Andreas W. Prengel

Randomised comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation

BACKGROUND Studies in animals have suggested that intravenous vasopressin is associated with better vital-organ perfusion and resuscitation rates than is epinephrine in the treatment of cardiac arrest. We did a randomised comparison of vasopressin with epinephrine in patients with ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS 40 patients in ventricular fibrillation resistant to electrical defibrillation were prospectively and randomly assigned epinephrine (1 mg intravenously; n = 20) or vasopressin (40 U intravenously; n = 20) as primary drug therapy for cardiac arrest. The endpoints of this double blind study were successful resuscitation (hospital admission), survival for 24 h, survival to hospital discharge and neurological outcome (Glasgow coma scale). Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS Seven (35%) patients in the epinephrine group and 14 (70%) in the vasopressin group survived to hospital admission (p = 0.06). At 24 h, four (20%) epinephrine-treated patients and 12 (60%) vasopressin-treated patients were alive (p = 0.02). Three (15%) patients in the epinephrine group and eight (40%) in the vasopressin group survived to hospital discharge (p = 0.16). Neurological outcomes were similar (mean Glasgow coma score at hospital discharge 10.7 [SE 3.8] vs 11.7 [1.6], p = 0.78). INTERPRETATION In this preliminary study, a significantly larger proportion of patients created with vasopressin than of those treated with epinephrine were resuscitated successfully from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation and survived for 24 h. Based upon these findings, larger multicentre studies of vasopressin in the treatment of cardiac arrest are needed.

Vasopressin administration in refractory cardiac arrest

In studies done in pigs, the administration of exogenous vasopressin during closed- and open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation has been shown to be more effective than optimal doses of epinephrine in improving vital organ blood flow and increasing perfusion pressure [1, 2]. Interest in the potential value of vasopressin administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation also stems from human studies showing high levels of circulating vasopressin in patients in cardiac arrest [3, 4]. Higher levels of endogenous vasopressin are associated with greater chances for survival, and higher endogenous levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine are associated with decreased chances for survival [4]. To date, no case reports or controlled studies have addressed the potential value of exogenous vasopressin for the treatment of patients having cardiac arrest. In light of the data from the animal studies, eight patients having refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest were treated with vasopressin after standard therapies, including intravenous administration of epinephrine, had failed. Methods In a final effort to resuscitate patients in whom standard American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support therapies after in-hospital cardiac arrest had failed, arginine vasopressin was administered centrally as an initial 40-U bolus. Each patient had received standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation with at least 1 mg of epinephrine and an attempt at direct-current shock before receiving vasopressin through either a femoral or jugular vein. Table 1 lists patient demographic characteristics, and Table 2 provides some details of therapy and outcome after cardiac arrest. One of eight patients (patient 2) had an unwitnessed arrest. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated less than 1 minute after arrest in the remaining patients; cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advanced cardiac life support were done on all patients for at least 12 minutes (mean SD, 21.6 11.8 minutes) before vasopressin was administered. Three patients were discharged from the hospital with good neurologic recovery. Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients Having In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Refractory to Epinephrine*. Table 2. Time Intervals and Outcome in Patients Having In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Refractory to Epinephrine*. Case Highlights Patient 4 Four days after having a hemicolectomy, a 78-year-old woman developed pulmonary emboli and ventricular fibrillation. Defibrillation (200 J) led to asystole. The patient received cardiopulmonary resuscitation and epinephrine (1-mg, 3-mg, and 5-mg doses administered 3 minutes apart). After the 5-mg bolus, ventricular fibrillation evolved but was resistant to repeated direct-current shocks and to lidocaine (100 mg). Central administration of vasopressin (40 U) followed by direct-current shock (360 J) resulted in a supraventricular rhythm with a palpable carotid pulse. A systolic blood pressure of approximately 100 mm Hg was maintained with a norepinephrine infusion of 0.15 g/kg of body weight per minute. After uncomplicated embolectomy, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for 3 days and was discharged without neurologic deficit 4 weeks later. Patient 5 A 71-year-old woman developed ventricular fibrillation while her chest was being scrubbed before implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Closed-chest cardiac massage was initiated within seconds. After three successive direct-current shocks (200 J, 300 J, and 300 J) followed by epinephrine (1 mg) and another direct-current shock (300 J), the patient remained in ventricular fibrillation. Examination of arterial blood gases showed a pH of 7.33 and a Po 2 of 60 mm Hg before endotracheal intubation. Additional epinephrine (1 mg) and defibrillation efforts were unsuccessful. Vasopressin (40 U) was administered 50 minutes after the arrest, and spontaneous circulation returned immediately after a 300-J direct-current shock. Immediately before vasopressin administration, the patients arterial blood had a pH of 7.18 and a Po 2 of 543 mm Hg. The patient was treated with dopamine (10 g/kg per minute) intravenously. Forty-five minutes later, she again developed hypotension followed by ventricular fibrillation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was reinitiated, but direct-current shock (300 J), epinephrine (1 mg), and another direct-current shock (300 J) failed to revive her. Vasopressin (20 U) followed 30 seconds later by direct-current shock (300 J) was unsuccessful; more vasopressin (20 U) was administered 2 minutes after the first 20-U dose. Thirty seconds later, a direct-current shock (300 J) led to an immediate return of spontaneous circulation. The patients pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at this time was 25 mm Hg, and her pulmonary systolic pressure was 35 mm Hg. Twenty minutes after her second and final resuscitation effort, she became hypotensive and bradycardic and died secondary to pulseless electrical activity. Patient 6 Immediately after induction with a standard cardiac general anesthetic for placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, a 45-year-old man developed pulseless electrical activity. Standard closed-chest manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation was started immediately. The patient received fluids (500 mL of normal saline), atropine (1 mg intravenously), and epinephrine (1 mg intravenously). After 10 minutes and another 1-mg epinephrine dose, he developed ventricular fibrillation. Several efforts to defibrillate failed. Twenty minutes after cardiac arrest, the patient received vasopressin (40 U); after a single 360-J transthoracic direct-current shock, spontaneous circulation promptly returned. The patient remained hemodynamically stable for 30 minutes. Despite intravenous fluids, dopamine (10 g/kg per minute), and placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump, he again developed hypotension, followed by ventricular fibrillation. After an effort to resuscitate the patient with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, epinephrine (1 mg), and direct-current shock was unsuccessful, the patient was given vasopressin (40 U) and was successfully resuscitated with direct-current shock. An angiogram showed a large thrombus at the site of an angioplasty done 2 weeks earlier; the vessel was again dilated. Within 30 minutes, the patient developed polymorphous ventricular tachycardia and had another cardiac arrest. Standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intravenous vasopressin (40 U), and direct-current shock were not effective. The patient received active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and vasopressin (40 U). Systolic arterial pressure increased to more than 100 mm Hg; when active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation was stopped, the patient spontaneously convertedwithout direct-current shockto sinus tachycardia. One hour later, ventricular fibrillation again developed. Resuscitation efforts were terminated. Patient 8 A 31-year-old man had several internal injuries after a car accident. He developed ventricular fibrillation on the way to the operating room for emergent repair of a ruptured aorta. Fibrillation persisted despite many direct-current shocks and the administration of epinephrine (2 1 mg repeated after 3 minutes). After 4 minutes of closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation, examination of the arterial blood showed a pH of 7.16, a Pco 2 of 54 mm Hg, a Po 2 of 49 mm Hg (fraction of inspired oxygen, 1.0), a potassium level of 2.8 mmol/L, and a hemoglobin level of 9.1 g/L. Despite treatment with epinephrine, diastolic arterial pressures remained less than 15 mm Hg. Administration of vasopressin (40 U) increased the diastolic arterial pressure to 30 mm Hg, and a subsequent direct-current shock (360 J) restored a stable heart and blood pressure. After the operation, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. Discussion These cases show that in patients in cardiac arrest who are receiving closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation and have not responded to the standard doses of epinephrine recommended by the American Heart Association, spontaneous circulation can be restored by intravenous administration (through the femoral or jugular vein) of 40 U of vasopressin. These results are consistent with recent data from animals showing that vasopressin has greater efficacy than epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation [1, 2]. Although the prognosis was poor in all cases and all conventional measures had failed, spontaneous circulation was restored in all eight patients after vasopressin administration. Three patients survived to hospital discharge with minimal or no neurologic deficit. In addition, when active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation was combined with the use of vasopressin, one patient had spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm without the use of direct-current shock. Although the optimal dose of vasopressin in humans is not known, 40 U was effective in all of our patients. In one patient, a dose of 20 U was not effective. In the eight patients studied, an initial dose of 1 mg of epinephrine was administered. In four of these eight patients, an escalating dose of epinephrine (from 1 mg to 3 mg to 5 mg) was used but was similarly ineffective. In humans having cardiac arrest, epinephrine therapy is used on the basis of case reports and animal studies [5, 6]. Recent clinical trials comparing low-dose with high-dose epinephrine show that the latter has no significant advantage [7, 8]. A more recent placebo-controlled trial showed that neither high- nor low-dose epinephrine had benefit compared with placebo [9]. In our patients, vasopressin may have been more effective because of several factors. Vasopressin exerts a greater vasoconstrictive effect under conditions of hypoxia and acidosis than does epinephrine, and the effects of vasopressin last longer [1, 2]. Vasopressin causes a greater increase in arterial tone than does epine

Vasopressin improves vital organ blood flow after prolonged cardiac arrest with postcountershock pulseless electrical activity in pigs

OBJECTIVE Although a benefit of vasopressin when compared with epinephrine was shown during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after a short duration of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, the effect of vasopressin during prolonged cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity is currently unknown. DESIGN Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model with instrumentation for measurement of hemodynamic variables, vital organ blood flow, blood gases, and return of spontaneous circulation. SETTING University hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS Eighteen domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS After 15 mins of cardiac arrest and 3 mins of chest compressions, 18 animals were randomly treated with either 0.8 units/kg vasopressin (n = 9) or 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 9). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Compared with epinephrine, vasopressin resulted, at both 90 secs and 5 mins after drug administration, in significantly higher (p < .05) median (25th-75th percentiles) left ventricular myocardial blood flow (120 [range, 96-193] vs. 54 [range, 11-92] and 56 [range, 41-80] vs. 21 [range, 11-40] mL/min/100 g, respectively) and total cerebral blood flow (85 [78-102] vs. 24 [18-41] and 50 [44-52] vs. 8 [5-23] mL/min/100 g, respectively). Spontaneous circulation was restored in eight of nine animals in the vasopressin group and in one of nine animals in the epinephrine group (p = .003). CONCLUSIONS Compared with a maximum dose of epinephrine, vasopressin significantly increased left ventricular myocardial and total cerebral blood flow during CPR and return of spontaneous circulation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest with postcountershock pulseless electrical activity.

Cerebral Oxygenation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With Epinephrine and Vasopressin in Pigs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Administration of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves vital organ blood flow compared with epinephrine, but the effect of vasopressin on cerebral oxygenation and cerebral venous hypercarbia during CPR has not previously been studied. METHODS Fourteen pigs were allocated to receive either epinephrine (0.2 mg/kg) or vasopressin (0.4 U/kg) after 4 minutes of ventricular fibrillation and 3 minutes of CPR. Cerebral blood flow was determined by radiolabeled microspheres, and arterial and cerebral venous blood gases were measured. RESULTS Cerebral blood flow, measured before and 90 seconds and 5 minutes after drug administration, was 9 (3; 12), 25 (19; 27), and 18 (10; 23) mL/min per 100 g (median and 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively) in the epinephrine group and 12 (5; 16), 51 (48; 70), and 53 (45; 63) mL/min per 100 g in the vasopressin group (P<.05 at 90 seconds, P<.01 at 5 minutes between groups). Five minutes after drug administration, cerebral venous Pco2 was 63 (59; 68) mm Hg in the epinephrine group and 47 (43; 55) mm Hg in the vasopressin group (P<.01); at the same time cerebral venous pH was 7.18 (7.17; 7.20) and 7.26 (7.22; 7.36) (P<.01) in the epinephrine and vasopressin groups, respectively. Cerebral oxygen extraction ratio, calculated before and 90 seconds and 5 minutes after drug administration, was 0.42 (0.32; 0.57), 0.47 (0.41; 0.57), and 0.56 (0.56; 0.64) in the epinephrine group and 0.43 (0.38; 0.45), 0.38 (0.25; 0.44), and 0.35 (0.33; 0.49) in the vasopressin group (P<.05 at 90 seconds and 5 minutes). CONCLUSIONS Compared with epinephrine, vasopressin not only increases cerebral blood flow but also improves cerebral oxygenation and decreases cerebral venous hypercarbia when administered during CPR in pigs.

Cardiovascular function during the postresuscitation phase after cardiac arrest in pigs: a comparison of epinephrine versus vasopressin.

OBJECTIVE The administration of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provides significantly more vital organ blood flow when compared with epinephrine during cardiac arrest in pigs. The effects of this potent vasoconstrictor on postresuscitation cardiovascular function remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine on cardiovascular function in the postresuscitation phase after CPR. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, experimental study. SETTING University research laboratory. SUBJECTS Domestic pigs, 12 to 14 wks of age. INTERVENTIONS Sixteen pigs were randomly allocated to receive either 0.045 mg/kg of epinephrine or 0.4 U/kg of vasopressin after 4 mins of cardiac arrest. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Hemodynamics, left ventricular contractility, and myocardial blood flow were measured for an interval of 240 mins after successful CPR. Differences between animals treated with epinephrine vs. vasopressin were most pronounced 15 mins after restoration of spontaneous circulation. At this time, mean aortic pressure was 64 +/- 6 (SEM) mm Hg in the epinephrine group and 84 +/- 6 mm Hg (p < .05) in the vasopressin group. Systemic vascular resistance was 1285 +/- 72 dyne.sec/cm5 in the epinephrine group and 2314 +/- 130 dyne.sec/cm5 (p < .001) in the vasopressin group. Cardiac index was 140 +/- 9 mL/min/kg in animals treated with epinephrine and 99 +/- 9 mL/min/kg (p < .01) in animals treated with vasopressin. Myocardial contractility (dp/ dtmax/P) was 52.8 +/- 3.4/sec with epinephrine as compared with 36.3 +/- 2.9 sec-1 (p < .01) with vasopressin. Left ventricular epicardial blood flow was 241 +/- 35 mL/min/100 g with epinephrine and 142 +/- 22 mL/min/100 g (p < .05) with vasopressin. Four hours after CPR, no significant differences were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS In the early postresuscitation phase, vasopressin provided higher systemic blood pressures and there was a reversible depressant effect on myocardial function when compared with epinephrine. Overall cardiovascular function was not irreversibly or critically impaired after the administration of vasopressin in this pig model of cardiac arrest.

Comparison of standard and high‐dose adrenaline in the resuscitation of asystole and electromechanical dissociation

Sixty‐eight adults with cardiac arrest (asystole and electromechanical dissociation) were randomly allocated for treatment with standard (1 mg) or high‐dose epinephrine (5 mg). If the first dose of adrenaline 11 or 5 mg) failed, standardized advanced life‐support was applied in all cases. High‐dose adrenaline was associated with higher initial resuscitation success rates (16 of 28) than standard‐dose adrenaline (6 of 40), whereas hospital discharge rates were not significantly different between the groups. Blood pressure was significantly higher in the high‐dose adrenaline group in comparison to the standard dose at 1 and 5 min after resuscitation. Although high‐dose adrenaline appears to improve cardiac resuscitation success, the duration of global cerebral ischaemia seems to determine the ultimate outcome.

Intraosseous vasopressin improves coronary perfusion pressure rapidly during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.

OBJECTIVE Intravenous administration of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be more effective than optimal doses of epinephrine. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether intraosseous vasopressin achieves serum drug levels comparable with intravenous doses during CPR and, additionally, to evaluate the effects of intraosseous vasopressin during CPR. DESIGN Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model with instrumentation for measurement of hemodynamic variables, blood gases, and return of spontaneous circulation. SETTING University hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS Twelve domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS After 4 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation and 3 mins of CPR, 12 pigs were randomized to be treated with intravenous administration of vasopressin (0.8 unit/kg vasopressin; n = 6) or intraosseous vasopressin (0.8 unit/kg vasopressin; n = 6). Defibrillation was performed 5 mins after drug administration to attempt the return of spontaneous circulation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS At both 90 secs and 5 mins after drug administration, intravenous and intraosseous administration of vasopressin resulted in comparable mean (+/-SEM) coronary perfusion pressure (43+/-4 vs. 44+/-3 and 30+/-2 vs. 37+/-2 mm Hg, respectively) and vasopressin plasma concentrations (13,706+/-1,857 vs. 16,166+/-3,114 pg/mL and 10,372+/-883 vs. 8246+/-2211 pg/mL, respectively). All animals in both groups were successfully resuscitated; pigs that received intraosseous vasopressin had a significantly higher (p < .05) mean arterial (92+/-6 vs. 129+/-12 mm Hg) and coronary perfusion pressure (84+/-11 vs. 119+/-11 mm Hg) at 5 mins of return of spontaneous circulation. CONCLUSIONS Intraosseous vasopressin resulted in comparable vasopressin plasma levels, hemodynamic variables, and return of spontaneous circulation rates as did intravenous vasopressin. Intraosseous vasopressin may be an alternative for vasopressor administration during CPR, when intravenous access is delayed or not available.

Vasopressin Combined With Epinephrine Decreases Cerebral Perfusion Compared With Vasopressin Alone During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pigs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE It is unknown whether a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine may be superior to vasopressin alone by targeting both nonadrenergic and adrenergic receptors. METHODS After 15 minutes of cardiac arrest (13 minutes of ventricular fibrillation and 2 minutes of pulseless electrical activity) and 3 minutes of chest compressions, 16 animals were randomly treated with either 0.8 U/kg vasopressin (n = 8) or 0.8 U/kg vasopressin combined with 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 8). RESULTS Comparison of vasopressin with vasopressin and epinephrine at 90 seconds and 5 minutes after drug administration resulted in comparable mean (+/-SEM) coronary perfusion pressure (54+/-3 versus 57+/-5 and 36+/-4 versus 35+/-4 mm Hg, respectively), cerebral perfusion pressure (59+/-6 versus 65+/-8 and 40+/-6 versus 39+/-6 mm Hg, respectively), and median (25th to 75th percentiles) left ventricular myocardial blood flow [116 (81 to 143) versus 108 (97 to 125) and 44 (35 to 81) versus 62 (42 to 74) mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1), respectively], but significantly increased (P<0.05) total cerebral blood flow [81 (77 to 95) versus 39 (34 to 58) and 50 (43 to 52) versus 28 (16 to 35) mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1), respectively]. Return of spontaneous circulation rates in both groups were comparable (vasopressin, 7 of 8; vasopressin and epinephrine, 6 of 8). CONCLUSIONS Comparison of vasopressin with vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in comparable left ventricular myocardial blood flow but significantly increased cerebral perfusion.

Endobronchial vasopressin improves survival during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.

Background: Intravenous administration of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be more effective than optimal doses of epinephrine. This study evaluated the effect of endobronchial vasopressin during CPR. Methods: After 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation and 3 min of CPR, 21 pigs were randomized to be treated with 0.8 U/kg intravenous vasopressin (n = 7), 0.8 U/kg endobronchial vasopressin (n = 9), or an endobronchial placebo of normal saline (n = 5). Defibrillation was performed 5 min after drug administration to attempt return of spontaneous circulation. Results: All animals in the intravenous and endobronchial vasopressin group were resuscitated successfully, but only two of five animals in the placebo group were. At 2 and 5 min after drug administration, coronary perfusion pressure in the intravenous and endobronchial vasopressin group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (50 +/‐ 10, 34 +/‐ 5 vs. 16 +/‐ 6 mmHg, respectively; and 35 +/‐ 10, 39 +/‐ 10 vs. 19 +/‐ 5 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05). Conclusions: Endobronchial vasopressin is absorbed during CPR, coronary perfusion pressure is increased significantly within a short period, and the chance of successful resuscitation is increased in this porcine model of CPR. Endobronchial vasopressin may be an alternative for vasopressor administration during CPR, when intravenous access is delayed or not available.

Plasma catecholamine concentrations after successful resuscitation in patients.

ObjectivesTo measure plasma catecholamine concentrations after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to correlate catecholamine concentrations with heart rate (HR), BP, and plasma glucose and lactate concentrations. DesignProspective, descriptive study. SettingEmergency medical service at a University Hospital. PatientsTen patients (58 to 85 yrs) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. InterventionsAt 1, 5, 15, 30, and 60 mins after restoration of spontaneous circulation, blood samples were drawn and BP and HR were measured. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography and plasma glucose and lactate concentrations were measured by enzymatic methods. Main ResultsMedian plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations were 136.3 μg/L (136,300 pg/mL), range 27.6 to 397.6 μg/L (27,600 to 397,600 pg/mL), and 4.7 μg/L (4700 pg/mL), range 1.8 to 14.5 μg/L (1800 to 14,500 pg/mL), respectively, at 1 min. Median plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations decreased to 8.7 μg/L (8700 pg/mL), range 1.2 to 55.0 μg/L (1200 to 55,000 pg/mL) and 1.9 μg/L (1900 pg/mL), range 1.3 to 5.8 μg/L (1300 to 5800 pg/mL), respectively, at 60 mins after restoration of spontaneous circulation. Epinephrine concentrations decayed with a semilogarithmic decay pattern. The half-life for the phase was 2.2 mins and was 38.7 mins for the β phase. Mean values of systolic arterial pressure were between 136 ±PT 23 mm Hg at 1 min and 120 ±PT 15 mm Hg at 30 mins. Median plasma glucose concentrations were between 8.2 mmol/L (147.7 mg/dL; range 5.8 to 11.2 mmol/L [104.5 to 201.8 mg/dL]) at 1 min and 13.9 mmol/L (250.4 mg/dL; range 9.7 to 16.6 mmol/L [174.8 to 299.1 mg/dL]) at 30 mins. Lactate values were between 11.4 mmol/L (range 4.7 to 16.5) at 1 min and 5.2 mmol/L (range 2.7 to 12.5) at 60 mins. No significant correlations were found between circulating catecholamine concentrations and the other variables. ConclusionsAfter CPR, plasma catecholamine concentrations remained at high values but they did not lead to increases in BP, HR, or circulating glucose concentrations. (Crit Care Med 1992; 20:609–614)