Andrew Bissett
Hobart Corporation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew Bissett.
GigaScience | 2016
Andrew Bissett; Anna Fitzgerald; Thys Meintjes; Pauline M. Mele; Frank Reith; Paul G. Dennis; Martin F. Breed; Belinda Brown; Mark V. Brown; Joël Brugger; Margaret Byrne; Stefan Caddy-Retalic; Bernie Carmody; David J. Coates; Carolina Correa; Belinda C. Ferrari; Vadakattu V. S. R. Gupta; Kelly Hamonts; Asha Haslem; Philip Hugenholtz; Mirko Karan; Jason Koval; Andrew J. Lowe; Stuart Macdonald; Leanne McGrath; David Martin; Matthew J. Morgan; Kristin I. North; Chanyarat Paungfoo-Lonhienne; Elise Pendall
BackgroundMicrobial inhabitants of soils are important to ecosystem and planetary functions, yet there are large gaps in our knowledge of their diversity and ecology. The ‘Biomes of Australian Soil Environments’ (BASE) project has generated a database of microbial diversity with associated metadata across extensive environmental gradients at continental scale. As the characterisation of microbes rapidly expands, the BASE database provides an evolving platform for interrogating and integrating microbial diversity and function.FindingsBASE currently provides amplicon sequences and associated contextual data for over 900 sites encompassing all Australian states and territories, a wide variety of bioregions, vegetation and land-use types. Amplicons target bacteria, archaea and general and fungal-specific eukaryotes. The growing database will soon include metagenomics data. Data are provided in both raw sequence (FASTQ) and analysed OTU table formats and are accessed via the project’s data portal, which provides a user-friendly search tool to quickly identify samples of interest. Processed data can be visually interrogated and intersected with other Australian diversity and environmental data using tools developed by the ‘Atlas of Living Australia’.ConclusionsDeveloped within an open data framework, the BASE project is the first Australian soil microbial diversity database. The database will grow and link to other global efforts to explore microbial, plant, animal, and marine biodiversity. Its design and open access nature ensures that BASE will evolve as a valuable tool for documenting an often overlooked component of biodiversity and the many microbe-driven processes that are essential to sustain soil function and ecosystem services.
Nature Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Andrew Bissett; David J. Eldridge; Fernando T. Maestre; Ji-Zheng He; Jun-Tao Wang; Kelly Hamonts; Yu-Rong Liu; Brajesh K. Singh; Noah Fierer
The legacy impacts of past climates on the current distribution of soil microbial communities are largely unknown. Here, we use data from more than 1,000 sites from five separate global and regional datasets to identify the importance of palaeoclimatic conditions (Last Glacial Maximum and mid-Holocene) in shaping the current structure of soil bacterial communities in natural and agricultural soils. We show that palaeoclimate explains more of the variation in the richness and composition of bacterial communities than current climate. Moreover, palaeoclimate accounts for a unique fraction of this variation that cannot be predicted from geographical location, current climate, soil properties or plant diversity. Climatic legacies (temperature and precipitation anomalies from the present to ~20u2009kyr ago) probably shape soil bacterial communities both directly and indirectly through shifts in soil properties and plant communities. The ability to predict the distribution of soil bacteria from either palaeoclimate or current climate declines greatly in agricultural soils, highlighting the fact that anthropogenic activities have a strong influence on soil bacterial diversity. We illustrate how climatic legacies can help to explain the current distribution of soil bacteria in natural ecosystems and advocate that climatic legacies should be considered when predicting microbial responses to climate change.Analysing data from more than 1,000 sites globally, the authors show that palaeoclimatic legacies explain a greater amount of variation in bacterial community richness and composition than current climate.
New Phytologist | 2017
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Jeff R. Powell; Kelly Hamonts; Frank Reith; Pauline M. Mele; Mark V. Brown; Paul G. Dennis; Belinda C. Ferrari; Anna Fitzgerald; Andrew G. Young; Brajesh K. Singh; Andrew Bissett
The current theoretical framework suggests that tripartite positive feedback relationships between soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity are universal. However, empirical evidence for these relationships at the continental scale and across different soil depths is lacking. We investigate the continental-scale relationships between the diversity of microbial and invertebrate-based soil food webs, fertility and above-ground plant productivity at 289 sites and two soil depths, that is 0-10 and 20-30xa0cm, across Australia. Soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity are strongly positively related in surface soils. Conversely, in the deeper soil layer, the relationships between soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity weaken considerably, probably as a result of a reduction in biodiversity and fertility with depth. Further modeling suggested that strong positive associations among soil biodiversity-fertility and fertility-plant productivity are limited to the upper soil layer (0-10xa0cm), after accounting for key factors, such as distance from the equator, altitude, climate and physicochemical soil properties. These findings highlight the importance of surface soil biodiversity for soil fertility, and suggest that any loss of surface soil could potentially break the links between soil biodiversity-fertility and/or fertility-plant productivity, which can negatively impact nutrient cycling and food production, upon which future generations depend.
Ecology | 2018
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Frank Reith; Paul G. Dennis; Kelly Hamonts; Jeff R. Powell; Andrew G. Young; Brajesh K. Singh; Andrew Bissett
The ecological drivers of soil biodiversity in the Southern Hemisphere remain underexplored. Here, in a continental survey comprising 647 sites, across 58 degrees of latitude between tropical Australia and Antarctica, we evaluated the major ecological patterns in soil biodiversity and relative abundance of ecological clusters within a co-occurrence network of soil bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes. Six major ecological clusters (modules) of co-occurring soil taxa were identified. These clusters exhibited strong shifts in their relative abundances with increasing distance from the equator. Temperature was the major environmental driver of the relative abundance of ecological clusters when Australia and Antarctica are analyzed together. Temperature, aridity, soil properties and vegetation types were the major drivers of the relative abundance of different ecological clusters within Australia. Our data supports significant reductions in the diversity of bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes in Antarctica vs. Australia linked to strong reductions in temperature. However, we only detected small latitudinal variations in soil biodiversity within Australia. Different environmental drivers regulate the diversity of soil archaea (temperature and soil carbon), bacteria (aridity, vegetation attributes and pH) and eukaryotes (vegetation type and soil carbon) across Australia. Together, our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms driving soil biodiversity in the Southern Hemisphere.
Global Change Biology | 2018
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; David J. Eldridge; Samantha K. Travers; James Val; Ian Oliver; Andrew Bissett
The role of climatic legacies in regulating community assembly of above- and belowground species in terrestrial ecosystems remains largely unexplored and poorly understood. Here, we report on two separate regional and continental empirical studies, including >500 locations, aiming to identify the relative importance of climatic legacies (climatic anomaly over the last 20,000xa0years) compared to current climates in predicting the relative abundance of ecological clusters formed by species strongly co-occurring within two independent above- and belowground networks. Climatic legacies explained a significant portion of the variation in the current community assembly of terrestrial ecosystems (up to 15.4%) that could not be accounted for by current climate, soil properties, and management. Changes in the relative abundance of ecological clusters linked to climatic legacies (e.g., past temperature) showed the potential to indirectly alter other clusters, suggesting cascading effects. Our work illustrates the role of climatic legacies in regulating ecosystem community assembly and provides further insights into possible winner and loser community assemblies under global change scenarios.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2018
Adam J. Kessler; Keryn L. Roberts; Andrew Bissett; Perran Cook
Copyright (2018) American Geophysical Union.Kessler, A. J., Roberts, K. L., Bissett, A. & Cook, P. L. M. (2018) Biogeochemical controls on the relative importance of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium in estuaries. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 1045–1057, doi:10.1029/2018GB005908To view the published open abstract, go to http://dx.doi.org and enter the DOI.
Ecology and Evolution | 2018
Samiran Banerjee; Peter H. Thrall; Andrew Bissett; Marcel G. A. van der Heijden; Alan E. Richardson
Abstract Ecotones between distinct ecosystems have been the focus of many studies as they offer valuable insights into key drivers of community structure and ecological processes that underpin function. While previous studies have examined a wide range of above‐ground parameters in ecotones, soil microbial communities have received little attention. Here we investigated spatial patterns, composition, and co‐occurrences of archaea, bacteria, and fungi, and their relationships with soil ecological processes across a woodland‐grassland ecotone. Geostatistical kriging and network analysis revealed that the community structure and spatial patterns of soil microbiota varied considerably between three habitat components across the ecotone. Woodland samples had significantly higher diversity of archaea while the grassland samples had significantly higher diversity of bacteria. Microbial co‐occurrences reflected differences in soil properties and ecological processes. While microbial networks were dominated by bacterial nodes, different ecological processes were linked to specific microbial guilds. For example, soil phosphorus and phosphatase activity formed the largest clusters in their respective networks, and two lignolytic enzymes formed joined clusters. Bacterial ammonia oxidizers were dominant over archaeal oxidizers and showed a significant association (p < 0.001) with potential nitrification (PNR), with the PNR subnetwork being dominated by Betaproteobacteria. The top ten keystone taxa comprised six bacterial and four fungal OTUs, with Random Forest Analysis revealing soil carbon and nitrogen as the determinants of the abundance of keystone taxa. Our results highlight the importance of assessing interkingdom associations in soil microbial networks. Overall, this study shows how ecotones can be used as a model to delineate microbial structural patterns and ecological processes across adjoining land‐uses within a landscape.
Pedobiologia | 2017
Nico Eisenhauer; Pedro M. Antunes; Alison E. Bennett; Klaus Birkhofer; Andrew Bissett; Matthew A. Bowker; Tancredi Caruso; Baodong Chen; David C. Coleman; Wietse de Boer; Peter C. de Ruiter; Thomas H. DeLuca; Francesco Frati; Bryan S. Griffiths; Miranda M. Hart; Stephan Hättenschwiler; Jari Haimi; Michael Heethoff; Nobuhiro Kaneko; Laura C. Kelly; Hans Petter Leinaas; Zoë Lindo; Catriona A. Macdonald; Matthias C. Rillig; Liliane Ruess; Stefan Scheu; Olaf Schmidt; Timothy R. Seastedt; Nico M. van Straalen; Alexei V. Tiunov
Soil Biology & Biochemistry | 2017
Miranda Prendergast-Miller; Alexandre B. de Menezes; Lynne M. Macdonald; Peter J. Toscas; Andrew Bissett; Geoff Baker; Mark Farrell; Alan E. Richardson; Tim Wark; Peter H. Thrall
Biological Conservation | 2018
DongFeng Yan; Jacob G. Mills; Nick Gellie; Andrew Bissett; Andrew J. Lowe; Martin F. Breed
Collaboration
Dive into the Andrew Bissett's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs