Andrea Tateo
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrea Tateo.
Physics in Medicine and Biology | 2015
Nicola Amoroso; Rosangela Errico; Bruno S; Andrea Chincarini; Elena Garuccio; Francesco Sensi; Sabina Tangaro; Andrea Tateo; Roberto Bellotti
In this study we present a novel fully automated Hippocampal Unified Multi-Atlas-Networks (HUMAN) algorithm for the segmentation of the hippocampus in structural magnetic resonance imaging. In multi-atlas approaches atlas selection is of crucial importance for the accuracy of the segmentation. Here we present an optimized method based on the definition of a small peri-hippocampal region to target the atlas learning with linear and non-linear embedded manifolds. All atlases were co-registered to a data driven template resulting in a computationally efficient method that requires only one test registration. The optimal atlases identified were used to train dedicated artificial neural networks whose labels were then propagated and fused to obtain the final segmentation. To quantify data heterogeneity and protocol inherent effects, HUMAN was tested on two independent data sets provided by the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies. HUMAN is accurate and achieves state-of-the-art performance (Dice[Formula: see text] and Dice[Formula: see text]). It is also a robust method that remains stable when applied to the whole hippocampus or to sub-regions (patches). HUMAN also compares favorably with a basic multi-atlas approach and a benchmark segmentation tool such as FreeSurfer.
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine | 2015
Sabina Tangaro; Nicola Amoroso; Massimo Brescia; Stefano Cavuoti; Andrea Chincarini; Rosangela Errico; Paolo Inglese; Giuseppe Longo; Rosalia Maglietta; Andrea Tateo; Giuseppe Riccio; Roberto Bellotti
Neurodegenerative diseases are frequently associated with structural changes in the brain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can show these variations and therefore can be used as a supportive feature for a number of neurodegenerative diseases. The hippocampus has been known to be a biomarker for Alzheimer disease and other neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, it requires accurate, robust, and reproducible delineation of hippocampal structures. Fully automatic methods are usually the voxel based approach; for each voxel a number of local features were calculated. In this paper, we compared four different techniques for feature selection from a set of 315 features extracted for each voxel: (i) filter method based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; two wrapper methods, respectively, (ii) sequential forward selection and (iii) sequential backward elimination; and (iv) embedded method based on the Random Forest Classifier on a set of 10 T1-weighted brain MRIs and tested on an independent set of 25 subjects. The resulting segmentations were compared with manual reference labelling. By using only 23 feature for each voxel (sequential backward elimination) we obtained comparable state-of-the-art performances with respect to the standard tool FreeSurfer.
Pattern Analysis and Applications | 2016
Rosalia Maglietta; Nicola Amoroso; Marina Boccardi; Stefania Bruno; Andrea Chincarini; Giovanni B. Frisoni; Paolo Inglese; Alberto Redolfi; Sabina Tangaro; Andrea Tateo; Roberto Bellotti
The automated identification of brain structure in Magnetic Resonance Imaging is very important both in neuroscience research and as a possible clinical diagnostic tool. In this study, a novel strategy for fully automated hippocampal segmentation in MRI is presented. It is based on a supervised algorithm, called RUSBoost, which combines data random undersampling with a boosting algorithm. RUSBoost is an algorithm specifically designed for imbalanced classification, suitable for large data sets because it uses random undersampling of the majority class. The RUSBoost performances were compared with those of ADABoost, Random Forest and the publicly available brain segmentation package, FreeSurfer. This study was conducted on a data set of 50 T1-weighted structural brain images. The RUSBoost-based segmentation tool achieved the best results with a Dice’s index of
Archive | 2017
Marianna La Rocca; Nicola Amoroso; Roberto Bellotti; Domenico Diacono; Alfonso Monaco; Anna Monda; Andrea Tateo; Sabina Tangaro
international conference on machine learning and applications | 2013
Rosalia Maglietta; Nicola Amoroso; Stefania Bruno; Andrea Chincarini; Giovanni B. Frisoni; Paolo Inglese; Sabina Tangaro; Andrea Tateo; Roberto Bellotti
0.88 \pm 0.01
Physics in Medicine and Biology | 2016
Andrea Tateo; A Iurino; Giuseppina Settanni; A Andrisani; P F Stifanelli; P Larizza; Francesca Mazzia; Rosa Maria Mininni; Sabina Tangaro; Roberto Bellotti
international workshop on brainlesion: glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries | 2016
Roberto Bellotti; Angela Lombardi; Cataldo Guaragnella; Nicola Amoroso; Andrea Tateo; Sabina Tangaro
0.88±0.01 (
international workshop on magnetic particle imaging | 2015
Andrea Tateo; Andrea Andrisani; Alessandro Iurino; Giuseppina Settanni; Patrizia F. Stifanelli; Pietro Larizza; Francesca Mazzia; Rosa Maria Mininni; Sabina Tangaro; Roberto Bellotti
international conference on image analysis and processing | 2015
Nicola Amoroso; Sabina Tangaro; Rosangela Errico; Elena Garuccio; Anna Monda; Francesco Sensi; Andrea Tateo; Roberto Bellotti
0.87 \pm 0.01
CompIMAGE | 2012
Nicola Amoroso; Roberto Bellotti; Stefania Bruno; Andrea Chincarini; Giancarlo Logroscino; Sabina Tangaro; Andrea Tateo