Andrea Zaw

Body mass index strongly impacts the diagnosis and incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the surgical intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND The obese state has been linked to several immune-mediated conditions. Our objective was to examine the association of body mass index (BMI) with the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). METHODS Prospectively collected data on patients in the surgical and cardiac intensive care unit suspected of having HIT between January 2007 and August 2014 were analyzed. Patients were categorized into five discrete BMI (kg/m2) groups and compared. Data collected included Warkentin 4-T scores, antiplatelet factor 4 (anti-PF4OD) values, serotonin release assay values, and thromboembolic diseases. HIT positivity was defined as serotonin release assay value greater than 20%. RESULTS Of 304 patients meeting inclusion criteria, mean (SD) age was 62.1 (16.5) years, 59% were male, and mean (SD) BMI was 27 (6) kg/m2. Thirty-six (12%) were positive for HIT. Incidence of HIT increased progressively with BMI (0%, 8%, 11%, 19%, 36%; p < 0.001). Compared with patients with normal BMI, patients with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 to 39.9 kg/m2 had a 200% increase in the odds for HIT (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20–7.54; p = 0.019), while patients with a BMI of 40 kg/m2 or greater had a 600% increase (OR, 6.98; 95% CI, 1.59–28.2; p = 0.012). After regression analysis, BMI remained an independent predictor of the development of HIT (adjusted OR per kg/m2, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02–1.14; p = 0.010). Anti-PF4OD values greater than or equal to 2.0 also increased with BMI (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality increased significantly with BMI above normal (p = 0.026). Warkentin 4-T scores, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and stroke incidence did not correlate with changes in BMI. CONCLUSION Increasing BMI seems to be strongly associated with increased rates of HIT in intensive care unit patients. Obesity is an important new clinical variable for estimating the pretest probability of HIT, and patient “thickness” could be considered a fifth “T” of the 4-T scoring system. Additional biochemical work is indicated to decipher the role of obesity in this immune-mediated condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

Overtreatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Surgical ICU.

Objective: Recent studies reveal a high occurrence of overdiagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in surgical patients with critical illness. The optimal criteria for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia remain unclear, contributing to unnecessary treatment. We reviewed patients who were admitted to surgical ICUs and were suspected of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia to identify how often patients were correctly treated. Design: In this clinical prospective study, data were collected including age, sex, antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, serotonin release assay, and Warkentin 4Ts scores. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-positive patients were defined as those with both positive antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (optical density, ≥ 0.40) and positive serotonin release assay results. Setting: Urban tertiary medical center. Patients: Patients admitted to the surgical and cardiac ICU who were presumed to have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and underwent antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and serotonin release assay testing between January 1, 2011, and August 1, 2014. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 135 patients had 4Ts, antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and serotonin release assay scores. A total of 11 patients (8.1%) had positive serotonin release assay and 80 patients had positive antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; 10 patients were identified as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive. Positive serotonin release assay was noted in nine of 11 patients (81.8%) with antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optical density greater than or equal to 2.0, compared with one of 22 patients (4.5%) with optical density values of 0.85–1.99, and one of 102 patients (1.0%) with optical density values of 0–0.84. Out of 135 patients, 29 patients (21.5%) received treatment with argatroban, lepirudin, or fondaparinux: 10 of 10 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-positive patients (100%) compared with 19 of 125 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-negative patients (15%). Conclusions: Overtreatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the surgical ICU continues even with recent increased caution encouraging a higher antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optical density threshold before initiating treatment. More stringent criteria should be used to determine when to order serologic testing and when the results of such testing should prompt a change in anticoagulant treatment. If antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is used to consider immediate treatment, an optical density greater than or equal to 2.0 may be a more appropriate threshold.