obese women lose weight prior to pregnancy to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Women who have recently given birth and plan future pregnancies are an important target population for preconception weight-loss interventions. Objective A systematic review to evaluate postpartum dietary and/or physical activity interventions to promote weight loss and improve health in a subsequent pregnancy was conducted. Data Sources Five databases-the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (through PubMed), Embase, the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, and the International Clinical Trials Registry-were searched using the following terms: preconception, pregnancy, postpartum, pregnancy outcomes, body mass index, weight gain, weight loss, weight change, postpartum weight retention, dietary or lifestyle intervention, and randomiz(s)ed controlled trial. The date of last search was November 2017. Data Extraction Data were extracted from each identified study using a standard form. The primary outcomes were weight loss at the completion of the intervention and at follow-up assessments. Secondary endpoints included maternal and infant outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy. Data Analysis Mean differences (MDs) were calculated for continuous data and risk ratios for dichotomous data, both with 95%CIs. Results A total of 235 abstracts (193 after duplicates were excluded) were identified, from which 37 manuscripts were selected for full-text review. In total, 27 trials were identified for inclusion. Outcome data were available for approximately 75% of participants (n = 3485). A combined dietary and physical activity intervention provided post partum produced greater postpartum weight loss (MD, -2.49 kg; 95%CI, -3.34 to -1.63 kg [random-effects model]; 12 studies, 1156 women), which was maintained at 12 months post partum (MD, -2.41 kg; 95%CI, -3.89 to -0.93 kg [random-effects model]; 4 studies, 405 women), compared with no intervention. No studies reported maternal or infant health outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy. Conclusions Providing a postpartum intervention is associated with weight loss after birth, but effects on maternal and infant health in a subsequent pregnancy are uncertain.