Andreas Funke

Clinical characteristics and course of dying in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis withdrawing from long-term ventilation.

Abstract Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or tracheotomy with invasive ventilation (TIV) are treatment options in ALS. However, a proportion of patients receiving long-term ventilation decide to have it withdrawn. The objective of this study was to analyse the clinical characteristics and palliative approaches in ALS patients withdrawing from long-term ventilation (WLTV). In a cohort study, two different palliative concepts in WLTV were studied: (1) augmented symptom control (ASC; sedation not intended) in patients with ventilator-free tolerance; (2) continuous deep sedation (CDS; sedation intended) in patients without ventilator-free tolerance. Results showed that WLTV was realised in 49 ALS patients (NIV = 13; TIV = 36). Mean daily ventilation was 23.4 h. The ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) was low (5.6 of 48). Forty-one per cent of patients (n = 20) presented with ophthalmoplegia. ASC was performed in 20 patients, CDS in 29 patients. The mean time to death following disconnection was 32 (0.3–164) h during ASC and 0.3 (0.2–0.6) h in CDS. In conclusion, a low ALSFRS-R, high incidence of ophthalmoplegia and extended ventilator dependency were found before WLTV. The presence or absence of ventilator-free tolerance determined the approach to the management of symptoms, the setting for immediate end-of-life care and the course of dying in WLTV.

Safety and efficacy of rasagiline as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor with neuroprotective potential in Parkinsons disease, has shown a disease-modifying effect in the SOD1-Gly93Ala low-expressing mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, both alone and in combination with riluzole. We sought to test whether or not rasagiline 1 mg/day can prolong survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis also receiving riluzole. METHODS Patients with possible, probable, or definite amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were enrolled to our randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 2 trial from 15 German network for motor neuron diseases (MND-NET) centres (university hospitals or clinics). Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, had onset of progressive weakness within the 36 months before the study, had disease duration of more than 6 months and less than 3 years, and had a best-sitting slow vital capacity of at least 50%. After a 4-week screening period, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either rasagiline (1 mg/day) or placebo in addition to riluzole (100 mg/day), after stratification for site of onset (bulbar or spinal) and study centre. Patients and all personnel assessing outcome parameters were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were followed up 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after randomisation. The primary endpoint was survival time, defined as the time to death or time to study cutoff date (ie, the last patients last visit plus 14 days). Analyses of primary outcome and safety measures were done in all patients who received at least one dose of trial treatment (intention-to-treat population). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01879241. FINDINGS Between July 2, 2013, and Nov 11, 2014, 273 patients were screened for eligibility, and 252 patients were randomly assigned to receive rasagiline (n=127) or placebo (n=125). 126 patients taking rasagiline and 125 taking placebo were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. For the primary outcome, the survival probability at the end of the study was 0·43 (95% CI 0·25-0·59) in the rasagiline group (n=126) and 0·53 (0·43-0·62) in the placebo group (n=125). The estimated effect size (hazard ratio) was 0·91 (one-sided 97·5% CI -infinity to 1·34; p=0·31). Rasagiline was well tolerated, and most adverse events were due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression rather than treatment; the most frequent of these were dysphagia (32 [25%] taking rasagiline vs 24 [19%] taking placebo) and respiratory failure (25 [20%] vs 31 [25%]). Frequency of adverse events were comparable between both groups. INTERPRETATION Rasagiline was safe in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. There was no difference between groups in the primary outcome of survival, although post-hoc analysis suggested that rasagiline might modify disease progression in patients with an initial slope of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised greater than 0·5 points per month at baseline. This should be confirmed in another clinical trial. FUNDING Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.

[Provision of assistive devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Analysis of 3 years case management in an internet-based supply network].

BACKGROUND The provision of assistive devices (PAD) is a key element of care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Since 2011, assistive devices (AD) have been coordinated in an internet-supported care network at university-based ALS centers in Berlin, Bochum, Hannover and Jena. The digitization of PAD processes has facilitated the evaluation of real-life ALS care. OBJECTIVES Orthotics (OT), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), supported treadmill (ST) and powered wheelchair (PW) were the PAD groups analyzed for delivery rates (proportion of delivered AD vs. medically indicated AD), rejection by patients and payers and latency of provision of care. RESULTS Between June 2011 and October 2014 a total of 1479 patients and 12,478 AD were coordinated, among which 3313 PAD were related to OT, AAC, ST or EM. The median delivery rate was 64.3 %. The mean rejection rate by patients was 9.8 % (OT 5.4 %, AAC 9.8 %, ST 10.2 % and PW 15.6 %). Marked differences were noted in the rejection rate by payers and in care provision latency: OT (16.2 %, 68 days, n = 734), AAC (30.4 %, 96 days, n = 392), ST (34.8 %, 113 days, n = 164) and PW (35.6 %, 129 days, n = 259). Analysis of rejection rates showed significant differences among insurers. CONCLUSION Only two thirds of the medically indicated AD reached the patients. Rejection rates by patients and payers and latency of provision of care were high. The PAD can substantially vary among health insurance companies. The establishment of consented criteria for PAD and their integration into treatment regimens and guidelines are crucial tasks for the future.

Hilfsmittelversorgung bei der amyotrophen Lateralsklerose

BACKGROUND The provision of assistive devices (PAD) is a key element of care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Since 2011, assistive devices (AD) have been coordinated in an internet-supported care network at university-based ALS centers in Berlin, Bochum, Hannover and Jena. The digitization of PAD processes has facilitated the evaluation of real-life ALS care. OBJECTIVES Orthotics (OT), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), supported treadmill (ST) and powered wheelchair (PW) were the PAD groups analyzed for delivery rates (proportion of delivered AD vs. medically indicated AD), rejection by patients and payers and latency of provision of care. RESULTS Between June 2011 and October 2014 a total of 1479 patients and 12,478 AD were coordinated, among which 3313 PAD were related to OT, AAC, ST or EM. The median delivery rate was 64.3 %. The mean rejection rate by patients was 9.8 % (OT 5.4 %, AAC 9.8 %, ST 10.2 % and PW 15.6 %). Marked differences were noted in the rejection rate by payers and in care provision latency: OT (16.2 %, 68 days, n = 734), AAC (30.4 %, 96 days, n = 392), ST (34.8 %, 113 days, n = 164) and PW (35.6 %, 129 days, n = 259). Analysis of rejection rates showed significant differences among insurers. CONCLUSION Only two thirds of the medically indicated AD reached the patients. Rejection rates by patients and payers and latency of provision of care were high. The PAD can substantially vary among health insurance companies. The establishment of consented criteria for PAD and their integration into treatment regimens and guidelines are crucial tasks for the future.

Implementing Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) in a large clinical trial: Real world experience from 27 centres

OBJECTIVE Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) is a quantitative neurophysiological method that reflects loss of motor neurons in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in longitudinal studies. It has been utilized in one natural history ALS study and one drug trial (Biogen USA) after training and qualification of raters. METHODS Prior to testing patients, evaluators had to submit test-retest data of 4 healthy volunteers. Twenty-seven centres with 36 raters measured MUNIX in 4 sets of 6 different muscles twice. Coefficient of variation of all measurements had to be <20% to pass the qualification process. MUNIX COV of the first attempt, number of repeated measurements and muscle specific COV were evaluated. RESULTS COV varied considerably between raters. Mean COV of all raters at the first measurements was 12.9% ± 13.5 (median 8.7%). Need of repetitions ranged from 0 to 43 (mean 10.7 ± 9.1, median 8). Biceps and first dorsal interosseus muscles showed highest repetition rates. MUNIX variability correlated considerably with variability of compound muscle action potential. CONCLUSION MUNIX revealed generally good reliability, but was rater dependent and ongoing support for raters was needed. SIGNIFICANCE MUNIX can be implemented in large clinical trials as an outcome measure after training and a qualification process.

Provision of assistive technology devices among people with ALS in Germany: a platform-case management approach

Abstract Objective: The procurement of assistive technology devices (ATD) is an essential component of managed care in ALS. The objective was to analyze the standards of care for ATD and to identify challenges in the provision process. Methods: A cohort study design was used. We investigated the provision of 11,364 ATD in 1494 patients with ALS at 12 ALS centers in Germany over four years. Participants were patients that entered a case management program for ATD including systematic assessment of ATD on a digital management platform. Results: Wheelchairs (requested in 65% of patients), orthoses (52%), bathroom adaptations (49%), and communication devices (46%) were the most needed ATD. There was a wide range in the number of indicated ATD per patient: 1 to 4 ATD per patient in 45% of patients, 5 to 20 ATD in 48%, and >20 ATD in 7% of patients. Seventy percent of all requested ATD were effectively delivered. However, an alarming failure rate during procurement was found in ATD that are crucial for ALS patients such as powered wheelchairs (52%), communication devices (39%), or orthoses (21%). Leading causes for not providing ATD were the refusal by health insurances, the decision by patients, and the death of the patient before delivery of the device. Conclusions: The need for ATD was highly prevalent among ALS patients. Failed or protracted provision posed substantial barriers to ATD procurement. Targeted national strategies and the incorporation of ATD indication criteria in international ALS treatment guidelines are urgently needed to overcome these barriers.

Patient-reported outcome of physical therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an observational online study (Preprint)

Background Physical therapy is an essential component of multidisciplinary treatment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, the meaning of physical therapy beside preservation of muscular strength and functional maintenance is not fully understood. Objective The purpose of this study was to examine patients’ perception of physical therapy during symptom progression using an internet assessment approach. Methods A prospective, longitudinal, observational study was performed. Recruitment took place in an ALS center in Berlin, Germany. Online self-assessment was established on a case management platform over 6 months. Participants self-assessed the progression of the disease with the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and tracked the efficacy of targeted physical therapy using Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP). We used the net promoter score (NPS) to inquire into recommendation levels of physical therapy. Results Forty-five participants with ALS were included in the study. Twenty-seven (60.0%) started the online assessment. The mean duration of physical therapy sessions per week was 142.7 minutes (SD 60.4) with a mean frequency of 2.9 (SD 1.2) per week. As defined by MYMOP input, the most concerning symptoms were reported in the legs (62.2%), arms (31.1%), and less frequently in the torso (6.7%). As expected for a progressive disease, there was a functional decline of 3 points in the ALSFRS-R at the end of the observation period (n=20). Furthermore, the MYMOP showed a significant loss of 0.8 in the composite score, 0.9 in the activity score and 0.8 in the targeted symptom. In spite of functional decline, the recommendation for physical therapy jumped from a baseline value of 20 NPS points to a very high 50 points at the end of study (P=.05). Conclusions Physical therapy is perceived as an important treatment method by patients with ALS. Despite functional deterioration, patients are satisfied with physical therapy and recommend this intervention. The results also underline how the meaning of physical therapy changes throughout the disease. Physical therapy in ALS has to be regarded as a supportive and palliative health care intervention beyond functional outcome parameters.

Hilfsmittelversorgung bei der amyotrophen Lateralsklerose@@@Provision of assistive devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Analyse aus 3 Jahren Fallmanagement in einem internetunterstützten Versorgungsnetzwerk@@@Analysis of 3 years case management in an internet-based supply network

BACKGROUND The provision of assistive devices (PAD) is a key element of care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Since 2011, assistive devices (AD) have been coordinated in an internet-supported care network at university-based ALS centers in Berlin, Bochum, Hannover and Jena. The digitization of PAD processes has facilitated the evaluation of real-life ALS care. OBJECTIVES Orthotics (OT), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), supported treadmill (ST) and powered wheelchair (PW) were the PAD groups analyzed for delivery rates (proportion of delivered AD vs. medically indicated AD), rejection by patients and payers and latency of provision of care. RESULTS Between June 2011 and October 2014 a total of 1479 patients and 12,478 AD were coordinated, among which 3313 PAD were related to OT, AAC, ST or EM. The median delivery rate was 64.3 %. The mean rejection rate by patients was 9.8 % (OT 5.4 %, AAC 9.8 %, ST 10.2 % and PW 15.6 %). Marked differences were noted in the rejection rate by payers and in care provision latency: OT (16.2 %, 68 days, n = 734), AAC (30.4 %, 96 days, n = 392), ST (34.8 %, 113 days, n = 164) and PW (35.6 %, 129 days, n = 259). Analysis of rejection rates showed significant differences among insurers. CONCLUSION Only two thirds of the medically indicated AD reached the patients. Rejection rates by patients and payers and latency of provision of care were high. The PAD can substantially vary among health insurance companies. The establishment of consented criteria for PAD and their integration into treatment regimens and guidelines are crucial tasks for the future.