Andreas Wallinder

Early results in transplantation of initially rejected donor lungs after ex vivo lung perfusion: a case-control study †

OBJECTIVES An increasing number of studies have shown that ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is safe and that rejected donor lungs can be resuscitated and used for lung transplantation (LTx). Early clinical outcomes in patients transplanted with reconditioned lungs at our centre were reviewed and compared with those of contemporary non-EVLP controls. METHODS During 18 months starting January 2011, 11 pairs of donor lungs initially deemed unsuitable for transplantation underwent EVLP. Haemodynamic (pulmonary flow, vascular resistance and artery pressure) and respiratory (peak airway pressure and compliance) parameters were analysed during evaluation. Lungs that improved (n = 11) to meet International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria were transplanted and compared with patients transplanted with non-EVLP lungs (n = 47) during the same time period. RESULTS Donor lungs were initially rejected due to either inferior PaO2/FiO2 ratio (n = 9), bilateral infiltrate on chest X-ray (n = 1) or ongoing extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 1). The donor lungs improved from a mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 27.9 kPa in the donor to a mean of 59.6 kPa at the end of the EVLP (median improvement 28.4 kPa, range 21.0-50.7 kPa). Two single lungs were deemed unsuitable and not used for LTx. Eleven recipients from the regular waiting list underwent either single (n = 3) LTx or double (n = 8) LTx with EVLP-treated lungs. The median time to extubation (12 (range, 3-912) vs 6 (range, 2-1296) h) and median intensive care unit (ICU) stay (152 (range, 40-625) vs 48 (range, 22-1632) h) were longer in the EVLP group (P = 0.05 and P = 0.01, respectively). There were no differences in length of hospital stay (median 28 (range 25-93) vs 28 (18-209), P = 0.21). Two patients in the EVLP group and 6 in the control group had primary graft dysfunction >Grade 1 at 72 h postoperatively. Three patients in the control group died before discharge. All recipients of EVLP lungs were discharged alive from hospital. CONCLUSIONS The use of EVLP seems safe and indicates that lungs otherwise refused for LTx can be recovered and subsequently used for transplantation, although time to extubation and ICU stay were longer for the EVLP group.

Transplantation of initially rejected donor lungs after ex vivo lung perfusion

OBJECTIVE Ex vivo lung perfusion has the potential to increase the number of patients treated with lung transplantation. Our initial clinical experience with ex vivo lung perfusion is reviewed as well as early clinical outcome in patients transplanted with reconditioned lungs. METHODS Six pairs of donor lungs deemed unsuitable for transplantation underwent ex vivo lung perfusion with Steen solution mixed with red blood cells to a hematocrit of 10% to 15%. After reconditioning, lung function was evaluated and acceptable lungs were transplanted. Technical experience with ex vivo lung perfusion as well as clinical outcome for patients transplanted with ex vivo lung perfusion-treated lungs were evaluated. RESULTS Donor lungs initially rejected either as a result of an inferior partial pressure of arterial oxygen/ fraction of inspired oxygen (n = 5; mean, 20.5 kPa; range, 9.1-29.9 kPa) or infiltrate on chest radiograph (n = 1) improved their oxygenation capacity to a mean partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen of 57 ± 10 kPa during the ex vivo lung perfusion (mean improvement, 33.6 kPa; range, 21-51 kPa; P < .01). During evaluation, hemodynamic (flow, vascular resistance, pressure) and respiratory (peak airway pressure, compliance) parameters were stable. Two single lungs were not used for lung transplantation because of subpleural hematoma or edema. Six recipients from the regular waiting list underwent single (n = 2) or double (n = 4) lung transplantation. One patient had primary graft dysfunction grade 2 at 72 hours. Median time to extubation was 7 hours. All patients survived 30 days and were discharged in good condition from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS The use of ex vivo lung perfusion seems safe and indicates that some lungs otherwise refused for lung transplantation can be recovered and transplanted with acceptable short-term results.

Transplantation after ex vivo lung perfusion: A midterm follow-up

BACKGROUND A large proportion of donor lungs are discarded due to known or presumed organ dysfunction. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has proven its value as a tool for discrimination between reversible and irreversible donor lung pathology. However, the long-term outcome after transplantation of lungs after EVLP is essentially unknown. We report short-term and midterm outcomes of recipients who received transplants of EVLP-evaluated lungs. METHODS Single-center results of recipients of lungs with prior EVLP were compared with consecutive recipients of non-EVLP lungs (controls) during the same period. Short-term follow-up included time to extubation, time in the intensive care unit, and the presence of primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours postoperatively. Mortality and incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction were monitored for up to 4 years after discharge. RESULTS During a 4-year period, 32 pairs of initially rejected donor lungs underwent EVLP. After EVLP, 22 double lungs and 5 single lungs were subsequently transplanted. During this period, 145 patients received transplants of conventional donor lungs that did not have EVLP and constituted the control group. Median time to extubation was 7 hours in the EVLP group and 6 hours in the non-EVLP control group (p = 0.45). Median intensive care unit stay was 4 days vs. 3 days, respectively (p = 0.15). Primary graft dysfunction grade > 1 was present in 14% in the EVLP group and in 12% in the non-EVLP group at 72 hours after transplant. Survival at 1 year was 92% in the EVLP group and 79% in the non-EVLP group. Cumulative survival and freedom from retransplantation or chronic rejection were also comparable between the 2 groups (p = 0.43) when monitored up to 4 years. CONCLUSIONS Selected donor lungs rejected for transplantation can be used after EVLP. This technique is effective for selection of transplantable donor lungs. Patients who received lungs evaluated under EVLP have short-term and midterm outcomes comparable to recipients of non-EVLP donor lungs.

ECMO as a bridge to non-transplant cardiac surgery

Cardiac surgery performed on patients in cardiogenic shock is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. This review outlines the current role of preoperative veno‐arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation to allow hemodynamic stability and organ recovery before definitive cardiac surgery.

A simplified preservation method for lungs donated after cardiac death.

UNLABELLED The shortage of donor lungs restricts the number of lung transplantations that can be performed. However, extension of the donor pool using organs donated after cardiac death (DCD) could potentially increase the number of patients who undergo transplantation. To establish acceptance among hospital personnel and the donors next of kin for the uncontrolled DCD procedure we proposed a simplified preservation regime for intrapleural cooling of the donor lungs. METHODS In an uncontrolled DCD model, 12 pigs were randomized to intrapleural lung cooling using either a standard method with two bilateral chest tubes and intermittent pleural fluid exchanges, or a simplified, less-invasive method with a single bilateral chest tube and filling of the pleural space without fluid exchange. Lungs were explanted and graft function was assessed during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and by histologic examination. RESULTS Although the mean temperature after 120 minutes of intrapleural cooling was significantly higher in the lungs cooled using the simplified method (25.9°C vs 13.5°C), this did not affect the oxygenation capacity, pulmonary vascular resistance or dynamic compliance of the lungs, as recorded during EVLP. Furthermore, no differences were found between the lungs preserved by the two methods with respect to the wet/dry ratio, levels of myeloperoxidase in bronchoalveolar lavage, or at histologic examination. CONCLUSIONS The simplified technique for DCD lung cooling results in a higher preservation temperature but does not affect lung function during EVLP, which implies that this less invasive method can be used in the uncontrolled DCD setting. This is another step forward in the development of a simplified preservation routine for DCD.

Donor Lung Procurement by Surgical Fellow with an Expectation of High Rate of Lung Utilisation

There is an ever increasing demand for donor lungs in patients waiting for transplantation. Lungs of many potential donors will be rejected if the standard criteria for donor assessment are followed. We have expanded our donor lung pool by accepting marginal donors and establishing a donation after circulatory death program. We have achieved comparable results using marginal donors and accepting donor lungs following donation after circulatory death. We present our assessment and technical guidelines on lung procurement taking into consideration an increasingly complex cohort of lung donors. These guidelines form the basis of the lung procurement training program involving surgical Fellows at the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne, Australia.