Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew A. Rosenberg is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew A. Rosenberg.


Nature | 2012

An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean

Benjamin S. Halpern; Catherine Longo; Darren Hardy; Karen L. McLeod; Jameal F. Samhouri; Steven K. Katona; Kristin M. Kleisner; Sarah E. Lester; Jennifer K. O’Leary; Marla Ranelletti; Andrew A. Rosenberg; Courtney Scarborough; Elizabeth R. Selig; Benjamin D. Best; Daniel R. Brumbaugh; F. Stuart Chapin; Larry B. Crowder; Kendra L. Daly; Scott C. Doney; Cristiane T. Elfes; Michael J. Fogarty; Steven D. Gaines; Kelsey I. Jacobsen; Leah Bunce Karrer; Heather M. Leslie; Elizabeth Neeley; Daniel Pauly; Stephen Polasky; Bud Ris; Kevin St. Martin

The ocean plays a critical role in supporting human well-being, from providing food, livelihoods and recreational opportunities to regulating the global climate. Sustainable management aimed at maintaining the flow of a broad range of benefits from the ocean requires a comprehensive and quantitative method to measure and monitor the health of coupled human–ocean systems. We created an index comprising ten diverse public goals for a healthy coupled human–ocean system and calculated the index for every coastal country. Globally, the overall index score was 60 out of 100 (range 36–86), with developed countries generally performing better than developing countries, but with notable exceptions. Only 5% of countries scored higher than 70, whereas 32% scored lower than 50. The index provides a powerful tool to raise public awareness, direct resource management, improve policy and prioritize scientific research.


PLOS ONE | 2012

The Structure of Mediterranean Rocky Reef Ecosystems across Environmental and Human Gradients, and Conservation Implications

Enric Sala; Enric Ballesteros; Panagiotis Dendrinos; Francesco Ferretti; Simonetta Fraschetti; Alan M. Friedlander; Joaquim Garrabou; Benjamin S. Halpern; Bernat Hereu; Alexandros A. Karamanlidis; Zafer Kizilkaya; Enrique Macpherson; L. Mangialajo; Simone Mariani; Fiorenza Micheli; Antonio Pais; Andrew A. Rosenberg; Kimberly A. Selkoe; Richard M. Starr; Fiona Tomas

Historical exploitation of the Mediterranean Sea and the absence of rigorous baselines makes it difficult to evaluate the current health of the marine ecosystems and the efficacy of conservation actions at the ecosystem level. Here we establish the first current baseline and gradient of ecosystem structure of nearshore rocky reefs at the Mediterranean scale. We conducted underwater surveys in 14 marine protected areas and 18 open access sites across the Mediterranean, and across a 31-fold range of fish biomass (from 3.8 to 118 g m−2). Our data showed remarkable variation in the structure of rocky reef ecosystems. Multivariate analysis showed three alternative community states: (1) large fish biomass and reefs dominated by non-canopy algae, (2) lower fish biomass but abundant native algal canopies and suspension feeders, and (3) low fish biomass and extensive barrens, with areas covered by turf algae. Our results suggest that the healthiest shallow rocky reef ecosystems in the Mediterranean have both large fish and algal biomass. Protection level and primary production were the only variables significantly correlated to community biomass structure. Fish biomass was significantly larger in well-enforced no-take marine reserves, but there were no significant differences between multi-use marine protected areas (which allow some fishing) and open access areas at the regional scale. The gradients reported here represent a trajectory of degradation that can be used to assess the health of any similar habitat in the Mediterranean, and to evaluate the efficacy of marine protected areas.


Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2010

Food security and marine capture fisheries: characteristics, trends, drivers and future perspectives

Serge M. Garcia; Andrew A. Rosenberg

World population is expected to grow from the present 6.8 billion people to about 9 billion by 2050. The growing need for nutritious and healthy food will increase the demand for fisheries products from marine sources, whose productivity is already highly stressed by excessive fishing pressure, growing organic pollution, toxic contamination, coastal degradation and climate change. Looking towards 2050, the question is how fisheries governance, and the national and international policy and legal frameworks within which it is nested, will ensure a sustainable harvest, maintain biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and adapt to climate change. This paper looks at global fisheries production, the state of resources, contribution to food security and governance. It describes the main changes affecting the sector, including geographical expansion, fishing capacity-building, natural variability, environmental degradation and climate change. It identifies drivers and future challenges, while suggesting how new science, policies and interventions could best address those challenges.


PLOS ONE | 2013

Cumulative Human Impacts on Mediterranean and Black Sea Marine Ecosystems: Assessing Current Pressures and Opportunities

Fiorenza Micheli; Benjamin S. Halpern; Shaun Walbridge; Saul Ciriaco; Francesco Ferretti; Simonetta Fraschetti; Rebecca L. Lewison; Leo Nykjaer; Andrew A. Rosenberg

Management of marine ecosystems requires spatial information on current impacts. In several marine regions, including the Mediterranean and Black Sea, legal mandates and agreements to implement ecosystem-based management and spatial plans provide new opportunities to balance uses and protection of marine ecosystems. Analyses of the intensity and distribution of cumulative impacts of human activities directly connected to the ecological goals of these policy efforts are critically needed. Quantification and mapping of the cumulative impact of 22 drivers to 17 marine ecosystems reveals that 20% of the entire basin and 60–99% of the territorial waters of EU member states are heavily impacted, with high human impact occurring in all ecoregions and territorial waters. Less than 1% of these regions are relatively unaffected. This high impact results from multiple drivers, rather than one individual use or stressor, with climatic drivers (increasing temperature and UV, and acidification), demersal fishing, ship traffic, and, in coastal areas, pollution from land accounting for a majority of cumulative impacts. These results show that coordinated management of key areas and activities could significantly improve the condition of these marine ecosystems.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Large-Scale Assessment of Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas Effects on Fish Assemblages

Paolo Guidetti; Pasquale Baiata; Enric Ballesteros; Antonio Di Franco; Bernat Hereu; Enrique Macpherson; Fiorenza Micheli; Antonio Pais; Pieraugusto Panzalis; Andrew A. Rosenberg; Michel Zabala; Enric Sala

Marine protected areas (MPAs) were acknowledged globally as effective tools to mitigate the threats to oceans caused by fishing. Several studies assessed the effectiveness of individual MPAs in protecting fish assemblages, but regional assessments of multiple MPAs are scarce. Moreover, empirical evidence on the role of MPAs in contrasting the propagation of non-indigenous-species (NIS) and thermophilic species (ThS) is missing. We simultaneously investigated here the role of MPAs in reversing the effects of overfishing and in limiting the spread of NIS and ThS. The Mediterranean Sea was selected as study area as it is a region where 1) MPAs are numerous, 2) fishing has affected species and ecosystems, and 3) the arrival of NIS and the northward expansion of ThS took place. Fish surveys were done in well-enforced no-take MPAs (HP), partially-protected MPAs (IP) and fished areas (F) at 30 locations across the Mediterranean. Significantly higher fish biomass was found in HP compared to IP MPAs and F. Along a recovery trajectory from F to HP MPAs, IP were similar to F, showing that just well enforced MPAs triggers an effective recovery. Within HP MPAs, trophic structure of fish assemblages resembled a top-heavy biomass pyramid. Although the functional structure of fish assemblages was consistent among HP MPAs, species driving the recovery in HP MPAs differed among locations: this suggests that the recovery trajectories in HP MPAs are likely to be functionally similar (i.e., represented by predictable changes in trophic groups, especially fish predators), but the specific composition of the resulting assemblages may depend on local conditions. Our study did not show any effect of MPAs on NIS and ThS. These results may help provide more robust expectations, at proper regional scale, about the effects of new MPAs that may be established in the Mediterranean Sea and other ecoregions worldwide.


PLOS ONE | 2013

A General Business Model for Marine Reserves

Enric Sala; Christopher Costello; Dawn T. Dougherty; Geoffrey Heal; Kieran Kelleher; Jason Murray; Andrew A. Rosenberg; Rashid Sumaila

Marine reserves are an effective tool for protecting biodiversity locally, with potential economic benefits including enhancement of local fisheries, increased tourism, and maintenance of ecosystem services. However, fishing communities often fear short-term income losses associated with closures, and thus may oppose marine reserves. Here we review empirical data and develop bioeconomic models to show that the value of marine reserves (enhanced adjacent fishing + tourism) may often exceed the pre-reserve value, and that economic benefits can offset the costs in as little as five years. These results suggest the need for a new business model for creating and managing reserves, which could pay for themselves and turn a profit for stakeholder groups. Our model could be expanded to include ecosystem services and other benefits, and it provides a general framework to estimate costs and benefits of reserves and to develop such business models.


PLOS ONE | 2010

An Overview of Marine Biodiversity in United States Waters

Daphne G. Fautin; Penelope Dalton; Lewis S. Incze; Jo-Ann C. Leong; Clarence Pautzke; Andrew A. Rosenberg; Paul A. Sandifer; George R. Sedberry; John W. Tunnell; Isabella A. Abbott; Russell E. Brainard; Melissa Brodeur; Lucius G. Eldredge; Michael Feldman; Fabio Moretzsohn; Peter S. Vroom; Michelle Wainstein; Nicholas H. Wolff

Marine biodiversity of the United States (U.S.) is extensively documented, but data assembled by the United States National Committee for the Census of Marine Life demonstrate that even the most complete taxonomic inventories are based on records scattered in space and time. The best-known taxa are those of commercial importance. Body size is directly correlated with knowledge of a species, and knowledge also diminishes with distance from shore and depth. Measures of biodiversity other than species diversity, such as ecosystem and genetic diversity, are poorly documented. Threats to marine biodiversity in the U.S. are the same as those for most of the world: overexploitation of living resources; reduced water quality; coastal development; shipping; invasive species; rising temperature and concentrations of carbon dioxide in the surface ocean, and other changes that may be consequences of global change, including shifting currents; increased number and size of hypoxic or anoxic areas; and increased number and duration of harmful algal blooms. More information must be obtained through field and laboratory research and monitoring that involve innovative sampling techniques (such as genetics and acoustics), but data that already exist must be made accessible. And all data must have a temporal component so trends can be identified. As data are compiled, techniques must be developed to make certain that scales are compatible, to combine and reconcile data collected for various purposes with disparate gear, and to automate taxonomic changes. Information on biotic and abiotic elements of the environment must be interactively linked. Impediments to assembling existing data and collecting new data on marine biodiversity include logistical problems as well as shortages in finances and taxonomic expertise.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Patterns and Emerging Trends in Global Ocean Health

Benjamin S. Halpern; Catherine Longo; Julia S. Stewart Lowndes; Benjamin D. Best; Melanie Frazier; Steven K. Katona; Kristin M. Kleisner; Andrew A. Rosenberg; Courtney Scarborough; Elizabeth R. Selig

International and regional policies aimed at managing ocean ecosystem health need quantitative and comprehensive indices to synthesize information from a variety of sources, consistently measure progress, and communicate with key constituencies and the public. Here we present the second annual global assessment of the Ocean Health Index, reporting current scores and annual changes since 2012, recalculated using updated methods and data based on the best available science, for 221 coastal countries and territories. The Index measures performance of ten societal goals for healthy oceans on a quantitative scale of increasing health from 0 to 100, and combines these scores into a single Index score, for each country and globally. The global Index score improved one point (from 67 to 68), while many country-level Index and goal scores had larger changes. Per-country Index scores ranged from 41–95 and, on average, improved by 0.06 points (range -8 to +12). Globally, average scores increased for individual goals by as much as 6.5 points (coastal economies) and decreased by as much as 1.2 points (natural products). Annual updates of the Index, even when not all input data have been updated, provide valuable information to scientists, policy makers, and resource managers because patterns and trends can emerge from the data that have been updated. Changes of even a few points indicate potential successes (when scores increase) that merit recognition, or concerns (when scores decrease) that may require mitigative action, with changes of more than 10–20 points representing large shifts that deserve greater attention. Goal scores showed remarkably little covariance across regions, indicating low redundancy in the Index, such that each goal delivers information about a different facet of ocean health. Together these scores provide a snapshot of global ocean health and suggest where countries have made progress and where a need for further improvement exists.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Assessing the Health of the U.S. West Coast with a Regional-Scale Application of the Ocean Health Index

Benjamin S. Halpern; Catherine Longo; Courtney Scarborough; Darren Hardy; Benjamin D. Best; Scott C. Doney; Steven K. Katona; Karen L. McLeod; Andrew A. Rosenberg; Jameal F. Samhouri

Management of marine ecosystems increasingly demands comprehensive and quantitative assessments of ocean health, but lacks a tool to do so. We applied the recently developed Ocean Health Index to assess ocean health in the relatively data-rich US west coast region. The overall region scored 71 out of 100, with sub-regions scoring from 65 (Washington) to 74 (Oregon). Highest scoring goals included tourism and recreation (99) and clean waters (87), while the lowest scoring goals were sense of place (48) and artisanal fishing opportunities (57). Surprisingly, even in this well-studied area data limitations precluded robust assessments of past trends in overall ocean health. Nonetheless, retrospective calculation of current status showed that many goals have declined, by up to 20%. In contrast, near-term future scores were on average 6% greater than current status across all goals and sub-regions. Application of hypothetical but realistic management scenarios illustrate how the Index can be used to predict and understand the tradeoffs among goals and consequences for overall ocean health. We illustrate and discuss how this index can be used to vet underlying assumptions and decisions with local stakeholders and decision-makers so that scores reflect regional knowledge, priorities and values. We also highlight the importance of ongoing and future monitoring that will provide robust data relevant to ocean health assessment.


AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment | 2013

Exploring Patterns of Seafood Provision Revealed in the Global Ocean Health Index

Kristin M. Kleisner; Catherine Longo; Marta Coll; Ben S. Halpern; Darren Hardy; Steven K. Katona; Frédéric Le Manach; Daniel Pauly; Andrew A. Rosenberg; Jameal F. Samhouri; Courtney Scarborough; U. Rashid Sumaila; Reg Watson; Dirk Zeller

Sustainable provision of seafood from wild-capture fisheries and mariculture is a fundamental component of healthy marine ecosystems and a major component of the Ocean Health Index. Here we critically review the food provision model of the Ocean Health Index, and explore the implications of knowledge gaps, scale of analysis, choice of reference points, measures of sustainability, and quality of input data. Global patterns for fisheries are positively related to human development and latitude, whereas patterns for mariculture are most closely associated with economic importance of seafood. Sensitivity analyses show that scores are robust to several model assumptions, but highly sensitive to choice of reference points and, for fisheries, extent of time series available to estimate landings. We show how results for sustainable seafood may be interpreted and used, and we evaluate which modifications show the greatest potential for improvements.

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew A. Rosenberg's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kristin M. Kleisner

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Enric Sala

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gretchen Goldman

Union of Concerned Scientists

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Halpern

Union of Concerned Scientists

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Fogarty

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge