Andreas Claas

Clinical and pathological impact of VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, SETD2, KDM6A, and JARID1c in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

VHL is mutated in the majority of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), with conflicting clinical relevance. Recent studies have identified recurrent mutations in histone modifying and chromatin remodeling genes, including BAP1, PBRM1, SETD2, KDM6A, and JARID1c. Current evidence suggests that BAP1 mutations are associated with aggressive disease. The clinical significance of the remaining genes is unknown. In this study, targeted sequencing of VHL and JARID1c (entire genes) and coding regions of BAP1, PBRM1, SETD2, and KDM6A was performed on 132 ccRCCs and matched normal tissues. Associations between mutations and clinical and pathological outcomes were interrogated. Inactivation of VHL (coding mutation or promoter methylation) was seen in 75% of ccRCCs. Somatic noncoding VHL alterations were identified in 29% of ccRCCs and may be associated with improved overall survival. BAP1 (11%), PBRM1 (33%), SETD2 (16%), JARID1c (4%), and KDM6A (3%) mutations were identified. BAP1‐mutated tumors were associated with metastatic disease at presentation (P = 0.023), advanced clinical stage (P = 0.042) and a trend towards shorter recurrence free survival (P = 0.059) when compared with tumors exclusively mutated for PBRM1. Our results support those of recent publications pointing towards a role for BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations in risk stratifying ccRCCs. Further investigation of noncoding alterations in VHL is warranted.

Smallest region of overlapping deletion in 1p36 in human neuroblastoma: A 1 Mbp cosmid and PAC contig

In human neuroblastomas, the distal portion of 1p is frequently deleted, as if one or more tumor suppressor genes from this region were involved in neuroblastoma tumorigenesis. Earlier studies had identified a smallest region of overlapping deletion (SRO) spanning approximately 23 cM between the most distally retained D1S80 and by the proximally retained D1S244. In pursuit of generating a refined delineation of the minimally deleted region, we have analyzed 49 neuroblastomas of different stages for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) from 1pter to 1p35 by employing 26 simple sequence length polymorphisms. Fifteen of the 49 tumors (31%) had LOH; homozygous deletion was not detected. Seven tumors had LOH at all informative loci analyzed, and eight tumors showed a terminal or an interstitial allelic loss of 1p. One small terminal and one interstitial deletion defined a new 1.7 cM SRO, approximately 1 Mbp in physical length, deleted in all tumors between the retained D1S2731 (distal) and D1S2666 (proximal). To determine the genomic complexity of the deleted region shared among tumors, we assembled a physical map of the 1 Mbp SRO consisting predominantly of bacteriophage P1‐derived artificial chromosome (PAC) clones. A total of 55 sequence‐tagged site (STS) markers (23 published STSs and short tandem repeats and 32 newly identified STSs from the insert ends of PACs and cosmids) were assembled in a contig, resulting in a sequence‐ready physical map with approximately one STS per 20 Kbp. Twelve genes (41BB, CD30, DFFA, DJ1, DR3, FRAP, HKR3, MASP2, MTHFR, RIZ, TNR2, TP73) previously mapped to 1p36 are localized outside this SRO. On the basis of this study, they would be excluded as candidate genes for neuroblastoma tumorigenesis. Ten expressed sequence tags were integrated in the contig, of which five are located outside the SRO. The other five from within the SRO may provide an entrance point for the cloning of candidate genes for neuroblastoma.

Cloning of the human homologue of the metastasis-associated rat C4.4A

We have previously described a rat metastasis-associated molecule, C4.4A, which has some common features with the uPAR. Because of its restricted expression in non-transformed tissues a search for the human homologue became of interest. Human C4.4A was cloned from a placental cDNA library. As in the rat, the human uPAR and the human C4.4A genes appear to belong to the same family. Both genes are located on chromosome 19q13.1-q13.2 and both molecules have a glycolipid anchor site and are composed of three extracellular domains. Only domains one and two of the human C4.4A and the uPAR protein show a significant degree of identity. Expression of the human C4.4A was observed by RT-PCR and Northern blotting in placental tissue, skin, esophagus and peripheral blood leukocytes, but not in brain, lung, liver, kidney, stomach, colon and lymphoid organs. Yet, tumors derived from the latter tissues frequently contained C4.4A mRNA. As demonstrated for malignant melanoma, C4.4A mRNA expression correlated with tumor progression. While nevi were negative and only a minority of primary malignant melanoma expressed C4.4A, all metastases were C4.4A-positive. Taking into account the high degree of homology between rat and human C4.4A, the conformity of the expression profiles and the association of rat C4.4A with tumor progression, human C4.4A might well become a prognostic marker and possibly a target of therapy.

BRCA2: A genetic risk factor for breast cancer

The identification of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 a few years ago has been greeted with great excitement and has raised hopes that they might illuminate the common mechanisms of this disease. Today we have to recognize that these expectations remain unfulfilled. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account only for a relatively small proportion of breast cancers, even within the group of familiar clusters, they seem to be virtually non-existing in sporadic breast cancers. A substantial proportion of familiar breast cancer clusters has failed to provide evidence for an association with mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2, thus we have to look forward to the identification of additional breast cancer susceptibility genes. What has been most disappointing is that the mutation status of BRCA1/2 can provide only limited information for cancer risk. Initial assessments had indicated a risk of close to 90% for mutation carriers to develop breast cancer until age 75 - a value that turned out to be restricted to high-risk families in which the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes had been genomically mapped. In unselected clusters the risk appears much lower, some estimates suggest less than 40%. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 large encode proteins that appear to have a plethora of functions, with a conspicuous association to DNA repair and DNA recombination, and probably transcription activation. Defects in DNA repair can result in cancer predisposition syndromes and are recognized as being instrumental in cancer progression. Central questions have remained unanswered: What is the function of damaged BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer risk? What is the basis of large variations of risk conferred to the patients by identical mutations? How can the predictive value of mutation surveys be increased?

Retention of polysomy at 9p23–24 during karyotypic evolution in human breast cancer cell line COLO 824

Somatic genetic alterations of 9p have been seen in a wide range of human cancers, including breast cancer. Loss of heterozygosity analysis of primary breast cancer tumors has revealed a high frequency of deletion of DNA from 9p21–22 encompassing the MTS1 (P16/CDKN2A) gene. We report the approximately tenfold increase in copy number of DNA from 9p23–24, which is far distal to P16/CDKN2A in female breast cancer cell line COLO 824, as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, comparative genomic hybridization, and microsatellite analysis. Amplification of DNA has been reported previously to encompass multiple sites of the genome of the breast cancer cell, but increase in DNA copy number has not been seen in distal 9p. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24:87–93, 1999.

Genetic variation of Aflatoxin B1 aldehyde reductase genes (AFAR) in human tumour cells

AFAR genes play a key role in the detoxification of the carcinogen Aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)). In the rat, Afar1 induction can prevent AFB(1)-induced liver cancer. It has been proposed that AFAR enzymes can metabolise endogenous diketones and dialdehydes that may be cytotoxic and/or genotoxic. Furthermore, human AFAR1 catalyses the rate limiting step in the synthesis of the neuromodulator gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and was found elevated in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimers and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). The human AFAR gene family maps to a genomic region in 1p36 of frequent hemizygous deletions in various human cancers. To investigate, if genetic variation of AFAR1 and AFAR2 exists that may alter protein detoxification capabilities and confer susceptibility to cancer, we have analysed a spectrum of human tumours and tumour cell lines for genetic heterogeneity. From 110 DNA samples, we identified nine different amino acid changes; two were in AFAR1 and seven in AFAR2. In AFAR1, we found genetic variation in the proposed substrate-binding amino acid 113, encoding Ala(113) or Thr(113). An AFAR2 variant had a Glu(55) substituted by Lys(55) at a position that is conserved among many aldo-keto reductases. This polarity change may have an effect on the proposed substrate binding amino acids nearby (Met(47), Tyr(48), Asp(50)). Further population analyses and functional studies of the nine variants detected may show if these variants are disease-related.

Chromosomal mapping of human genes by radioactive hybridization of cDNAs to CEPH-YAC high density gridded filter sets

Chromosomal assignment of human transcribed sequences has been done mainly by high throughput genome analysis in specialized genome centres and, in a more classical fashion, by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Not every laboratory has the ability to map cDNAs by FISH analysis. We here report a rapid mapping approach that is based on the hybridization of cDNA probes to high density gridded CEPH-YAC filters followed by subsequent computational analysis by database searches in the internet. Not only transcribed sequences but also genomic DNA could be subjected to this mapping approach. The presented approach allows to map human transcribed and genomic DNAs within 1-3 days and with a high level of resolution that will constantly increase in line with the incorporation of data deriving from high throughput genome mapping.