Andrew C. Taylor

Capsule endoscopy vs. push enteroscopy and enteroclysis in suspected small-bowel Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND The diagnosis of small-bowel Crohns disease sometimes is difficult and may be missed by conventional imaging studies. Capsule endoscopy might identify small-bowel disease undetected by other investigations. METHODS Patients with or without known Crohns disease who were suspected to have small-bowel Crohns disease were prospectively evaluated with push enteroscopy, enteroclysis, and capsule endoscopy. Each examiner was blinded to results of other investigations. Referring doctors were required to complete questionnaires before and after the investigations. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were known to have Crohns disease (Group 1), and 21 were suspected to have small-bowel Crohns disease (Group 2). In Group 1, capsule endoscopy detected more erosions than the other two investigations (p < 0.001). In Group 2, a new diagnosis of Crohns disease was made in two patients, but there was no significant difference in yield compared with the other two investigations. Referring physicians rated the usefulness of capsule endoscopy as 4.4 on a scale of 5. Capsule endoscopy changed management for 30 patients (70%). CONCLUSIONS Capsule endoscopy has a higher yield than push enteroscopy and enteroclysis in patients with known Crohns disease when small-bowel mucosal disease is suspected, and this leads to a change in management in the majority of these patients.

Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Cold biopsy forceps polypectomy (CBP) is often used for the removal of diminutive polyps. The efficacy of the technique has not been thoroughly assessed. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the efficacy of CBP for removing diminutive polyps. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective study from St Vincents Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne, Australia. A total of 143 patients were screened and 52 patients with ≥ 1 diminutive polyps were enrolled. CBP was used to resect diminutive polyps until no polyp tissue was visible. The polyp base was then resected using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with a 1 - 2-mm margin. The CBP and EMR samples were compared to assess completeness of the resection. RESULTS Overall 39 % (21 / 54) of diminutive polyps were completely resected using CBP. After binary logistic regression analysis, polyp histology was found to be predictive of resection, with complete resection of 62 % (13 / 21) for adenomas and 24 % (8 / 33) for hyperplastic polyps (odds ratio 5.1; P = 0.008). The size and number of bites taken with the forceps were not predictive of complete response. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of a modest sample size, CBP appears to be inadequate treatment for the removal of diminutive polyps.

Chromoendoscopy versus narrow band imaging for colonic surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: Mucosal dye spraying (chromoendoscopy [CE]) has been shown in controlled studies to enhance lesion detection in colitis surveillance. Narrow band imaging (NBI) potentially offers a more convenient mode of highlighting mucosal lesions. The primary objectives of this study were to compare CE and NBI in colitis surveillance with respect to lesion detection. A secondary objective was to assess the accuracy of the mucosal pit pattern (Kudo classification) with NBI in predicting mucosal histology. Methods: Patients with colitis of 8 years or greater disease duration underwent screening colonoscopy with NBI, followed immediately by CE by 2 endoscopists blinded to each other’s results. All lesions were biopsied to confirm histology. Diagnostic yield of each modality for dysplastic lesions. Accuracy of Kudo classification by NBI for neoplasia. Results: Forty-four participants were enrolled. One hundred forty-four colonic lesions were identified in total. Overall, CE identified more lesions than NBI (131 versus 102, P < 0.001); however, most were nondysplastic. CE detected 23 neoplastic (dysplastic or indefinite for dysplasia) lesions in 11 patients and NBI 20 lesions in 10 patients, P = 0.180. Kudo assessment by NBI had low sensitivity for dysplasia (42%) and modest accuracy (74%) for dysplasia. Conclusions: NBI detected fewer lesions than CE in chronic colitis; however, most were not dysplastic. There was a nonsignificant trend in favor of CE for detection of dysplasia. At present, NBI cannot be recommended as an alternative to CE for dysplasia surveillance in colitis.

Added value of narrow band imaging and confocal laser endomicroscopy in detecting Barrett’s esophagus neoplasia

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Advances in endoscopic imaging techniques have enabled more accurate identification of subtle mucosal abnormalities. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of predicting high grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal cancer (IMC) in mucosa predicted as being nondysplastic vs. dysplastic by high definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE), narrow band imaging (NBI), and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed in a tertiary referral setting between February 2010 and September 2011. A total of 50 consecutive patients who were referred to St Vincents Hospital for management of dysplastic Barretts esophagus were included. A prediction of likely histology was made for each mucosal point (four-quadrant every 1 cm and any visible mucosal abnormality), first with HD-WLE, followed by NBI, and finally CLE. Biopsies were taken at all of these points. RESULTS A total of 1190 individual biopsy points were assessed. At histology, 39 biopsy points were found to harbor HGD and 52 biopsy points harbored IMC. For the detection of HGD/IMC the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were: HD - WLE, 79.1 %, 83.1 %, and 82.8 %; NBI, 89.0 %, 80.1 %, and 81.4 %; and CLE, 75.7 %, 80.0 %, and 79.9 %, respectively. All mucosal points with IMC and all patients with HGD were detected by targeted biopsies guided by HD-WLE and NBI without the need for random Seattle protocol biopsies. CONCLUSIONS HD-WLE in combination with NBI is highly accurate in the detection of HGD/IMC. Performing targeted biopsies in the surveillance of Barretts esophagus is possible in expert centers.

SINGLE-01: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and depth of insertion of single- and double-balloon enteroscopy by using a novel method to determine insertion depth.

BACKGROUND Single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) was introduced as an alternative to double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) for the investigation and management of small-bowel conditions. To date, there is only 1 randomized, controlled trial comparing SBE and DBE in a Western population. OBJECTIVE To compare the 2 instruments in a Western population to assess for differences in clinical outcomes and insertion depth (ID). A novel method to determine ID by counting folds on withdrawal was used. DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING University hospitals in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. PATIENTS Patients with suspected or proven small-bowel disease. INTERVENTIONS SBE and DBE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT The primary endpoint was diagnostic yield (DY). Secondary endpoints were therapeutic yield (TY), procedure times, and ID. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS A total of 116 patients were screened, and 107 patients were enrolled between July 2008 and June 2010, in whom 119 procedures were undertaken (53 SBEs and 66 DBEs). DY was 57% for SBE and 53% for DBE (P = .697). TY was 32% for SBE and 26% for DBE (P = .490). The median enteroscopy times were identical for SBE and DBE at 60 minutes. The mean ID by the fold-counting method for antegrade procedures was 201.1 folds for SBE and 258.6 folds for DBE (P = .046). After multiple comparisons adjustment, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Mean IDs by using the visual estimation method for SBE and DBE were, respectively, 72.1 cm and 75.2 cm (P = .835) for retrograde procedures and 203.8 cm and 234.1 cm (P = .176) for antegrade procedures. LIMITATIONS Unable to reach target sample size, mostly single-center recruitment, novel method to determine ID, which requires further validation. CONCLUSIONS SBE has DY, TY, and procedure times similar to those of DBE. There were no statistically significant differences in ID between SBE and DBE. By using the fold-counting method for antegrade procedures, the estimated IDs for SBE and DBE were 201.1 folds versus 258.6 folds (P = .046; P = not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons). ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12609000917235.).

Australian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma

Barretts esophagus (BE), a common condition, is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There is uncertainty about the best way to manage BE as most people with BE never develop EAC and most patients diagnosed with EAC have no preceding diagnosis of BE. Moreover, there have been recent advances in knowledge and practice about the management of BE and early EAC. To aid clinical decision making in this rapidly moving field, Cancer Council Australia convened an expert working party to identify pertinent clinical questions. The questions covered a wide range of topics including endoscopic and histological definitions of BE and early EAC; prevalence, incidence, natural history, and risk factors for BE; and methods for managing BE and early EAC. The latter considered modification of lifestyle factors; screening and surveillance strategies; and medical, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. To answer each question, the working party systematically reviewed the literature and developed a set of recommendations through consensus. Evidence underpinning each recommendation was rated according to quality and applicability.

Cluster of 4 cases of esophageal squamous cell cancer developing in adults with surgically corrected esophageal atresia—time for screening to start

BACKGROUND Currently, no recommendations exist for the endoscopic screening of patients in adulthood, with surgically corrected esophageal atresia (EA), for the development of esophageal cancer. A small number of individual case reports in the literature have raised concern that these cancers pose an increased risk (2 adenocarcinoma and 3 squamous cell carcinoma). METHODS St Vincents hospital has set up an EA clinic to review adult patients previously operated on for correction of EA. These patients underwent clinical review and were offered endoscopic evaluation if they had symptoms of dysphagia or gastroesophageal reflux. Among those patients, 3 have developed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A retrospective review of the EA database from the Royal Childrens Hospital (798 patients [309 patients older than 40 years]) was then performed to identify any other cases of esophageal cancer developing in this cohort. One further patient was identified. RESULTS To date, 4 of 309 patients have developed esophageal SCC over the age of 40 years. The cumulative incidence of esophageal SCC in this age group was 50 times that expected in the general population. CONCLUSIONS (1) This cluster provides strong evidence that there is a substantial risk of SCC in these adults with surgically repaired EA. (2) We believe that long-term surveillance endoscopy enhanced by advanced imaging techniques is indicated in all adults from the age of 20 years who have had surgical repair of EA.

Gastric fundic gland polyps in south-east Scotland: Absence of adenomatous polyposis coli gene mutations and a strikingly low prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background and Aim: Fundic gland polyps (FGP) were originally described in association with familial polyposis syndromes, but it is now accepted that the majority of FGP are picked up incidentally in up to 1.9% of routine endoscopies in dyspeptic patients. The familial adenomatous polyposis phenotype arises from germline mutations of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. We aimed to see if there was any association between the presence of FGP, Helicobacter pylori, and two common APC gene mutations.

Cancer surveillance strategies in ulcerative colitis: the need for modernization.

&NA; The risk of colorectal cancer is increased in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Traditional surveillance has centered around regular standard white‐light colonoscopy, with multiple biopsies aimed at detecting dysplasia or the identification of early cancer. This has resulted in only a modest reduction in cancer incidence and mortality. A better understanding of disease risk factors may allow endoscopic resources to be more focused on patients at higher risk. In addition, advanced endoscopic techniques have the potential to improve dysplasia detection, minimize the need for routine biopsies, and allow for the removal of dysplastic lesions, avoiding the need for surgery. Techniques such as magnification colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, narrow band imaging, autofluorescence, and confocal endomicroscopy may all have a role to play in improving the benefits of endoscopic surveillance. Revised endoscopic surveillance strategies are proposed, incorporating aspects of risk stratification, a well‐established practice in noncolitis‐related colorectal cancer screening, and some of these new technologies. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010;)

Push enteroscopy: A single centre experience and review of published series

Background: To assess the efficacy of push enteroscopy in a single tertiary hospital and review the available literature to assess the overall diagnostic yield of push enteroscopy.