Andrew A. Somogyi

Pharmacogenetics of Opioids

Opioids are used for acute and chronic pain and dependency. They have a narrow therapeutic index and large interpatient variability in response. Genetic factors regulating their pharmacokinetics (metabolizing enzymes, transporters) and pharmacodynamics (receptors and signal transduction elements) are contributors to such variability. The polymorphic CYP2D6 regulates the O‐demethylation of codeine and other weak opioids to more potent metabolites with poor metabolizers having reduced antinociception in some cases. Some opioids are P‐glycoprotein substrates, whereas, ABCB1 genotypes inconsistently influence opioid pharmacodynamics and dosage requirements. Single‐nucleotide polymorphisms in the mu opioid receptor gene are associated with increasing morphine, but not methadone dosage requirements and altered efficacy of mu opioid agonists and antagonists. As knowledge regarding the interplay between genes affecting opioid pharmacokinetics including cerebral kinetics and pharmacodynamics increases, our understanding of the role of pharmacogenomics in mediating interpatient variability in efficacy and side effects to this important class of drugs will be better informed. Opioid drugs as a group have withstood the test of time in their ability to attenuate acute and chronic pain. Since the isolation of morphine in the early 1800s by Friedrich Sertürner, a large number of opioid drugs beginning with modification of the 4,5‐epoxymorphinan ring structure were developed in order to improve their therapeutic margin, including reducing dependence and tolerance, ultimately without success.

Drug Interactions with Cimetidine

SummaryBecause of widespread (and often uncritical) use of Cimetidine, there is considerable potential for interactions to occur with other drugs.In studies on absorption, benzylpenicillin absorption was not disturbed by Cimetidine in most cases, but a several-fold increase in urinary excretion occurred repeatedly in I subject, indicating that increased absorption of acid-labile compounds may occur in some patients. The absorption of ketoconazole was reduced by more than half with Cimetidine, a consequence of its poor water solubility which is enhanced in acid solution. Conflicting results are reported with tetracycline, the overall absorption of which does not appear to be significantly altered by Cimetidine. Aspirin absorption was halved by Cimetidine in 3 of 6 subjects, when the intragastric pH was raised above 3.5. Cimetidine did not affect the absorption of ampicillin, co-trimoxazole or prednisolone.Cimetidine has been shown to inhibit various microsomal drug-metabolising enzymes in animal as well as human liver, most likely through the binding of the imidazole ring structure of Cimetidine to the haeme moiety of cytochrome P-450. In 7 studies, Cimetidine uniformly prolonged antipyrine half-life by 18 to 37% and reduced its clearance by 10 to 27%. After chronic dosing with Cimetidine, warfarin clearance was reduced from 3.4 to 2.5ml/min, whilst the volume of distribution and elimination half-life remained unchanged. Steady-state warfarin concentrations, as well as Prothrombin times, increased upon addition of Cimetidine to the treatment regimen. Warfarin concentration and effect both returned to pre-Cimetidine values when Cimetidine was withdrawn. Amongst the benzodiazepines, diazepam, desmethyldiazepam and chlordiazepoxide plasma clearance values were reduced by Cimetidine by 43, 28 and 63 %, respectively, and half-lives increased accordingly, while volumes of distribution and protein binding were not affected. Long term treatment with Cimetidine and diazepam resulted in a 30 to 80% increase in steady-state diazepam concentrations. In contrast, the pharmacokinetics of oxazepam and lorazepam, which are eliminated almost entirely by glucuronidation and not oxidation, were not altered by Cimetidine. Cimetidine also inhibits the metabolism of phenytoin, theophylline and carbamazepine.A single dose of Cimetidine decreased indocyanine green clearance by 23%, which was interpreted as a reduction in hepatic blood flow. The area below the Propranolol concentration-time curve (oral administration) was increased by between 25 and 60 % with Cimetidine and by 25 % after intravenous administration of Propranolol, with no change in elimination half-life, volume of distribution or bioavailability. With chronic oral Propranolol dosing, Cimetidine increased the steady-state concentration from 23.2 to 44.9ng/ml. The bioavailability of labetalol almost doubled from 30 to 54 % with Cimetidine, with no change in half-life and systemic clearance. The oral clearance and elimination half-life of chlormethiazole was increased by 30 and 50%, respectively, by Cimetidine. Studies with high hepatic clearance drugs have not consistently shown cimetidine-induced changes in systemic clearance (liver blood flow dependent), but oral clearance increased in all cases, consistent with inhibition of drug metabolism.Peculiarities of Cimetidine effect on drug metabolism are (a) only about 20% of a Cimetidine dose is metabolised in man, as compared with a much larger fraction with other inhibitory drugs; (b) the maximum effect attained occurs within I day whereas offset of effect varies with individual interacting drugs; (c) the degree of inhibition of metabolism is much more pronounced in patients with already impaired liver function (i.e. liver disease).Antacids of a weak neutralising capacity (10 to 15mmol/dose) did not influence the absorption of Cimetidine. However, antacids (aluminium plus magnesium hydroxide) with a neutralising capacity between 26 and 41 mmol/10ml reduced the bioavailability of Cimetidine by 20 to 35%. A recent study with an aluminium plus magnesium hydroxide antacid of 70mmol/10ml did not affect Cimetidine bioavailability. The antacid preparation used differed from others by a disproportionate increase in the aluminium hydroxide content. Metoclopramide and propantheline also reduced the absorption of Cimetidine by an average of 20 %, indicating the importance of gastric emptying for Cimetidine absorption. Phenobarbitone administration over 3 weeks led to an increase in Cimetidine plasma clearance by 18%, mainly due to an increase in the non-renal clearance, but probably also partially due to a reduction in Cimetidine absorption.The most important clinical consequences of interactions with Cimetidine primarily involve inhibition of drug metabolism. Clinically important interactions are predominantly manifested in those drugs which have a narrow therapeutic index (e.g. Phenytoin, warfarin, theophylline). The interaction leads to higher steady-state blood concentrations and hence increases the incidence of side effects and toxicity. Adverse effects of such interactions can be avoided by careful monitoring and adjustment of dosage for those drugs which undergo phase I metabolic detoxification in the liver when it is necessary to administer such drugs concomitantly with Cimetidine.

Mu receptor binding of some commonly used opioids and their metabolites

The binding affinity to the mu receptor of some opioids chemically related to morphine and some of their metabolites was examined in rat brain homogenates with 3H-DAMGO. The chemical group at position 6 of the molecule had little effect on binding (e.g. morphine-6-glucuronide Ki = 0.6 nM; morphine = 1.2 nM). Decreasing the length of the alkyl group at position 3 decreased the Ki values (morphine less than codeine less than ethylmorphine less than pholcodine). Analgesics with high clinical potency containing a methoxyl group at position 3 (e.g. hydrocodone, Ki = 19.8 nM) had relatively weak receptor binding, whilst their O-demethylated metabolites (e.g. hydromorphone, Ki = 0.6 nM) had much stronger binding. Many opioids may exert their pharmacological actions predominantly through metabolites.

Proinflammatory cytokines oppose opioid-induced acute and chronic analgesia

Spinal proinflammatory cytokines are powerful pain-enhancing signals that contribute to pain following peripheral nerve injury (neuropathic pain). Recently, one proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1, was also implicated in the loss of analgesia upon repeated morphine exposure (tolerance). In contrast to prior literature, we demonstrate that the action of several spinal proinflammatory cytokines oppose systemic and intrathecal opioid analgesia, causing reduced pain suppression. In vitro morphine exposure of lumbar dorsal spinal cord caused significant increases in proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine release. Opposition of analgesia by proinflammatory cytokines is rapid, occurring < or =5 min after intrathecal (perispinal) opioid administration. We document that opposition of analgesia by proinflammatory cytokines cannot be accounted for by an alteration in spinal morphine concentrations. The acute anti-analgesic effects of proinflammatory cytokines occur in a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nitric oxide dependent fashion. Chronic intrathecal morphine or methadone significantly increased spinal glial activation (toll-like receptor 4 mRNA and protein) and the expression of multiple chemokines and cytokines, combined with development of analgesic tolerance and pain enhancement (hyperalgesia, allodynia). Statistical analysis demonstrated that a cluster of cytokines and chemokines was linked with pain-related behavioral changes. Moreover, blockade of spinal proinflammatory cytokines during a stringent morphine regimen previously associated with altered neuronal function also attenuated enhanced pain, supportive that proinflammatory cytokines are importantly involved in tolerance induced by such regimens. These data implicate multiple opioid-induced spinal proinflammatory cytokines in opposing both acute and chronic opioid analgesia, and provide a novel mechanism for the opposition of acute opioid analgesia.

Morphine activates neuroinflammation in a manner parallel to endotoxin

Opioids create a neuroinflammatory response within the CNS, compromising opioid-induced analgesia and contributing to various unwanted actions. How this occurs is unknown but has been assumed to be via classic opioid receptors. Herein, we provide direct evidence that morphine creates neuroinflammation via the activation of an innate immune receptor and not via classic opioid receptors. We demonstrate that morphine binds to an accessory protein of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), myeloid differentiation protein 2 (MD-2), thereby inducing TLR4 oligomerization and triggering proinflammation. Small-molecule inhibitors, RNA interference, and genetic knockout validate the TLR4/MD-2 complex as a feasible target for beneficially modifying morphine actions. Disrupting TLR4/MD-2 protein–protein association potentiated morphine analgesia in vivo and abolished morphine-induced proinflammation in vitro, the latter demonstrating that morphine-induced proinflammation only depends on TLR4, despite the presence of opioid receptors. These results provide an exciting, nonconventional avenue to improving the clinical efficacy of opioids.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Cimetidine 1987

SummaryThe number of studies on drug interactions with Cimetidine has increased at a rapid rate over the past 5 years, with many of the interactions being solely pharmacokinetic in origin. Very few studies have investigated the clinical relevance of such pharmacokinetic interactions by measuring pharmacodynamic responses or clinical endpoints. Apart from pharmacokinetic studies, invariably conducted in young, healthy subjects, there have been a large number of in vitro and in vivo animal studies, case reports, clinical observations and general reviews on the subject, which is tending to develop an industry of its own accord. Nevertheless, where specific mechanisms have been considered, these have undoubtedly increased our knowledge on the way in which humans eliminate xenobiotics. There is now sufficient information to predict the likelihood of a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction with cimetidine and to make specific clinical recommendations.Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with cimetidine occur at the sites of gastrointestinal absorption and elimination including metabolism and excretion. Cimetidine has been found to reduce the plasma concentrations of ketoconazole, indomethacin and chlorpromazine by reducing their absorption. In the case of ketoconazole the interaction was clinically important. Cimetidine does not inhibit conjugation mechanisms including glucuronidation, sulphation and acetylation, or deacetylation or ethanol dehydrogenation. It binds to the haem portion of cytochrome P-450 and is thus an inhibitor of phase I drug metabolism (i.e. hydroxylation, dealkylation). Although generally recognised as a nonspecific inhibitor of this type of metabolism, cimetidine does demonstrate some degree of specificity. To date, theophylline 8-oxidation, tolbutamide hydroxylation, Ibuprofen hydroxylation, misonidazole demethylation, carbamazepine epoxidation, mexiletine oxidation and steroid hydroxylation have not been shown to be inhibited by cimetidine in humans but the metabolism of at least 30 other drugs is affected. Recent evidence indicates negligible effects of cimetidine on liver blood flow. Cimetidine reduces the renal clearance of drugs which are organic cations, by competing for active tubular secretion in the proximal tubule of the kidney, reducing the renal clearances of procainamide, ranitidine, triamterene, metformin, flecainide and the active metabolite N-acetylprocainamide. This previously unrecognised form of drug interaction with cimetidine may be clinically important for both parent drug, and metabolites which may be active. Cimetidine does not alter plasma protein binding of other drugs, but reduces the volumes of distribution of labetolol, lignocaine (lidocaine), Imipramine and pethidine (meperidine) by unknown mechanisms. Cimetidine increases the plasma concentrations of drugs in a wide range of therapeutic classes.A number of physiological, pathological and drug-related factors alter the degree of inhibition of hepatic drug clearance by cimetidine. In certain patients with already depressed drug clearance (e.g. the elderly, the cirrhotic), cimetidine will further decrease drug clearance to a potentially dangerous extent. This reduction in drug clearance is greater following enzyme induction by rifampicin or phenytoin or in smokers, although findings in the latter group have been inconsistent. Cimetidine will not fully attenuate the induction of drug metabolism by the above agents.The degree of inhibition of drug metabolism by cimetidine is of the order of 10 to 20% with a daily dosage of 300 to 400mg, 20 to 30% with 400 to 800mg, 30 to 40% with 800 to 1600mg: with daily dosages greater than 2000mg, the inhibition is between 40 and 50%, depending upon the substrate used. The onset of inhibition is rapid: maximum inhibition occurs 24 hours after starting cimetidine, and is maintained for at least 30 days if cimetidine is continued. The recovery rate is also rapid and clearance rates return to baseline 2 to 3 days after stopping cimetidine, depending on the half-life of the interacting drug; in the case of warfarin, plasma concentrations will not return to the precimetidine level for at least 7 days.Because of the large number of drugs which can potentially interact with cimetidine, the physician should suspect a drug interaction when an abnormal response is encountered in any patient coprescribed cimetidine. Toxicity may occur for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, e.g. theophylline, Phenytoin, warfarin and the majority of the antiarrhythmic, antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs for which clinical evidence of the drug interactions has been reported. These patients can be managed by: (a) reducing the dose of the interacting drug; (b) selecting a drug of similar therapeutic efficacy that does not interact with cimetidine; or (c) selecting other antiulcer drugs which do not interact. The need for cimetidine or other antiulcer therapy should also be assessed.Although cimetidine interacts with a large number of drugs, reports of incidents of drug toxicity are uncommon. This may be due to the fact that physicians are well aware of those drugs with a narrow therapeutic index which interact clinically with cimetidine and have taken appropriate action, or the fact that the majority of drugs have a wide therapeutic index, so that a 50% increase in plasma concentration would not be deleterious to the patient.

Attenuation of morphine-induced delirium in palliative care by substitution with infusion of oxycodone

We have observed among patients of the Southern Community Hospice Programme that up to 25% experience acute delirium when treated with morphine and improve when the opioid is changed to oxycodone or fentanyl. This study aimed to confirm by a prospective trial that oxycodone produces less delirium than morphine in such patients. Oxycodone was administered by a continuous subcutaneous infusion, as this allowed more flexible and reliable dosing, and patients were monitored for any adverse reactions to the drug. Thirteen patients completed the study. Statistically significant improvements in mental state and nausea and vomiting occurred following a change from morphine to oxycodone. Pain scores improved but did not reach a level of statistical significance. The phenotype status of the patients was tested to establish their capacity to metabolize oxycodone. One patient who did not achieve adequate pain control proved to be a poor metabolizer. These results show that oxycodone administered by the subcutaneous route can provide effective analgesia without significant side effects in patients with morphine-induced delirium. This treatment allows patients to remain more comfortable and lucid in their final days. A small proportion of patients who do not metabolize oxycodone effectively may not receive this benefit.

Methadone maintenance patients are cross-tolerant to the antinociceptive effects of morphine

&NA; We have previously shown that methadone maintenance patients are hyperalgesic. Very little is known about the antinociceptive effects of additional opioids in these patients. This study (1) compared the intensity and duration of antinociceptive responses, at two pseudo‐steady‐state plasma morphine concentrations (CSS1 and CSS2), between four patients on stable, once daily, doses of methadone and four matched control subjects; and (2) determined, in methadone patients, whether the antinociceptive effects of morphine are affected by changes in plasma R(−)‐methadone concentration that occur during an inter‐dosing interval. Two types of nociceptive stimuli were used: (1) a cold pressor test (CP), (2) electrical stimulation (ES). Morphine was administered intravenously to achieve the two consecutive plasma concentrations. Blood samples were collected, concurrently with nociceptive responses, to determine plasma morphine concentrations. Methadone patients achieved mean CSS1 and CSS2 of 16 and 55 ng/ml respectively; those of controls were 11 and 33 ng/ml. Methadone patients were hyperalgesic to pain induced by CP but not ES. Despite significantly greater plasma morphine concentrations, methadone patients experienced minimal antinociception in comparison with controls. Furthermore in methadone patients, the antinociception ceased when the infusion ended. In comparison, the duration of effect in control subjects was 3 h. The fluctuations that occurred in plasma R(−)‐methadone concentration during an inter‐dosing interval had little effect on patients’ responses to morphine. Our findings suggest that methadone patients are cross‐tolerant to the antinociceptive effects of morphine, and conventional doses of morphine are likely to be ineffective in managing episodes of acute pain amongst this patient group. Further research is needed to determine whether other drugs are more effective than morphine in managing acute pain in this patient population.

Cimetidine-procainamide pharmacokinetic interaction in man: Evidence of competition for tubular secretion of basic drugs

SummaryThe hypothesis that basic drugs can compete for active tubular secretion by the kidney was tested in six healthy volunteers by comparing the single dose pharmacokinetics of oral procainamide before and during a daily dose of cimetidine. The area under the procainamide plasma concentration-time curve was increased by cimetidine by an average of 35% from 27.0±0.3 µg/ml·h to 36.5±3.4 µg/ml·h. The elimination half-life increased from an harmonic mean of 2.92 to 3.68 h. The renal clearance of procainamide was reduced by cimetidine from 347±46 ml/min to 196±11 ml/min. All these results were statistically significant (p<0.016). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve for n-acetylprocainamide was increased by a mean of 25% by cimetidine due to a significant (p<0.016) reduction in renal clearance from 258±60 ml/min to 197±59 ml/min. The data suggests that cimetidine inhibits the tubular secretion of both procainamide and n-acetylprocainamide, and, if so, represents the first documented evidence for this type of drug interaction in man. The clinical implications from this study necessitate dosage adjustments of procainamide in patients being concomitantly treated with cimetidine. The interaction is pertinent not only for basic drugs that are cleared by the kidney, but also for metabolites of basic drugs and endogenous substances which require active transport into the lumen of the proximal tubule of the kidney for their elimination.

Opioid Activation of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contributes to Drug Reinforcement

Opioid action was thought to exert reinforcing effects solely via the initial agonism of opioid receptors. Here, we present evidence for an additional novel contributor to opioid reward: the innate immune pattern-recognition receptor, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), and its MyD88-dependent signaling. Blockade of TLR4/MD2 by administration of the nonopioid, unnatural isomer of naloxone, (+)-naloxone (rats), or two independent genetic knock-outs of MyD88-TLR4-dependent signaling (mice), suppressed opioid-induced conditioned place preference. (+)-Naloxone also reduced opioid (remifentanil) self-administration (rats), another commonly used behavioral measure of drug reward. Moreover, pharmacological blockade of morphine-TLR4/MD2 activity potently reduced morphine-induced elevations of extracellular dopamine in rat nucleus accumbens, a region critical for opioid reinforcement. Importantly, opioid-TLR4 actions are not a unidirectional influence on opioid pharmacodynamics, since TLR4−/− mice had reduced oxycodone-induced p38 and JNK phosphorylation, while displaying potentiated analgesia. Similar to our recent reports of morphine-TLR4/MD2 binding, here we provide a combination of in silico and biophysical data to support (+)-naloxone and remifentanil binding to TLR4/MD2. Collectively, these data indicate that the actions of opioids at classical opioid receptors, together with their newly identified TLR4/MD2 actions, affect the mesolimbic dopamine system that amplifies opioid-induced elevations in extracellular dopamine levels, therefore possibly explaining altered opioid reward behaviors. Thus, the discovery of TLR4/MD2 recognition of opioids as foreign xenobiotic substances adds to the existing hypothesized neuronal reinforcement mechanisms, identifies a new drug target in TLR4/MD2 for the treatment of addictions, and provides further evidence supporting a role for central proinflammatory immune signaling in drug reward.