Andrew J. Anderson
University of Melbourne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew J. Anderson.
Ophthalmology Clinics of North America | 2003
Andrew J. Anderson; Chris A. Johnson
The FDT perimeter is a compact and relatively inexpensive perimeter whose transportability, tolerance to refractive errors, and rapid test times (less than 1 minute per eye) make it a suitable candidate for visual field screening. It is a uniform finding that the C-20-1 screening protocol of the FDT perimeter provides good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of moderate and severe losses in glaucoma. Sensitivity can be increased by use of the C-20-5 screening protocol. In addition, the FDT perimeter demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity for detecting the presence of neuro-ophthalmic disorders, though it may have a limited ability to determine whether a field defect is hemianopic. There is only limited evidence that the FDT can appropriately detect retinal disease. Despite some evidence that the current FDT perimeter may be suitable for staging and monitoring the progression of visual field damage, the large targets used in the test make this of limited practicability. The development of a frequency-doubling test with smaller targets spaced over narrower intervals would improve the ability of FDT perimetry to determine the spatial extent of visual field defects.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2008
Peter N. Dimitrov; Robyn H. Guymer; Andrew J. Zele; Andrew J. Anderson; Algis J. Vingrys
PURPOSE A cathode-ray-tube (CRT) monitor-based technique was used to isolate clinically significant components of dark adaptation. The utility of the technique in identifying adaptation abnormalities in eyes with age-related maculopathy (ARM) is described. METHODS A CRT dark adaptometer was developed to assess cone and rod recovery after photopigment bleach. The following measures were obtained: cone recovery rate (R(c); in decades per minute) and absolute threshold (Tf(c); log candelas per square meter), rod recovery rate (R(r); decades per minute), and rod-cone transition (rod-cone break [RCB], in minutes). These components were isolated by appropriately selecting stimulus size, stimulus location, pigment bleach, and test duration and by coupling the CRT with judiciously selected neutral-density (ND) filters. The protocol was developed by using 5 young observers and was tested on 27 subjects with ARM in the study eye and 22 age-matched control subjects. RESULTS The parameters necessary for effective isolation of cone and early phase rod dark adaptation were a 2.6 ND filter (for a standard CRT monitor, 0.08-80 cd . m(-2) luminance output); a 4 degrees foveated, 200-ms, achromatic spot; approximately 30% pigment bleaching; and a 30-minute test duration. These settings returned obvious rod and cone recovery curves in control and ARM eyes that were compatible with conventional test methods and identified 93% of participants with ARM as having delayed dynamics in at least one of the parameters. Cone recovery dynamics were significantly slower in the ARM group when compared with age-matched control subjects (R(c), 0.99 +/- 0.35 vs. 2.63 +/- 0.61 decades . min(-1), P < 0.0001). Three of the 27 eyes with ARM did not achieve RCB during the allowed duration (30 minutes). The remaining eyes with ARM (n = 24) exhibited a significant delay in rod recovery (R(r)(,) ARM, 0.16 +/- 0.03 vs. controls, 0.22 +/- 0.02 decades . min(-1), P < 0.0001) and the average time to RCB (+/-SD) in the ARM group was significantly longer than in the control subjects (19.12 +/- 5.17 minutes vs. 10.40 +/- 2.49 minutes, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The CRT dark-adaptation technique described in this article is an effective test for identifying abnormalities in cone and rod recovery. Slowed cone and rod recovery and a delayed RCB were evident in the eyes with ARM. The test method is potentially useful for clinical intervention trials in which ARM progression is monitored.
The Journal of Physiology | 2009
R. H. S. Carpenter; B. A. J. Reddi; Andrew J. Anderson
The neural mechanisms underlying reaction times have previously been modelled in two distinct ways. When stimuli are hard to detect, response time tends to follow a random‐walk model that integrates noisy sensory signals. But studies investigating the influence of higher‐level factors such as prior probability and response urgency typically use highly detectable targets, and response times then usually correspond to a linear rise‐to‐threshold mechanism. Here we show that a model incorporating both types of element in series – a detector integrating noisy afferent signals, followed by a linear rise‐to‐threshold performing decision – successfully predicts not only mean response times but, much more stringently, the observed distribution of these times and the rate of decision errors over a wide range of stimulus detectability. By reconciling what previously may have seemed to be conflicting theories, we are now closer to having a complete description of reaction time and the decision processes that underlie it.
Vision Research | 2000
Andrew J. Anderson; Algis J. Vingrys
We investigated the interactions between flicker thresholds and luminance pedestals using threshold versus contrast (TvC) and method of constant stimuli paradigms. High amplitude luminance pedestals were found to elevate flicker thresholds, but low amplitude luminance pedestals were unable to reduce flicker thresholds. Luminance pedestals elevated flicker thresholds more at low temporal frequencies. A simple model based on local light adaptation was able to capture the general form of the TvC functions. Our results suggest that flicker thresholds derived in the presence of a luminance pedestal (luminance-pedestal flicker) may vary from those obtained by modulating about a mean luminance (mean-modulated flicker).
Vision Research | 2001
Andrew J. Anderson; Algis J. Vingrys
By systematically manipulating the luminance of a flickering spot and the area immediately surrounding it, we investigated why thresholds from flickering stimuli that cause a change in average luminance are elevated relative to those from stimuli with no luminance change. Threshold elevation resulted from local light adaptation and from temporal-frequency-specific interactions between the spot and its surround: at low frequencies, the contrast between the spot and the surround elevated thresholds, whereas at high frequencies, dark adaptation within the surround elevated thresholds. Our findings suggest that two common ways of determining temporal sensitivity may give markedly different outcomes.
Optometry and Vision Science | 2002
Andrew J. Anderson; Chris A. Johnson
Background. In frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry, the second eye tested has reduced sensitivity. We investigated the cause of this sensitivity reduction. Methods. Contrast sensitivity was measured for frequency doubling (0.25 cpd, 25 Hz) and nonflickering (4 cpd) gratings, arranged similarly to the targets in the FDT perimeter (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY, and Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, CA). Various test orders were examined. Results. Frequency-doubling (FD) sensitivity was reduced (0.15 log) in the second eye. A similar reduction occurred when first and second eye gratings were oriented orthogonally, suggesting that dichoptic contrast adaptation was not the cause. FD sensitivity was little affected after testing with nonflickering gratings, suggesting that fatigue effects were small. Sensitivity was reduced when testing was performed after 5 min of opaque occlusion. The use of a translucent occluder eliminated the reduction in sensitivity in the second eye. Conclusion. We confirm the presence of reduced sensitivity in the second eye tested with FD perimetry and find that it is caused by delayed light adaptation post-occlusion.
Vision Research | 2003
Andrew J. Anderson
Bayesian adaptive threshold procedures may be run for a fixed number of trials, or may be stopped when the calculated confidence interval for the threshold reaches a selected limit (a dynamic termination criterion). This study used Monte-Carlo simulations to determine whether the confidence interval is a useful predictor of errors in the estimated threshold. No difference was found between the distribution of errors in a fixed trial procedure versus a dynamically terminated procedure of the same average number of trials. In addition, the width of the confidence interval failed to usefully predict observer variability arising from a shallow psychometric function slope or increased false positive response probabilities. This study suggests that dynamic termination criteria are of little use in Bayesian adaptive threshold procedures.
Current Biology | 2008
Andrew J. Anderson; Hemang Yadav; R. H. S. Carpenter
One popular and fruitful approach to understanding what influences the decision of where to look next has been to present targets in a series of trials either to the right or left of a central fixation point and examine sequential effects on saccadic latency. However, there is a problem with this paradigm: Every saccade to a target is necessarily followed by an equal and opposite movement back to the center, yet the potentially confounding influence of this refixation saccade is rarely considered. Here, we introduce a novel random-walk paradigm that eliminates this difficulty. Each successive target appears to the left or right of the previous one, allowing us to study long sequences of saccades uncontaminated by refixations. This exposes a new stimulus-history effect, which is remarkably prolonged and relates primarily to movement direction: A saccade reduces the latency for subsequent movements made in the same direction and retards those in the opposite direction. Although in conventional refixation paradigms this effect cancels out, it is of particular significance in the real world--where our fixation point shifts constantly with the object of interest--and reflects a prediction of the way that real objects typically move.
Journal of Vision | 2006
Andrew J. Anderson; R. H. S. Carpenter
Our expectation of an event such as a visual stimulus clearly depends on previous experience, but how the brain computes this expectation is currently not fully understood. Because expectation influences the time to respond to a stimulus, we arranged for the probability of a visual target to suddenly change and found that the time taken to make an eye movement to it then changed continuously, eventually stabilizing at a level reflecting the new probability. The time course of this change can be modeled making a simple assumption: that the brain discounts old information about the probability of an event by a factor lambda, relative to new information. The value of lambda presumably represents a compromise between responding rapidly to genuine changes in the environment and not prematurely discarding information still of value. The model we propose may be implemented by a very simple neural circuit composed of only a few neurons.
Vision Research | 2006
Andrew J. Anderson; Chris A. Johnson
The modified binary search, or MOBS, technique is an adaptive, non-parametric procedure for estimating thresholds [Tyrrell, R. A, & Owens, D. A. (1988). A rapid technique to assess the resting states of eyes and other threshold phenomena: the modified binary search (MOBS). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 137-141.], which has recently been incorporated into a commercially available perimeter. Information regarding the performance of this technique is limited, however. We performed Monte Carlos simulations on the MOBS procedure, as well as on a Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing, or ZEST, procedure (King-Smith, Grigsby, Vingrys, Benes & Supowit, 1994) and an Accelerated Stochastic Approximation, or ASA, procedure (Kesten, 1958) for comparison. The efficiency, convergence probability, and robustness to false positive and false negative responses were determined. Differences between the three procedures typically were small, the most prominent being the number of presentations required to estimate threshold.