Andrew Fry
University of Utah
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew Fry.
Other Information: PBD: 1 Aug 2004 | 2004
JoAnn S. Lighty; Geoffrey D. Silcox; Andrew Fry; Constance L. Senior; Joseph J. Helble
The objective of this project is to understand the importance of and the contribution of gas-phase and solid-phase coal constituents in the mercury oxidation reactions. The project involves two experimental scales and a modeling effort. The team is comprised of University of Utah, Reaction Engineering International, and University of Connecticut. The objective is to determine the experimental parameters of importance in the homogeneous and heterogeneous oxidation reactions; validate models; and, improve existing models. Parameters to be studies include HCl, NOx, and SO{sub 2} concentrations, ash constituents, and temperature. This report summarizes Year 1 results for the experimental and modeling tasks. Experiments in the drop tube are just beginning and a new, speciated mercury analyzer is up and running. A preliminary assessment has been made for the drop tube experiments using the existing model of gas-phase kinetics.
8th International Symposium on Coal Combustion,ISCC 2015 | 2015
Zhonghua Zhan; Sida Tian; Andrew Fry; Jost O.L. Wendt
Many coal-fired power plants now burn coal blends instead of a single raw coal because of required low sulfur attainment levels. Mineral matter for the coal blends is likely to be different from that for their parent coals and is unlikely to be predictable from simple averaging rules. The problem is important because deposit buildup alters the characteristics of heat transfer and pollutant emissions of the boiler. In this work, experiments were conducted on a 100-kW rated pilot-scale down-fired self-sustained combustor, firing an Illinois coal, a Powder River Basin (PRB) coal, and a 60 % Illinois/40 % PRB coal blend. Such a 60/40 % blend had been planned for the FutureGen 2.0 project. Air combustion as well as oxy-coal combustion with recycled flue gas (RFG) was investigated. The intent was not only to test how deposit was formed from coal blend but also to relate the size-segregated composition of the ash aerosol to the spatially resolved composition within the deposits. To this end, a Berner low-pressure impactor (BLPI), a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), and an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) were utilized to acquire size-segregated ash aerosol samples and to measure particle size distribution (PSD). A novel surface temperature-controlled ash deposition probe system was used for fouling deposits collection. The results from air combustion show that PSDs measured by BLPI and SMPS/APS agree well with each other. Combustion of Illinois coal will likely produce more ultrafine particles compared to PRB coal. However, combustion of Illinois-PRB blended coal could somewhat reduce the formation of these ultrafine particles. Aerosols from combustion of Illinois coal have higher Si and Al, and corresponding lower Ca, Mg, S, and Na compared to those from combustion of PRB coal. The elemental concentrations in aerosols from combustion of blended coal lie between those of the parent coals. Comparing to PRB coal, the inside deposits from combustion of Illinois coal have higher Al, K, Fe, and Si, while lower S, Ca, Na, and Mg, which is consistent with the trends of ash aerosol composition measurements. This agrees with our previous theory that vaporization mode ash aerosols are the main contributor to build up inside layer deposits, and their composition depends on coal composition. Blended coal increased S retention in ash due to higher alkaline earth metal (AAEM, especially Ca) concentration in PRB coal. Deposits of the blend do not obey simple averaging rules for the two components of the blend, which is not surprising given that in order to understand mechanisms of deposit formation, one must have access to both the size-segregated composition of the ash aerosol and the spatially resolved composition of the deposits.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2011
Jiyoung Ahn; Ryan Okerlund; Andrew Fry; Eric G. Eddings
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2011
Dunxi Yu; William J. Morris; Raphael Erickson; Jost O.L. Wendt; Andrew Fry; Constance L. Senior
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute | 2007
Andrew Fry; Brydger Cauch; Geoffrey D. Silcox; JoAnn S. Lighty; Constance L. Senior
Environmental Science & Technology | 2008
Brydger Cauch; Geoffrey D. Silcox; JoAnn S. Lighty; Jost O.L. Wendt; Andrew Fry; Constance L. Senior
Energy & Fuels | 2014
Zhonghua Zhan; Lawrence E. Bool; Andrew Fry; Weidong Fan; Minghou Xu; Dunxi Yu; Jost O.L. Wendt
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2011
Andrew Fry; Brad Adams; Alan Paschedag; Paul Kazalski; Casey Carney; Danylo B. Oryshchyn; Rigel Woodside; Steve Gerdemann; Thomas L. Ochs
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute | 2013
Curtis K. Stimpson; Andrew Fry; Trevor Blanc; Dale R. Tree
Fuel | 2016
Zhonghua Zhan; Andrew Fry; Jost O.L. Wendt