Andreas Bindl

Flexural strength of Cerec 2 machined and jointed InCeram-Alumina and InCeram-Zirconia bars.

OBJECTIVE The flexural strength of Cerec 2 InCeram-Alumina and InCeram-Zirconia bars is evaluated. The focus of the in vitro study is to identify a jointing procedure for InCeram which may be used for producing full-ceramic fixed-partial-denture frameworks. METHODS Six groups (n=15) of machined and jointed InCeram-Alumina (T1-T5) and InCeram-Zirconia (T6) bars (3x4x13mm(3)), respectively, were examined using a 3-point-bending test. InCeram-Alumina joint-free controls were: machined (C1), slip cast (C2, C3) and cut from the block (C4) bars. Machined joint-free InCeram-Zirconia bars were used as controls (C5). InCeram-Alumina slip was used for jointing T1-T5 and InCeram-Zirconia slip for bars T6. Bars were jointed in groups T1 and T2 using butt joint (S1), in T3 and T4 oblique (S2, S3) and in T5 and T6 rounded (S4) joint shapes. RESULTS Two-way analysis of variance showed significant differences between materials (p<0.001) and jointing shapes (p<0.001). The rounded (S4) shape showed the highest flexural strength of 434 (65) MPa of InCeram-Alumina (T5) and 475 (54) MPa of InCeram-Zirconia (T6) bars, respectively but machined/joint-free InCeram-Alumina (511 (59) MPa, C1) and machined/joint-free InCeram-Zirconia (624 (58) MPa, C5) were significantly (p<0.01/p<0.001) stronger. No significant differences (p>0.05) were found between machined/jointed InCeram-Zirconia (475 (54) MPa, T6), joint-free InCeram-Alumina slip cast (498 (125) MPa, C2) and joint-free InCeram-Alumina machined bars (511 (59) MPa, C1). SIGNIFICANCE Compared to conventional slip cast InCeram-Alumina the flexural strength of machined/jointed InCeram-Zirconia appears to be adequate for fixed-partial-denture frameworks.

Current Status and Perspectives of Mucogingival Soft Tissue Measurement Methods

UNLABELLED The morphologic and metric assessment of mucogingival soft tissue dimensions is of great multidisciplinary clinical and academic interest, in order to quantify and monitor gingival changes while in treatment, e.g., during periodontal, restorative, prosthetic, orthodontic, or implant therapy. Pink esthetics play an increasingly important role in the overall treatment success, and therefore have to be monitored throughout therapy. The purpose of this article was to identify and summarize methods, which aim at quantifying gingival dimensions in terms of morphology, thickness, and volume, with respect to their accuracy and practicability. The introduced measurement methods should further facilitate personalized treatment planning and monitoring. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Mucogingival esthetics play an increasingly important role whenever treatment results are evaluated. Several qualitative and (semi)quantitative methods for measuring soft tissue dimensions are available. New methods like CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) technologies are emerging and allow practitioners to reliably monitor their patients soft tissues throughout therapy. Future improvements may help to develop better treatment strategies in terms of optimized preservation and creation of gingival morphology, especially in the esthetic zone.

All-ceramic, chair-side computer-aided design/computer-aided machining restorations.

An update is given on the research and development of chair-side all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations. The Cerec CAD/CAM technology now has close to 8000 users worldwide. Recent improvements provide a sufficiently user-friendly handling of all components to accommodate the user with ordinary technical skills. CAD/CAM technology using non-metallic esthetic materials is increasingly gaining importance in restorative dentistry.

A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results

OBJECTIVES The aim of the present pilot study was to test whether or not posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with pressed veneering ceramic exhibit less chipping than FDPs with layered veneering ceramics. METHODS Forty patients (13 female, 27 male; mean age 54 years (range 26.1-80.7 years) in need of one maxillary or mandibular three-unit FDP in the second premolar or molar region were recruited and treated at two separate centers at the University of Zurich according to the same study protocol. The frameworks were made out of zirconia using a CAD/CAM system (Cerec Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). The patients were randomly assigned to either the test group (zirconia frameworks veneered with pressed ceramic; IPS e.max ZirPress, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein; n=20) or the control group (layered veneering ceramic; IPS e.max Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein; n=20). All FDPs were adhesively cemented and evaluated at baseline (i.e., cementation), at 6 months and at 1 and 3 years of clinical service. The survival of the reconstruction was recorded. The technical outcome was assessed using modified United States Public Health Services (USPHS) criteria. The biologic parameters analyzed at abutment teeth and analogous non-restored teeth included probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque control record (PCR), bleeding on probing (BOP), and tooth vitality (CO2). Data was descriptively analyzed and survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS 36 patients (25 female, 11 male; mean age 52.3 years) with 18 test and 18 control FDPs were examined after a mean follow-up of 36 months (95% CI: 32.6-39.1 months). Comparison of groups was done by Crosstabulation showing even distribution of the respective restored teeth amidst the groups. Survival rate was 100% for both test and control FDPs. Chipping of the veneering ceramic tended to occur more frequently in test (n=8; 40%) than in control (n=4; 20%) FDPs, albeit not significantly (p=0.3). No further differences of the technical outcomes of test and control FDPs occurred.In both test and control group healthy conditions and no difference of the biologic parameters at the abutment and un-restored teeth was found. CONCLUSION Zirconia FDPs with pressed and layered veneering ceramics exhibited similar outcomes at 3 years. A trend to more chipping of the pressed veneering ceramic, however, was observed. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Posterior restorations with zirconia frameworks are a viable treatment method. When restoring posterior teeth with all-ceramic restorations, care providers should be aware of the higher rate of chipping compared to the published data on conventional metal-ceramic restorations.

Clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based three-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses: Up-to ten-year results.

OBJECTIVES Only a few studies exist, which assess the clinical long-term behavior of all-ceramic FDPs in the posterior region. The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior three-unit FDPs manufactured from Y-TZP after a service period up to 10 years. METHODS 55 patients received 59 three-unit FDPs in the posterior region of the maxilla or mandible. Abutment teeth were prepared and full-arch impressions were taken. Definitive casts were fabricated and optically scanned. Frameworks were fabricated with computer-aided design (CAD) and manufacturing (CAM) technology. Y-TZP frameworks were veneered and adhesively luted to the abutment teeth. Baseline and follow-up examinations (service time: ≥ 48 months) were recorded by applying modified United States Public Health Services (USPHS) rating criteria. Cumulative survival rate was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier. Percentage of biological and technical complication was calculated. RESULTS Fifty-three patients with 57 FDPs attended the last follow-up visit and a mean observation period of the remaining was 6.3 ± 1.9 years was calculated. Biological complications occurred in 17.5%, technical complications in 28% of the FDPs. The 10-year cumulative survival rate amounted 85.0%. Three FDPs failed to survive, two due to a root fracture of the abutment tooth and one due to secondary caries. CONCLUSIONS Three-unit FDPs made from Y-TZP, veneered with ceramic offer a treatment option with a high rate of chipping. However, the manufacturing processes nowadays are modified in order to avoid this complication. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The results of the present investigation suggest that three-unit Y-TZP posterior FDPs may are a possible treatment option. However, a high rate of chipping can be expected.

Three-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) veneered with layered and milled (CAD-on) veneering ceramics: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was to test posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) veneered with a computer-aided design/computer- assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) lithium disilicate veneering ceramic (CAD-on) and manually layered zirconia veneering ceramic with respect to survival of the FDPs, and technical and biologic outcomes. METHOD AND MATERIALS Sixty patients in need of one posterior three-unit FDP were included. The zirconia frameworks were produced with a CAD/CAM system (Cerec inLab 3D/Cerec inEOS inLab). Thirty FDPs were veneered with a CAD/CAM lithium disilicate veneering ceramic (Cad-on) (test) and 30 were veneered with a layered zirconia veneering ceramic (control). For the clinical evaluation at baseline, 6, and 12 months, the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used. The biologic outcome was judged by comparing the plaque control record (PCR), bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing pocket depth (PPD). Data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were examined at a mean follow-up of 13.9 months. At the 1-year follow-up the survival rate was 100% in the test and in the control group. No significant differences of the technical outcomes occurred. Major chipping occurred in the control group (n = 3) and predominantly minor chipping in the test group (minor n = 2, major n = 1). No biologic problems or differences were found. CONCLUSIONS Both types of zirconia-ceramic FDPs exhibited very good clinical outcomes without differences between groups. Chipping occurred in both types of FDPs at small amounts, yet the extension of the chippings differed. The test FDPs predominantly exhibited minor chipping, the control FDPs major chipping.

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth without ferrule using a novel H-shaped short post.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the fracture resistance and failure types of modified H-designed intradental short retention preparation for computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) restorations, in cases where no ferrule is possible. METHOD AND MATERIALS A combined finite element analysis and in vitro testing was employed. Forty extracted single-rooted premolars were selected and prepared for the following four groups (n = 10 per group): Group A, H-post preparation restored with glass-ceramic crowns; group B, H-post preparation restored with lithium disilicate crowns; group C, endocrowns (negative control group); and group D, 2-mm ferrule preparation and restoration with fiber posts (positive control). After cementation, specimens were loaded to fracture (1 mm/min) in a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc Scheffé test and chisquare test. RESULTS The H-post group restored with lithium disilicate crowns (group B) presented higher fracture resistance compared to the H-post group with glass-ceramic crowns (group A) and the endocrowns (group C). Among the failure analysis, only specimens of group C were all repairable after fracture load test, while the specimens of remaining groups A, B, and D accounted for 90%, 70%, and 50% repairable fracture modes, respectively. CONCLUSION The modification of the short intracoronal restoration anchorage profile may be a valid concept to improve the retention and fracture resistance, given that the materials are adjusted for this purpose in terms of mechanical resistance and internal adaptation. Numerical evaluations and future in vitro studies may help to select the best designs and materials.

Retrospective Evaluation of CAD/CAM Cantilever Reconstructions to Restore Compromised Posterior Teeth:: A Preliminary Report

PURPOSE To describe the survival, clinical rating, and patient satisfaction of monolithic computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) ceramic single unit cantilever crowns placed on hemisected molars and premolars after a follow-up of at least 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixteen consecutive patients (mean age, 56.8 years) with 16 restored two-unit cantilever crowns (5 premolars and 11 hemisected molar abutments) were reevaluated after an observation period of at least 12 months. Tooth mobility, plaque and bleeding scores, and pocket probing depths were assessed on both the restored and contralateral untreated teeth. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale. RESULTS The mean observation time was 25.7 ± 13.1 months. All restorations were in situ, and no significant biologic differences were observed between the treated and contralateral teeth. Clinical evaluation showed good performance, and patient satisfaction was recorded as excellent. CONCLUSION The use of CAD/CAM ceramic single-unit cantilever crowns may be regarded as a conservative and cost-effective treatment modality with high patient acceptance in carefully selected patients.