Andrew Fenwick
National Physical Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew Fenwick.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2015
S.M. Collins; A.K. Pearce; K.M. Ferreira; Andrew Fenwick; P. H. Regan; J.D. Keightley
Radioactive decay half-life measurements of (223)Ra, a member of the (235)U naturally occurring radioactive decay series, have been performed of a radiochemically pure solution with an ionisation chamber. The radioactive decay of (223)Ra was followed for 50 days, approximately 4.4 half-lives. The deduced half-life of (223)Ra was found to be 11.4358 (28) days, supporting the other published direct measurements. A detailed uncertainty budget is presented. A new evaluation of the published half-life values was performed, indicating significant variation across the existing published values, suggesting that further measurements of the half-life of (223)Ra are required. A new evaluated half-life has been calculated using a power moderated weighted mean of selected experimental values, with a new value of the recommended half-life for (223)Ra of 11.4354 (17) days.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2015
J.D. Keightley; A.K. Pearce; Andrew Fenwick; S.M. Collins; K.M. Ferreira; Lena Johansson
An aqueous solution of 223Ra chloride in equilibrium with its decay progeny was standardised by liquid scintillation counting techniques. Since secular equilibrium with the decay progeny of 223Ra had been established by the time of measurement, the apparent detection efficiency of 223Ra was approximately 6 and was determined by both the CIEMAT/NIST efficiency tracing technique and the 4π(LS)-γ digital coincidence counting techniques. The results obtained were compared with γ-spectrometry and ionisation chamber measurements. Whilst the γ-spectrometry measurements were in agreement (albeit exhibiting a large spread (18%) in the individual activity estimations using the main γ-emissions), a significant discrepancy of the order of 9% was identified between the liquid scintillation counting results and those obtained using published calibration factors for a variety of radionuclide calibrators.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2016
M. D’Arienzo; M. Cazzato; M.L. Cozzella; M. Cox; M. D’Andrea; A. Fazio; Andrew Fenwick; G. Iaccarino; Lena Johansson; Lidia Strigari; S. Ungania; P. De Felice
Over the last years (177)Lu has received considerable attention from the clinical nuclear medicine community thanks to its wide range of applications in molecular radiotherapy, especially in peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). In addition to short-range beta particles, (177)Lu emits low energy gamma radiation of 113keV and 208keV that allows gamma camera quantitative imaging. Despite quantitative cancer imaging in molecular radiotherapy having been proven to be a key instrument for the assessment of therapeutic response, at present no general clinically accepted quantitative imaging protocol exists and absolute quantification studies are usually based on individual initiatives. The aim of this work was to develop and evaluate an approach to gamma camera calibration for absolute quantification in tomographic imaging with (177)Lu. We assessed the gamma camera calibration factors for a Philips IRIX and Philips AXIS gamma camera system using various reference geometries, both in air and in water. Images were corrected for the major effects that contribute to image degradation, i.e. attenuation, scatter and dead- time. We validated our method in non-reference geometry using an anthropomorphic torso phantom provided with the liver cavity uniformly filled with (177)LuCl3. Our results showed that calibration factors depend on the particular reference condition. In general, acquisitions performed with the IRIX gamma camera provided good results at 208keV, with agreement within 5% for all geometries. The use of a Jaszczak 16mL hollow sphere in water provided calibration factors capable of recovering the activity in anthropomorphic geometry within 1% for the 208keV peak, for both gamma cameras. The point source provided the poorest results, most likely because scatter and attenuation correction are not incorporated in the calibration factor. However, for both gamma cameras all geometries provided calibration factors capable of recovering the activity in anthropomorphic geometry within about 10% (range -11.6% to +7.3%) for acquisitions at the 208keV photopeak. As a general rule, scatter and attenuation play a much larger role at 113keV compared to 208keV and are likely to hinder an accurate absolute quantification. Acquisitions of only the (177)Lu main photopeak (208keV) are therefore recommended in clinical practice. Preliminary results suggest that the gamma camera calibration factor can be assessed with a standard uncertainty below (or of the order of) 3% if activity is determined with equipment traceable to primary standards, accurate volume measurements are made, and an appropriate chemical carrier is used to allow a homogeneous and stable solution to be used during the measurements.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2014
Andrew Fenwick; Michaela Baker; K.M. Ferreira; J.D. Keightley
Comparison exercises involving (90)Y and (177)Lu were performed during 2009 and 2012, respectively, to assess the measurement capability of hospitals in the UK and Europe. The results from the measurement of a typical liquid solution of (90)Y show that only 40% of participants could measure the solution to within 5% of the certificated value and that a significant -6% bias was present due to the use of non-standard geometries for the calibration of equipment. The results from the measurement of a standard liquid solution of (177)Lu show that 81% of participants could measure to within 5% of the certificated value and in fact 65% of these results were within 2% of the certificated value, showing administered activities can be far more accurately measured for (177)Lu than for (90)Y and that (177)Lu has a far smaller geometry dependence. These studies were performed to identify specific measurement issues in the user community and to identify areas where future research should be focused. In addition to this the work allows the participants to adjust measurement practice and identify key measurement issues.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2016
K.M. Ferreira; Andrew Fenwick; Arzu Arinc; Lena Johansson
The use of (90)Y resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres® microspheres) in Nuclear Medicine has dramatically increased in recent years due to its favourable outcome in the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases (Rajekar et al., 2011). The measurement of administered activity before and residual activity after treatment in radionuclide calibrators is required to determine total activity delivered to the patient. In comparison with External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) where administered doses are often know to within ±5%, the actual administered activity in nuclear medicine procedures may only be known to within ±20% and subsequent dose calculations can result in even larger uncertainties (Fenwick et al., 2009). It is a well-recognised issue that ion chambers are instruments that are sensitive to the measurement geometry and matrix of a source, in particular for pure beta or low energy (<100keV) x-ray emitters (Gadd et al., 2006). This paper presents new calibration factors for NPL secondary standard ionisation chamber system (Vinten 671) and a Capintec CRC-25R radionuclide calibrator along with a discussion of the measurement problems associated with this radionuclide and matrix. Calibration of the NPL secondary standard system for this measurement matrix will enable NPL to provide standards for the Nuclear Medicine community and consequently increase the measurement capability.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2014
M. Baker; Andrew Fenwick; K.M. Ferreira; J.D. Keightley; Lena Johansson; S.M. Collins
As the pre-calibrated sample containers used for activity assay in the two NPL secondary standards ionisation chambers are being phased out, suitable replacements have been identified. Characterisation checks have been carried out on the new ISO ampoules and a long-term recalibration schedule has been devised. Around 40 calibration factors have been determined so far and comparison of ion chamber responses for the two ampoule types showed variations of up to 7% for low energy photon emitting radionuclides.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2016
C Michotte; M. Nonis; I.V. Alekseev; I.A. Kharitonov; E.E. Tereshchenko; A.V. Zanevskiy; J.D. Keightley; Andrew Fenwick; K.M. Ferreira; Lena Johansson; M. Capogni; P. Carconi; A. Fazio; P. De Felice
In 2014, the first three comparisons of activity measurements of (18)F were carried out at the VNIIM, NPL and the ENEA-INMRI using the BIPMs Transfer Instrument of the International Reference System. The transfer instrument and the NMIs primary measurement methods are briefly described. The degrees of equivalence with the key comparison reference value defined in the frame of the corresponding SIR comparison have been evaluated. World-wide consistency of activity measurements of (18)F is demonstrated.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Emilio Mezzenga; Vincenzo D’Errico; Marco D’Arienzo; Lidia Strigari; Koutla Panagiota; Federica Matteucci; Stefano Severi; Giovanni Paganelli; Andrew Fenwick; David Bianchini; Francesco Marcocci; Anna Sarnelli
The purpose of this study is to investigate the optimal reference geometry for gamma camera calibration. Yet another question of interest was to assess the influence of the number of 3D Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization (3D-OSEM) updates on activity quantification for SPECT imaging with 177Lu. The accuracy of 177Lu activity quantification was assessed both in small and in large objects. Two different reference geometries, namely a cylindrical homogeneous phantom and a Jaszczak 16 ml sphere surrounded by cold water, were used to determine the gamma camera calibration factor of a commercial SPECT/CT system. Moreover, the noise level and the concentration recovery coefficient were evaluated as a function of the number of 3D-OSEM updates by using the SPECT/CT images of the reference geometry phantoms and those of a cold Jaszczak phantom with three hot spheres (16ml, 8ml and 4ml), respectively. The optimal choice of the number of 3D-OSEM updates was based on a compromise between the noise level achievable in the reconstructed SPECT images and the concentration recovery coefficients. The quantitative accuracy achievable was finally validated on a test phantom, where a spherical insert composed of two concentric spheres was used to simulate a lesion in a warm background. Our data confirm and extend previous observations. Using the calibration factor obtained with the cylindrical homogeneous phantom and the Jaszczak 16 ml sphere, the recovered activity in the test phantom was underestimated by -16.4% and -24.8%, respectively. Our work has led us to conclude that gamma camera calibration performed with large homogeneous phantom outperforms calibration executed with the Jaszczak 16ml sphere. Furthermore, the results obtained support the assumption that approximately 50 OSEM updates represent a good trade-off to reach convergence in small volumes, meanwhile minimizing the noise level.
EJNMMI Physics | 2018
Jill Wevrett; Andrew Fenwick; James Scuffham; Lena Johansson; Jonathan I. Gear; Susanne Schlögl; Marcel Segbers; Katarina Sjögreen-Gleisner; Pavel Solný; Michael Lassmann; Jill Tipping; A. Nisbet
BackgroundThis inter-comparison exercise was performed to demonstrate the variability of quantitative SPECT/CT imaging for lutetium-177 (177Lu) in current clinical practice. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of using international inter-comparison exercises as a means to ensure consistency between clinical sites whilst enabling the sites to use their own choice of quantitative imaging protocols, specific to their systems.Dual-compartment concentric spherical sources of accurately known activity concentrations were prepared and sent to seven European clinical sites. The site staff were not aware of the true volumes or activity within the sources—they performed SPECT/CT imaging of the source, positioned within a water-filled phantom, using their own choice of parameters and reported their estimate of the activities within the source.ResultsThe volumes reported by the participants for the inner section of the source were all within 29% of the true value and within 60% of the true value for the outer section. The activities reported by the participants for the inner section of the source were all within 20% of the true value, whilst those reported for the outer section were up to 83% different to the true value.ConclusionsA variety of calibration and segmentation methods were used by the participants for this exercise which demonstrated the variability of quantitative imaging across clinical sites. This paper presents a method to assess consistency between sites using different calibration and segmentation methods.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2017
K.M. Ferreira; Andrew Fenwick
Three comparison exercises have been performed in 1996, 1999 and 2015 with 123I to assess the UK hospitals measurement capabilities using radionuclide calibrators for this particular radionuclide. The exercise performed in 1996 showed that only 62% of the participants could measure the solution to within 10% of the standardised value and only 28% could measure within 5% of the certificated value. The intercomparison exercise performed in 1999 showed no improvement in the measurement capability, with only 66% of the participants measuring to within 10% of the standardised value. The exercise performed in 2015 showed great improvement in the hospitals measurement capability, 94% of participants reported results within 10% of the certificated activity and 85% of the participants reported results within the 5% of the reported activity. The intercomparison exercises are an important way to identify possible measurement problems within the medical community. Additionally, the intercomparison exercises provide hospitals with traceability to national primary standards and improve measurement capability within the Nuclear Medicine community.