Andrew Chalmers

The efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients with non–life‐threatening manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: Results of a twelve‐month, multicenter, exploratory, phase IIb, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

OBJECTIVE To evaluate abatacept therapy in patients with non-life-threatening systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and polyarthritis, discoid lesions, or pleuritis and/or pericarditis. METHODS In a 12-month, multicenter, exploratory, phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, SLE patients with polyarthritis, discoid lesions, or pleuritis and/or pericarditis were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to receive abatacept (∼10 mg/kg of body weight) or placebo. Prednisone (30 mg/day or equivalent) was given for 1 month, and then the dosage was tapered. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with new flare (adjudicated) according to a score of A/B on the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index after the start of the steroid taper. RESULTS A total of 118 patients were randomized to receive abatacept and 57 to receive placebo. The baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The proportion of new BILAG A/B flares over 12 months was 79.7% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 72.4, 86.9) in the abatacept group and 82.5% (95% CI 72.6, 92.3) in the placebo group (treatment difference -3.5 [95% CI -15.3, 8.3]). Other prespecified flare end points were not met. In post hoc analyses, the proportions of abatacept-treated and placebo-treated patients with a BILAG A flare were 40.7% (95% CI 31.8, 49.5) versus 54.4% (95% CI 41.5, 67.3), and the proportions with physician-assessed flare were 63.6% (95% CI 54.9, 72.2) and 82.5% (95% CI 72.6, 92.3), respectively; treatment differences were greatest in the polyarthritis group. Prespecified exploratory patient-reported outcomes (Short Form 36 health survey, sleep problems, fatigue) demonstrated a treatment effect with abatacept. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) was comparable in the abatacept and placebo groups (90.9% versus 91.5%), but serious AEs (SAEs) were higher in the abatacept group (19.8 versus 6.8%). Most SAEs were single, disease-related events occurring during the first 6 months of the study (including the steroid taper period). CONCLUSION Although the primary/secondary end points were not met in this study, improvements in certain exploratory measures suggest some abatacept efficacy in patients with non-life-threatening manifestations of SLE. The increased rate of SAEs requires further assessment.

Low-dose cyclosporin versus placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

144 patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis from six centres were randomised to receive oral cyclosporin or placebo for 6 months. The initial daily dose of cyclosporin was 2.5 mg/kg, which was increased cautiously with monitoring of serum cyclosporin levels and creatinine; the mean stabilisation dose was 3.8 mg/kg. There were significant improvements in the cyclosporin-treated patients compared with the controls in the major outcomes of reduction of active joints (23% improvement), pain (24%), and functional status (16%); global improvement was 27%. In the cyclosporin group serum creatinine increased by a mean of 15.6 mumols/l and mean arterial blood pressure by 6.27 mmHg; these increases were controlled in all but 2 patients by dose adjustment without withdrawal from the study.

A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis.

Objectives:Utility scores can be assessed indirectly using preference-based instruments and used as weightings for quality-adjusted life years in economic analyses. It is not clear whether available instruments yield similar results or what domains of health are contributing to the overall score in a sample of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Subjects:Our study included 313 individuals with rheumatologist-confirmed RA. Measures:A self-completed survey that permitted scoring of 4 indirect utility instruments (the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 (HUI-2 and HUI-3), the EuroQoL (EQ-5D), and the Short Form 6D (SF-6D) was the basis of our study. Results:Mean (standard deviation) global utility scores were 0.63 (0.24) for the SF-6D, 0.66 (0.13) for the EQ-5D, 0.71 (0.19) for the HUI-2, and 0.53 (0.29) for the HUI-3 (P = 0.02 by repeated-measures analysis of variance). The intraclass correlation across all the indices was 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.62–0.71). Bland-Altman plots revealed that agreement among instruments was poor at lower utility values. In this elderly RA sample, all of the global utilities mostly measured functional ability and pain. Conclusions:There are significant differences in utilities obtained from different indirect methods. Agreement among the instruments was moderate but poorer at lower utilities. It is unlikely that these utility values, if used as the weightings for quality-adjusted life years, would result in comparable estimates.

Association between dinucleotide repeat in non-coding region of interferon-gamma gene and susceptibility to, and severity of, rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND Rheumatoid arthritis ranges from a mild, non-deforming arthropathy with little long-term disability to severe, incapacitating, deforming arthritis which may be refractory to conventional disease-modifying agents. Epidemiological studies show an important genetic influence in rheumatoid arthritis, and MHC region genes and cytokine genes within and outside this region have been considered as candidates. We did a case-control study to test whether polymorphisms in the interferon-gamma gene are associated with severity of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS Interferon gamma dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms were examined with quantitative genescan technology, and HLA-DR alleles were identified by PCR and restriction-fragment-length polymorphism analysis. We studied 60 patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis, 39 with mild disease, and 65 normal controls. FINDINGS Susceptibility to, and severity of, rheumatoid arthritis were related to a microsatellite polymorphism within the first intron of the interferon-gamma gene. A 126 bp allele was seen in 44 (73%) of 60 patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis, compared with eight (21%) of 39 with mild disease (odds ratio 10.66 [95% CI 4.1-24.9]), and with eight (12%) of 65 normal controls (19.59 [7.7-49.9]). Conversely, a 122 bp allele at the same locus was found in four (7%) patients with severe disease compared with 25 (64%) of those with mild disease (0.04 [0.01-0.1]) and with 52 (80%) of controls (0.018 [0.005-0.06]). INTERPRETATION This association may be valuable for understanding the mechanism of disease progression, for predicting the course of the disease, and for guiding therapy.

Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study on adverse effects of rubella immunisation in seronegative women

BACKGROUND The objective of our study was to investigate the association of adverse clinical musculoskeletal and neurological events in healthy postpartum women with live attenuated (RA27/3 strain) rubella-virus vaccine, and to assess the frequency of acute and recurrent arthralgia and arthritis and associations with acute and recurrent muscle pain (myalgia) and neurological manifestations (paraesthesias). METHODS We used a randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind design in a community setting. 636 women were enrolled and, after 90 women dropped out, 546 healthy women aged 18-41 years, who were rubella seronegative on routine screening were immunised parenterally with either monovalent live attenuated (RA27/3 strain) rubella vaccine (n = 270) or saline placebo (n = 276) in the postpartum period. Outcome measures were the occurrence of acute and persistent or recurrent joint manifestations (arthralgia or arthritis) at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after immunisation. Occurrence of muscle pain (myalgia), and neurological symptoms (paraesthesia) was also assessed at the same times. FINDINGS 543 women completed 1-month follow-up. 456 women completed the 12-month assessment. There were no differences at the time of immunisation between rubella vaccine and placebo groups in distribution of age, ethnic origin, parity, time between delivery and immunisation, breastfeeding history, or histories of earlier rubella vaccination or joint complaints. Results indicated a significantly higher incidence (p = 0.006; odds ratio = 1.73 [95% CI = 1.17-2.57]) of acute joint manifestations in rubella-vaccine recipients (30%) than in placebo recipients (20%). Frequency of chronic (recurrent) arthralgia or arthritis was only marginally significant (p = 0.042; 1.58 [1.01-2.45]). INTERPRETATION RA27/3 rubella vaccine given to seronegative women during the postpartum period was significantly associated with development of acute arthralgia or arthritis. Although the numbers of women assessed and length of follow-up revealed only marginally significant differences in persistent or recurrent joint manifestations between rubella vaccine and placebo recipients, it is possible that susceptible women who are given rubella vaccination may experience this outcome.

The effectiveness and toxicity of cyclosporin A in rheumatoid arthritis: longitudinal analysis of a population-based registry.

OBJECTIVE To determine factors associated with response or toxicity to cyclosporin A (CSA) in a population-based inception cohort with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Prospectively collected longitudinal measures including tender joint count (JC), duration of morning stiffness (MS), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and serum creatinine (SCr) were modeled using generalized estimating equations. Survival methods were used to estimate CSA continuation time and its determinants. RESULTS Of 133 patients (75% female, median RA duration 13 years), 37 discontinued CSA because of ineffectiveness (19) or because of toxicity (18) including increased SCr in 10, hypertension in 4, infections in 3, and gingival hyperplasia in 1. Patients remained on CSA a median of 75 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 38-112). Those receiving concomitant methotrexate (MTX) were more than 4 times as likely to continue on CSA therapy (hazard ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.94). A lower final JC was predicted by a longer CSA treatment duration (relative risk [RR] 0.99 per month, 95% CI 0.98-0.99) and concomitant MTX therapy (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99); decreased MS was predicted only by longer CSA treatment duration (reduction of 2.0 minutes per month, 95% CI 1.1-3.0). Each previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) exposure predicted a rise in SCr (35 micromole/liter, 95% CI 22-48), SBP (7.2 mm Hg, 95% CI 2.7-11.7), and DBP (3.8 mm Hg, 95% CI 3.0-6.4). CONCLUSIONS Combination CSA/MTX prolongs therapy and reduces JC. Long-term CSA treatment was fairly well tolerated. Previous DMARD use appears to be a determinant for the development of toxicity.

The High Clinic: a pilot project of a new model for an outpatient, community-based teaching clinic in rheumatology

The objectives were to develop an outpatient, community-based clinical education experience for second-year rheumatology fellows based on sound education principles, and to pilot the program to test its practicability and assess student perception of its educational efficacy. The outpatient clinical education experience consisted of four steps. In Step 1 second-year rheumatology fellows assessed patients and reviewed their cases with two supervisors. Step 2 entailed each fellow presenting a brief summary of each case to their colleagues and supervisors for discussion and analysis of learning issues. In Step 3 each fellow conducted a literature search of the learning issues identified in Step 2. Step 4 occurred in the days following the clinic and entailed a seminar discussion of the literature search results with fellow colleagues. At the end of this outpatient clinical education program, questionnaires were given to participating fellows to assess its effectiveness. All participants judged this new clinical education program to be practical and effective; outcomes were positive for all skills specified as objectives for the clinic. This model of outpatient community-based clinical teaching, named ‘The High Clinic’ is a new and effective model for a teaching clinic in rheumatology, featuring augmented patient exposure, increased interactions with supervisors and a case-based learning. The pilot test of the clinic was implemented successfully. Participants in the clinic were satisfied with their achievement of stated objectives. This model is applicable to other specialties. Practice points•This outpatient, community-based clinical education experience, based on sound education principles, features augmented patient exposure, increased interactions with supervisors and case-based learning.•A task-based, student-centered, community-based approach is an effective educational model in rheumatology and is applicable to other specialties.

Uveitis associated with primary angiitis of the central nervous system

BACKGROUND In Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System (PACNS), disease is typically limited to the brain and spinal cord although other organs may be affected. Uveitis is occasionally seen in systemic vasculitides but is not a recognized manifestation of PACNS. We describe two patients who developed PACNS following the onset of uveitis. CASE DESCRIPTIONS Case 1--a 47-year-old male suffered multiple TIAs and left pontine stroke shortly after two episodes of diffuse uveitis. A cerbral angiogram demonstrated multiple caliber changes within several intracranial vessels. Cyclophosphamide was added after his stroke occurred during pulse methylprednisolone therapy. Case 2--a 35-year-old male suffered a spinal cord TIA followed by hemispheric and brainstem infarctions two months after an episode of uveitis and Bells palsy treated with oral prednisone. A cerebral angiogram demonstrated multiple caliber changes within several intracranial vessels. He was successfully treated with oral prednisone and cyclophosphamide. CONCLUSIONS Uveitis should be considered a recognized feature of PACNS. Combination immunosuppressive therapy with prednisone and cyclophosphamide may be necessary for successful treatment.