Andrew George Lee
Pfizer
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew George Lee.
Menopause | 2006
Michael R. McClung; Ethel S. Siris; Steve Cummings; Michael A. Bolognese; Mark P. Ettinger; Alfred H. Moffett; Ronald Emkey; Wesley W. Day; Veena Somayaji; Andrew George Lee
Objective: Osteoporosis is a significant health problem in postmenopausal women. Consequently, new and effective therapies are being sought to preserve bone mass and prevent osteoporosis in this population of women. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of lasofoxifene with raloxifene and placebo on indices of bone health in postmenopausal women. Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active treatment-controlled study of 2 years duration was conducted. Women included 410 postmenopausal women aged 47 to 74 years. The four treatment groups were: lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day, or 1.0 mg/day, raloxifene 60 mg/day, or placebo daily. All women received daily calcium and vitamin D supplements. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline to 2 years in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in all women having baseline and at least one follow-up bone density measurement. Total hip BMD, biochemical markers of bone turnover, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and safety were also evaluated in all women. Results: Both doses of lasofoxifene significantly increased lumbar spine BMD compared with raloxifene (P ≤ 0.05) and with placebo treatment (P ≤ 0.05). Least squares mean increases (95% CI) from baseline in lumbar spine BMD, compared with placebo, were 3.6% (1.9, 5.2) for lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day, 3.9% (2.4, 5.5) for lasofoxifene 1.0 mg/day, and 1.7% (0.3, 3.0) for raloxifene. The two doses of lasofoxifene and raloxifene were equally effective at increasing total hip BMD. Lasofoxifene and raloxifene significantly reduced the levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover compared with placebo. In general, the effects of lasofoxifene were greater than the responses to raloxifene. At 2 years, lasofoxifene significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 20.6% and 19.7% with 0.25 mg/day and 1 mg/day, respectively, compared with raloxifene (12.1%) and placebo (3.2%). Lasofoxifene and raloxifene had a similar adverse event profile with low rate of discontinuations due to adverse events. Conclusions: Lasofoxifene may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women.
Archive | 2001
Andrew George Lee; Wesley W. Day; David Duane Thompson
Archive | 2001
Wesley W. Day; David Duane Thompson; Andrew George Lee
Archive | 2001
David Duane Thompson; Andrew George Lee; Wesley W. Day; Robert Louis Rosati
Archive | 2004
Andrew George Lee
Archive | 2002
Wesley W. Day; Andrew George Lee; David Duane Thompson; Charles David Petrie
Archive | 2004
Andrew George Lee; David Duane Thompson
Archive | 2001
Andrew George Lee; Wesley W. Day; David Duane Thompson
Archive | 2001
Wesley W. Day; Andrew George Lee; David Duane Thompson
Archive | 2001
Wesley W. Day; Andrew George Lee; David Duane Thompson