Andrés Navarro Galera

Identifying barriers to the application of standardized performance indicators in local government

Abstract Local governments in many countries are implementing administrative reforms within the framework of New Public Management (NPM) in order to improve the quality and productivity of public services. The use of performance indicators and benchmarking facilitates evaluation of efficiency regarding the provision of such services and favours the acquisition of better practices. The problems that may arise in the introduction of performance indicators in local government mainly concern the consensual design and standardization of indicators for various entities, the method to be used for calculations and the selection of analytical criteria to be applied to the values obtained. In this article, we identify obstacles that may be encountered in achieving a standardized definition of performance indicators within local government and, on the basis of learning from the practical experience of several large city councils in Spain, formulate strategies to resolve these problems, taking note of the viability and real efficacy of the solutions adopted.

Risk Factors and Drivers of Financial Sustainability in Local Government: An Empirical Study

Abstract The current international crisis in public finances has made financial sustainability a key issue for governments. Although the European Union (EU) and other international organisations have recommended governments to monitor demographic and economic variables, few studies have considered the influence of these variables on financial sustainability. This paper seeks to identify and analyse the drivers and risk factors that influence the financial sustainability of local government. The findings identify both risk factors (unemployment and population aged under 16 years) and drivers (budgetary outcome) of financial sustainability, which may constitute a useful basis for decision-taking by managers and policy-makers.

Consensus Among Public Managers as Strategy for Standardization of Performance Indicators

ABSTRACT The usefulness of performance indicators increases when organizations compare their data. However, most discussions have failed to emphasize two lines of action that could improve the relevance of such comparisons: a) agreement among service managers on the indicators to be used in the evaluation; b) homogenization of the indicators to be used by organizations, and of the process used to calculate them. In this context, this paper proposes a methodology based on the participation of and consensus among managers, which helps to standardize the construction and presentation of performance indicators. The aim of this proposal is to improve the comparative evaluation of organizations. Finally, in order to test the proposal, a practical application is carried out on the local culture departments of nine large municipalities in southern Spain.

Could fair value accounting be useful, under NPM models, for users of financial information?:

International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) are an essential quality-control factor for Public Sector Accounting Systems in European Union member states. The compliance of the latter systems with IPSAS could be influenced to a large degree by perceptions of how useful these standards are in enabling the needs of financial information users to be met. Therefore, the aim of this article is to investigate the capability of fair value accounting to improve the usefulness of governmental financial information so that administrative reforms may be undertaken with the implementation of New Public Management (NPM) postulates. The theoretical section of the article studies the relevance of fair value accounting with respect to meeting the information requirements for implementing NPM models. This is followed by the results of empirical research carried out to determine the opinions of one of the main groups of information users concerning the practicality of fair value accounting and its association w...International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) are an essential quality-control factor for Public Sector Accounting Systems in European Union member states. The compliance of the latter systems with IPSAS could be influenced to a large degree by perceptions of how useful these standards are in enabling the needs of financial information users to be met. Therefore, the aim of this article is to investigate the capability of fair value accounting to improve the usefulness of governmental financial information so that administrative reforms may be undertaken with the implementation of New Public Management (NPM) postulates. The theoretical section of the article studies the relevance of fair value accounting with respect to meeting the information requirements for implementing NPM models. This is followed by the results of empirical research carried out to determine the opinions of one of the main groups of information users concerning the practicality of fair value accounting and its association with the solvency and feasibility of fair value measures. To achieve this aim, we applied the χ2 test and the ρ Spearman test and obtained findings about the capability of fair value accounting to meet the new information requirements under NPM models more effectively than under historical cost accounting.

New development: The role of accounting in assessing local government sustainability

In order to evaluate financial sustainability, public sector managers are being pressured to provide better financial information and information transparency. This article examines the role of accounting in assessing the sustainability of local governments and analyses of the usefulness of annual income statements in the measurement of ‘inter-period equity’.

Modernizing governments in Transitional and Emerging Economies through financial reporting based on international standards

In the administrative reforms that countries with emerging and transitional economies are undertaking, the choice of the method to be used for government accounts evaluation is a crucial issue, as the replacement of historical cost by fair value evaluation could affect the success or otherwise of the administrative reforms in these countries. In this article, we analyse the opinions of the National Accounting Standards Setters (NASS) regarding the utility of Fair Value Accounting (FVA) proposed by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) in the development of administrative reforms in transitional and emerging economies. To achieve this, we perform a survey of the Official National Accounting Standards Setters in these countries, to study the relevance and reliability of financial government reports based on fair value model. Based on the opinions of NASS in sample countries, the findings show that the implementation of fair value in Transitional and Emerging Economies could contribute to administrative reforms, mainly through the enhancement of the usefulness of government financial statements for purposes of transparency and efficiency measurement. In addition, in countries in transition, NASS opinions show that the crucial factor for the usefulness of fair value is the type of assets held by public organizations, but in emerging countries NASS think that the main factor in this respect is the existence of markets where they can be traded. Points for practitioners For public managers in Transitional and Emerging Economies, the findings of this article may be useful. The findings show how the implementation of international accounting standards can contribute to successful administrative reforms, through the improvement of financial transparency and the evaluation of the efficiency of public sector services. In addition, we identify determining factors of the usefulness of financial information for administrative reform purposes in Transitional and Emerging Economies, on an individual basis.In the administrative reforms that countries with emerging and transitional economies are undertaking, the choice of the method to be used for government accounts evaluation is a crucial issue, as the replacement of historical cost by fair value evaluation could affect the success or otherwise of the administrative reforms in these countries. In this article, we analyse the opinions of the National Accounting Standards Setters (NASS) regarding the utility of Fair Value Accounting (FVA) proposed by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) in the development of administrative reforms in transitional and emerging economies. To achieve this, we perform a survey of the Official National Accounting Standards Setters in these countries, to study the relevance and reliability of financial government reports based on fair value model. Based on the opinions of NASS in sample countries, the findings show that the implementation of fair value in Transitional and Emerging Economies could contribute...

The Role of Fair Value Accounting in Promoting Government Accountability

A key factor to improve the financial accountability of governments is the existence of a set of generally accepted financial reporting of standards, such as IPSAS issued by the IFAC, which seek to enhance information transparency. This paper examines the capability of fair value accounting to improve, through financial transparency, government accountability, analysing the possible effect of the implementation of this measurement basis on understandability, comparability and timeliness - three qualitative characteristics linked to the relevance of financial reporting. This paper further considers whether the difficulties involved in achieving FV estimations could affect government financial accountability. The findings indicate that FVA implementation could enhance accountability by improving understandability, comparability and timeliness in governmental financial reporting, although the use of objective measures to estimate the FV of assets is fundamental. In addition, the type of assets and the existence of an active market are crucial to improving the comparability of financial statements under FVA, whereas improving timeliness could be limited by the possibility of estimating FV measures in�?house.

Utilidad del modelo de valoración de las IPSAS para la rendición de cuentas de los gobiernos: la perspectiva de los OCEX

RESUMEN Los sistemas contables gubernamentales están desempeñando un papel esencial en el desarrollo de las reformas administrativas, utilizándose como instrumentos para mejorar la Accountability de los gobiernos. El modelo de valoración contable propuesto por las IPSAS pretende aumentar la utilidad de los estados financieros gubernamentales para fomentar la transparencia financiera como elemento clave de la rendición de cuentas. En base a una investigación empírica realizada en OCEX de 29 países, este trabajo concluye que, bajo ciertas condiciones, la adopción del valor razonable podría favorecer la rendición de cuentas en algunos de ellos, aunque su aplicación conllevaría problemas de fiabilidad, cuya subsanación requeriría incorporar en la Memoria información sobre sus estimaciones. En países sin experiencia en empleo del valor razonable, su uso podría encontrarse con dificultades inesperadas para mejorar la rendición de cuentas, que han surgido en países cuyos estados financieros ya están siendo elaborados sobre la base del valor razonable.

The Effect of Changes in Public Sector Accounting Policies on Administrative Reforms Addressed to Citizens

Changes in financial reporting systems are relevant to the usefulness of governmental financial reporting in implementing New Public Management (NPM) reforms. The International Public Sector Accounting Standards, published by the International Federation of Accountants, seeks to improve the financial information reported. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether Fair Value Accounting (FVA) could improve the usefulness of governmental financial statements for citizens under NPM reforms. To achieve this aim, this paper examines the opinions of the National Accounting Standards Setters on the utility of FVA in the introduction of NPM models in countries under different administrative traditions. Our results show that FVA could promote successful NPM reforms, enhancing the implementation of the postulates of efficiency, transparency, and benchmarking analysis. Likewise, the administrative tradition could influence National Accounting Standards Setters’ viewpoints regarding the capability of financial information based on FVA to meet the new information requirements under NPM models.

La repercusión del valor razonable de los bienes inmuebles en la utilidad de los estados financieros: una nota de investigación

The option in the recent Spanish regulation for fair value over historical cost, as the preferred measurement basis for some assets, has raised some controversy. This paper studies the effects on accounting information relevance and reliability of fair value accounting for investment properties. The empirical study is based on a questionnairebased survey of the perceptions of 151 Spanish accountants in the building industry about the usefulness and reliability of fair value accounting. The analysis of results allows us concluding that accountants perceive that the usefulness of financial statements increases when investment property is valued on a fair value basis, compared with a historical cost basis. However, respondents conceive fair value accounting as less objective and verifiable. We have also observed that firm size may influence the opinion of the impact of fair value on the relevance and reliability of financial statements.